Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • June 1, 1794
  • Page 58
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, June 1, 1794: Page 58

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, June 1, 1794
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. ← Page 2 of 5 →
Page 58

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

ed , consisting of nine Members of that House , in order to investigate the said papers , and to report the result to the House at large . The motion being seconded , Lord Stanhope opposed it . He could not conceive the necessity or propriety of a Committee being formed , to examine secretly what was notorious . 20 . Committee appointed by the House to examine seditious papers , viz . the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Privy Seal , the Dukes of Leeds and Portland , Earls of Hardwicke , Carlisle , Carnarvon , Chatham , and Mansfield . 22 . A debate of great length occurredon the motion for the first reading of the

, Bill to empower his Majesty to secure and detain such persons as are suspected to be conspiring against his royal person and government . The measure was supported by Lords Grenville , Radnor , Townshcnd , Mansfield , the Lord Chancellor , & c . and opposed by Lords Stanhope , Lauderdale , Derby , and the Marquis of Lansdowne . The question of adjournment being moved by Lord Lauderdale , there appeared—Contents 9 —IVou ' -Contents 107 . The Bill was then read a second time , and committed . On a motion for a third reading , ano _ h _ r division took place—Contents 95—Non-Contents 7 . Adjourned at three o ' clock in the morning .

23 . The Royal Assent was given by commission to So Public and Private Bills . — Among the Public Bills passed , was , that to empower his Majesty to secure suspected persons , & c . & c . Two Protests signed by Opposition Lords against said Bill were entered on the Journals . Marquis Lansdowne moved for a call of the House on Monday , in consequence of a general Embargo being laid on all shipping in the American ports . Adjourned .

26 . The House resolved itself into a Committee upon the Bill for the regulation of Statute Labour , the Bishop of Bangor in the Chair . Lord Stanhope took some objections on the Bill , and contended , that instead of relieving the poor , it will tend to add to the hardships of their situation . Lord Tbnrlo-w thought there were some strong grounds in what the noble Lord had said , and therefore moved , that the Rev . Prelate should report progress , and postpone the t ommittee , which was agreed to . The Marqui ; of Lansdoioiteafter an introductory speechmoved for an Address to

, , his Majesty , praying him to lay before the House a copy of the instructions sent to Lord Dorche _ ter , as far as related to his negotiation with the Indians . The motion went to a reprobation of Ministers for their conduct towards America , which his Lordship insisted tended to a rupture with the States , and had produced the late embargo on all shipping in the American ports . It was opposed by Lord Grenville , and a debate took place , when the House divided—Contents 9—Non-Contcnts 6 9 .

1 % . The Land Revenue Bill was reported . The Bill to allow the printing of Newspapers on single Demy Paper was read a third time ; also the Bill to supply the French West-India Islands with provisions , & c . 30 . The Duke of Bedford , after delivering a speech of considerable length , with much force and energy , made his promised motion for the immediate acceleration of peace . —' — Lords Auckland and Darnley , Earls Fitzwilliam and Mansfield , and Lord Grenville , opposed the motion . The Duke of Grafton , Earls of Albemarle and Lauderdale , and

the Marquis of Lansdowne , supported it . In order to defeat the motion , Lord Auckland moved , that' the House do adjourn , which at one o ' clock was carried—113 against 12 . The noble Lords who voted in the minority were—Duke of Norfolk , Earl of Albemarle , Grafton , _ Thanet ; Bedford ; Lord St . John , . Earl of Derby , Chedworth , Stanhope , Egremont ; Lauderdale , Marquis of Lansdowne .

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1794-06-01, Page 58” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01061794/page/58/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
LONDON: Article 1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 2
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE, OR GENERAL AND COMPLETE LIBRARY. Article 3
PRESENT STATE OF FREE MASONRY. Article 4
A SPEECH Article 9
LITERATURE. Article 14
LETTER THE FIRST. Article 14
ANECDOTES OF THE LAST CENTURY. Article 16
ACCOUNT OF A TOUR TO KILLARNEY, &c. Article 17
THE LIFE OF MRS. ANNE AYSCOUGH, OR ASKEW. Article 21
ACCOUNT OF DRUIDISM. Article 28
MASONIC ANECDOTE Article 33
REFUTATION Article 35
A SERMON Article 36
JOHN COUSTOS, FOR FREEMASONRY, Article 40
A DESCRIPTION OF ST. GEORGE'S CAVE AT GIBRALTAR. Article 45
SHORT ABSTRACT OF THE HISTORY OF GUADALOUPE. Article 46
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE JACKALL. Article 49
SPEECH OF A CREEK INDIAN, Article 50
THE USE AND ABUSE OF SPEECH. Article 52
ON SUICIDE . Article 55
PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. Article 57
STRICTURES ON PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 61
POETRY. Article 63
VERSES Article 64
BY MR. TASKER. Article 66
ODE TO A MILITIA OFFICER. Article 66
TRUE GREATNESS. Article 67
A MASONIC SONG. Article 68
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 69
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 69
PREFERMENTS. Article 74
Untitled Article 75
Untitled Article 76
BANKRUPTS. Article 77
INDEX TO THE SECOND VOLUME. Article 78
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

2 Articles
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

2 Articles
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

2 Articles
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

2 Articles
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

2 Articles
Page 46

Page 46

2 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

2 Articles
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

2 Articles
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

2 Articles
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

2 Articles
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

1 Article
Page 64

Page 64

2 Articles
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

3 Articles
Page 67

Page 67

2 Articles
Page 68

Page 68

2 Articles
Page 69

Page 69

2 Articles
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 74

Page 74

2 Articles
Page 75

Page 75

2 Articles
Page 76

Page 76

1 Article
Page 77

Page 77

2 Articles
Page 78

Page 78

1 Article
Page 79

Page 79

1 Article
Page 80

Page 80

1 Article
Page 58

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Parliamentary Proceedings.

ed , consisting of nine Members of that House , in order to investigate the said papers , and to report the result to the House at large . The motion being seconded , Lord Stanhope opposed it . He could not conceive the necessity or propriety of a Committee being formed , to examine secretly what was notorious . 20 . Committee appointed by the House to examine seditious papers , viz . the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Privy Seal , the Dukes of Leeds and Portland , Earls of Hardwicke , Carlisle , Carnarvon , Chatham , and Mansfield . 22 . A debate of great length occurredon the motion for the first reading of the

, Bill to empower his Majesty to secure and detain such persons as are suspected to be conspiring against his royal person and government . The measure was supported by Lords Grenville , Radnor , Townshcnd , Mansfield , the Lord Chancellor , & c . and opposed by Lords Stanhope , Lauderdale , Derby , and the Marquis of Lansdowne . The question of adjournment being moved by Lord Lauderdale , there appeared—Contents 9 —IVou ' -Contents 107 . The Bill was then read a second time , and committed . On a motion for a third reading , ano _ h _ r division took place—Contents 95—Non-Contents 7 . Adjourned at three o ' clock in the morning .

23 . The Royal Assent was given by commission to So Public and Private Bills . — Among the Public Bills passed , was , that to empower his Majesty to secure suspected persons , & c . & c . Two Protests signed by Opposition Lords against said Bill were entered on the Journals . Marquis Lansdowne moved for a call of the House on Monday , in consequence of a general Embargo being laid on all shipping in the American ports . Adjourned .

26 . The House resolved itself into a Committee upon the Bill for the regulation of Statute Labour , the Bishop of Bangor in the Chair . Lord Stanhope took some objections on the Bill , and contended , that instead of relieving the poor , it will tend to add to the hardships of their situation . Lord Tbnrlo-w thought there were some strong grounds in what the noble Lord had said , and therefore moved , that the Rev . Prelate should report progress , and postpone the t ommittee , which was agreed to . The Marqui ; of Lansdoioiteafter an introductory speechmoved for an Address to

, , his Majesty , praying him to lay before the House a copy of the instructions sent to Lord Dorche _ ter , as far as related to his negotiation with the Indians . The motion went to a reprobation of Ministers for their conduct towards America , which his Lordship insisted tended to a rupture with the States , and had produced the late embargo on all shipping in the American ports . It was opposed by Lord Grenville , and a debate took place , when the House divided—Contents 9—Non-Contcnts 6 9 .

1 % . The Land Revenue Bill was reported . The Bill to allow the printing of Newspapers on single Demy Paper was read a third time ; also the Bill to supply the French West-India Islands with provisions , & c . 30 . The Duke of Bedford , after delivering a speech of considerable length , with much force and energy , made his promised motion for the immediate acceleration of peace . —' — Lords Auckland and Darnley , Earls Fitzwilliam and Mansfield , and Lord Grenville , opposed the motion . The Duke of Grafton , Earls of Albemarle and Lauderdale , and

the Marquis of Lansdowne , supported it . In order to defeat the motion , Lord Auckland moved , that' the House do adjourn , which at one o ' clock was carried—113 against 12 . The noble Lords who voted in the minority were—Duke of Norfolk , Earl of Albemarle , Grafton , _ Thanet ; Bedford ; Lord St . John , . Earl of Derby , Chedworth , Stanhope , Egremont ; Lauderdale , Marquis of Lansdowne .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 57
  • You're on page58
  • 59
  • 80
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy