Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • May 1, 1795
  • Page 51
  • PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1795: Page 51

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1795
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. ← Page 2 of 9 →
Page 51

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

The House , in a Committee upon the Hair Powder Bill , passed the claus _ Subjecting masters of families to a penalty of tol . for concealing the names elf persons in . their houses , who should wear powder without a licence . The Duke of Norfolk opposed this clause , as subjecting house-keepers to became informers against their families . The Earl of Moira disapproved the principle of the Bill , on account of its tendency to create invidious distinctions , the evil of which might be severely felt .

Lord Syiiuy defended the clause ; and , On a division , there appeared for it ii , against it 6 . 24 . Previous to proceeding upon the Order of the Day , Lord FitzaUliaat got tip ; he said he did hot see how it was possible for him to . taf . e his seat sifeiiiiy among them , after what had 30 recently passed , with respect to the situation he had been appointed to , and so suddenly recalled from , in the sister kingdom . He believed no one Would deny but that some great error had been committed ,

and that there must be blame somewhere ; his Majesty ' s Ministers had publicly denied , during his absence , that the blame rested with them ; he must therefore trust to their candour for the appointment of an early day , when his conduct should be investigated , and that he might have an opportunity of justifying . himself from the odiuni which had been cast upon his character . Lord' Gre ' niillc felt-himself exceedingly concerned that the noble Lord should have introduced this subject ; and if he unfortunately continued of the same opinionthe time and mode of bringing it forward must entirely rest with

him-, self . For his own part * he did not see any investigation necessary . His Majesty surely possessed the right of recal ; nor did that recal , in his opinion , cast any blame upon the person ; arid it would be extremely improper to call upon his Majesty ' s Ministers to explain their reasons for giving that advice . In the present instance , their Lordships must recollect , that nothing had been said ill that House ( and he had no right to notice what might have been said elsewhere )

which tended , to cast any blame upon the noble Earl ; Ministers had only spoke as far as related to themselves . ¦ ' Lord Fitzailliam contended there was a strong necessity for going into the enquiry ; the country at large was interested in it . It was not the recal merely that he complained of , but the time and suddenness with which it had been done ; their Lordships should consider , it was in the middle of a Sessions , when the most important questions ever brought forward in that kingdom were under discussion , when the utmost exertions were necessary to preserve order , and to

maintain a good understanding between the two kingdoms . Was it possible that any man could be suddenly recalled at such a moment , without creating the suspicion of misconduct ? It had gone further in this instance ; for he knew the fact , that at the very moment it was industriously circulated here , that lid , by his conduct , Would stir up disturbance and confusion in that country . Knowing this to be the fart , and knowing with what justice he could justify himself , was it possible that he should rest satisfied under the stigma ? Ministers had thrown down the gauntlet , end he trusied they would now give him an oppai'

-Umrty to accept the challenge . ' Lord Moira agreed with the noble Secretary of State , that a Viceroy being , recalled was . no disgrace , ' and that Minsters ought hot to be called upon to explain their reasons for giving advice to his Majesty ; but that was only in common eases , and not such us that of which the noble Ear ! complained . It would be toochildish for their Lordships to assume an ignorance , in their legislative capacities , of what ihcy were perfectly acquainted ivilh as individuals . Slime , aiid rery great blame , was certainly imputable somewhere ; if to the noble Earl 11

, 0 . tght to be brought home £ 0 him ; at least it ought to be traced to its reaJ source , that the odium might be properly applied . The Duke of Norfolk thought it a matter of the grea ' est importance to tbe country , and ought to be enquired into . Ministers and the noble Earl were narti . s concerned ; and therefore , injustice , the House ought to take tip the

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1795-05-01, Page 51” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 31 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01051795/page/51/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
LONDON : Article 1
TO OUR READERS, CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 2
PRICES OF BINDING PER VOLUME. Article 2
Untitled Article 3
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE, OR GENERAL AND COMPLETE LIBRARY. Article 4
THE STAGE. Article 6
SKETCH OF THE CHARACTER OF THE LATE JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ. Article 8
BRIEF HISTORY OF THE RELIGIOUS AND MILITARY ORDER OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS OF ST. JOHN OF JERUSALEM. Article 10
ANECDOTE OF THE LATE SIR RICHARD ARKWRIGHT. Article 19
ANTICIPATION. Article 20
EXTRACT FROM THE WILL OF THE LATE MR. BOWYER, PRINTER, OF LONDON. Article 22
CURIOUS PARTICULARS RESPECTING THE LAST KING OF CORSICA. Article 23
SPECIMEN OF AN. INTENDED HISTORY OF ENGLAND. Article 26
THE FREEMASON. Article 30
STORY OF URBAIN GRANDIER. Article 33
BASEM; OR, THE BLACKSMITH. AN ORIENTAL APOLOGUE. Article 39
ACCOUNT AND DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAPEL OF ROSLIN, &c. Article 46
PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. Article 50
POETRY. Article 59
PRESENTED TO A YOUNG LADY, Article 61
EPITAPH. Article 61
Untitled Article 62
AN ELEGY, Article 62
MUTUAL OBLIGATION. Article 63
TO THE STORKS AT AMSTERDAM. Article 63
STRICTURES ON PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 64
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 68
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 69
BANKRUPTS. Article 73
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

2 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

2 Articles
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

2 Articles
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

2 Articles
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

2 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

2 Articles
Page 62

Page 62

2 Articles
Page 63

Page 63

3 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

2 Articles
Page 69

Page 69

2 Articles
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

2 Articles
Page 51

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

The House , in a Committee upon the Hair Powder Bill , passed the claus _ Subjecting masters of families to a penalty of tol . for concealing the names elf persons in . their houses , who should wear powder without a licence . The Duke of Norfolk opposed this clause , as subjecting house-keepers to became informers against their families . The Earl of Moira disapproved the principle of the Bill , on account of its tendency to create invidious distinctions , the evil of which might be severely felt .

Lord Syiiuy defended the clause ; and , On a division , there appeared for it ii , against it 6 . 24 . Previous to proceeding upon the Order of the Day , Lord FitzaUliaat got tip ; he said he did hot see how it was possible for him to . taf . e his seat sifeiiiiy among them , after what had 30 recently passed , with respect to the situation he had been appointed to , and so suddenly recalled from , in the sister kingdom . He believed no one Would deny but that some great error had been committed ,

and that there must be blame somewhere ; his Majesty ' s Ministers had publicly denied , during his absence , that the blame rested with them ; he must therefore trust to their candour for the appointment of an early day , when his conduct should be investigated , and that he might have an opportunity of justifying . himself from the odiuni which had been cast upon his character . Lord' Gre ' niillc felt-himself exceedingly concerned that the noble Lord should have introduced this subject ; and if he unfortunately continued of the same opinionthe time and mode of bringing it forward must entirely rest with

him-, self . For his own part * he did not see any investigation necessary . His Majesty surely possessed the right of recal ; nor did that recal , in his opinion , cast any blame upon the person ; arid it would be extremely improper to call upon his Majesty ' s Ministers to explain their reasons for giving that advice . In the present instance , their Lordships must recollect , that nothing had been said ill that House ( and he had no right to notice what might have been said elsewhere )

which tended , to cast any blame upon the noble Earl ; Ministers had only spoke as far as related to themselves . ¦ ' Lord Fitzailliam contended there was a strong necessity for going into the enquiry ; the country at large was interested in it . It was not the recal merely that he complained of , but the time and suddenness with which it had been done ; their Lordships should consider , it was in the middle of a Sessions , when the most important questions ever brought forward in that kingdom were under discussion , when the utmost exertions were necessary to preserve order , and to

maintain a good understanding between the two kingdoms . Was it possible that any man could be suddenly recalled at such a moment , without creating the suspicion of misconduct ? It had gone further in this instance ; for he knew the fact , that at the very moment it was industriously circulated here , that lid , by his conduct , Would stir up disturbance and confusion in that country . Knowing this to be the fart , and knowing with what justice he could justify himself , was it possible that he should rest satisfied under the stigma ? Ministers had thrown down the gauntlet , end he trusied they would now give him an oppai'

-Umrty to accept the challenge . ' Lord Moira agreed with the noble Secretary of State , that a Viceroy being , recalled was . no disgrace , ' and that Minsters ought hot to be called upon to explain their reasons for giving advice to his Majesty ; but that was only in common eases , and not such us that of which the noble Ear ! complained . It would be toochildish for their Lordships to assume an ignorance , in their legislative capacities , of what ihcy were perfectly acquainted ivilh as individuals . Slime , aiid rery great blame , was certainly imputable somewhere ; if to the noble Earl 11

, 0 . tght to be brought home £ 0 him ; at least it ought to be traced to its reaJ source , that the odium might be properly applied . The Duke of Norfolk thought it a matter of the grea ' est importance to tbe country , and ought to be enquired into . Ministers and the noble Earl were narti . s concerned ; and therefore , injustice , the House ought to take tip the

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 50
  • You're on page51
  • 52
  • 73
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy