Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Oct. 5, 1878
  • Page 2
  • MEETING OF LANCASHIRE FREEMASONS.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Oct. 5, 1878: Page 2

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Oct. 5, 1878
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE MASONIC DISPUTE IN SCOTLAND. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article THE MASONIC DISPUTE IN SCOTLAND. Page 2 of 2
    Article MEETING OF LANCASHIRE FREEMASONS. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 2

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Dispute In Scotland.

thing when brethren dwell together in unity , and will smile the smile of sarcasm when they read these evidences of what must certainly be described as something else than unity . Even a Mason may be pardoned the exhibition of unusual warmth when stoutly defending some cardinal

principle of Freemasonry , when , for instance , he is engaged in upholding the ancient landmarks of the Order , or when he is resenting the unwarranted , because unjust , attacks on them which are occasionally made by the bigot or the scoffer . In such case a defence couched in stronger

terms than are ordinarily employed in argument is excusable ; nay , we should not think much of him who did not so indulge himself , as the lack of warmth might be considered as betokening a state of indifference to the fair fame of the Craft . But for brethren of position to have

been betrayed into a most unseemly squabble over a matter of comparative unimportance is pitiful indeed , and , as we have said , will not tend to enhance the reputation of Freemasons in the opinion of the general public . We claim , and by the outside world are assumed , to be a body

of men united together by the most fraternal feelings . One of our watchwords is " Charity , " which we use , not simply in the sense of almsgiving , but in that infinitely wider and moro extended sense in which it is used by one

of the sacred writers of the earliest Christian era ; yet a simple statement , which , whether it were right or wrong , was of little moment , has sufficed to set the whole body of Scottish Freemasons by the ears . What makes it worse still is that the Grand Master Mason of Scotland is himself

in great measure responsible for this unseemly dicussion having taken place . Having seen a statement in the Scotsman to the effect that Bro . Inglis of Torsonce , Depute Grand Master , had declined to be put in nomination , on the ground that the present Grand Master ,

( Sir M . R . Shaw Stewart ) had expressed a wish to retain office for another year , thereupon the Grand Master writes to say that he had not been consulted by Bro . Inglis or his friends , and that he had not expressed any

desire for re-election . Still he had latterly been made aware of a very strong wish on the part of a large number of Freemasons , including the most influential in the Craft , that he should retain his office for the present , and for reasons which he believed were as well known to Bro .

Inglis as to himself . Now , whether the Grand Master had expressed a wish to be re-elected , or whether a large and influential section of the Craft had memorialised him to retain office for the present , was a matter so entirely imma . terial to tho outside public , that it was matter for surprise Si r

M . Shaw Stewart should have for a singlo moment entertained the idea of writing to non-Masonic journals about it . It is true the statement he was anxious to rectify appeared in the columns of such a journal ; but , in our humble opinion , the proper place for the correction of so trivial a

misunderstanding was Grand Lodge itself , when a few words of conversation between the Grand Master and the Depute Grand Master would have set the whole thing at rest . Nor was there any reason in pointing out that Bro . Inglis or his friends had not consulted him ( the Grand Master ) , because

there was no absolute reason why he or they should have done so . Bro . Inglis had acted with the greatest courtesy towards his chief , declining to be nominated to the Grand Mastership when he heard—erroneously as it turned out , however—that the latter was desirous of retaining office

another year . A brief explanatory statement to Bro . Inglis to this effect , that he ( Sir M . Stewart ) had not expressed any such desire , would have answered every purpose till the next Communication of Grand Lodge , when further personal explanations would have set the whole matter at rest .

But the Grand Master having initiated the discussion in the columns of the Scotsman , the Depute Grand Master followed the example of his chief , and wrote a letter to the effect that he was not acquainted with the reasons which had induced a section of the Craft to request the

Grand Master to retain office for a further term , that he had declined " the requisition of nearl y five hundred members of the Craft from all quarters of Scotland to be put in nomination for the chair solely from a desire to avoid unpleasant and unseemly discussion

in Grand Lodge ; " but that if the Grand Master was under the impression that his re-election was desired by " those most influential in the Craft" he ( Bro . Inglis ) , was quite willing to abide the result of a scrutiny of their respective requisitions . The challenge in the last clause we have referred to , is not , we regret to say , in accordance with'Bro . Inglis ' s previous and invariable courtesy . It

The Masonic Dispute In Scotland.

means simply : Let us try this issue , which of us is the more popular with the Craft , you whose re-election is desired by " those most influential in the Craft , " or I who have received a requisition signed by nearly 500 members

to be nominated for the chair . Moreover , in italicising tho words which are in italics , Bro . Inglis would appear to have cast some doubt on Sir M . Shaw Stewart ' s statement .

In short , tho Grand Master made a serious mistake when he sent his letter for publication , and the Depute Grand Master assuredly did not mend matters by replying . Had the matter stopped here , much as we might have regretted

the unseemliness of the controversy , we should havo contented ourselves with feeling , instead of expressing , our regret , but with one exception , the following letters have made matters still worse . Let the reader

note carefully their contents , and he cannot do otherwise than arrive at the conclusion that , while the language in which they are couched may bo unobjectionable , the tone which characterises all but that signed " R . W . MASTER " is most decidedly to be deprecated . " R . W . MASTER " thinks with us that there existed

other ways and means whereby the Grand Master Mason of Scotland might have made known " to the Craft ( who alone have an interest ) his sentiments on all subjects relating to its affairs . " But even he thinks it worth while to express his opinion that " a change in the occupancy

of the Masonic throne would he desirable , " thus at once constituting himself an opponent of the Grand Master , if not a partisan of tho Depute Grand Master . We regret the publication of controversial letters on a purely Masonic subject in anon-Masonic journal ; in the first place , because

it is uncalled for , the internal administration of the Craft being a matter of no interest to non-Masons : and in the next , because those who take part in the controversy

appear to lay aside those sentiments of charity by which Brethren of the Mystic Tie—presumably living together in unity — are supposed to be animated towards one another .

Meeting Of Lancashire Freemasons.

MEETING OF LANCASHIRE FREEMASONS .

THE annual meeting of the Provincial Grand Lodge of tho Western Division of Lancashire was held at tho Philharmonic Hall on Wednesday . The Right Hon . Lord Skelmersdale , Deputy Grand Worshipful Master of England , Right Worshipful Provincial Grand Master of the Western Division of Lancashire ( the second most extensive province in tho United Kingdom ) presided , and he was assisted by a large nnmber of past and present Provincial Grand

Lodge Officers . Altogether there wero over 1 , 000 brethren present , each wearing fall Masonic dress , with his insignia or jewels of office . Bro . Spence W . M . Lodgo 32 officiated as W . M . in opening the Craft Lodge in accordance with the ancient rules and customs ; Bros . W . J . Chapman I . P . M . 1 , 609 as P . M ., W . W . Iolton 113 as S . W ., Jowett 281 as J . W ., and R . 11 . Evans 292 as J . D . The Prov . Grand Lodge

having been announced , a procession was formed , and the Prov . Grand Lodge was opened in due form . The Provincial Grand Secretary ( Bro . H . S . Alpass ) then read the roll of Lodges in the Province , when the responses showed that the whole of the 79 , with the exception of two , were represented . Tho absent Lodges were the Ellesmere , No 730 , Chorley , and the Arthur John Brogden , No .

1 , 715 , Grange-Over-Sands . The Provincial Grand Secretary also read the minutes of the last Prov . Grand Lodge meeting , held at South , port , which were confirmed . It appeared from the report of the Provincial Grand Treasurer , which was taken as read , that the balances fiom last year were : — Charity Fund , £ 308 lis 6 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 369 2 s lid ;

Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 637 3 s 9 d—total , £ 2 , 314 18 s 2 d . The income during the year with theso balances amounted to the following Bums : — Charity Fund , £ 472 5 » 9 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 719 Os 2 d ; Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 962 19 s lOd—total £ 3 , 154 5 s 9 d . The disbursements included votes of £ 200 for the Indian Famine Fund , £ 100 to tho Royal Masonic Educational Benevolent Institution , and £ 105 to the West Lancashire Masonic Educational

Institution . The report also showed that up to the last report the sum of £ 1 , 829 5 s had been paid to the West Lancashire Masonic Educational Institution . There had been £ 1 , 000 invested in a bond in the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board ; £ 773 8 s Id in the Savings' Bauk ; and £ 757 10 s 5 d in the National Bank of Liverpool . The balances at tho

end of the financial year were : —Charity Fund , £ 472 5 s 9 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 719 03 2 d ; Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 962 19 s lOd —total , £ 3 , 154 5 s 9 d . On the motion of Bro . Dr . J . K . Smith , Bro . J . T . Callow P . M . 673 and 1505—a most assiduous Mason—was unanimously appointed to the office of Provincial Grand Treasurer . Bro . Callow returned

thanks . The P . G . M . then proceeded to invest his Officers for the ensuing year : Bros . W . J . A . Baldwin ( Baltoo-in-Fnrness ) P . Q . O . W ., H . R . Kobertson ( Liverpool ) P . G . J . W ., Rev . J . Rees Jenkins 216 P . G . Chaplain , Ralph Robinson 1502 P . G . Reg ., F . W . Sergeant 203 P . G . S . D ., W . Archer 1086 P . G . J . D ., J . E . Jackson 667 P . G . S . of W ., J . Welis 580 P . G . D . C ., J . Wainwright 613 P . G . A . D . C ., E . C . Cooper

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1878-10-05, Page 2” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 12 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_05101878/page/2/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE APPROACHING ELECTIONS. Article 1
THE MASONIC DISPUTE IN SCOTLAND. Article 1
MEETING OF LANCASHIRE FREEMASONS. Article 2
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 4
THE GOOSE AND GRIDIRON. Article 4
CHARITY STEWARDS. Article 4
DEDICATION OF A NEW MASONIC HALL AT SHIPLEY. Article 5
DISPOSAL OF LODGE FUNDS. Article 5
MISS FLORENCE SMART'S EVENING CONCERT. Article 6
THE MASONIC FUNERAL SERVICE. Article 6
GRAND LODGE OF SCOTLAND. Article 7
Untitled Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
OUR WEEKLY BUDGET. Article 8
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 10
Untitled Ad 10
CONSECRATION OF THE MID SURREY CHAPTER, No. 1044. Article 11
Untitled Article 11
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

4 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

10 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

12 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

16 Articles
Page 2

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Dispute In Scotland.

thing when brethren dwell together in unity , and will smile the smile of sarcasm when they read these evidences of what must certainly be described as something else than unity . Even a Mason may be pardoned the exhibition of unusual warmth when stoutly defending some cardinal

principle of Freemasonry , when , for instance , he is engaged in upholding the ancient landmarks of the Order , or when he is resenting the unwarranted , because unjust , attacks on them which are occasionally made by the bigot or the scoffer . In such case a defence couched in stronger

terms than are ordinarily employed in argument is excusable ; nay , we should not think much of him who did not so indulge himself , as the lack of warmth might be considered as betokening a state of indifference to the fair fame of the Craft . But for brethren of position to have

been betrayed into a most unseemly squabble over a matter of comparative unimportance is pitiful indeed , and , as we have said , will not tend to enhance the reputation of Freemasons in the opinion of the general public . We claim , and by the outside world are assumed , to be a body

of men united together by the most fraternal feelings . One of our watchwords is " Charity , " which we use , not simply in the sense of almsgiving , but in that infinitely wider and moro extended sense in which it is used by one

of the sacred writers of the earliest Christian era ; yet a simple statement , which , whether it were right or wrong , was of little moment , has sufficed to set the whole body of Scottish Freemasons by the ears . What makes it worse still is that the Grand Master Mason of Scotland is himself

in great measure responsible for this unseemly dicussion having taken place . Having seen a statement in the Scotsman to the effect that Bro . Inglis of Torsonce , Depute Grand Master , had declined to be put in nomination , on the ground that the present Grand Master ,

( Sir M . R . Shaw Stewart ) had expressed a wish to retain office for another year , thereupon the Grand Master writes to say that he had not been consulted by Bro . Inglis or his friends , and that he had not expressed any

desire for re-election . Still he had latterly been made aware of a very strong wish on the part of a large number of Freemasons , including the most influential in the Craft , that he should retain his office for the present , and for reasons which he believed were as well known to Bro .

Inglis as to himself . Now , whether the Grand Master had expressed a wish to be re-elected , or whether a large and influential section of the Craft had memorialised him to retain office for the present , was a matter so entirely imma . terial to tho outside public , that it was matter for surprise Si r

M . Shaw Stewart should have for a singlo moment entertained the idea of writing to non-Masonic journals about it . It is true the statement he was anxious to rectify appeared in the columns of such a journal ; but , in our humble opinion , the proper place for the correction of so trivial a

misunderstanding was Grand Lodge itself , when a few words of conversation between the Grand Master and the Depute Grand Master would have set the whole thing at rest . Nor was there any reason in pointing out that Bro . Inglis or his friends had not consulted him ( the Grand Master ) , because

there was no absolute reason why he or they should have done so . Bro . Inglis had acted with the greatest courtesy towards his chief , declining to be nominated to the Grand Mastership when he heard—erroneously as it turned out , however—that the latter was desirous of retaining office

another year . A brief explanatory statement to Bro . Inglis to this effect , that he ( Sir M . Stewart ) had not expressed any such desire , would have answered every purpose till the next Communication of Grand Lodge , when further personal explanations would have set the whole matter at rest .

But the Grand Master having initiated the discussion in the columns of the Scotsman , the Depute Grand Master followed the example of his chief , and wrote a letter to the effect that he was not acquainted with the reasons which had induced a section of the Craft to request the

Grand Master to retain office for a further term , that he had declined " the requisition of nearl y five hundred members of the Craft from all quarters of Scotland to be put in nomination for the chair solely from a desire to avoid unpleasant and unseemly discussion

in Grand Lodge ; " but that if the Grand Master was under the impression that his re-election was desired by " those most influential in the Craft" he ( Bro . Inglis ) , was quite willing to abide the result of a scrutiny of their respective requisitions . The challenge in the last clause we have referred to , is not , we regret to say , in accordance with'Bro . Inglis ' s previous and invariable courtesy . It

The Masonic Dispute In Scotland.

means simply : Let us try this issue , which of us is the more popular with the Craft , you whose re-election is desired by " those most influential in the Craft , " or I who have received a requisition signed by nearly 500 members

to be nominated for the chair . Moreover , in italicising tho words which are in italics , Bro . Inglis would appear to have cast some doubt on Sir M . Shaw Stewart ' s statement .

In short , tho Grand Master made a serious mistake when he sent his letter for publication , and the Depute Grand Master assuredly did not mend matters by replying . Had the matter stopped here , much as we might have regretted

the unseemliness of the controversy , we should havo contented ourselves with feeling , instead of expressing , our regret , but with one exception , the following letters have made matters still worse . Let the reader

note carefully their contents , and he cannot do otherwise than arrive at the conclusion that , while the language in which they are couched may bo unobjectionable , the tone which characterises all but that signed " R . W . MASTER " is most decidedly to be deprecated . " R . W . MASTER " thinks with us that there existed

other ways and means whereby the Grand Master Mason of Scotland might have made known " to the Craft ( who alone have an interest ) his sentiments on all subjects relating to its affairs . " But even he thinks it worth while to express his opinion that " a change in the occupancy

of the Masonic throne would he desirable , " thus at once constituting himself an opponent of the Grand Master , if not a partisan of tho Depute Grand Master . We regret the publication of controversial letters on a purely Masonic subject in anon-Masonic journal ; in the first place , because

it is uncalled for , the internal administration of the Craft being a matter of no interest to non-Masons : and in the next , because those who take part in the controversy

appear to lay aside those sentiments of charity by which Brethren of the Mystic Tie—presumably living together in unity — are supposed to be animated towards one another .

Meeting Of Lancashire Freemasons.

MEETING OF LANCASHIRE FREEMASONS .

THE annual meeting of the Provincial Grand Lodge of tho Western Division of Lancashire was held at tho Philharmonic Hall on Wednesday . The Right Hon . Lord Skelmersdale , Deputy Grand Worshipful Master of England , Right Worshipful Provincial Grand Master of the Western Division of Lancashire ( the second most extensive province in tho United Kingdom ) presided , and he was assisted by a large nnmber of past and present Provincial Grand

Lodge Officers . Altogether there wero over 1 , 000 brethren present , each wearing fall Masonic dress , with his insignia or jewels of office . Bro . Spence W . M . Lodgo 32 officiated as W . M . in opening the Craft Lodge in accordance with the ancient rules and customs ; Bros . W . J . Chapman I . P . M . 1 , 609 as P . M ., W . W . Iolton 113 as S . W ., Jowett 281 as J . W ., and R . 11 . Evans 292 as J . D . The Prov . Grand Lodge

having been announced , a procession was formed , and the Prov . Grand Lodge was opened in due form . The Provincial Grand Secretary ( Bro . H . S . Alpass ) then read the roll of Lodges in the Province , when the responses showed that the whole of the 79 , with the exception of two , were represented . Tho absent Lodges were the Ellesmere , No 730 , Chorley , and the Arthur John Brogden , No .

1 , 715 , Grange-Over-Sands . The Provincial Grand Secretary also read the minutes of the last Prov . Grand Lodge meeting , held at South , port , which were confirmed . It appeared from the report of the Provincial Grand Treasurer , which was taken as read , that the balances fiom last year were : — Charity Fund , £ 308 lis 6 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 369 2 s lid ;

Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 637 3 s 9 d—total , £ 2 , 314 18 s 2 d . The income during the year with theso balances amounted to the following Bums : — Charity Fund , £ 472 5 » 9 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 719 Os 2 d ; Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 962 19 s lOd—total £ 3 , 154 5 s 9 d . The disbursements included votes of £ 200 for the Indian Famine Fund , £ 100 to tho Royal Masonic Educational Benevolent Institution , and £ 105 to the West Lancashire Masonic Educational

Institution . The report also showed that up to the last report the sum of £ 1 , 829 5 s had been paid to the West Lancashire Masonic Educational Institution . There had been £ 1 , 000 invested in a bond in the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board ; £ 773 8 s Id in the Savings' Bauk ; and £ 757 10 s 5 d in the National Bank of Liverpool . The balances at tho

end of the financial year were : —Charity Fund , £ 472 5 s 9 d ; Prov . Grand Lodge Fund , £ 719 03 2 d ; Fund of Benevolence , £ 1 , 962 19 s lOd —total , £ 3 , 154 5 s 9 d . On the motion of Bro . Dr . J . K . Smith , Bro . J . T . Callow P . M . 673 and 1505—a most assiduous Mason—was unanimously appointed to the office of Provincial Grand Treasurer . Bro . Callow returned

thanks . The P . G . M . then proceeded to invest his Officers for the ensuing year : Bros . W . J . A . Baldwin ( Baltoo-in-Fnrness ) P . Q . O . W ., H . R . Kobertson ( Liverpool ) P . G . J . W ., Rev . J . Rees Jenkins 216 P . G . Chaplain , Ralph Robinson 1502 P . G . Reg ., F . W . Sergeant 203 P . G . S . D ., W . Archer 1086 P . G . J . D ., J . E . Jackson 667 P . G . S . of W ., J . Welis 580 P . G . D . C ., J . Wainwright 613 P . G . A . D . C ., E . C . Cooper

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • You're on page2
  • 3
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy