Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • April 1, 1796
  • Page 79
  • TRIAL OF VICE-ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, April 1, 1796: Page 79

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, April 1, 1796
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article TRIAL OF VICE-ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS. Page 1 of 4 →
Page 79

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Trial Of Vice-Admiral Cornwallis.

TRIAL OF VICE-ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS .

PORTSMOUTH , April 9 . Yesterday the COURT MARTIAL for the Trial of VICE ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS met on Board the O RION , of 74 guns , laying in our Harbour . ' The members were as follows : ADMIRAL EARL HOWE , President . Admirals Sit Peter Parker Admirals H . Harvey . Lord Bridport R . R . Bligh G . Vandeput C . M . Pole Sir A . Gardner . Captains E . E . ^ Mugent J . Colpbys C . P . Hamilton ' Sir R . Curtis E . Dod .

Judge Advocate , SIR G . JACKSON , Bart . The charges stated , that the Admiral , after having proceeded part of the way to the West Indies , did return contrary to the orders he had received ; that instead of shifting his flag , as he ought when the Royal Sovereign had been disabled , he gave the command of the convoy to another Officer ; and that after his return , he disobeyed a second order , by nofhoisting his flag on board the Astrea frigate , and proceeding to the West Indies . As the charges originated with the Admiralty , a prosecutor did not appear . ' ¦ in

To substantiate these Charges , the order given to Admiral Cornwallis , February , to proceed in the Royal Sovereign , to the West Indies , was read , as was the Admiral ' s letter , mentioning his return and the cause of it . The order of the Board , to proceed in the Astrea , was then read , with the Admiral's reply ; in which hestated his precarious health , which would be destroyed if he went out in a frigate , and requesting permission of the ' Board to . wait the repair of the Royal Sovereign . ' Sir Charles Cotton proved the delivery of the first order At seaMrTebbet

. . , master ship builder , of . Portsmouth Yard , ' proved his having examined thedamages the Royal Sovereign had received , which could not be repaired either at sea or in the West Indies , and which made it requisite she should return to Dock . .. The evidence for the prosecution being closed , Admiral Cornwallis was called upon for his defence ; when having a ' weakness-in his eyes , . he obtained leave for Mr . Erskine to read a paper , which stated , -that his health , injured by a long

and laborious life of service , would have justified his having declined the situation offered to him " , which he understood was to act under Sir John Laforey ; that under this impression , his principal solicitude was for . the safety and expedition of the convoy- ; that the Royal Sovereign , being compelled . to return , and part of the ships that sailed with him having been separated from the others , he was prevented shifting his flag on boar A any of those others , by a knowledge that , they were not intended to be a part of his squadron , but that each had distinct and secret orders ; that had the good of the service required him to interfere with these secret hesitated to have done h at the of

orders , he should not have so , thoug certainty that Court Martial to which he knew the act would make him liable ; that he trusted it would be believed , his health , or his life , could not , i ' n his estimation , weigh with the good of the service ; but that it would have been unworthy the honest pride'of a British seaman to have given up his real duty , for the . appearance of an ostentatious and fruitless zeal ; that in the state of his health , he should have been inexcusable in giving up Officers , in whom he knew he in every situation could relyfor othersof whom he was wholly ignorantbut that had he been so

incli-, , ; ned , -not one of the ships into which he could have gone , was provided , or in any respect ' fit , to go to the West Indies ; that the command he had accepted was not compulsory ; his health would have justified its refusal , had he disliked it ; but the reverse was the cse ; and it would be absurd to impute 16 him a deliberate purpose to sacrifice the credit acquired by a long and laborious life ; that it was one thing io decide under the difficulty and embarrassment Of immediate and pres-

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1796-04-01, Page 79” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 30 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01041796/page/79/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
LONDON: Article 2
TO READERS, CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 3
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE: AND CABINET OF UNIVERSAL LITERATURE. Article 5
MOON-LIGHT. Article 12
AN ADDRESS TO THE BRETHREN OF ST. JOHN'S LODGE, NO. 534, LAHCASTER. Article 14
EXTRACTS FROM THE MEMOIRS OF THE LIFE AND WRITINGS OF EDWARD GIBBON, ESQ. Article 17
SKETCHES OF THE MANNERS AND CUSTOMS OF THE NORTH-AMERICAN INDIANS. Article 22
CHARACTERS OF CHILLINGWORTH AND BAYLE. Article 26
SCENE IN THE ALPS. Article 28
A TOUR THROUGH LONDON, Article 29
THE STAGE. Article 35
ON THE RETURN OF SPRING. Article 39
TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE. Article 41
THE VANITY OF FAME. Article 42
ANECDOTES. Article 44
SINGULAR INSTANCES OF PUSILLANIMITY Article 46
SINGULAR INSTANCE OF GENEROSITY. Article 47
BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Article 48
HOUSE OF COMMONS. Article 49
REVIEW OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 54
LIST OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 59
POETRY. Article 60
THE MASON,S PRAYER. Article 61
ELEGY. Article 62
TO THE MOON. Article 63
PROLOGUE TO VORTIGERN. Article 64
EPILOGUE TO THE SAME. Article 65
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 66
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 69
FROM THE LONDON GAZETTES. Article 70
STATE PAPERS. Article 75
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 77
HOME NEWS. Article 78
TRIAL OF VICE-ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS. Article 79
PROMOTIONS. Article 82
Untitled Article 82
OBITUARY. Article 83
LIST OF BANKRUPTS. Article 85
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

0 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

0 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

2 Articles
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

2 Articles
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

2 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

2 Articles
Page 62

Page 62

2 Articles
Page 63

Page 63

1 Article
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

2 Articles
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 74

Page 74

1 Article
Page 75

Page 75

2 Articles
Page 76

Page 76

1 Article
Page 77

Page 77

1 Article
Page 78

Page 78

1 Article
Page 79

Page 79

1 Article
Page 80

Page 80

1 Article
Page 81

Page 81

1 Article
Page 82

Page 82

3 Articles
Page 83

Page 83

1 Article
Page 84

Page 84

1 Article
Page 85

Page 85

1 Article
Page 79

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Trial Of Vice-Admiral Cornwallis.

TRIAL OF VICE-ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS .

PORTSMOUTH , April 9 . Yesterday the COURT MARTIAL for the Trial of VICE ADMIRAL CORNWALLIS met on Board the O RION , of 74 guns , laying in our Harbour . ' The members were as follows : ADMIRAL EARL HOWE , President . Admirals Sit Peter Parker Admirals H . Harvey . Lord Bridport R . R . Bligh G . Vandeput C . M . Pole Sir A . Gardner . Captains E . E . ^ Mugent J . Colpbys C . P . Hamilton ' Sir R . Curtis E . Dod .

Judge Advocate , SIR G . JACKSON , Bart . The charges stated , that the Admiral , after having proceeded part of the way to the West Indies , did return contrary to the orders he had received ; that instead of shifting his flag , as he ought when the Royal Sovereign had been disabled , he gave the command of the convoy to another Officer ; and that after his return , he disobeyed a second order , by nofhoisting his flag on board the Astrea frigate , and proceeding to the West Indies . As the charges originated with the Admiralty , a prosecutor did not appear . ' ¦ in

To substantiate these Charges , the order given to Admiral Cornwallis , February , to proceed in the Royal Sovereign , to the West Indies , was read , as was the Admiral ' s letter , mentioning his return and the cause of it . The order of the Board , to proceed in the Astrea , was then read , with the Admiral's reply ; in which hestated his precarious health , which would be destroyed if he went out in a frigate , and requesting permission of the ' Board to . wait the repair of the Royal Sovereign . ' Sir Charles Cotton proved the delivery of the first order At seaMrTebbet

. . , master ship builder , of . Portsmouth Yard , ' proved his having examined thedamages the Royal Sovereign had received , which could not be repaired either at sea or in the West Indies , and which made it requisite she should return to Dock . .. The evidence for the prosecution being closed , Admiral Cornwallis was called upon for his defence ; when having a ' weakness-in his eyes , . he obtained leave for Mr . Erskine to read a paper , which stated , -that his health , injured by a long

and laborious life of service , would have justified his having declined the situation offered to him " , which he understood was to act under Sir John Laforey ; that under this impression , his principal solicitude was for . the safety and expedition of the convoy- ; that the Royal Sovereign , being compelled . to return , and part of the ships that sailed with him having been separated from the others , he was prevented shifting his flag on boar A any of those others , by a knowledge that , they were not intended to be a part of his squadron , but that each had distinct and secret orders ; that had the good of the service required him to interfere with these secret hesitated to have done h at the of

orders , he should not have so , thoug certainty that Court Martial to which he knew the act would make him liable ; that he trusted it would be believed , his health , or his life , could not , i ' n his estimation , weigh with the good of the service ; but that it would have been unworthy the honest pride'of a British seaman to have given up his real duty , for the . appearance of an ostentatious and fruitless zeal ; that in the state of his health , he should have been inexcusable in giving up Officers , in whom he knew he in every situation could relyfor othersof whom he was wholly ignorantbut that had he been so

incli-, , ; ned , -not one of the ships into which he could have gone , was provided , or in any respect ' fit , to go to the West Indies ; that the command he had accepted was not compulsory ; his health would have justified its refusal , had he disliked it ; but the reverse was the cse ; and it would be absurd to impute 16 him a deliberate purpose to sacrifice the credit acquired by a long and laborious life ; that it was one thing io decide under the difficulty and embarrassment Of immediate and pres-

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 78
  • You're on page79
  • 80
  • 85
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy