Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • May 1, 1796
  • Page 53
  • HOUSE OF COMMONS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1796: Page 53

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1796
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article HOUSE OF COMMONS. ← Page 4 of 7 →
Page 53

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

House Of Commons.

Mr . C . LONG asked leave to introduce a Bill for the Prevention of Landing Goods without the inspection of the proper Officers , & c . —Granted . The Report of the Committee with respect to allowing ioool . to the Clerks of the Secretary of State's Office , approving such allowance was read , and , after some debate , agreed to . The Reports of several Committees read , and agreed to . " " The Mackarel Fishery Bill read a second time . The House in a Committee voted certain allowances to Subaltern Militia Officers

. Several private Bills read a third time , and passed . WAYS AND MEANS , AND NEW DOG TAX . The House having resolved itself into a Committee of Ways and Means , Mr . PITT proposed a tax of 53 . each for every Hound , Pointer , Greyhound , Setting-Dog or Spaniel , kept by any person whatever . —Also that persons living in assessed houses pay 3 s . for one dogthey keep . ( not of the above description ! and 5 s . for every other , annually . . Mr . DENT objected strongly to the exemption of unassessed houses ,-and this

greatly apprehended measure would rather increase the evil he wished to remedy than otherwise , since it would encourage the Poor in keeping dogs , and tempt the rich to quarter their dogs among their poor tenants , in order to evade the tax . Mr . JOLLIFE opposed the exemption , from the principle , that the luxuries of the Poor ought to be taxed , as well as those of the Rich . Mr . PITT could not admit that the luxuries of the Poor ought to be placed on a par with those of the Rich . As to evasions of the Richthese he thought might

, be provided against in the progress of the Bill . He thought there was no danger of Ladies putting out their Lap-Dogs , and if Gentlemen put out their Sporting-Dogs , they would pay the same at a poor man ' s house as at their own . . C . BERKELEY proposed to include Lurchers and Terriers , and to exempt Puppies Mr . COUKTENAY complimented the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the adoption of this measure , and ridiculed the fears of Mr . Dent , particularly as to the danger of the Hydrophobia ; it reminded him of the celebrated Baron Munchausen ° in whose absencemaddog into his wardrobe '

. a - got , and having bit his fur-cloak , this infected all the other articles of his dress , and produced a commotion beyond his power to quiet 1 [ vin universal laugh "} . Mr . DENT thought the Hon . Gentleman a very fit rival of the Baron ; and that with the assistance of another Gentleman ( Mr . Sheridan ) Tor his Merry-Andrew he might exhibit very successfully at Bartholomew-Fair . ' Mr . COURTENAY retorted , that if he and the Hon . Gentleman were reduced to the necessity of making such an experiment , he thought the one might live while the other starved .

After some farther conversation the Committee divided on Mr . Pitt ' s Motion— - Ayes 53—Noes 29 . QUAKERS .- —Serjeant Adair brought in the Bill for the Relief of Quakers mentioned in yesterday's Debate . ' Mr . Hawkins BROWNE feared that some persons might improperly assume the character of Quakers . . Mr . ADAIR thought the inconvenience under which the Quakers would still labour , sufficiently obviated this ; but had no objection to ) cautionary hints that

an Gentlemen might suggest . The Bill was ordered to be printed , and read a second time on Monday next Thursday 28 . Several Inclosure Bills reported , ancl ordered to be engrossed - ' — Agreed to the Lord ' s Amendments in that of Old Malton . The Succession to Estates Bill went through the Committee , and was ordered to be primed . The Resolutions of the Committee of Ways and Means reportedand

, agreed to lhe Resolutions of the Committee on the Dog Tax reported , and asrreed to - ns were those of the Committee on the Hat Duty . ' CURATE ' RELIEF BILL . — -Mr . JODRELL observed , that being a Money Bill * * ought to have originated with the Commons , and not the Lords . VOL . vi , y

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1796-05-01, Page 53” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01051796/page/53/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
Untitled Article 3
LONDON: Article 3
TO READERS, CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 4
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE. FOR MAY 1796. PRESENT STATE OF FREEMASONRY IN SCOTLAND. Article 5
Untitled Article 10
COPY OF A LETTER. FROM THE REV. DR. STURGES, Article 13
THE FOLLY OF NOBLEMEN AND GENTLEMEN PAYING THEIR DEBTS, Article 16
SKETCHES OF THE MANNERS AND CUSTOMS OF THE NORTH-AMERICAN INDIANS. Article 19
DISCIPLINE. Article 24
EXTRACTS FROM THE MEMOIRS OF THE LIFE AND WRITINGS OF EDWARD GIBBON, ESQ. Article 25
ON THE MASONIC JEWELS. Article 31
ON PRESENCE OF MIND. Article 33
THE DOG-TAX; A FRAGMENT. Article 35
CIVIC ANECDOTE. Article 36
EXCERPTA ET COLLECTANEA. Article 37
CLOWNISH SIMPLICITY. Article 38
BON MOT OF THE DEVIL. Article 38
ORIGINALITY IN DR. ROBERTSON AND MR. GIBBON. Article 39
SOME ANECDOTES OF HENRY PRINCE OF WALES, Article 40
SOME PARTICULARS NOT GENERALLY KNOWN RESPECTING MONSIEUR BAILLY. Article 41
REVIEW OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 43
LIST OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 48
BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Article 49
HOUSE OF COMMONS. Article 50
THE FINE ARTS. Article 57
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 59
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 61
ANNIVERSARY OF THE GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND. Article 63
POETRY. Article 66
ELEGY, TO THE MEMORY OF STEPHEN STORACE , THE COMPOSER. Article 67
A NEW OCCASIONAL LYRIC, MASONIC EULOGIVM, Article 68
LINES TO DAPHNE, Article 68
Untitled Article 69
TO DELIA. Article 70
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 71
HOME NEWS. Article 73
PROMOTIONS. Article 77
Untitled Article 77
OBITUARY. Article 78
LIST OF BANKRUPTS. Article 80
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

2 Articles
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

2 Articles
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

2 Articles
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

2 Articles
Page 36

Page 36

2 Articles
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

3 Articles
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

2 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

2 Articles
Page 68

Page 68

2 Articles
Page 69

Page 69

2 Articles
Page 70

Page 70

2 Articles
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

2 Articles
Page 74

Page 74

1 Article
Page 75

Page 75

1 Article
Page 76

Page 76

1 Article
Page 77

Page 77

2 Articles
Page 78

Page 78

1 Article
Page 79

Page 79

1 Article
Page 80

Page 80

1 Article
Page 81

Page 81

0 Articles
Page 53

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

House Of Commons.

Mr . C . LONG asked leave to introduce a Bill for the Prevention of Landing Goods without the inspection of the proper Officers , & c . —Granted . The Report of the Committee with respect to allowing ioool . to the Clerks of the Secretary of State's Office , approving such allowance was read , and , after some debate , agreed to . The Reports of several Committees read , and agreed to . " " The Mackarel Fishery Bill read a second time . The House in a Committee voted certain allowances to Subaltern Militia Officers

. Several private Bills read a third time , and passed . WAYS AND MEANS , AND NEW DOG TAX . The House having resolved itself into a Committee of Ways and Means , Mr . PITT proposed a tax of 53 . each for every Hound , Pointer , Greyhound , Setting-Dog or Spaniel , kept by any person whatever . —Also that persons living in assessed houses pay 3 s . for one dogthey keep . ( not of the above description ! and 5 s . for every other , annually . . Mr . DENT objected strongly to the exemption of unassessed houses ,-and this

greatly apprehended measure would rather increase the evil he wished to remedy than otherwise , since it would encourage the Poor in keeping dogs , and tempt the rich to quarter their dogs among their poor tenants , in order to evade the tax . Mr . JOLLIFE opposed the exemption , from the principle , that the luxuries of the Poor ought to be taxed , as well as those of the Rich . Mr . PITT could not admit that the luxuries of the Poor ought to be placed on a par with those of the Rich . As to evasions of the Richthese he thought might

, be provided against in the progress of the Bill . He thought there was no danger of Ladies putting out their Lap-Dogs , and if Gentlemen put out their Sporting-Dogs , they would pay the same at a poor man ' s house as at their own . . C . BERKELEY proposed to include Lurchers and Terriers , and to exempt Puppies Mr . COUKTENAY complimented the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the adoption of this measure , and ridiculed the fears of Mr . Dent , particularly as to the danger of the Hydrophobia ; it reminded him of the celebrated Baron Munchausen ° in whose absencemaddog into his wardrobe '

. a - got , and having bit his fur-cloak , this infected all the other articles of his dress , and produced a commotion beyond his power to quiet 1 [ vin universal laugh "} . Mr . DENT thought the Hon . Gentleman a very fit rival of the Baron ; and that with the assistance of another Gentleman ( Mr . Sheridan ) Tor his Merry-Andrew he might exhibit very successfully at Bartholomew-Fair . ' Mr . COURTENAY retorted , that if he and the Hon . Gentleman were reduced to the necessity of making such an experiment , he thought the one might live while the other starved .

After some farther conversation the Committee divided on Mr . Pitt ' s Motion— - Ayes 53—Noes 29 . QUAKERS .- —Serjeant Adair brought in the Bill for the Relief of Quakers mentioned in yesterday's Debate . ' Mr . Hawkins BROWNE feared that some persons might improperly assume the character of Quakers . . Mr . ADAIR thought the inconvenience under which the Quakers would still labour , sufficiently obviated this ; but had no objection to ) cautionary hints that

an Gentlemen might suggest . The Bill was ordered to be printed , and read a second time on Monday next Thursday 28 . Several Inclosure Bills reported , ancl ordered to be engrossed - ' — Agreed to the Lord ' s Amendments in that of Old Malton . The Succession to Estates Bill went through the Committee , and was ordered to be primed . The Resolutions of the Committee of Ways and Means reportedand

, agreed to lhe Resolutions of the Committee on the Dog Tax reported , and asrreed to - ns were those of the Committee on the Hat Duty . ' CURATE ' RELIEF BILL . — -Mr . JODRELL observed , that being a Money Bill * * ought to have originated with the Commons , and not the Lords . VOL . vi , y

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 52
  • You're on page53
  • 54
  • 81
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy