-
Articles/Ads
Article MASONIC GRAMMAR. ← Page 2 of 2 Article MASONIC GRAMMAR. Page 2 of 2 Article PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF MIDDLESEX. Page 1 of 2 Article PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF MIDDLESEX. Page 1 of 2 →
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Masonic Grammar.
time to time we see in the pages of the Freemason that it has readers far more competent that " Lindley Murray " to deal with a question of this kind , who must have seen thc word which offended his hypercritical eye , and who yet allowed it to pass . Your crotchety correspondent could not . 1 sail he was inconsistent , anil I feel sure you have not
one reader ( except himself—he likes people to be particular ) who will deny that , while " Lindley Murray " has charged me with being personal , he has been far more personal in his own remarks . Is it not personal to say a brother is deficient in capacity , and to apply to him the lines which were written by Dryden of Shadwell ? More virulent ( I do not say vulgar ) personality cannot be conceived , and
could not be exemplified even by " Lindley Murray . " There is a predisposition in some people to be personal . " Lindley Murray" himself esteems it a blemish in human character ; let me assure him it is one which is likely to be much aggravated in those who admire the style in vvhich " Absalom and Achitophel" is written . I sairl that " Lindley Muiray " was inaccurate in his
statements , and this controversy , whatever else it does , clearly shows the truth of my remark . He has had to own that he was wrong in saying ( i ) that exceptional was in Johnson ; ( 2 ) that exceptional and exceptionable were synonymous ; and ( 3 ) that the use ol the word exceptional was not warranted by any authority but mine . He cannot be accurate even in smaller matters . He
imputes to me ignorance of the common use of the word stickler without the least ground for so doing ; and I notice , as all readers of Scott will have noticed , that he speaks of a Bertram in thc " Antiquaiy , " whereas in that novel there is no such character . Of course " Lindley Murray " may reply that it was verv pardonable to forget that Bertram is found in " Guy Mannering . " I do not
say it matters much ; and , since the words of the quotation are given as in the original , I mention the circumstance , in addition to these other four instances , only to show with what caution thc statements of " Lindley Murray " must be received . Strange that those who aie inaccurate themselves should be so ready to see the fault in others ! " Lindley Murray " seems to know Dryden . Can lie not admire this passatre : —
"'I he soul , shut up in her dark room , Viewing so clear abroad , at home sees nothing ; But , like a mole in earth , busy and blind , Works all her folly up , and casts it outward To the world ' s open view . "
Lastly , I said that , to judge from "Lindley Murray ' s ' letters , tin re was little to show that he had any qualification which decidedly entitled him to assume the office of ¦ 1 censor in . 1 matter of this kind . It was the remark of a great critic , speaking of literary work : —
Sunt delicta tamen ( juibus ignovissc vclimus ; " but will you allow me to say—I do not say it harshly—that , after making every allowance for your correspondent , the more I have seen of his productions , the more confirmed has my opinion become ? He has already dispu ted my capacity ; and , therefore , I could not possibly hope to persuade him that his style is not good , or that , in the
case uf every letter which he has written on this subject , it is marked by many inelegancus . This is a question on which many of your readers who have seen these letters will have already formed their opinion , and it is one to do justice to which would require too much of your space , and too much of my time , even if " Lindley Murray " were likely to be influenced by wint I might write .
" Lindley Muiray " has advised me to refer to Todd ' s Johnson ' s Dictionary , for he says "Emollit mores , ncc sinit esse feros . " The circumstances of the case do not allow this to appeal to me as a powerful argument , but I shall get the bonk . Let me also advise your correspondent , not i-i the words of the midwife in the passage [ from which he qjoted , to
'Do anything but write ;" for I say what is said a few lines furth-rr
on" I see , 1 sec , ' lis counsel given in vain ;" but let mc advise him , in the words which Polonius addressed to Laertes" Beware Of entrance into quarrel but , being in , Bear it that theoppose r may beware of thee . " I hope there is nothing in this letter which will wound
the feelings of " Lindley Murray , " or confirm in him the idea that I am " vulgarly personal . " 1 have read the article 011 "Personality in Masonic writing , " suggested , no doubt , by this controversy . Its impartiality , its tolerant spirit , its gentle rebuke , and , above all , its strong common sense invest it with a power by which it is impossible that our minds should not be affected . In a discussion of this
kind one is so easily led from the " retort courteous " ( as Touchstone has shown ) to the " quip modest , " " ihe reply churlish , " "the reproof valiant , " and so on even , except in the case of Masons , to the " lie direct . " 1 cannot conscientiously plead guilty to the charges made against me by " Lindley Murray ; " but we are brethren , and ought
to part , since we are about to part , on fraternal terms . Let me therefore retract anything I may have written which seemed to him a " vulgar personality , " and let me assure your correspondent that I never supposed any remark of mine could have been so characterised . Si Yours fraternally , T . M . DBON , J . W . 417 .
To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — 1 have been much surprised at the rather hairsplitting—if not head-splitting—controversy lately going 011 iii your cuiumns on English grammar , as 1 lliink , with one ul old , how delightful it is for brethren to dwell together in unity , nnd that they , especially ) ought to do no In facti lo use it veiy commyni but very unHfatrirnailsid ****
Masonic Grammar.
or rather absurd—phrase , that , of all others , they ought to be the last to fall our , especially about trifles . I was equally pleased with your very sensible and wellwritten article upon the subject . May those whom it concerns profitt by it . I , too , might have written to say that I was no aware that Masonic grammar differed from that of other people , as I really thought ;
but I cannot help saying that in rearling the letter of one of your correspondents ( I think Bro . Mackenzie ' s ) one would be lead to infer that such was the case , as he begins with this astonishing sentence 1 " I was not previously aware that Freemasons in any way differed in the construction of the English language to others . " Now for a
person to rush , uncalled , into a controversy on rather a nice point in the English language , and to commence his letter with such a sentence as tha f , does certainly seem extraordinary , and shows the truth of what you say , that people ought to consider before they do anything of the kind . Yours , Sec , OBSTUPUI .
MASONIC LITERATURE . To tlie Editor ofthe " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Referring to your journal of the 19 th of April , and your remarks under the above heading , I note your remark that the " Masonic public wants educating " as to the high importance and value and light " imparted by
' Masonic literature . ' And as a rule you fear the less profound artistic and aesthetic level of Masonic literature is preferred , which deals with the ' menu ' and the ' songs , ' which sets up elaborate ' summonses ' and deftly decorated invitations as the ' summum bonum ' of Masonic literary taste and power , and that you fear thc majority of our Order remain perpetually indifferent to the lucubrations of
thc Masonic antiquarian , or the pages of thc Masonic historian . " Now Sir , while agreeing with you as to the importance , and value , and light imparted by " Masonic literature , " and while not differing with you to some extent in your latter remarks—that is as to the existence of those practices—I yet must , in all due deference , submit that the sense in which you have connected them , as ¦' their
being preferred , etc ., " is unjust and uncharitable . I claim for myself every desire to study Masonic literature , but while the " price " of such stands at the exorbitant rate as at present , you must not be surprised at that apparent want of interest in Masonic literature which , as your remarks would seem to point out , exists . If you can be the means of
causing " Masonic literature " to be put within the reach of the brethren , the same as other valuable literature , I think you would find no cause to draw any future comparisons , which as some one remarked are " odorous , " but would deserve the thai . ks of the Ciaft . Yours fraternally , CHEAP LITERATURE .
AN ERROR . To lhc Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — There is an error in your list of contributions to the Girls' School , which please correct . It should be ND . I Lodge , I . W . Sewell , £ 22 is . Yours fraternally , ISAAC WILLIAM SEWELL .
Provincial Grand Lodge Of Middlesex.
PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF MIDDLESEX .
The annual meeting of the Provincial Grand Lotlge of Middlesex was held last Saturday at the Memorial Hall , Great Stanmore . Col . Burdett , R . W . Prov . Grand Master , presided . Sir Crurles T . Bright , Dep . Prov . Grand Master ; Bros . H . G . Buss . Prov . G . Treas .: H . C . Levander ,
Prov . G . Sec . ; Louis Beck , Prov . G . Org . ; John Gilbert , Prov . G . Tyler ; and the following brethren were also present : Bros . John Hammond , G . Steward ; R . Hilsdon , P . P . G . P . ; D . W . Pearse , P . P . G . R . ; Randolph G . Glover , P . G . D . ; Thos . J . Sabine , P . P . G . S . D . ; B . H . Swallow , P . P . G . J . D . ; M . A . Dubois , P . P . G . S . D . ; C . J . Rushworth , P . G . R ; George Kenning , P . P . G . J . D . ; Frederic Davison ,
P . G . S . W . ; R . W . Giddy , Dist . G . M . Griqualand Colonel shadwell II . Gierke , P . G . D . ; Charles Horsley , P . P . G . R . j J . B . Shackleton , P . P . G . P . ; T . C . Walls , P . P . G . D . ; Dr . K . W . Ramsay , P . G . S . W . ; Charles Veal , P . G . S . D . Surrey ; E . Hopwood , P . G . S . B , ; E . Letchworth , P . G . Reg . j W . Hammond , P . G . D . ; F . W . Levander , P . M . 1415 ; Cecil Thompson , VV . M . 1237 ; E . B .
Bright , P . M . 778 ; John Hunt , P . M . 1512 ; Henry Lovegrove , S . W . 177 < j ; H . Mead , P . M . 788 ; John Verity , S . W . 1194 ; C . J . W . Davis , P . M . 382 ; W . Grist , J . W . 1637 ; W . Stephens , W . M . 16 . 37 ; W . Radford , S . W . 1702 ; T . Keene , P . M . 1415 ; Heiiry C . Finch , P . M . 708 ; J . Wall , J . W . 1702 ; J . R . Nichols , W . M . 1 367 ; W . W . Stevens , I . P . M . 1733 ; T . VV . Clarke , J . W . 15 G 7 ; J . W . Robbins ,
D . D ., P . M . 1 C 85 ; George Penn , P . M . 1642 ; J . L . Coulton , P . M . 3 82 ; German Fehrenbach , P . M . 382 ; Fred W . Dougall , P . M . 755 ; Fred H . Varley , P . M . 16 37 ; George Harrison , 1326 ; T . W . Ockenden , J . W . 1512 ; W . S . Marshall , J . 1549 ; C . Harding , P . M . 77 8 ; W . H . Paul , J . D . 77 8 ; Thomas Cubitt , P . G . P . ; G . H . Stephens , S . W . 1626 ; T . J . Maidwell , I . P . M . 27 ; Francis Buckland , P . M .
2 c $ and 88 9 , W . M . 1638 ; T . J . V . Honeywell , I . P . M . S 8 9 ; R . T . Elsam , P . M . * 201 and 889 , P . P . G . D . C . Surrey ; 11 . Handel , 16 5 6 ; G . H . Mead , 34 ; G . H . Hunt , 1194 ; Charles Hawksley , Sec . 1702 ; W . T . Buck , S . D . 1702 ; F . W . Greenwood , James W . Lambert , S . D . 1285 ; It . Farquharson , 2 ; Fredk . H . Cozens , Org . 907 ; Robert P .
Paton , 1549 ; John Middleton , 834 ; John Green , P . M . 27 ; George J . Fox , 1239 ; Charles Graham , 1326 , 1540 ; F . H , Wilson lies , P . P . G . S . VV ,, G . Sec . Herts ; W . Johnson , 1549 i Fredk , Binckes , P . O . Steward of England ( John E , Dawson , P . G . J . VY , Httts . ) Thos . Massa , and H . Mftittcy . P . Mi 619 ( JVMMWfl ) .
Provincial Grand Lodge Of Middlesex.
Bro . Middleton assisted Bro . Gilbert , the Prov . Grand Tyler . The Grand Lodge having been opened , the minutes read , and the report of the Audit Committee adopted , on the motion of Bro . Davison , seconded by Bro . Sabine , Bro . H . G . Buss , Assistant Grand Secretary , was unanimously
reelected Prov . Grand Treas . ; for which mark of confidence and esteem Bro . Buss returned his sincere thanks . It was then arranged that the meetings of Prov . Grand Lodge should take place annually on the fourth Saturday in June . The following brethren were then invested as Provincial Grand Officers for the year 1—
Bro . Sir C . T . Brig ht Prov . D . G . M . „ T . J . Sabine Prov . G . S . W . „ H . A . Dubois Prov . G . J . W . ,, Rev . John Robbins Prov . G . Chap . „ H . G . Buss Prov . G . Treas . „ Thomas Keene Prov . G . Reg . . I-I . C . Levander Prov . G . Sec .
. „ F . S . Knyvett Prov . G . S . D . „ John Hammond Prov . G . J . D . „ John Verity Prov . G . S . of XV .
„ VV . Stephens Prov . G . D . C . „ G . I-I . Mead Prov . G . A . D . C . „ T . C . Walls Prov . G . S . B . „ J . B . Shackleton Prov . G . Purst .
„ John Hurst Prov . G . A . Purst . „ John Gilbert Prov . G . Tyler . Bros . Davis , F . W . Levander , E . ~ ) Bright , Tiricomb , W . H . Stevens , V Prov . G . Stewards , and Japheth Tickle J
The Prov . G . Master in proposing that £ 10 10 s . be granted from the Benevolent Fund to the Royal Masonic Institution for Girls , £ 10 ios . to the . Royal Masonic Institution for Boys , and £ 10 10 s . to the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution , said it required very few words from him to induce the brethren to assist thc Charities in
the way they had done in foinier years , and were very happy to do . The province had had rather an uphill work in its younger ( lays , but it had reduced its difficulties now to an infinitesimal measure , and he hoped that by next year , even after assisting the Charities , there would be a balance altogether in favour of the Prov . G . Lodge . The Masonic Institutions told their own tale , and there
was hardly any necessity to say anything in their favour . By the exertions made on behalf of those Institutions very large sums had been raised , £ 10 , 000 to one , £ 11 , 000 to another , and £ 12 , 000 to another in one year , but there were very heavy calls on them , and it was the duty of Masons to place those Institutions in a proud position , not only before Masons but before the world . Other Charities
thought themselves very fortunate if they collected £ 5000 , but the Masonic Institutions had no difficulty in doubling that amount . He hoped it always would be so , and that by the benefits thc Institutions afforded they would prove themselves worthy of such generous support . Sir Charles Bright , D . P . G . M ., seconded the motion , which was then put and carried by acclamation .
I he sum of £ 10 was granted to a provincial brother m distress , and ordered to be paid immediately . Bro . H . C . Levander , P . G . Secretary , reael the letter he had been directed , by the vote of last Grand Lodge , to write to the widow of the late Bro . R . W . Little , and Grand Lodge was thereupon closed . The brethren aftervvarels attended the parish church , which had been kindly placed
at the disposal of the Grand Lodge by the rector , the Rev . L . J . Bernays , where a sermon was preached by the Rev . John Robbins , Prov . G . Chaplain . After church the rector invited the brethren to the rectory house and grounds , after inspecting which a banquet , admirably supplied by Bro . Veal , of the Abercorn Arms , was partaken of . The customary toasts vvere afterwards honoured .
1 he Prov . G . M ., in proposing " The Pro Grand Master , and the rest of the Grand Officers , " said that Lord Carnarvon was always ready to perform his duties , and when he was at the Colonial Office put himself to considerable inconvenience in order to preside at Grand Lodge . So much was this the case that it frequently kept him up till one o ' clock in the morning discharging his secretarial
duties . Lord Skelmersdale was also very energetic as Deputy Grand Master , as were also other Grand Officers . Some of these were presert , and , while not forgetting Bro . Col . Shadwell Clerkcyhe wished to mention Bro . Richard Giddy , District Grand Master of Griqualand , where , under his rule , Masonry was now in a very flouiishingcondition , although the country , unhappily , was at present in a
disturbed state . Bro . R . H . Giddy , Dist . G . M . of Griqualand , replied . He felt a difficulty , he said , on such an occasion as that in replying to a toast so wide in its application , because , coming as he did a comparative stranger to England , he could not be supposed just yet to know the merits of the Grand Officers . He could , however , testify to the merits
of Lord Carnarvon and Lord Skelmersdale . As far as he had seen , all the Grand Officers weie worthy of the position they occupied , and he was very glad to find they were so highly appreciated by the brethren in general . Bro . Giddy , in proposing " The Health of the Prov . Grand Master , " said it had given him great pleasure to see the Grand Master conduct ihe business of Grand Lodge so
admirably . Altherugh liberalism of ideas was growing very extensively , Masons confessed that there must be a hiad to everything . It was necessary there shoulel be a head of Grand Lodge , of Provincial Grand Lodges , and of private lodges . It was also necessary that there should be
a head in business life . While Masons had such a head as the Provincial Grand Master for Middlesex , who ruled with courtesy and geniality , as the brethren must confess he hail ruled that evening , such a Provincial Giand L-odtf * as thai of Middlesex must prosper . Th « l ' ror . Grand Ma » t « r . In ruporuc , a a id he ( tit evn »
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Masonic Grammar.
time to time we see in the pages of the Freemason that it has readers far more competent that " Lindley Murray " to deal with a question of this kind , who must have seen thc word which offended his hypercritical eye , and who yet allowed it to pass . Your crotchety correspondent could not . 1 sail he was inconsistent , anil I feel sure you have not
one reader ( except himself—he likes people to be particular ) who will deny that , while " Lindley Murray " has charged me with being personal , he has been far more personal in his own remarks . Is it not personal to say a brother is deficient in capacity , and to apply to him the lines which were written by Dryden of Shadwell ? More virulent ( I do not say vulgar ) personality cannot be conceived , and
could not be exemplified even by " Lindley Murray . " There is a predisposition in some people to be personal . " Lindley Murray" himself esteems it a blemish in human character ; let me assure him it is one which is likely to be much aggravated in those who admire the style in vvhich " Absalom and Achitophel" is written . I sairl that " Lindley Muiray " was inaccurate in his
statements , and this controversy , whatever else it does , clearly shows the truth of my remark . He has had to own that he was wrong in saying ( i ) that exceptional was in Johnson ; ( 2 ) that exceptional and exceptionable were synonymous ; and ( 3 ) that the use ol the word exceptional was not warranted by any authority but mine . He cannot be accurate even in smaller matters . He
imputes to me ignorance of the common use of the word stickler without the least ground for so doing ; and I notice , as all readers of Scott will have noticed , that he speaks of a Bertram in thc " Antiquaiy , " whereas in that novel there is no such character . Of course " Lindley Murray " may reply that it was verv pardonable to forget that Bertram is found in " Guy Mannering . " I do not
say it matters much ; and , since the words of the quotation are given as in the original , I mention the circumstance , in addition to these other four instances , only to show with what caution thc statements of " Lindley Murray " must be received . Strange that those who aie inaccurate themselves should be so ready to see the fault in others ! " Lindley Murray " seems to know Dryden . Can lie not admire this passatre : —
"'I he soul , shut up in her dark room , Viewing so clear abroad , at home sees nothing ; But , like a mole in earth , busy and blind , Works all her folly up , and casts it outward To the world ' s open view . "
Lastly , I said that , to judge from "Lindley Murray ' s ' letters , tin re was little to show that he had any qualification which decidedly entitled him to assume the office of ¦ 1 censor in . 1 matter of this kind . It was the remark of a great critic , speaking of literary work : —
Sunt delicta tamen ( juibus ignovissc vclimus ; " but will you allow me to say—I do not say it harshly—that , after making every allowance for your correspondent , the more I have seen of his productions , the more confirmed has my opinion become ? He has already dispu ted my capacity ; and , therefore , I could not possibly hope to persuade him that his style is not good , or that , in the
case uf every letter which he has written on this subject , it is marked by many inelegancus . This is a question on which many of your readers who have seen these letters will have already formed their opinion , and it is one to do justice to which would require too much of your space , and too much of my time , even if " Lindley Murray " were likely to be influenced by wint I might write .
" Lindley Muiray " has advised me to refer to Todd ' s Johnson ' s Dictionary , for he says "Emollit mores , ncc sinit esse feros . " The circumstances of the case do not allow this to appeal to me as a powerful argument , but I shall get the bonk . Let me also advise your correspondent , not i-i the words of the midwife in the passage [ from which he qjoted , to
'Do anything but write ;" for I say what is said a few lines furth-rr
on" I see , 1 sec , ' lis counsel given in vain ;" but let mc advise him , in the words which Polonius addressed to Laertes" Beware Of entrance into quarrel but , being in , Bear it that theoppose r may beware of thee . " I hope there is nothing in this letter which will wound
the feelings of " Lindley Murray , " or confirm in him the idea that I am " vulgarly personal . " 1 have read the article 011 "Personality in Masonic writing , " suggested , no doubt , by this controversy . Its impartiality , its tolerant spirit , its gentle rebuke , and , above all , its strong common sense invest it with a power by which it is impossible that our minds should not be affected . In a discussion of this
kind one is so easily led from the " retort courteous " ( as Touchstone has shown ) to the " quip modest , " " ihe reply churlish , " "the reproof valiant , " and so on even , except in the case of Masons , to the " lie direct . " 1 cannot conscientiously plead guilty to the charges made against me by " Lindley Murray ; " but we are brethren , and ought
to part , since we are about to part , on fraternal terms . Let me therefore retract anything I may have written which seemed to him a " vulgar personality , " and let me assure your correspondent that I never supposed any remark of mine could have been so characterised . Si Yours fraternally , T . M . DBON , J . W . 417 .
To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — 1 have been much surprised at the rather hairsplitting—if not head-splitting—controversy lately going 011 iii your cuiumns on English grammar , as 1 lliink , with one ul old , how delightful it is for brethren to dwell together in unity , nnd that they , especially ) ought to do no In facti lo use it veiy commyni but very unHfatrirnailsid ****
Masonic Grammar.
or rather absurd—phrase , that , of all others , they ought to be the last to fall our , especially about trifles . I was equally pleased with your very sensible and wellwritten article upon the subject . May those whom it concerns profitt by it . I , too , might have written to say that I was no aware that Masonic grammar differed from that of other people , as I really thought ;
but I cannot help saying that in rearling the letter of one of your correspondents ( I think Bro . Mackenzie ' s ) one would be lead to infer that such was the case , as he begins with this astonishing sentence 1 " I was not previously aware that Freemasons in any way differed in the construction of the English language to others . " Now for a
person to rush , uncalled , into a controversy on rather a nice point in the English language , and to commence his letter with such a sentence as tha f , does certainly seem extraordinary , and shows the truth of what you say , that people ought to consider before they do anything of the kind . Yours , Sec , OBSTUPUI .
MASONIC LITERATURE . To tlie Editor ofthe " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Referring to your journal of the 19 th of April , and your remarks under the above heading , I note your remark that the " Masonic public wants educating " as to the high importance and value and light " imparted by
' Masonic literature . ' And as a rule you fear the less profound artistic and aesthetic level of Masonic literature is preferred , which deals with the ' menu ' and the ' songs , ' which sets up elaborate ' summonses ' and deftly decorated invitations as the ' summum bonum ' of Masonic literary taste and power , and that you fear thc majority of our Order remain perpetually indifferent to the lucubrations of
thc Masonic antiquarian , or the pages of thc Masonic historian . " Now Sir , while agreeing with you as to the importance , and value , and light imparted by " Masonic literature , " and while not differing with you to some extent in your latter remarks—that is as to the existence of those practices—I yet must , in all due deference , submit that the sense in which you have connected them , as ¦' their
being preferred , etc ., " is unjust and uncharitable . I claim for myself every desire to study Masonic literature , but while the " price " of such stands at the exorbitant rate as at present , you must not be surprised at that apparent want of interest in Masonic literature which , as your remarks would seem to point out , exists . If you can be the means of
causing " Masonic literature " to be put within the reach of the brethren , the same as other valuable literature , I think you would find no cause to draw any future comparisons , which as some one remarked are " odorous , " but would deserve the thai . ks of the Ciaft . Yours fraternally , CHEAP LITERATURE .
AN ERROR . To lhc Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — There is an error in your list of contributions to the Girls' School , which please correct . It should be ND . I Lodge , I . W . Sewell , £ 22 is . Yours fraternally , ISAAC WILLIAM SEWELL .
Provincial Grand Lodge Of Middlesex.
PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF MIDDLESEX .
The annual meeting of the Provincial Grand Lotlge of Middlesex was held last Saturday at the Memorial Hall , Great Stanmore . Col . Burdett , R . W . Prov . Grand Master , presided . Sir Crurles T . Bright , Dep . Prov . Grand Master ; Bros . H . G . Buss . Prov . G . Treas .: H . C . Levander ,
Prov . G . Sec . ; Louis Beck , Prov . G . Org . ; John Gilbert , Prov . G . Tyler ; and the following brethren were also present : Bros . John Hammond , G . Steward ; R . Hilsdon , P . P . G . P . ; D . W . Pearse , P . P . G . R . ; Randolph G . Glover , P . G . D . ; Thos . J . Sabine , P . P . G . S . D . ; B . H . Swallow , P . P . G . J . D . ; M . A . Dubois , P . P . G . S . D . ; C . J . Rushworth , P . G . R ; George Kenning , P . P . G . J . D . ; Frederic Davison ,
P . G . S . W . ; R . W . Giddy , Dist . G . M . Griqualand Colonel shadwell II . Gierke , P . G . D . ; Charles Horsley , P . P . G . R . j J . B . Shackleton , P . P . G . P . ; T . C . Walls , P . P . G . D . ; Dr . K . W . Ramsay , P . G . S . W . ; Charles Veal , P . G . S . D . Surrey ; E . Hopwood , P . G . S . B , ; E . Letchworth , P . G . Reg . j W . Hammond , P . G . D . ; F . W . Levander , P . M . 1415 ; Cecil Thompson , VV . M . 1237 ; E . B .
Bright , P . M . 778 ; John Hunt , P . M . 1512 ; Henry Lovegrove , S . W . 177 < j ; H . Mead , P . M . 788 ; John Verity , S . W . 1194 ; C . J . W . Davis , P . M . 382 ; W . Grist , J . W . 1637 ; W . Stephens , W . M . 16 . 37 ; W . Radford , S . W . 1702 ; T . Keene , P . M . 1415 ; Heiiry C . Finch , P . M . 708 ; J . Wall , J . W . 1702 ; J . R . Nichols , W . M . 1 367 ; W . W . Stevens , I . P . M . 1733 ; T . VV . Clarke , J . W . 15 G 7 ; J . W . Robbins ,
D . D ., P . M . 1 C 85 ; George Penn , P . M . 1642 ; J . L . Coulton , P . M . 3 82 ; German Fehrenbach , P . M . 382 ; Fred W . Dougall , P . M . 755 ; Fred H . Varley , P . M . 16 37 ; George Harrison , 1326 ; T . W . Ockenden , J . W . 1512 ; W . S . Marshall , J . 1549 ; C . Harding , P . M . 77 8 ; W . H . Paul , J . D . 77 8 ; Thomas Cubitt , P . G . P . ; G . H . Stephens , S . W . 1626 ; T . J . Maidwell , I . P . M . 27 ; Francis Buckland , P . M .
2 c $ and 88 9 , W . M . 1638 ; T . J . V . Honeywell , I . P . M . S 8 9 ; R . T . Elsam , P . M . * 201 and 889 , P . P . G . D . C . Surrey ; 11 . Handel , 16 5 6 ; G . H . Mead , 34 ; G . H . Hunt , 1194 ; Charles Hawksley , Sec . 1702 ; W . T . Buck , S . D . 1702 ; F . W . Greenwood , James W . Lambert , S . D . 1285 ; It . Farquharson , 2 ; Fredk . H . Cozens , Org . 907 ; Robert P .
Paton , 1549 ; John Middleton , 834 ; John Green , P . M . 27 ; George J . Fox , 1239 ; Charles Graham , 1326 , 1540 ; F . H , Wilson lies , P . P . G . S . VV ,, G . Sec . Herts ; W . Johnson , 1549 i Fredk , Binckes , P . O . Steward of England ( John E , Dawson , P . G . J . VY , Httts . ) Thos . Massa , and H . Mftittcy . P . Mi 619 ( JVMMWfl ) .
Provincial Grand Lodge Of Middlesex.
Bro . Middleton assisted Bro . Gilbert , the Prov . Grand Tyler . The Grand Lodge having been opened , the minutes read , and the report of the Audit Committee adopted , on the motion of Bro . Davison , seconded by Bro . Sabine , Bro . H . G . Buss , Assistant Grand Secretary , was unanimously
reelected Prov . Grand Treas . ; for which mark of confidence and esteem Bro . Buss returned his sincere thanks . It was then arranged that the meetings of Prov . Grand Lodge should take place annually on the fourth Saturday in June . The following brethren were then invested as Provincial Grand Officers for the year 1—
Bro . Sir C . T . Brig ht Prov . D . G . M . „ T . J . Sabine Prov . G . S . W . „ H . A . Dubois Prov . G . J . W . ,, Rev . John Robbins Prov . G . Chap . „ H . G . Buss Prov . G . Treas . „ Thomas Keene Prov . G . Reg . . I-I . C . Levander Prov . G . Sec .
. „ F . S . Knyvett Prov . G . S . D . „ John Hammond Prov . G . J . D . „ John Verity Prov . G . S . of XV .
„ VV . Stephens Prov . G . D . C . „ G . I-I . Mead Prov . G . A . D . C . „ T . C . Walls Prov . G . S . B . „ J . B . Shackleton Prov . G . Purst .
„ John Hurst Prov . G . A . Purst . „ John Gilbert Prov . G . Tyler . Bros . Davis , F . W . Levander , E . ~ ) Bright , Tiricomb , W . H . Stevens , V Prov . G . Stewards , and Japheth Tickle J
The Prov . G . Master in proposing that £ 10 10 s . be granted from the Benevolent Fund to the Royal Masonic Institution for Girls , £ 10 ios . to the . Royal Masonic Institution for Boys , and £ 10 10 s . to the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution , said it required very few words from him to induce the brethren to assist thc Charities in
the way they had done in foinier years , and were very happy to do . The province had had rather an uphill work in its younger ( lays , but it had reduced its difficulties now to an infinitesimal measure , and he hoped that by next year , even after assisting the Charities , there would be a balance altogether in favour of the Prov . G . Lodge . The Masonic Institutions told their own tale , and there
was hardly any necessity to say anything in their favour . By the exertions made on behalf of those Institutions very large sums had been raised , £ 10 , 000 to one , £ 11 , 000 to another , and £ 12 , 000 to another in one year , but there were very heavy calls on them , and it was the duty of Masons to place those Institutions in a proud position , not only before Masons but before the world . Other Charities
thought themselves very fortunate if they collected £ 5000 , but the Masonic Institutions had no difficulty in doubling that amount . He hoped it always would be so , and that by the benefits thc Institutions afforded they would prove themselves worthy of such generous support . Sir Charles Bright , D . P . G . M ., seconded the motion , which was then put and carried by acclamation .
I he sum of £ 10 was granted to a provincial brother m distress , and ordered to be paid immediately . Bro . H . C . Levander , P . G . Secretary , reael the letter he had been directed , by the vote of last Grand Lodge , to write to the widow of the late Bro . R . W . Little , and Grand Lodge was thereupon closed . The brethren aftervvarels attended the parish church , which had been kindly placed
at the disposal of the Grand Lodge by the rector , the Rev . L . J . Bernays , where a sermon was preached by the Rev . John Robbins , Prov . G . Chaplain . After church the rector invited the brethren to the rectory house and grounds , after inspecting which a banquet , admirably supplied by Bro . Veal , of the Abercorn Arms , was partaken of . The customary toasts vvere afterwards honoured .
1 he Prov . G . M ., in proposing " The Pro Grand Master , and the rest of the Grand Officers , " said that Lord Carnarvon was always ready to perform his duties , and when he was at the Colonial Office put himself to considerable inconvenience in order to preside at Grand Lodge . So much was this the case that it frequently kept him up till one o ' clock in the morning discharging his secretarial
duties . Lord Skelmersdale was also very energetic as Deputy Grand Master , as were also other Grand Officers . Some of these were presert , and , while not forgetting Bro . Col . Shadwell Clerkcyhe wished to mention Bro . Richard Giddy , District Grand Master of Griqualand , where , under his rule , Masonry was now in a very flouiishingcondition , although the country , unhappily , was at present in a
disturbed state . Bro . R . H . Giddy , Dist . G . M . of Griqualand , replied . He felt a difficulty , he said , on such an occasion as that in replying to a toast so wide in its application , because , coming as he did a comparative stranger to England , he could not be supposed just yet to know the merits of the Grand Officers . He could , however , testify to the merits
of Lord Carnarvon and Lord Skelmersdale . As far as he had seen , all the Grand Officers weie worthy of the position they occupied , and he was very glad to find they were so highly appreciated by the brethren in general . Bro . Giddy , in proposing " The Health of the Prov . Grand Master , " said it had given him great pleasure to see the Grand Master conduct ihe business of Grand Lodge so
admirably . Altherugh liberalism of ideas was growing very extensively , Masons confessed that there must be a hiad to everything . It was necessary there shoulel be a head of Grand Lodge , of Provincial Grand Lodges , and of private lodges . It was also necessary that there should be
a head in business life . While Masons had such a head as the Provincial Grand Master for Middlesex , who ruled with courtesy and geniality , as the brethren must confess he hail ruled that evening , such a Provincial Giand L-odtf * as thai of Middlesex must prosper . Th « l ' ror . Grand Ma » t « r . In ruporuc , a a id he ( tit evn »