Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Jan. 22, 1876
  • Page 5
  • DID NOT LIKE MASONRY.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Jan. 22, 1876: Page 5

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Jan. 22, 1876
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MASONRY AND ANCIENT MYSTERIES. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article DID NOT LIKE MASONRY. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 5

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonry And Ancient Mysteries.

Egyptians , and regarded as gods those skilful adventurers , who communicated to them the arts and sciences of their native land . In this manner were sown , in Greece , those seeds of improvement which , in after ages , exalted that country to such pre-eminence among nations .

About 1500 B . C . the Eleusinian mysteries were instituted , in honour of Ceres ; about the same time tho Panathena were instituted , in honor of Minerva , and tho Dionysian mysteries , in honour of Bacchus , who invented theatres and instructed the Greeks in many useful arts , but especially in the culture of tho vine .

That tho Eleusinian and Dionysian mysteries were ultimately connected with the progress of tho arts and sciences is manifest , from tho very end for which they were formed , and that they were modelled upon the mysteries of Isis and Osiris , celebrated in Egypt , is probable

from tho similarity of their origin ; we must , therefore , naturally conclude that the Dionysia and mysteries of Eleusis were societies of Freemasons tinctured with the doctrines of the Egyptian mythology . The striking

similarity among the external forms of those several associations , and the still more striking similarity of the objects they had in view , aro strong proofs that they were only different streams issuing from a common source .

Those who were initiated in tho Eleusinian mysteries were bound , by the most awful engagements , to conceal the instructions they received and the ceremonies that were performed ; significant w ords were communicated to tho members , Grand Officers presided over their assemblies , and the candidates advanced from one decree to another till

they received all the lessons of wisdom and virtue which the priests could impart . But besides the circumstances of resemblance , there are two facts transmitted to us by ancient authors which have an astonishing similarity to the ceremonies of the third

degree of Freemasonry ; the sacrifices , purifications , hymns and dances , which were necessary in the festival of Ceres , have indeed no place in the society of Freemasons , but these points of dissimilarity , instead of weakening , rather

strengthen our opinion . It cannot be expected that in the reign of Pol y theisia just sentiments of the deity should be entertained , and much less that the adherents of Christianity should bend their knees to the pods of the heathens . The

ancients worshipped those beings who conferred on them the most signal benefits , with sacrifices , and other tokens of their humility and gratitude ; but when revelations concerning the Divine Beinp ; had disclosed to man more amiable sentiments , the Society of Freemasons banished

from their mysteries these useless rites with which the anciont brethren of the Order attempted to appease and requite their deities , aud modelled their ceremonies upon this foundation , that there is but one God , who mnst be worshipped in spirit and in truth .

The opinions , therefore , of Freemasons that their Order existed and flourished at the building of Solomon ' s Temple is by no means so pregnant with absurdity as some men would wish us to believe . We have already shewn , from authentic sources of information , that the mysteries of Ceres

and Bacchus were instituted about 400 years before the reign of Solomon , and there are strong reasons for believing that even the associations of the Dionysian architects existed before the building of tho Temple , It was not J indeed till about 300 years B . C . that they were incorporated

at Tiers under the Kings of Pergamus , but it is universall y allowed that they arose long before the settlement in Ionia , and , what is more to our purpose , that they also existed in the land of Judea ; moreover , it is observed by Dr . Robinson , that they came from Persia into Syria along with that style

of architecture which is called Grecian ; and since we are informed b y Josephus that that species of architecture was used at the erection of the Temple , we are authorised to infer not only that the Dionysiacs existed before the reign of Solomon , but that they assisted this monarch in building

that magnificent fabric which he reared to the God of Israel . Nothing , indeed , can be more simple and consistent than the creed of the fraternity concerning the state of the Order at this period . The vicinity of Jerusalem to Egypt , the connections of Solomon with the Royal Family of that

Kingdom , the progress of the Egyptians in architectural science , thoir attachment to mysteries and hieroglyphic symbols , and the probability of their being employed by

the King of Israel , are additional considerations which corroborate the sentiments of Freemasons , and absolve them from the charges of credulity and pride with which they havo been so frequently branded . j

Did Not Like Masonry.

DID NOT LIKE MASONRY .

BY WM . EOUNSEVILLE . I ONCE knew a man who did not like Masonry . That is by nomeans ^ singular , for it has been clearly ascertained that besides Blanchard and tho Pope , there aro several persons in tho world who should bo recorded in the sanio category . But in this particular case there wore somo incidental circumstances which would servo to separate it from those of tho distinguished individuals wo havo named , if not from tho whole remaining list of dislikes of tho

venerablo Institution . In tho first place this man of whom I write was a member of tho Masonic body . I do not cull him a Mason , because I have an abiding faith that all true Masons liko Masonry , and tho fact that ho did not like the Institution is proof as strong as Holy Writ , to my judgment , that ho was not a Mason . However , that may be , he had become

ono of tho Fraternity in tho regular way—had been proposed , ballotted for , elected , initiated , passed , raised , etc ., by tho usual methods , and still he did not like Masonry . This is ono of tho singular and noteworthy facts connected with this case , becauso a great majority , if not nearly all of those who thus proceed , liko tho old Institution and speak in its praise . That this member did not , after thus

progressing , proves him an exception to tho general rule . Most persons liko it , and do not scruple to avow tho fact whenever an opportunity offers , others , few in number , perhaps , say nothing about it , whilo this ono talked against it . Another singular fact connected with , this case , and which removes tho individual from the possibility of a classification with tho two

distinguished gentlemen abovo mentioned , is that ho was made acquainted with the " true inwardness" of tho Institution ; had sat in Lodge and Chapter as a member for a space of two years , and consequently might have beon expected to know whereof ho affirmed , and to have been ablo to give a reason for tho faith that was in him . The gentlemen abovo named had not those advantages , having

neglected to avail themselves of tho privilege or entering the door always opened to the worthy . It has been stated , it is trne , that tho Pope was a Mason before ho becamo a Cardinal , and that ho has lately beon expelled from his Lodge for un-Masonic conduct , but it is preferred to regard the tale as an idlo rumour , and henco our man who did not liko Masonry must not be classed with tho Pope or the

Presideut . I mention another singular fact that exists in this case ; tho mau who did not find that such was tho caso when he took the first degree . On the contrary , ho liked that well . He did not find his dislike at the second degree ; nor at the third degree , nor at the fourth , nor at the fifth , nor at tho sixth , neither did ho find his cause for dislike to

Masonry when ho was inducted into tho seventh degree . It is allowable to say that ho was well satisfied at every one of tho stages in his progress , for he immediately went forward until he was a Knight Templar . His eulogies on that Order on tho night of his creation wore calculated to convoy a strong impression that he liked Masonry " from turret to foundation stono . " In point of fact , he stated that

to be the case then and there , and it was only after a lapso of two or threo years that he found that ho did not liko Masonry . It may be thought strange that it should require so long a period for him to discover tho bad points in Masonry , bnt so it was . To an average mind it wonld seem that he could havo discovered " the cat in the meal " before he had taken thirteen degrees , but , according to his own

assertion , such was tho fact . Ho actually took all the degrees in tho Lodge , Chapter , Council , and Comtnaudery , and still had not thou found out that ho did not like Masonry . There is still another fact in connection with this caso that we must not forget to put on record . Tho earliest period , now rccol . looted by the brethren , at which this member expressed that he did

nob like Masonry was just after an election in which ho had been a candidate and defeated . Ho was heard to assert , when in company with brethren , that Masonry was good for nothing unless it would assist a brother in such an exigency as that , and he soundly rated those who had not voted for him . This fact presents an inseparable obstacle to our classifying this man , who did not like Masonry , with

Blanchard and tho 1 ' opo , because they uniformly insist , I believe , that Masons do vote for each other against all comers , while he strenuously insists that they ought so to vote but will not . As wo do not desire to injure the opposition , wo refuse to put together iu the same class elements so incongruous . It was noticed , by the strict attendants , on tho meetings of the

Lodgo that our member was present but seldom . This was the winter following the disastrous election . Hence it was not surprising to them that he should announce that he did not like Masonry . And as they became more intimately acquainted with him somo of them wondered why he ever liked Masonry , and what induced him to join tho Fraternity at all .

In the spring onr man , who had faintly avowed that ho did not liko "Masonry , opened a dry grocery store in the villngo in which he lived . This fact precludes us utterly from classing him with tho two distinguished men named above who do not liko Masonry , for neither of them , so far as wo can learn , has ever run a grocery , wet or drv . But tho fact of the opening of this grocery could not well be omitted

from a history of the case , because it is one of the horns of tho dilemma on which the man , who did not liko Masonry , impaled tho Lodge . Trade opened rather brisk in the afore-mentioued dry grocery , ain ' t the proprietor thereof congratulated himself ou tho prospect that ho should soon acquire an abundance of shekels , and that his brethren

of tho Lodge were fast becoming liberal contributors . Ho congratulated himself that he had found tho true use of Masonry , anil that henceforth he would he able to make it pay ; whereas , heretofore , to use his own phrase , " it had not paid him tho first nickel . " Matters passed smoothly enough through tho spring with our grocery mau , but ou tho commencement of the summer there was ; i

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1876-01-22, Page 5” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 26 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_22011876/page/5/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
TOADIES AND OTHERS Article 1
MASONIC PORTRAITS (No. 12.) THE SOLDIER. Article 2
SPECULATIONS ON THE PYRAMIDS. Article 3
MASONRY AND MAGIC. Article 3
MASONRY AND ANCIENT MYSTERIES. Article 4
DID NOT LIKE MASONRY. Article 5
ALEXANDRA LODGE, No. 1511, HORNSEA. Article 6
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
OUR WEEKLY BUDGET. Article 8
INSTALLATION OF H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES. Article 10
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 11
THE ANTIQUITY OF FREEMASONRY. Article 11
MASONIC BALL AT THE TOWN HALL, LIVERPOOL. Article 11
RED CROSS OF ROME AND CONSTANTINE. Article 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 11
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 12
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

5 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

5 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

13 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

17 Articles
Page 5

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonry And Ancient Mysteries.

Egyptians , and regarded as gods those skilful adventurers , who communicated to them the arts and sciences of their native land . In this manner were sown , in Greece , those seeds of improvement which , in after ages , exalted that country to such pre-eminence among nations .

About 1500 B . C . the Eleusinian mysteries were instituted , in honour of Ceres ; about the same time tho Panathena were instituted , in honor of Minerva , and tho Dionysian mysteries , in honour of Bacchus , who invented theatres and instructed the Greeks in many useful arts , but especially in the culture of tho vine .

That tho Eleusinian and Dionysian mysteries were ultimately connected with the progress of tho arts and sciences is manifest , from tho very end for which they were formed , and that they were modelled upon the mysteries of Isis and Osiris , celebrated in Egypt , is probable

from tho similarity of their origin ; we must , therefore , naturally conclude that the Dionysia and mysteries of Eleusis were societies of Freemasons tinctured with the doctrines of the Egyptian mythology . The striking

similarity among the external forms of those several associations , and the still more striking similarity of the objects they had in view , aro strong proofs that they were only different streams issuing from a common source .

Those who were initiated in tho Eleusinian mysteries were bound , by the most awful engagements , to conceal the instructions they received and the ceremonies that were performed ; significant w ords were communicated to tho members , Grand Officers presided over their assemblies , and the candidates advanced from one decree to another till

they received all the lessons of wisdom and virtue which the priests could impart . But besides the circumstances of resemblance , there are two facts transmitted to us by ancient authors which have an astonishing similarity to the ceremonies of the third

degree of Freemasonry ; the sacrifices , purifications , hymns and dances , which were necessary in the festival of Ceres , have indeed no place in the society of Freemasons , but these points of dissimilarity , instead of weakening , rather

strengthen our opinion . It cannot be expected that in the reign of Pol y theisia just sentiments of the deity should be entertained , and much less that the adherents of Christianity should bend their knees to the pods of the heathens . The

ancients worshipped those beings who conferred on them the most signal benefits , with sacrifices , and other tokens of their humility and gratitude ; but when revelations concerning the Divine Beinp ; had disclosed to man more amiable sentiments , the Society of Freemasons banished

from their mysteries these useless rites with which the anciont brethren of the Order attempted to appease and requite their deities , aud modelled their ceremonies upon this foundation , that there is but one God , who mnst be worshipped in spirit and in truth .

The opinions , therefore , of Freemasons that their Order existed and flourished at the building of Solomon ' s Temple is by no means so pregnant with absurdity as some men would wish us to believe . We have already shewn , from authentic sources of information , that the mysteries of Ceres

and Bacchus were instituted about 400 years before the reign of Solomon , and there are strong reasons for believing that even the associations of the Dionysian architects existed before the building of tho Temple , It was not J indeed till about 300 years B . C . that they were incorporated

at Tiers under the Kings of Pergamus , but it is universall y allowed that they arose long before the settlement in Ionia , and , what is more to our purpose , that they also existed in the land of Judea ; moreover , it is observed by Dr . Robinson , that they came from Persia into Syria along with that style

of architecture which is called Grecian ; and since we are informed b y Josephus that that species of architecture was used at the erection of the Temple , we are authorised to infer not only that the Dionysiacs existed before the reign of Solomon , but that they assisted this monarch in building

that magnificent fabric which he reared to the God of Israel . Nothing , indeed , can be more simple and consistent than the creed of the fraternity concerning the state of the Order at this period . The vicinity of Jerusalem to Egypt , the connections of Solomon with the Royal Family of that

Kingdom , the progress of the Egyptians in architectural science , thoir attachment to mysteries and hieroglyphic symbols , and the probability of their being employed by

the King of Israel , are additional considerations which corroborate the sentiments of Freemasons , and absolve them from the charges of credulity and pride with which they havo been so frequently branded . j

Did Not Like Masonry.

DID NOT LIKE MASONRY .

BY WM . EOUNSEVILLE . I ONCE knew a man who did not like Masonry . That is by nomeans ^ singular , for it has been clearly ascertained that besides Blanchard and tho Pope , there aro several persons in tho world who should bo recorded in the sanio category . But in this particular case there wore somo incidental circumstances which would servo to separate it from those of tho distinguished individuals wo havo named , if not from tho whole remaining list of dislikes of tho

venerablo Institution . In tho first place this man of whom I write was a member of tho Masonic body . I do not cull him a Mason , because I have an abiding faith that all true Masons liko Masonry , and tho fact that ho did not like the Institution is proof as strong as Holy Writ , to my judgment , that ho was not a Mason . However , that may be , he had become

ono of tho Fraternity in tho regular way—had been proposed , ballotted for , elected , initiated , passed , raised , etc ., by tho usual methods , and still he did not like Masonry . This is ono of tho singular and noteworthy facts connected with this case , becauso a great majority , if not nearly all of those who thus proceed , liko tho old Institution and speak in its praise . That this member did not , after thus

progressing , proves him an exception to tho general rule . Most persons liko it , and do not scruple to avow tho fact whenever an opportunity offers , others , few in number , perhaps , say nothing about it , whilo this ono talked against it . Another singular fact connected with , this case , and which removes tho individual from the possibility of a classification with tho two

distinguished gentlemen abovo mentioned , is that ho was made acquainted with the " true inwardness" of tho Institution ; had sat in Lodge and Chapter as a member for a space of two years , and consequently might have beon expected to know whereof ho affirmed , and to have been ablo to give a reason for tho faith that was in him . The gentlemen abovo named had not those advantages , having

neglected to avail themselves of tho privilege or entering the door always opened to the worthy . It has been stated , it is trne , that tho Pope was a Mason before ho becamo a Cardinal , and that ho has lately beon expelled from his Lodge for un-Masonic conduct , but it is preferred to regard the tale as an idlo rumour , and henco our man who did not liko Masonry must not be classed with tho Pope or the

Presideut . I mention another singular fact that exists in this case ; tho mau who did not find that such was tho caso when he took the first degree . On the contrary , ho liked that well . He did not find his dislike at the second degree ; nor at the third degree , nor at the fourth , nor at the fifth , nor at tho sixth , neither did ho find his cause for dislike to

Masonry when ho was inducted into tho seventh degree . It is allowable to say that ho was well satisfied at every one of tho stages in his progress , for he immediately went forward until he was a Knight Templar . His eulogies on that Order on tho night of his creation wore calculated to convoy a strong impression that he liked Masonry " from turret to foundation stono . " In point of fact , he stated that

to be the case then and there , and it was only after a lapso of two or threo years that he found that ho did not liko Masonry . It may be thought strange that it should require so long a period for him to discover tho bad points in Masonry , bnt so it was . To an average mind it wonld seem that he could havo discovered " the cat in the meal " before he had taken thirteen degrees , but , according to his own

assertion , such was tho fact . Ho actually took all the degrees in tho Lodge , Chapter , Council , and Comtnaudery , and still had not thou found out that ho did not like Masonry . There is still another fact in connection with this caso that we must not forget to put on record . Tho earliest period , now rccol . looted by the brethren , at which this member expressed that he did

nob like Masonry was just after an election in which ho had been a candidate and defeated . Ho was heard to assert , when in company with brethren , that Masonry was good for nothing unless it would assist a brother in such an exigency as that , and he soundly rated those who had not voted for him . This fact presents an inseparable obstacle to our classifying this man , who did not like Masonry , with

Blanchard and tho 1 ' opo , because they uniformly insist , I believe , that Masons do vote for each other against all comers , while he strenuously insists that they ought so to vote but will not . As wo do not desire to injure the opposition , wo refuse to put together iu the same class elements so incongruous . It was noticed , by the strict attendants , on tho meetings of the

Lodgo that our member was present but seldom . This was the winter following the disastrous election . Hence it was not surprising to them that he should announce that he did not like Masonry . And as they became more intimately acquainted with him somo of them wondered why he ever liked Masonry , and what induced him to join tho Fraternity at all .

In the spring onr man , who had faintly avowed that ho did not liko "Masonry , opened a dry grocery store in the villngo in which he lived . This fact precludes us utterly from classing him with tho two distinguished men named above who do not liko Masonry , for neither of them , so far as wo can learn , has ever run a grocery , wet or drv . But tho fact of the opening of this grocery could not well be omitted

from a history of the case , because it is one of the horns of tho dilemma on which the man , who did not liko Masonry , impaled tho Lodge . Trade opened rather brisk in the afore-mentioued dry grocery , ain ' t the proprietor thereof congratulated himself ou tho prospect that ho should soon acquire an abundance of shekels , and that his brethren

of tho Lodge were fast becoming liberal contributors . Ho congratulated himself that he had found tho true use of Masonry , anil that henceforth he would he able to make it pay ; whereas , heretofore , to use his own phrase , " it had not paid him tho first nickel . " Matters passed smoothly enough through tho spring with our grocery mau , but ou tho commencement of the summer there was ; i

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 4
  • You're on page5
  • 6
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy