Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • June 1, 1798
  • Page 60
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, June 1, 1798: Page 60

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, June 1, 1798
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article IRlSH PARLIAMENT. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 60

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Irlsh Parliament.

IRlSH PARLIAMENT .

HOUSE OF C OMMONS .

THUESDAY , MARCH 8 . . nPHE order of the day for going into a Committee upon the bill to mdem * . 1 nify those persons who have ° acted" for the public service * **?««* - in , ? insurrections since the ist of June 1797 , . being : read , s * J ° **« J £ and Mr . Dobb . opposed it , on the ground o this bill _ tending , to ni , e . rupt tta course of justice , and to protect persons guilty of crimes against the punishment which they had incurred . , . bill accused Government ot de

-Mr Ti-h said much against the . He . gn ineT by is p wis on ,, tolnde . nnify' Orange-men for the excesses which they ha d committed against the Catholics . He said that Government had committed many ach to prove that their objeft was to . divide he peope ; and among other things , that they had taken commissions in tiie ffliliDAfaom men of weight and consequence , and given tnem to persons unqualified in "oint of property to hold them . ,, . '' The Attorney-General said , that the ohieft of the b . ll was to allow the jury to judge of a man by his intention . Could murder , which always deiAA : J . „?„ .... „ ... U , . rvLned bv such a permission > -Could felony , which

must always be accompanied with a felonious intention be protected h om due punishment , by thus enlarging the powers of the Jury to judge o . the intention of every act which should come before tnem ? If any one passage of the bill could bear such a construction , he would most gladly alter it . Saturday , 17 . The House resolved into a Committee to take into consideration the amendments made by the Lords in the Insurrection bill . _ Mr . Attorney-Genera ! moved , ' That from and alter the passing of this dirk other such

bill into a law , if any pike , pike-head , spear , , dagger , or weapon , shall be found in the possession of any person or persons , in any proc laimed district , after such person shall have been duly called on and required bv any magistrate to deliver up all arms in his possession , sucr . person or persons shall be deemed within the meaning of this act , and liable to the punishment therein prescribed , and , on conviction thereof before a magistral , will be liable to be sent to serve on board the King s fleets , or in his armies having , however , the liberty of appeal at the next quarter sesssions of the peace '—this amendment , with those made by the Lords , being agreed to it was ordered back to the Lords for their further concurrence .

Monday , id . The amendments made b y the Lords in the Libel bill were read by which the title and imprint of any paper , containing a libel , should be , prima facie evidence to go to a jury on the trial of any indiCtment for such libel " against the registered printer of the newspaper so intituled , unless he shall by evidence shiw that lie was not the printer or publisher of such a paper so conatining- such libel . Mr Martin replied , that the clause went to make any news-paper , bearing libel proof with jury to

cona particular title , and containing a , competent a vict the registered printer of the newspaper usually bearing that title , unless he could prove the contrary . This would be to invert the on . er ot evidence established by the constitutional forms of law in the first instance ; for instead of presuming the accused man innocent , until his guilt shall be substantiated by evidence on the part of his accusers , it presumes him guilty , in the hrss ; instance , upon the mere exhibition of written or printed testimony , not substantiated upon oath , as the law requires of such testimony , and which may . be a malicious forgery j and it puts upon" the accused person the onus probands

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1798-06-01, Page 60” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 2 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01061798/page/60/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
LONDON: Article 2
TO CORRESPONDENTS, &c. Article 3
THE LIFE OF BISHOP WARBURTON. Article 4
CURIOUS ACCOUNT OF A DUMB PHILOPHER . Article 6
AN HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ACCOUNT OF IRELAND. Article 9
THE LIFE OF XIMENES, ARCHBISHOP OF TOLEDO. Article 18
THE LIFE OF CONFUCIUS. Article 23
ON DREAMS. Article 27
DESCRIPTION OF M1DDLETON DALE, Article 30
DESCRIPTION OF THE SOURCE OF THE RHINE, Article 32
ON THE PRESERVATION OF DEAD BODIES. Article 33
THE COLLECTOR. Article 34
THE FREEMASONS' REPOSITORY. Article 38
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 41
REVIEW OF NEW PUBLICATIONS. Article 42
POETRY. Article 50
REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT. Article 54
IRlSH PARLIAMENT. Article 60
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 62
INDEX TO THE TENTH VOLUME. Article 74
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

2 Articles
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

2 Articles
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

2 Articles
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

1 Article
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

1 Article
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

1 Article
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

1 Article
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 74

Page 74

1 Article
Page 75

Page 75

1 Article
Page 76

Page 76

1 Article
Page 77

Page 77

1 Article
Page 60

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Irlsh Parliament.

IRlSH PARLIAMENT .

HOUSE OF C OMMONS .

THUESDAY , MARCH 8 . . nPHE order of the day for going into a Committee upon the bill to mdem * . 1 nify those persons who have ° acted" for the public service * **?««* - in , ? insurrections since the ist of June 1797 , . being : read , s * J ° **« J £ and Mr . Dobb . opposed it , on the ground o this bill _ tending , to ni , e . rupt tta course of justice , and to protect persons guilty of crimes against the punishment which they had incurred . , . bill accused Government ot de

-Mr Ti-h said much against the . He . gn ineT by is p wis on ,, tolnde . nnify' Orange-men for the excesses which they ha d committed against the Catholics . He said that Government had committed many ach to prove that their objeft was to . divide he peope ; and among other things , that they had taken commissions in tiie ffliliDAfaom men of weight and consequence , and given tnem to persons unqualified in "oint of property to hold them . ,, . '' The Attorney-General said , that the ohieft of the b . ll was to allow the jury to judge of a man by his intention . Could murder , which always deiAA : J . „?„ .... „ ... U , . rvLned bv such a permission > -Could felony , which

must always be accompanied with a felonious intention be protected h om due punishment , by thus enlarging the powers of the Jury to judge o . the intention of every act which should come before tnem ? If any one passage of the bill could bear such a construction , he would most gladly alter it . Saturday , 17 . The House resolved into a Committee to take into consideration the amendments made by the Lords in the Insurrection bill . _ Mr . Attorney-Genera ! moved , ' That from and alter the passing of this dirk other such

bill into a law , if any pike , pike-head , spear , , dagger , or weapon , shall be found in the possession of any person or persons , in any proc laimed district , after such person shall have been duly called on and required bv any magistrate to deliver up all arms in his possession , sucr . person or persons shall be deemed within the meaning of this act , and liable to the punishment therein prescribed , and , on conviction thereof before a magistral , will be liable to be sent to serve on board the King s fleets , or in his armies having , however , the liberty of appeal at the next quarter sesssions of the peace '—this amendment , with those made by the Lords , being agreed to it was ordered back to the Lords for their further concurrence .

Monday , id . The amendments made b y the Lords in the Libel bill were read by which the title and imprint of any paper , containing a libel , should be , prima facie evidence to go to a jury on the trial of any indiCtment for such libel " against the registered printer of the newspaper so intituled , unless he shall by evidence shiw that lie was not the printer or publisher of such a paper so conatining- such libel . Mr Martin replied , that the clause went to make any news-paper , bearing libel proof with jury to

cona particular title , and containing a , competent a vict the registered printer of the newspaper usually bearing that title , unless he could prove the contrary . This would be to invert the on . er ot evidence established by the constitutional forms of law in the first instance ; for instead of presuming the accused man innocent , until his guilt shall be substantiated by evidence on the part of his accusers , it presumes him guilty , in the hrss ; instance , upon the mere exhibition of written or printed testimony , not substantiated upon oath , as the law requires of such testimony , and which may . be a malicious forgery j and it puts upon" the accused person the onus probands

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 59
  • You're on page60
  • 61
  • 77
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy