Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • July 9, 1881
  • Page 1
  • ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, July 9, 1881: Page 1

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, July 9, 1881
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST. Page 1 of 5
    Article ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST. Page 1 of 5 →
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Analysis Of The Subscription List.

ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST .

THE last of our Anniversary Festivals for the year 1881 has come and gone , and the result in its main features was before our readers last -week . If Bro . Binckes ' s achievement in this instance represents a considerable falling off by comparison with that of last year , it must be borne in

mind that a steadily-progressive increase in the total of our subscription lists is a thing unknown in the annals of Freemasonry . There must and will be fluctuations in the yearly amounts subscribed , aud what is equally clear to all who pay any heed to matters of this kind , it is in the order of things that one Institution will take the lead in one

particular year , and another in tbe next . Last year for instance , it was the Boys' School which received the greatest share of support from the Masonic public , so far as the Festival was concerned , while the Benevolent Institution brought up the rear . This year the latter takes the lead ,

with over £ 14 , 300 , while the Schools are about level , with , in round figures , £ 11 , 500 each . It is quite possible that next year , the Girls' School may occupy the post of honour , and then in due conrse the Boys' will repeat their triumph of last year . It is as well , indeed , there should be these

fluctuations . It would be very disheartening to a Secretary to find that , no matter how constant and energetic his labours , he was invariably last in respect of the result achieved at his Festivals . These fluctuations , therefore , have a wholesome effect , and a disappointed Secretary with

the comparatively modest total of £ 11 , 000 in 1880 , finds himself to the fore the next year , or year after that , with over £ 14 , 000 , while the jubilant Secretary who has snored some £ 14 , 000 at one particular Festival , finds himself very much behind , with only some £ 10 , 000 or £ 12 , 000 at the

succeeding . There are , likewise , several other causes which cannot fail to operate beneficially or the reverse on the amounts subscribed from year to year . Trade may be particularl y flourishing now , and now be in a state of extreme stagnation . At one Festival there maybe a chairman with

a strong and influential Province at his back , which mav be relied on to raise subscriptions to the extent of £ 2 , 000 or £ 3 , 000 , while at another the chairman may be the head of a small Province , or have no Province whatever to give him any special assistance . However , after making

every allowance for these and other contingencies , we shall hnd that taking one year with another , the Festivals of our Masonic Institutions are among the most splendid successes connected with charitable celebrations . It is quite excusable for any Mason to point with something like eni-l , - j «~ j , ^ ...... . „ ,. «„ . WVU . VNJVVV IU ^ Alli \ 3 ViUMnsiasm

to the large sums annually raised by voluntary subscription towards the maintenance of our two Schools and Benevolent Institution . It may be some £ 33 , 000 one year , and only £ 30 , 000 the year following , bnt a good average , such as few other Institutions point to will be

prett y generally maintained . Last year the total for the ™ ree Festivals was some £ 39 , 500 , or about £ 2 . 000 in excess of what it is in 1881 , while 1881 is some £ 1 , 500 in lTeHthet0ta1for1879Yet{fwetakefchetln'eeveai'9 f A , . ' strilv ' e an average , we shall have little reason

» oe dissatisfied with the result for the current year . As gards the particular Festival we are considering , it stands wW series wWcl 1 have ^ e neld in aid of either of our tS r ¦ ¦ Tt is tl , e first that uas ever been held ° ntside Brio-U * ° f the Metro P olitan area . The selection of to he tte celebratiOQ is an innovation , which apnears nave iound but little favour with Borne members of the

Analysis Of The Subscription List.

Craft ; but , notwithstanding this , tho day appears to have been a great success , and the Province of Sussex showed its sense of the unwonted honour conferred upon it by the action of the Board of Stewards and most loyally contributed a sum not far short of £ 800 , while Durham aided

its chief , the Marquis of Londonderry , by raising over £ 728 , which , if short of what might have been looked for , is still a very satisfactory amount . It is early yet to speculate on the probability of holding the Festival of 1882 in one of the Provinces , but the experiment having been tried

and proved successful , we see no reason why it should not be repeated . The Provinces do their share in supporting our Institutions , and some such consideration as in this instance has been shown Sussex will certainly be

appreciated . However , it will be for the authorities to decide the point when the time for making the necessary arrangements is at band , and that will not be till several months have passed .

"We now enter on our usual task of analysing the result . The Board of Stewards was undoubtedly a strong one , if not the strongest , whose services Bro . Binckes has succeeded in enlisting . It consisted of 258 Stewards , of whom ] 10 , or if we include Bro . Matier , the representative

of the Allied Masonic Degrees , 111 belouged to London , and 148 , or in the alternative case mentioned 147 , acted for the Provinces . The result of the combined efforts of this Board was a subscription list amounting to £ 11 , 681 7 s 3 d , the London brethren raisinsr amon ? them £ 5 , 21017 s , and the

Provinces £ 6 , 47010 s 3 d . Taking the Metropolitan first , we find that of the 303 Lodges within its limits , eighty-eight were representedby ninety four Stewards , there being no less than six Lodges which sent up two Stewards ; one Royal Arch Chapter was represented , and the Dinner Committee Club of

the R . M . I . B . had for its Steward Bro . John Palmer . There were also fourteen Stewards unattached , while Bro . C . F . Matier did duty on behalf of the Allied Masonic Degrees , and may be looked upon as Metropolitan or Provincial , at the option of the reader , the Degrees in question being able to boast

of several homes in the Provinces though their headquarters are in London . Of the several lists , as many as sixteen , are three-figure , the Pythagorean , No . 79 , with a total of £ 215 5 s , by the hands of Bro . Henry Roberts , being at the top of the tree as regards amount . After a considerable

interval comes Bro . F . Binckes , unattached , with £ 163 •, Prosperity , No . 65 , with £ 154 7 s , per Bro . Daniel ; and then Bro . T . J . Barnes , the well-known Preceptor , who in the capacity of Steward for the Doric , No . 933 , gave in a total of £ 136 10 s . Bro . A . J . Dnff-Filer P . G . S . B .,

as Steward for the Canonbury Lodge , No . 657 , is down for £ 130 4 s ; Bro . J . L . Mather , of Lodge Perseverance , No , 1743 , occupies a position close up , with £ 123 18 s ; and La Tolerance , No . 538 , and Victoria , No . 1 , 056 , gave £ 120 apiece . Confidence , No . 193 , per Bro . W . Wood , stands

well with £ 115 10 s ; Egyptian , No . 27 , per Bro . Charles Atkins , contributing £ 114 19 s 6 d ; Higngate , No . 1366 , per Bro . John E . Cussans , £ 11217 s 6 d ; Bro . Edward Bowyer , acting independently of Lodge and Chapter , £ 108 3 s . Friends in Council , No . 1383 , per Captain W . A . Eicks ,

£ 107 6 s ; Justice No . 147 , per Bro . George Bolton £ 106 17 s ; Evening Star , No . 1719 , per Bro . M . Mildred , £ 105 ; and Royal Jubilee , No . 72 , £ 103 3 s Gd , per Bro . Dunn . "Very many of these , and especially " Friends in Council , "

figure with regularity at the Festivals of all our Institutions year after year , and the remainder are more often than not conspicuous by their presence . Of the remaining Lodges which sent up Stewards very many , like Grand Master ' s , No . 1 , Antiquity , No . 2 , R . Somerset House and Inverness ,

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1881-07-09, Page 1” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 11 Aug. 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_09071881/page/1/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST. Article 1
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 5
STATEMENT OF PROVINCIAL CONTRIBUTION'S TO THE ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS, FOR THE SEPTENNIAL PERIOD 1875-81. Article 6
UNITY CHAPTER, No. 1151. Article 7
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 9
FREEMASONRY IN NEW YORK. Article 9
MARK MASONRY. Article 9
MARK GRAND LODGE BENEVOLENT FUND. Article 10
COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE BOYS' SCHOOL. Article 10
CONSECRATION OF THE MONTAGUE GUEST LODGE, No. 1900. Article 11
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 13
CORNWALLIS LODGE, No. 1107. Article 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

17 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

5 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

11 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

12 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

15 Articles
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Analysis Of The Subscription List.

ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST .

THE last of our Anniversary Festivals for the year 1881 has come and gone , and the result in its main features was before our readers last -week . If Bro . Binckes ' s achievement in this instance represents a considerable falling off by comparison with that of last year , it must be borne in

mind that a steadily-progressive increase in the total of our subscription lists is a thing unknown in the annals of Freemasonry . There must and will be fluctuations in the yearly amounts subscribed , aud what is equally clear to all who pay any heed to matters of this kind , it is in the order of things that one Institution will take the lead in one

particular year , and another in tbe next . Last year for instance , it was the Boys' School which received the greatest share of support from the Masonic public , so far as the Festival was concerned , while the Benevolent Institution brought up the rear . This year the latter takes the lead ,

with over £ 14 , 300 , while the Schools are about level , with , in round figures , £ 11 , 500 each . It is quite possible that next year , the Girls' School may occupy the post of honour , and then in due conrse the Boys' will repeat their triumph of last year . It is as well , indeed , there should be these

fluctuations . It would be very disheartening to a Secretary to find that , no matter how constant and energetic his labours , he was invariably last in respect of the result achieved at his Festivals . These fluctuations , therefore , have a wholesome effect , and a disappointed Secretary with

the comparatively modest total of £ 11 , 000 in 1880 , finds himself to the fore the next year , or year after that , with over £ 14 , 000 , while the jubilant Secretary who has snored some £ 14 , 000 at one particular Festival , finds himself very much behind , with only some £ 10 , 000 or £ 12 , 000 at the

succeeding . There are , likewise , several other causes which cannot fail to operate beneficially or the reverse on the amounts subscribed from year to year . Trade may be particularl y flourishing now , and now be in a state of extreme stagnation . At one Festival there maybe a chairman with

a strong and influential Province at his back , which mav be relied on to raise subscriptions to the extent of £ 2 , 000 or £ 3 , 000 , while at another the chairman may be the head of a small Province , or have no Province whatever to give him any special assistance . However , after making

every allowance for these and other contingencies , we shall hnd that taking one year with another , the Festivals of our Masonic Institutions are among the most splendid successes connected with charitable celebrations . It is quite excusable for any Mason to point with something like eni-l , - j «~ j , ^ ...... . „ ,. «„ . WVU . VNJVVV IU ^ Alli \ 3 ViUMnsiasm

to the large sums annually raised by voluntary subscription towards the maintenance of our two Schools and Benevolent Institution . It may be some £ 33 , 000 one year , and only £ 30 , 000 the year following , bnt a good average , such as few other Institutions point to will be

prett y generally maintained . Last year the total for the ™ ree Festivals was some £ 39 , 500 , or about £ 2 . 000 in excess of what it is in 1881 , while 1881 is some £ 1 , 500 in lTeHthet0ta1for1879Yet{fwetakefchetln'eeveai'9 f A , . ' strilv ' e an average , we shall have little reason

» oe dissatisfied with the result for the current year . As gards the particular Festival we are considering , it stands wW series wWcl 1 have ^ e neld in aid of either of our tS r ¦ ¦ Tt is tl , e first that uas ever been held ° ntside Brio-U * ° f the Metro P olitan area . The selection of to he tte celebratiOQ is an innovation , which apnears nave iound but little favour with Borne members of the

Analysis Of The Subscription List.

Craft ; but , notwithstanding this , tho day appears to have been a great success , and the Province of Sussex showed its sense of the unwonted honour conferred upon it by the action of the Board of Stewards and most loyally contributed a sum not far short of £ 800 , while Durham aided

its chief , the Marquis of Londonderry , by raising over £ 728 , which , if short of what might have been looked for , is still a very satisfactory amount . It is early yet to speculate on the probability of holding the Festival of 1882 in one of the Provinces , but the experiment having been tried

and proved successful , we see no reason why it should not be repeated . The Provinces do their share in supporting our Institutions , and some such consideration as in this instance has been shown Sussex will certainly be

appreciated . However , it will be for the authorities to decide the point when the time for making the necessary arrangements is at band , and that will not be till several months have passed .

"We now enter on our usual task of analysing the result . The Board of Stewards was undoubtedly a strong one , if not the strongest , whose services Bro . Binckes has succeeded in enlisting . It consisted of 258 Stewards , of whom ] 10 , or if we include Bro . Matier , the representative

of the Allied Masonic Degrees , 111 belouged to London , and 148 , or in the alternative case mentioned 147 , acted for the Provinces . The result of the combined efforts of this Board was a subscription list amounting to £ 11 , 681 7 s 3 d , the London brethren raisinsr amon ? them £ 5 , 21017 s , and the

Provinces £ 6 , 47010 s 3 d . Taking the Metropolitan first , we find that of the 303 Lodges within its limits , eighty-eight were representedby ninety four Stewards , there being no less than six Lodges which sent up two Stewards ; one Royal Arch Chapter was represented , and the Dinner Committee Club of

the R . M . I . B . had for its Steward Bro . John Palmer . There were also fourteen Stewards unattached , while Bro . C . F . Matier did duty on behalf of the Allied Masonic Degrees , and may be looked upon as Metropolitan or Provincial , at the option of the reader , the Degrees in question being able to boast

of several homes in the Provinces though their headquarters are in London . Of the several lists , as many as sixteen , are three-figure , the Pythagorean , No . 79 , with a total of £ 215 5 s , by the hands of Bro . Henry Roberts , being at the top of the tree as regards amount . After a considerable

interval comes Bro . F . Binckes , unattached , with £ 163 •, Prosperity , No . 65 , with £ 154 7 s , per Bro . Daniel ; and then Bro . T . J . Barnes , the well-known Preceptor , who in the capacity of Steward for the Doric , No . 933 , gave in a total of £ 136 10 s . Bro . A . J . Dnff-Filer P . G . S . B .,

as Steward for the Canonbury Lodge , No . 657 , is down for £ 130 4 s ; Bro . J . L . Mather , of Lodge Perseverance , No , 1743 , occupies a position close up , with £ 123 18 s ; and La Tolerance , No . 538 , and Victoria , No . 1 , 056 , gave £ 120 apiece . Confidence , No . 193 , per Bro . W . Wood , stands

well with £ 115 10 s ; Egyptian , No . 27 , per Bro . Charles Atkins , contributing £ 114 19 s 6 d ; Higngate , No . 1366 , per Bro . John E . Cussans , £ 11217 s 6 d ; Bro . Edward Bowyer , acting independently of Lodge and Chapter , £ 108 3 s . Friends in Council , No . 1383 , per Captain W . A . Eicks ,

£ 107 6 s ; Justice No . 147 , per Bro . George Bolton £ 106 17 s ; Evening Star , No . 1719 , per Bro . M . Mildred , £ 105 ; and Royal Jubilee , No . 72 , £ 103 3 s Gd , per Bro . Dunn . "Very many of these , and especially " Friends in Council , "

figure with regularity at the Festivals of all our Institutions year after year , and the remainder are more often than not conspicuous by their presence . Of the remaining Lodges which sent up Stewards very many , like Grand Master ' s , No . 1 , Antiquity , No . 2 , R . Somerset House and Inverness ,

  • Prev page
  • You're on page1
  • 2
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy