Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • May 1, 1798
  • Page 62
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1798: Page 62

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, May 1, 1798
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MONTHLY CHRONICLE. ← Page 6 of 16 →
Page 62

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Monthly Chronicle.

prosecutors , that the prisoners at the bar should be brought to tiial under the prejudice which had been raised in the minds of ( hose who were to try them ; and he therefore trusted the Court would co-operate in endeavouring to prevent the Jurors who had been so prejudiced from constituting a part of the Jury . He added , that itwas his duty to accompany these observations with an application personally against Mr . Young . Mr . Justice Buller -aid , it was an offence that ought not to go unpunished ; but he feared the power of the Court to punish would cease with the commission .

Mr . Young was called , but did not make his appearance . Mr . Attorney-General said , he was perfect !' . ' persuaded he should be believed by a !) present , when be stated , in ihe name of God and his country , that he had heard , with great affliction , the circumstance just mentioned ; and he had no difficulty in saying , if , upon enquiry , he should have reason to be satisfied the charge was true , he should think he deserved lo he immediately dismissed from bis office , if he hesitated one moment in using . bis power to the utmost , in order to bring that man to justice who had dared lo prejudice the minds of persons

exercising the office of" Jurors . The Atiomcy-Gvner-al then not only pledged himself to bring Mr . Young to justice , if he was guilty , but he desired the names of all the Jurors summoned from the hundred of Blackburn should be shuck out of tbe panne ! . The Clerk of the Arraigns proceeded to call the Jurors . — There were several challenges for cause on behalf of ihe prisoner ? . —Among the latter , Thomas Raikes , Esq . of Bromley , was challenged , n the oath of Mr . Folkes , w-lto . staled , that on a former occasionwhen the prisoners were in courtMr . Kaikes

en-, , quired of the deponent their names ; and upon being informed , he looked sternly and savagely at ' them , clenched his fist , and exclaimed ' damned rascals I' His eligibility was tried by two Jurors , who determined he should be rejected . The Jurv was at length formed , and consisted ot the following persons : — Charles Haskins , West Wickham , Foreman ; William Small , farmer , Shoreham ; William Cronk , fanner , Seal ; Richard Rav . farmer , Sevcnoaks ; James

Chappie , distiller , Sevenoaks ; Michael Saxby , farmer , Penshursl ; Silas Newman , farmer , Wrotham ; Isaac Tom . 'in , Esq . Wrotham ; Thomas Henham , farmer , East 1 ' eckham ; Waller Barion , farmer , East Beckham ; John Miller , Gentleman , Yalrfing ; and John Simmons , farmer , Yalding . The indictment having been briefly s'ate'd , The Attorney-General said , that in discharge of the duties of the office he held , he had been most imperiously called on to lay befori a Grand Jury of the county the charge contained in the indictment , which the Jury were now

solemnly sworn 10 try . ' The charge made by this indictment was , in the language ofthe ' law , first , that of compassing the King ' s death ; secondly , adhering to his enemies , giving them aid and comfort ; and thirdly , inviting strangers and foreigners to invade this land . With reference to each of these charges , the indictment staled various overt acts , the meaning of which he would explain . In order that persons might know the nature of a charge brought against them in courts of justice , and be prepared for their defence , the law not only required it should be imputed they were gniity of compassing the King ' s death , adhering to his

enemies , or imitifig strangers and foreigners lo invade ihe land , but it also required that the indictment should detail those facts and circumstances which proved such compassing , adhering , or inviting to invasion ; and itwas necessary that the over ! act should be proved by two witnesses . "With respect to those facts or overt acts , he would proceed to detail them with as few observations of his own as possible . On ihe 27 th of February last , three of the prisoners at the bar , namely , Quigley , Allen , and Learv , ' came from V / hitstable to the King's Head , at Margate Ouigleyunder tbe name and character of Captain Jones ; Allen in

; . the character of his servant , though he really was not so ; and Leary , the servant of O'Connor , who waited on his master . They had not been at ihe King's Head a quarter of an hour , when Mr . O'Connor , who went In- ( he name of Colonel Morris , and Binns , who assumed the name of Mr . Williams , arrived . Thev remained at the King ' s Head that evening , and part of the next morning . The ' nexi morning , while ihev were meditating the removal of their baggage , for a purpose of which there could be no doubt , they were arrested by Revet and .

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1798-05-01, Page 62” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 8 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01051798/page/62/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
LONDON: Article 1
TO CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 2
MEMOIR OF THE COUNTESS OF DERBY, Article 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE SOURCE OF THE RHINE, Article 4
WISDOM AND FOLLY. Article 7
HAWKESWORTH'S NOTES on ROBERTSON'S HISTORY OF SCOTLAND. Article 10
LETTER II. Article 12
PROCEEDINGS OF A GREAT COUNCIL OF JEWS, Article 14
COLVILLE. Article 17
THE LIFE OF XIMENES, ARCHBISHOP OF TOLEDO. Article 23
A BRIEF ENQUIRY INTO THE LEARNING OF SHAKSPEARE. Article 29
SCIENTIFIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 33
THE FREEMASONS' REPOSITORY. Article 38
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 41
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 45
POETRY. Article 47
REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Article 49
IRISH PARLIAMENT. Article 55
HOUSE OF COMMONS. Article 56
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 57
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

2 Articles
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

1 Article
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 62

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Monthly Chronicle.

prosecutors , that the prisoners at the bar should be brought to tiial under the prejudice which had been raised in the minds of ( hose who were to try them ; and he therefore trusted the Court would co-operate in endeavouring to prevent the Jurors who had been so prejudiced from constituting a part of the Jury . He added , that itwas his duty to accompany these observations with an application personally against Mr . Young . Mr . Justice Buller -aid , it was an offence that ought not to go unpunished ; but he feared the power of the Court to punish would cease with the commission .

Mr . Young was called , but did not make his appearance . Mr . Attorney-General said , he was perfect !' . ' persuaded he should be believed by a !) present , when be stated , in ihe name of God and his country , that he had heard , with great affliction , the circumstance just mentioned ; and he had no difficulty in saying , if , upon enquiry , he should have reason to be satisfied the charge was true , he should think he deserved lo he immediately dismissed from bis office , if he hesitated one moment in using . bis power to the utmost , in order to bring that man to justice who had dared lo prejudice the minds of persons

exercising the office of" Jurors . The Atiomcy-Gvner-al then not only pledged himself to bring Mr . Young to justice , if he was guilty , but he desired the names of all the Jurors summoned from the hundred of Blackburn should be shuck out of tbe panne ! . The Clerk of the Arraigns proceeded to call the Jurors . — There were several challenges for cause on behalf of ihe prisoner ? . —Among the latter , Thomas Raikes , Esq . of Bromley , was challenged , n the oath of Mr . Folkes , w-lto . staled , that on a former occasionwhen the prisoners were in courtMr . Kaikes

en-, , quired of the deponent their names ; and upon being informed , he looked sternly and savagely at ' them , clenched his fist , and exclaimed ' damned rascals I' His eligibility was tried by two Jurors , who determined he should be rejected . The Jurv was at length formed , and consisted ot the following persons : — Charles Haskins , West Wickham , Foreman ; William Small , farmer , Shoreham ; William Cronk , fanner , Seal ; Richard Rav . farmer , Sevcnoaks ; James

Chappie , distiller , Sevenoaks ; Michael Saxby , farmer , Penshursl ; Silas Newman , farmer , Wrotham ; Isaac Tom . 'in , Esq . Wrotham ; Thomas Henham , farmer , East 1 ' eckham ; Waller Barion , farmer , East Beckham ; John Miller , Gentleman , Yalrfing ; and John Simmons , farmer , Yalding . The indictment having been briefly s'ate'd , The Attorney-General said , that in discharge of the duties of the office he held , he had been most imperiously called on to lay befori a Grand Jury of the county the charge contained in the indictment , which the Jury were now

solemnly sworn 10 try . ' The charge made by this indictment was , in the language ofthe ' law , first , that of compassing the King ' s death ; secondly , adhering to his enemies , giving them aid and comfort ; and thirdly , inviting strangers and foreigners to invade this land . With reference to each of these charges , the indictment staled various overt acts , the meaning of which he would explain . In order that persons might know the nature of a charge brought against them in courts of justice , and be prepared for their defence , the law not only required it should be imputed they were gniity of compassing the King ' s death , adhering to his

enemies , or imitifig strangers and foreigners lo invade ihe land , but it also required that the indictment should detail those facts and circumstances which proved such compassing , adhering , or inviting to invasion ; and itwas necessary that the over ! act should be proved by two witnesses . "With respect to those facts or overt acts , he would proceed to detail them with as few observations of his own as possible . On ihe 27 th of February last , three of the prisoners at the bar , namely , Quigley , Allen , and Learv , ' came from V / hitstable to the King's Head , at Margate Ouigleyunder tbe name and character of Captain Jones ; Allen in

; . the character of his servant , though he really was not so ; and Leary , the servant of O'Connor , who waited on his master . They had not been at ihe King's Head a quarter of an hour , when Mr . O'Connor , who went In- ( he name of Colonel Morris , and Binns , who assumed the name of Mr . Williams , arrived . Thev remained at the King ' s Head that evening , and part of the next morning . The ' nexi morning , while ihev were meditating the removal of their baggage , for a purpose of which there could be no doubt , they were arrested by Revet and .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 61
  • You're on page62
  • 63
  • 72
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy