Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Jan. 7, 1893
  • Page 11
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Jan. 7, 1893: Page 11

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Jan. 7, 1893
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ARE YOU A MASON? ← Page 2 of 2
    Article CONCERNING LANDMARKS. Page 1 of 1
    Article CONCERNING LANDMARKS. Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
Page 11

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Are You A Mason?

Trne it is , and worthy of Masonic appreciation , that prevention is better than cure . Prevent mischief and the •vils that else wonld arise are surely avoided . —Keystone .

Concerning Landmarks.

CONCERNING LANDMARKS .

" rTTHOU shalt not remove thy neighbour ' s landmarks , JL which they of old time have set in thine inheritance , " was an old Jewish law , and such must bave been the sentiment of a majority iu Grand Lodge assembled when they summarily rejected the recommendation of the Revision

Committee to omit certain Masonic Landmarks from the forthcoming new issue of the Book of Constitutions . The incident draws attention to the fact that on the subject of Landmarks thero exists not only a difference of opinion , but conflicting statements ; and this is the more singular as

it is a point on which there should be no suspicion of doubt and no sense of disagreement . The Landmarks , our jurists agree in affirming , form a part of the unwritten law of Masonry , so remote in their origin as to be void of all clue and of a " higher antiquity than memory or history can

reach . " Bro . Dr . Mackey , an able and resourceful writer , fixes their number at twenty-five , and , so far as we have been able to ascertain , he was the first and earliest authority on them , specifying and tabuhting them . His version has been accepted by the generality of English-speaking

Freemasons . These Landmarks lay down certain esoterical , ethical , and religious principles ; prescriptive rights and privileges ; qualifying restrictions ;[ and , finaliy , the maxim that these cannot be subject to mutation , but have been the same from the beginning and must remain so to the end . Thus

far all appears plain and definite , but if we should extend our inquiries and go further afield , we arrive at the knowledge that a claim is put in for fifteen other landmarks with a considerable extention of their design and purport ; and this in face ofthe previous asseveration that they were

limited to twenty-five articles of belief which could know no change or shadow of turning . In addition to this , Brother Dr . Oliver , another learned and prolific writer , yet withal far too imaginative to be accepted without some reserve , says : —Some restrict them" ( the landmarks ) "tothe

O . B ., signs , tokens , and words . Others include the ceremonies of initiation , passing , and raising ; and the form , dimensions , and support ; the ground , situation , and covering ; and the ornaments , furniture , and jewels of a Lodge . " Some think that the Order has no landmarks

beyond its peculiar secrets . " So that their asserted fixity and finality does not stand the test of examination , but only goes to prove that they are a moveable and variable quantity . At whose bidding fifteen more were added , making forty landmarks in all , we cannot say , or what was

the exact purport we cannot charge our memory with ; but to the innovating—though sometimes misdirected—genius of American Masonry we may attribute their conception with some show of probability . Before Mackey treated on them we have grounds for hazarding the conjecture that

the nature of the landmarks was only vaguely understood , and that there was no absolute definition of them to go upon Not one of the Manuscript Masonic Constitutions , or ¦¦ Old Charges , " known to us contains any reference to landmarks , though some of the Old Charges served in

part as a basis whereon to construct them . Neither is there from the creation of Grand Lodges under a Speculative system to the present time any English Book of Constitutions which includes them in its contents . Passing allusions are certainly to be met with in the

Constitutions of the last century , and in the works of Masonic writers of the same period , but nothing in explanation or enumeration of them nntil Mackey undertook the task , about fifty years ago , in his Masonic Cyclopaedia , and a treatise on Masonic Jurisprudence . Bro . R . F .

Gould , in his carefully expressed opinions in the " History of Fiecmasonry , " says— " We shall vainly search in the ricords nf those early times for a full specification of the twevty-Jice 'hu . dinai-ks' which modern search pronounces , to be bothancient and unalterable . " As further illustration

of their di .-credited and unreliable claim , the Freemasons ' MagazUe , of February l-G ' -, has the following passage : — ' Nobody knows what lhey ( landmarks ) comprise or omit ;

they art of no rait !> ly auhonty , U cau o everything is a landmark when a * i opponent desir . s to pi It-nee you , but nothingi 3 a Jandm irk tint i-tunds in i . H o . vn wiy . " Yet these are they which somo of us believe to bo too sacred

Concerning Landmarks.

and indisputable to be doubted , and too aocredited £ to be denied a place in the Constitution Book . Those who will peruse Mackey ' s " Landmarks " ( which are those of our adoption ) together with his commentaries on each and all , will , we are disposed to believe , find nothing of illimitable

antiquity about them , but , on tbe contrary , will detect a distinct bearing on and application to the requirements of modern Freemasonry . Moreover , if they approach thesubject with an unclouded intelligence , a miud free from bais , and a fair understanding of what wo owe to up-to-date

investigation and troth-searching revelation , they cannot fail to bowl the late Bro . Mackey out in some glaring discrepancies and false arguments . Were it not that we should overlap the space allowed us , it would be easy to place these in full before the reader and prove our case . Mackey with clear insight

but some inconsistency , when dealing with the landmarks was most insistent that in relation to them - ' antiquity mnst be an essential element , " for well he kenned that it was the same indispensable element of antiquity whioh invested them with a charm beyond compare . " Anoient "

is . the qualifying adjective by which they have always been known among Speculative Masons , yet the landmarks , as certified to by Mackey have very little of that ascription in fcheir composition ; nothing traceable longer back than the old Craft-Guild system , and much in them that carries

with it the conviction of an intimate connection with modern Freemasonry . So that the balance of evidence is more in favour of a comparatively recent than to a highly remote origin , of something introduced within tbe memory of man , preferably to the same thing boing derived in

unbroken continuity from a source lost in incalculable teons past . In whichever way we may elect to regard these Landmarks , whether venerable with age , or at the stage of adolescence , as prescribing twenty-five guiding princi ples on which to square our Masonic rule and action , they

suffice and may fulfil their part m tbe economy of this jurisdiction without onr bestowing further thought on thequestion of their antiquity , immutableness , or universalit y . Whether it is necessary to allot them a place in our Statute Book is a mere detail which has now been voted for affirmatively . —South Australian Freemason .

Ad01103

ROYALAQUARIUM, WESTMINSTER . REFRESHMENTDEPARTMENT, TABLED'HOTEDINNERS AT SEPARATE TABLES . DINNERSALACARTE. Luncheons , Dinners , and Suppers from the Grill and Joint . Dining Room in the Galley icith Tables , having a view ofthe Stage . PRIVATE DINING ROOMS WITH BALCONIES , IN PULL VIEW OP THE STAGE , May be engaged by Private Parties without extra charge . SPECIAL TERMS FOR SCHOOLS AMD LARGE PARTIES . CONTRACTORS : — SPIERS&POND,LIMITED.

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1893-01-07, Page 11” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 28 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_07011893/page/11/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
VOLUME THIRTY-SEVEN. Article 1
THE INSTITUTIONS IN 1892. Article 1
HOW SHOULD A MASON LIVE. Article 2
Untitled Ad 2
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 3
THE INTELLECTUAL STIMULUS OF FREEMASONRY. Article 6
SONNET. Article 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Article 9
CONSECRATION OF THE BREEDSTOW LODGE, No. 2448. Article 9
ENTERTAINMENT TO THE AGED POOR OF WESTON-SUPER-MARE. Article 9
MASONIC SONNETS.—No. 30. Article 9
Obituary. Article 10
ARE YOU A MASON? Article 10
CONCERNING LANDMARKS. Article 11
Untitled Ad 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
INSTRUCTION. Article 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
THE THEATRES, &c. Article 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

5 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

10 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

9 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

4 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

5 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

6 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

15 Articles
Page 11

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Are You A Mason?

Trne it is , and worthy of Masonic appreciation , that prevention is better than cure . Prevent mischief and the •vils that else wonld arise are surely avoided . —Keystone .

Concerning Landmarks.

CONCERNING LANDMARKS .

" rTTHOU shalt not remove thy neighbour ' s landmarks , JL which they of old time have set in thine inheritance , " was an old Jewish law , and such must bave been the sentiment of a majority iu Grand Lodge assembled when they summarily rejected the recommendation of the Revision

Committee to omit certain Masonic Landmarks from the forthcoming new issue of the Book of Constitutions . The incident draws attention to the fact that on the subject of Landmarks thero exists not only a difference of opinion , but conflicting statements ; and this is the more singular as

it is a point on which there should be no suspicion of doubt and no sense of disagreement . The Landmarks , our jurists agree in affirming , form a part of the unwritten law of Masonry , so remote in their origin as to be void of all clue and of a " higher antiquity than memory or history can

reach . " Bro . Dr . Mackey , an able and resourceful writer , fixes their number at twenty-five , and , so far as we have been able to ascertain , he was the first and earliest authority on them , specifying and tabuhting them . His version has been accepted by the generality of English-speaking

Freemasons . These Landmarks lay down certain esoterical , ethical , and religious principles ; prescriptive rights and privileges ; qualifying restrictions ;[ and , finaliy , the maxim that these cannot be subject to mutation , but have been the same from the beginning and must remain so to the end . Thus

far all appears plain and definite , but if we should extend our inquiries and go further afield , we arrive at the knowledge that a claim is put in for fifteen other landmarks with a considerable extention of their design and purport ; and this in face ofthe previous asseveration that they were

limited to twenty-five articles of belief which could know no change or shadow of turning . In addition to this , Brother Dr . Oliver , another learned and prolific writer , yet withal far too imaginative to be accepted without some reserve , says : —Some restrict them" ( the landmarks ) "tothe

O . B ., signs , tokens , and words . Others include the ceremonies of initiation , passing , and raising ; and the form , dimensions , and support ; the ground , situation , and covering ; and the ornaments , furniture , and jewels of a Lodge . " Some think that the Order has no landmarks

beyond its peculiar secrets . " So that their asserted fixity and finality does not stand the test of examination , but only goes to prove that they are a moveable and variable quantity . At whose bidding fifteen more were added , making forty landmarks in all , we cannot say , or what was

the exact purport we cannot charge our memory with ; but to the innovating—though sometimes misdirected—genius of American Masonry we may attribute their conception with some show of probability . Before Mackey treated on them we have grounds for hazarding the conjecture that

the nature of the landmarks was only vaguely understood , and that there was no absolute definition of them to go upon Not one of the Manuscript Masonic Constitutions , or ¦¦ Old Charges , " known to us contains any reference to landmarks , though some of the Old Charges served in

part as a basis whereon to construct them . Neither is there from the creation of Grand Lodges under a Speculative system to the present time any English Book of Constitutions which includes them in its contents . Passing allusions are certainly to be met with in the

Constitutions of the last century , and in the works of Masonic writers of the same period , but nothing in explanation or enumeration of them nntil Mackey undertook the task , about fifty years ago , in his Masonic Cyclopaedia , and a treatise on Masonic Jurisprudence . Bro . R . F .

Gould , in his carefully expressed opinions in the " History of Fiecmasonry , " says— " We shall vainly search in the ricords nf those early times for a full specification of the twevty-Jice 'hu . dinai-ks' which modern search pronounces , to be bothancient and unalterable . " As further illustration

of their di .-credited and unreliable claim , the Freemasons ' MagazUe , of February l-G ' -, has the following passage : — ' Nobody knows what lhey ( landmarks ) comprise or omit ;

they art of no rait !> ly auhonty , U cau o everything is a landmark when a * i opponent desir . s to pi It-nee you , but nothingi 3 a Jandm irk tint i-tunds in i . H o . vn wiy . " Yet these are they which somo of us believe to bo too sacred

Concerning Landmarks.

and indisputable to be doubted , and too aocredited £ to be denied a place in the Constitution Book . Those who will peruse Mackey ' s " Landmarks " ( which are those of our adoption ) together with his commentaries on each and all , will , we are disposed to believe , find nothing of illimitable

antiquity about them , but , on tbe contrary , will detect a distinct bearing on and application to the requirements of modern Freemasonry . Moreover , if they approach thesubject with an unclouded intelligence , a miud free from bais , and a fair understanding of what wo owe to up-to-date

investigation and troth-searching revelation , they cannot fail to bowl the late Bro . Mackey out in some glaring discrepancies and false arguments . Were it not that we should overlap the space allowed us , it would be easy to place these in full before the reader and prove our case . Mackey with clear insight

but some inconsistency , when dealing with the landmarks was most insistent that in relation to them - ' antiquity mnst be an essential element , " for well he kenned that it was the same indispensable element of antiquity whioh invested them with a charm beyond compare . " Anoient "

is . the qualifying adjective by which they have always been known among Speculative Masons , yet the landmarks , as certified to by Mackey have very little of that ascription in fcheir composition ; nothing traceable longer back than the old Craft-Guild system , and much in them that carries

with it the conviction of an intimate connection with modern Freemasonry . So that the balance of evidence is more in favour of a comparatively recent than to a highly remote origin , of something introduced within tbe memory of man , preferably to the same thing boing derived in

unbroken continuity from a source lost in incalculable teons past . In whichever way we may elect to regard these Landmarks , whether venerable with age , or at the stage of adolescence , as prescribing twenty-five guiding princi ples on which to square our Masonic rule and action , they

suffice and may fulfil their part m tbe economy of this jurisdiction without onr bestowing further thought on thequestion of their antiquity , immutableness , or universalit y . Whether it is necessary to allot them a place in our Statute Book is a mere detail which has now been voted for affirmatively . —South Australian Freemason .

Ad01103

ROYALAQUARIUM, WESTMINSTER . REFRESHMENTDEPARTMENT, TABLED'HOTEDINNERS AT SEPARATE TABLES . DINNERSALACARTE. Luncheons , Dinners , and Suppers from the Grill and Joint . Dining Room in the Galley icith Tables , having a view ofthe Stage . PRIVATE DINING ROOMS WITH BALCONIES , IN PULL VIEW OP THE STAGE , May be engaged by Private Parties without extra charge . SPECIAL TERMS FOR SCHOOLS AMD LARGE PARTIES . CONTRACTORS : — SPIERS&POND,LIMITED.

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 10
  • You're on page11
  • 12
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy