-
Articles/Ads
Article PARLIAMENTARY ANALYSIS. ← Page 5 of 5
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Parliamentary Analysis.
Lord AA iiARNCLiFFE gave notice that , after the recess , he would bring forward a motion respecting secondary punishments . The Irish Juries ' Amendment Bill and the Mutiny Bill were read a second time . The Lord CHANCELLOR presented the last report of the Common Law Commissioners , of wliich he expressed his high approbation , so far as he had been able to consider it . His lordship suggested , at the
same time , that he had much doubt whether the country ought to accept the services of the commissioners gratuitously . The report was ordered to be printed .
March 9 . 1 st . —The Liverpool Disfranchisement Bill was read a first time . Earl GREY presented a petition from Cambridge in favour of Dissenters . The Duke of AVELLINGTON cautioned the House against interfering with the statutes of such corporations . After some further discussion , the petition was ordered to be laid on the table . March 99 d . —Their lordships sat to-day for the first time on a
Saturday since the opening of the session . The Mutiny Bill was read a third time and passed . Some members of the House of Commons brought up the report of the committee , together ivith the minutes of evidence upon which the Liverpool Freemen Disfranchisement Bill is founded , in conformity with the message of their lordships . —Laid- on the table .
March 94-th . —The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented the copy of Order in Council , adopting the Act of the Legislature of Jamaica for the total abolition of slavery . March 96 th . —The Lord CHANCELLOR , in presenting a petition from the Dissenters of Edinburgh and Leith , expressed his dissent from tbat
part of the prayer wliich contemplated the separation of church anil state . His lordship afterwards introduced a bill for extending the criminal jurisdiction of the metropolis . Their lordships adjourned till the 20 th , when they met for the hearing of appeals .
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Parliamentary Analysis.
Lord AA iiARNCLiFFE gave notice that , after the recess , he would bring forward a motion respecting secondary punishments . The Irish Juries ' Amendment Bill and the Mutiny Bill were read a second time . The Lord CHANCELLOR presented the last report of the Common Law Commissioners , of wliich he expressed his high approbation , so far as he had been able to consider it . His lordship suggested , at the
same time , that he had much doubt whether the country ought to accept the services of the commissioners gratuitously . The report was ordered to be printed .
March 9 . 1 st . —The Liverpool Disfranchisement Bill was read a first time . Earl GREY presented a petition from Cambridge in favour of Dissenters . The Duke of AVELLINGTON cautioned the House against interfering with the statutes of such corporations . After some further discussion , the petition was ordered to be laid on the table . March 99 d . —Their lordships sat to-day for the first time on a
Saturday since the opening of the session . The Mutiny Bill was read a third time and passed . Some members of the House of Commons brought up the report of the committee , together ivith the minutes of evidence upon which the Liverpool Freemen Disfranchisement Bill is founded , in conformity with the message of their lordships . —Laid- on the table .
March 94-th . —The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented the copy of Order in Council , adopting the Act of the Legislature of Jamaica for the total abolition of slavery . March 96 th . —The Lord CHANCELLOR , in presenting a petition from the Dissenters of Edinburgh and Leith , expressed his dissent from tbat
part of the prayer wliich contemplated the separation of church anil state . His lordship afterwards introduced a bill for extending the criminal jurisdiction of the metropolis . Their lordships adjourned till the 20 th , when they met for the hearing of appeals .