Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • April 5, 1884
  • Page 3
  • ST. JOHN'S LODGE, PHILADELPHIA.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, April 5, 1884: Page 3

  • Back to search results
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article THE HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY. Page 2 of 2
    Article ST. JOHN'S LODGE, PHILADELPHIA. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The History Of Freemasonry.

is concerned , by the excerpts that follow from martyroloo-ies and breviaries , is a point about which we have very considerable doubts . Bro . Gould himself says , in the latter part of the chapter , " A good deal has been made of the Four Martyrs , taking the name for the whole , from a

Masonic point of view , but as I think erroneously . These martyrs were the patron saints of particular trades , chosen , like the patron saints of all other trades , long after the event of martyrdom , when trades acquired some corporate or other organised form , and when in consequence

they chose for patrons those who had some kmd of affinity , more or less remote , with their own pursuits . " And again , " If Freemasons would only cease reading in a circle , and would take counsel of some other writers besides those within the mystic pale , they would see that the legend of

the Four , besides being perfectly natural and authentic , is of immeasurably higher antiquity than anything of which the building or any other trades can boast . It will be tolerably evident to those who take the trouble to reason calmly and correctly , that when the guilds , trades unions , or

by whatever other name the associations of workmen may have been called , were formed , that according as was the fashion of the times , they chose patron saints , and that the building trades chose the sculptors under the generic name of the Four Holy Martyrs , as being the nearest approach to

men of their own calling . " The cogency of these remarks makes it the more surprising that Bro . Gould should have devoted so much space to examining the different versions of a legend , which is not so very material to the history of the Mason Craft .

The concluding chapter of the second volume treats of "Apocryphal Manuscripts , " which , with the exception of the " Larmenius Charter , " are considered " according to priority oi publication . " The first of these is the " Leland-Locke " MS ., the first trace of which is to be found in the

Gentleman ' s Magazine for 1753 , wherein it is described " as a copy of a small pamphlet at Frankfort in 1748 . " The value of this may be judged from the following remarks , quoted from Halliwell : " The orthography is most grotesque , and too gross ever to have been penned either by Henry

the Sixth or Leland , or both combined . For instance , we have Peter Gowere , a Grecian , explained in a note by the fabricator—for who else could have solved it?—to be Pythagoras ! As a whole , it is but a clumsy attempt at deception , and is quite a parallel to the recently discovered

one of the first Englishe Mercurie . " Bro . Gould's conclusion is , " that the cathechism must have been drawn up at some period subsequent to the publication of Dr . Anderson ' s

'Constitutions '"; and he thinks it " not improbable that the memoir of Ashmole , given in the' Biographia Britannica ' ( 1747 ) , may have suggested the idea of practising on the credulity of the Freemasons . "

Of the " Steinmetz Catechism , " which comes next in order , the author says : " Its antiquity is a difficult matter to determine , To judge by the orthography and construction , we must call it quite modern—say eighteenth century ; but it is evident that Schneider may have taken it

from the mouth of an eighteenth century workman , and the absence of all archaic expressions and spelling would thus be accounted for . Again , the fact of its being the examination of a salute-Mason—as distinguished from a letter Mason—points to a date subsequent to the fusion of

the Steinmetzen with the bricklayers and others ; though , on the other hand , it may have been communicated to these new bodies by the old Steinmetzen , and slightly altered to suit the circumstances . Steinbrenner , however , is certainly not justified in calling it the ' Examination of

a German Steinmetz during the Middle Ages ; ' he adduces no proof of such a high antiquity ; and disproof of course is equally wanting . The age of the catechism becomes , therefore , a matter of conjecture rather than of opinion . The document may be of recent origin , or a survival of

something more ancient ; though , in its present form it is , without doubt , of quite modern date . " The three that follow are the Malcolm Canmore Charter , Krause ' s MS ., or Prince Edwin ' s Constitution of 926 , and the Charter of Coloerne : and laatlv ornnfis thn Lnmnenins

Charter or the Charter of Transmission . The claims of these to be what they profess to be are very carefully and criticall y considered by Bro . Gould , and the conclusion he

arrives at in each case is perfectly satisfactory . Many , indeed , will be inclined to say that he has been at too great Pains in order to demonstrate the worthlessness of these and the previous manuscripts . But it must not be forgotten that there are writers of ability who have accepted them .

The History Of Freemasonry.

Thus of the Leland-Looke , Fort , as quoted by Gould , says that " a careful examination of the pamphlet convinces me that it is genuine and entitled to full credence . " And again , " whoever wrote the document in question was profoundly learned in the secrets possessed by the Craft ;"

while of the Larmenius Charter , we are told that Sir James Burnes has written of it : " Stai'tling as is the assertion , there has been a succession of Knights Templars from the twelfth century down even to these days ; the chain of its transmission is perfect in all its links . Jacques de Molay ,

the Grand Master at the time of the persecution , anticipating his own martyrdom , appointed as his successor , in power and dignity , Johannes Marcus Larmenius , of Jerusalem , and from that time to the present there has been a

regular and uninterrupted line of Grand Masters . The charter , by which the supreme authority has been transmitted , is judicial and conclusive evidence of the Order ' s continued existence . "

We have now completed our lengthy review of the Second Volume of Bro . Gould's important work . We think there is much in it that might have been treated more briefly , but save in this respect , the volume fully sustains the author ' s reputation . As regards the third

instalment of his labours , which has reached us quite recently , we can only say just now that it treats of by far the most difficult portion of our history , and will require to be very carefully and critically considered before wo can venture to offer an opinion upon its merits .

St. John's Lodge, Philadelphia.

ST . JOHN'S LODGE , PHILADELPHIA .

EARLY MEMBERS OF THE LODGE—1731-8 . FKOM THE KEYSTONE . ( Continued from page 125 . ) We quote from William Pringle's Masonic record , as follows : 0

ADom : W . PKINGLE to Stock 1731 Dr . June 24 To 5 Lodge days Omitions @ 6 d per diem 2 6 July 5 To stock for this Lodge day ... ... 6 Aug . 2 To stock for this day ... ... 6 Sept . 6 To your monthly quota ... ... 6 Oct . 4 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Nov . 1 To monthly quota ... ... ... 6

Deo . 6 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 1731-2 Jan ' y 3 To ditto ... ... ... ... 6 Feb ' y 7 , 6 March 6 ,, ... ... ¦•• ... , 6

1732 April 3 To ditto ... ... ... ... 6 and so on to 2 nd July , 1733 . William Pringle was a most regular attendant at the Lodge , but one absence being charged against him , to-wit , on 4 th Sept . 1732 . We quote from John Hubart ' s record , as follows :

A Dom : JOHN HUBART to Stock 1731 Dr . June 24 To 5 days omitions @ 6 d per diem ... 2 6 July 5 To stock for this Lodge day 6 d ... 6 Aug . 2 To stock for this day ... ... 6 Sent . 6 To monthly quota ... ... ... 6

Oct . 4 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Nov . 1 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Deo . 6 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 1731-2 Jan ' y 3 To Do ... ... ... ... 6 Feb ' y 7 To Do ... ... ... ... 6 March 6 To Do ... ... ... ... 6

1732 April 3 To Do ... .. ... 6 John Hnbart was a moat exemplary member , for he never appears , by his record , to have missed a meeting from June 1731 to June 1738 .

Humphry Murray was elected Provincial Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in 1734 . He was a member of the Common Council of Philadelphia in 1739 , Alderman in 1744 , aud Mayor of the city in 1745 . We quote from Humphry Murray ' s record as follows : A Dom .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1884-04-05, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 March 2023, masonicperiodicals.org/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_05041884/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE LATE DUKE OF ALBANY. Article 1
THE GIRLS' SCHOOL ELECTION. Article 1
THE HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY. Article 2
ST. JOHN'S LODGE, PHILADELPHIA. Article 3
AN ADDRESS TO FREEMASONS. Article 5
INSTALLATION MEETINGS, &c. Article 6
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Article 9
MARK MASONRY. Article 9
ROYAL ARCH. Article 10
Obituary. Article 10
FUNERAL OF BRO. W. P. PHILLIPS, P.M. DORIC LODGE. Article 10
REVIEWS. Article 11
THE SECOND CITY MASONIC BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION. Article 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
THE THEATRES. &c. Article 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

7 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

8 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

5 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

5 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

12 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

15 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The History Of Freemasonry.

is concerned , by the excerpts that follow from martyroloo-ies and breviaries , is a point about which we have very considerable doubts . Bro . Gould himself says , in the latter part of the chapter , " A good deal has been made of the Four Martyrs , taking the name for the whole , from a

Masonic point of view , but as I think erroneously . These martyrs were the patron saints of particular trades , chosen , like the patron saints of all other trades , long after the event of martyrdom , when trades acquired some corporate or other organised form , and when in consequence

they chose for patrons those who had some kmd of affinity , more or less remote , with their own pursuits . " And again , " If Freemasons would only cease reading in a circle , and would take counsel of some other writers besides those within the mystic pale , they would see that the legend of

the Four , besides being perfectly natural and authentic , is of immeasurably higher antiquity than anything of which the building or any other trades can boast . It will be tolerably evident to those who take the trouble to reason calmly and correctly , that when the guilds , trades unions , or

by whatever other name the associations of workmen may have been called , were formed , that according as was the fashion of the times , they chose patron saints , and that the building trades chose the sculptors under the generic name of the Four Holy Martyrs , as being the nearest approach to

men of their own calling . " The cogency of these remarks makes it the more surprising that Bro . Gould should have devoted so much space to examining the different versions of a legend , which is not so very material to the history of the Mason Craft .

The concluding chapter of the second volume treats of "Apocryphal Manuscripts , " which , with the exception of the " Larmenius Charter , " are considered " according to priority oi publication . " The first of these is the " Leland-Locke " MS ., the first trace of which is to be found in the

Gentleman ' s Magazine for 1753 , wherein it is described " as a copy of a small pamphlet at Frankfort in 1748 . " The value of this may be judged from the following remarks , quoted from Halliwell : " The orthography is most grotesque , and too gross ever to have been penned either by Henry

the Sixth or Leland , or both combined . For instance , we have Peter Gowere , a Grecian , explained in a note by the fabricator—for who else could have solved it?—to be Pythagoras ! As a whole , it is but a clumsy attempt at deception , and is quite a parallel to the recently discovered

one of the first Englishe Mercurie . " Bro . Gould's conclusion is , " that the cathechism must have been drawn up at some period subsequent to the publication of Dr . Anderson ' s

'Constitutions '"; and he thinks it " not improbable that the memoir of Ashmole , given in the' Biographia Britannica ' ( 1747 ) , may have suggested the idea of practising on the credulity of the Freemasons . "

Of the " Steinmetz Catechism , " which comes next in order , the author says : " Its antiquity is a difficult matter to determine , To judge by the orthography and construction , we must call it quite modern—say eighteenth century ; but it is evident that Schneider may have taken it

from the mouth of an eighteenth century workman , and the absence of all archaic expressions and spelling would thus be accounted for . Again , the fact of its being the examination of a salute-Mason—as distinguished from a letter Mason—points to a date subsequent to the fusion of

the Steinmetzen with the bricklayers and others ; though , on the other hand , it may have been communicated to these new bodies by the old Steinmetzen , and slightly altered to suit the circumstances . Steinbrenner , however , is certainly not justified in calling it the ' Examination of

a German Steinmetz during the Middle Ages ; ' he adduces no proof of such a high antiquity ; and disproof of course is equally wanting . The age of the catechism becomes , therefore , a matter of conjecture rather than of opinion . The document may be of recent origin , or a survival of

something more ancient ; though , in its present form it is , without doubt , of quite modern date . " The three that follow are the Malcolm Canmore Charter , Krause ' s MS ., or Prince Edwin ' s Constitution of 926 , and the Charter of Coloerne : and laatlv ornnfis thn Lnmnenins

Charter or the Charter of Transmission . The claims of these to be what they profess to be are very carefully and criticall y considered by Bro . Gould , and the conclusion he

arrives at in each case is perfectly satisfactory . Many , indeed , will be inclined to say that he has been at too great Pains in order to demonstrate the worthlessness of these and the previous manuscripts . But it must not be forgotten that there are writers of ability who have accepted them .

The History Of Freemasonry.

Thus of the Leland-Looke , Fort , as quoted by Gould , says that " a careful examination of the pamphlet convinces me that it is genuine and entitled to full credence . " And again , " whoever wrote the document in question was profoundly learned in the secrets possessed by the Craft ;"

while of the Larmenius Charter , we are told that Sir James Burnes has written of it : " Stai'tling as is the assertion , there has been a succession of Knights Templars from the twelfth century down even to these days ; the chain of its transmission is perfect in all its links . Jacques de Molay ,

the Grand Master at the time of the persecution , anticipating his own martyrdom , appointed as his successor , in power and dignity , Johannes Marcus Larmenius , of Jerusalem , and from that time to the present there has been a

regular and uninterrupted line of Grand Masters . The charter , by which the supreme authority has been transmitted , is judicial and conclusive evidence of the Order ' s continued existence . "

We have now completed our lengthy review of the Second Volume of Bro . Gould's important work . We think there is much in it that might have been treated more briefly , but save in this respect , the volume fully sustains the author ' s reputation . As regards the third

instalment of his labours , which has reached us quite recently , we can only say just now that it treats of by far the most difficult portion of our history , and will require to be very carefully and critically considered before wo can venture to offer an opinion upon its merits .

St. John's Lodge, Philadelphia.

ST . JOHN'S LODGE , PHILADELPHIA .

EARLY MEMBERS OF THE LODGE—1731-8 . FKOM THE KEYSTONE . ( Continued from page 125 . ) We quote from William Pringle's Masonic record , as follows : 0

ADom : W . PKINGLE to Stock 1731 Dr . June 24 To 5 Lodge days Omitions @ 6 d per diem 2 6 July 5 To stock for this Lodge day ... ... 6 Aug . 2 To stock for this day ... ... 6 Sept . 6 To your monthly quota ... ... 6 Oct . 4 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Nov . 1 To monthly quota ... ... ... 6

Deo . 6 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 1731-2 Jan ' y 3 To ditto ... ... ... ... 6 Feb ' y 7 , 6 March 6 ,, ... ... ¦•• ... , 6

1732 April 3 To ditto ... ... ... ... 6 and so on to 2 nd July , 1733 . William Pringle was a most regular attendant at the Lodge , but one absence being charged against him , to-wit , on 4 th Sept . 1732 . We quote from John Hubart ' s record , as follows :

A Dom : JOHN HUBART to Stock 1731 Dr . June 24 To 5 days omitions @ 6 d per diem ... 2 6 July 5 To stock for this Lodge day 6 d ... 6 Aug . 2 To stock for this day ... ... 6 Sent . 6 To monthly quota ... ... ... 6

Oct . 4 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Nov . 1 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 Deo . 6 To quota ... ... ... ... 6 1731-2 Jan ' y 3 To Do ... ... ... ... 6 Feb ' y 7 To Do ... ... ... ... 6 March 6 To Do ... ... ... ... 6

1732 April 3 To Do ... .. ... 6 John Hnbart was a moat exemplary member , for he never appears , by his record , to have missed a meeting from June 1731 to June 1738 .

Humphry Murray was elected Provincial Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in 1734 . He was a member of the Common Council of Philadelphia in 1739 , Alderman in 1744 , aud Mayor of the city in 1745 . We quote from Humphry Murray ' s record as follows : A Dom .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2023

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy