Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • Sept. 5, 1874
  • Page 8
  • Original Correspondence.
Current:

The Freemason, Sept. 5, 1874: Page 8

  • Back to The Freemason, Sept. 5, 1874
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article Original Correspondence. ← Page 2 of 3
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 2 of 3
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 2 of 3 →
Page 8

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Original Correspondence.

, ¦¦ ¦ - — - —r . * i . , To the \\ Editor of the Freemason . Dear Sir nnd Brother . — I hope you will kindly give the enclosed a place in your next number of The Freemason . I went a long way to Plymouth in order to be present at the Masonic reception of H . R . H . and

you may imagine how disgusted I was when I found that my cenirades in arms were prevented from joining in the procession . I , with others , endeavoured to get the prohibition cancelled . In the Plymouth garrison there were about 120 non-commissioned officers who are Masons , all

of them very estimable men , and I know that all we who could put on a black coat for the occasion would have been delighted to have seen those sergeants and corporals walking side by side with us , and were very much disappointed at their absence .

Yours truly and fraternally , AN OFFICER AND A P . P . J . G . W . "WHAT BETTER THEME THAN MASONRY ?"

To the Editor of the Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , In your leader " On the Onward Progress of Freemasonry" in your last impression , I observe the following sentence— " ' What better theme than Masonry ? ' says a good old poetic brother , now , alas ! no longer to the fore . "

As the author of the Masonic song bearing the title quoted , I am , naturally enough , surprised to find myself referred to in the above named terms , for , whatever qualities may be credited to me by your contributor , as I am only now about to celebrate my jubilee , I do not

think the second adjective altogether applicable , and as to the remainder of the sentence , it reads like a lament over one departed , which , I thank the G . A . O . T . U ., is not yet my case . Of course 1 presume your contributor really refers to my song , the title ot which , " What

better Theme , & c , ' I have always believed to be original , never having met with any similar words in any of my Masonic researches . If otherwise , and he will kindly inform me thereof , he will confer a favour which will quite

Satisfy me for the surprise his remarks have occasioned . If , on the contrary , he does allude to me , I should wish it to be known , that if I am " no longer to the fore , " I am not far in the rear , and am as ready for service in the vanguard of

Freemasonry as ever . Yours truly and fraternally , J AMES STEVENS . P . M ., P . Z ., & c .

Clapham , August 29 , 1874 . [ We apologise to our most excellent and worthy Bro . Stevens for taking away his due honours from him , and inadvertently consigning him to the " limbus poetarium . " The truth is

we made a slight " beefsteak , " and confounded our living Bro . Stevens , with our defunct and regretted Bro . Carpenter . Will Bro . Stevens , on the Masonic principle of returning good for evil , favour us with a little " refrain" for the next Free mason . —E u . ]

THE SECRECY OF FREEMASONRY . To the Editor ofthe Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , In my former letter I suggested that the first objection which can with any degree of reason be urged against Freemasonry arises from the fact of its being a secret society . In other

words , that this is an inherent objection to any society , however innocent or even praiseworthy its objects may be , whose meetings are held in private , and whose members have a bond of union , known only to themselves , and kept concealed from the world at large .

Now if in reply to this broad assertion we ask , ' What is the objection , " or , why is there such objection ? we get from some of our opponents , generally people of a pragmatical disposition , the same sort of answer as ladies sometimes give

to the question asked by their male friends , Why is smoking an ungentlemanly habit ? " Because it is . " In other words , such persons entertain an objection which they cannot express in words , but which is sufficiently apparent to themselves , and valid enough to keep them out-

Original Correspondence.

side the pale of our Order . And such a feeling ought by all means lo be respected . God forbid that Masons above all men should mock at a difficulty , honestly felt and consistently regarded ! But surely we may demand that an attempt should at least be made to formalise the objection ,

in order that we may , in our turn , have the opportunity of attempting a reply to it . Let me then state the objection thus , " * Much mischief , political and religious , has been wrought by secret societies , therefore secret societies are mischievous . " Now we will examine the logic

of this reasoning presently , but first let us observe that it is " nihil ad rem . " In granting that there are , and have been , at home and abroad , secret societies of men , banded together to promote civil and religious discord , Freemasonry has nothing in common with these , " But , "

pursues our objector , " Freemasonry abroad has been actually forbidden in some countries , because of its fomenting political strife ; and as Freemasonry is one and indivisible , the stigma attaches to the whole body . " To which we reply , " Freemasonry is one and indivisible in

this sense only , a Freemason in London is a Freemason in Paris , or Vienna , or any where else . But each country his its distinct constitution , and if foreign Masons allow their Craft to be prostituted to civil purposes , it in no way affects us , whose Masonic constitution absolutely forbids

anything of the kind . Nay , further ; if any English Mason was visiting a lodge , say in Vienna , and he found that any plotting against the government were going on therein , it would be his bounden duty , as a Freemason , to leave that lodge at once , because he is bound not to

propose , or in any way to encourage any act which may tend to subvert the peace and good order of society , and to render a due obedience to the laws of any state which may for a time become the place of his residence , or afford him its protection . "

Let me now put the objection grounded on the secrecy of Freemasonry in a syllogistic form . It will run thus , " All secret societies are mischievous ; Freemasonry is a secret society , therefore Freemasonry is mischievous . " My good friend , I deny your major premiss . I have

shown you that we have nothing to do with any mischief-plotting abroad ; and to turn our eyes homewards , what secret societies are there here , absolutely unsuspected of any mischievous tendency ! You must modify your major premiss , and so vitiate your conclusion . Granted that

some secret societies are or have been troublesome inchurch or stateygranted even Freemasonry abroad has been so abused in troublous times , we assert that there are many secret societies in England at the present time , not only illegal , but allowed and protected by the law . What

are the Odd Fellows , Druids , Foresters , Good Templars , but secret societies ? And has any one ever laid political or religious disturbance to their charge ? On the contrary , are not their objects well known , and innocent , or even laudable ? If members of Benefit or Temperance

Societies may , without detriment to the commonwealth , league themselves together by the tie of a common secret and a solemn obligation , surely the Masonic body may do the same , whose object is not to receive a " quid pro quo" for their subscriptions , or to pick out one only virtue for

practice , one only vice for abhorrence , but who are bound by the strongest ties to the fear of God , obedience to the laws , and the practice of every moral and social virtue . Nay more ; if once political or religious discussion were admitted into our lodges , the very framework of our

Order would fall to pieces , our obligations must be altered , our ceremonies re-modelled , our ancient charges abandoned , our exhortations and lectures scattered to the winds , in one word , Masonry would be Masonry no more . Of all men Masons have reason to cry , " Give peace in

our time , O Lord , " because when men are excited by the heat of religious or political animosity , they are not in a suitable frame of mind for the duties of a Masonic lodge . So then , we may triumphantly reply to all such

objectors , " yes , Freemasonry is a secret society ; its members , dispersed over the face of earth and water , need no letter of recommendation or introduction ; wherever there i . s civilisation , there is Freemasonry , and there every Mason , however

Original Correspondence.

poor , may find friends and a home . " Publish our secrets to the world;—we need not blush ; they are harmless in every respect—but by doing so you take away the very charm nnd recommendation of Freemasonry , you destroy the mystic tie which binds brother to brother ; you deprive us of

our means of mutual intercommunication , with which no stranger intermeddleth . Who dare venture to raise any objection to a husband and wife , or father and children , separated by the changes of life , communicating , if they choose , by means of a cypher , in order that the expression of their

secret thoughts might not become legible or intelligible to any one in the world ? Why then find fault with us Masons , in the North , East , South , and West , bound together by ties , which strangers cannot comprehend , because we have the power of making ourselves known to each

other , in a way which you cannot divine ? There is no secrecy in our objects , in the time and placer of our lodge ' s assembling , in our long roll-call of members , in our fidelity to the constitution and laws , in our brotherly concord and mutual affection . Our only secret , dear to us as life

itself , is the chain whose links of magic sympathy bind us each to the other . Join us , thenj become partakers of our secrets , work heartily with us , explore our mysteries , become imbued with our spirit , so far as we are ourselves worthy * of our Order , and you will find that , not for one

moment , or by the breadth of one single hair , will you be a less faithful servant of God , a less dutiful subject of the Queen , a less loving husband , a less tender father , a less firm and abiding friend , a less honest and upright man . Sir , even as I write , I feel assured that these poor words of mine will awaken an echo in thousands of

Masonic breasts , and that they will add their testimony to mine that , though we would face death , God helping us , rather than betray the secrets of our Order , yet , so far as we are concerned , we need no fear the publication of our secrets to the whole

world-Nothing is said in a Masonic lodge which would raise a blush on the purest cheek ,, nothing done therein which the most scrupulous penitent need fear to acknowledge in the Confessional . Nay , if strangers could be admitted within our walls , and witness there our labours ,

begun in order , conducted in peace , and closed in harmony , the shame would be to our detractors , and the ready blush would mantle on many a cheek among those who , in their ignorance or prejudice , have censured that they which they knew not , and derided that which they did not understand .

Sir ; there are other secrets besides those of Freemasonry , which the Roman Priest in the Confessional , forbidden by the laws of his church to be either husband or father , cannot fathom or comprehend ; and the authorities of that church , may with as much reason forbid the sacramental tie of marriage , as the deep mysterious bond of

fraternal love , as forbid her children to be Masons , because we are bound together by ties in . which the church and the world have no share . I am , Dear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , P . PROV . G . C . OXON , CHAPLAIN AND SEC , 489 .

PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGES . To the Editor ofthe Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , — In your leader of the 22 nd inst ., yon again draw attention to the title " Grand Lodge " being applied to " Prov . Grand Lodges , " and I quite agree with you , that it is very objectionable .

Can you ; however , be surprised at the mistake being made , when the chief organ of the Craft , The Freemason , in its reports of tbe meetings , uses the same incorrect title . In those cases where the words of the speaker are given , I suppose , he ( the speaker ) must be held responsible , though even in this case , I

would suggest , the editor mi ght correct the error , but in many instances the title of Grand Lodge is used when reference is being made to what takes place , and is not an extract ofa speech . In one report of the Prov . Grand Lodge of Devon ( which indeed calls forth the remarks in question ) you say , in speaking of thu

“The Freemason: 1874-09-05, Page 8” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 10 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_05091874/page/8/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Province of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Article 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 1
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
Untitled Ad 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Article 3
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 3
Scotland. Article 4
Knights Templar. Article 4
UNITED GRAND LODGE. Article 4
EARLY GRAND ENCAMPMENT, SCOTLAND. Article 5
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR GIRLS. Article 5
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Article 6
RESIGNATION OF THE GRAND MASTER. Article 6
THE SECRECY OF FREEMASONRY. Article 6
THE PLYMOUTH QUESTION. Article 7
Original Correspondence. Article 7
COSMOPOLITAN MASONIC CALENDAR. Article 9
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 9
Untitled Article 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 12
Page 1

Page 1

14 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

16 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

4 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

5 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

8 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

5 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

6 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

18 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

25 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 8

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Original Correspondence.

, ¦¦ ¦ - — - —r . * i . , To the \\ Editor of the Freemason . Dear Sir nnd Brother . — I hope you will kindly give the enclosed a place in your next number of The Freemason . I went a long way to Plymouth in order to be present at the Masonic reception of H . R . H . and

you may imagine how disgusted I was when I found that my cenirades in arms were prevented from joining in the procession . I , with others , endeavoured to get the prohibition cancelled . In the Plymouth garrison there were about 120 non-commissioned officers who are Masons , all

of them very estimable men , and I know that all we who could put on a black coat for the occasion would have been delighted to have seen those sergeants and corporals walking side by side with us , and were very much disappointed at their absence .

Yours truly and fraternally , AN OFFICER AND A P . P . J . G . W . "WHAT BETTER THEME THAN MASONRY ?"

To the Editor of the Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , In your leader " On the Onward Progress of Freemasonry" in your last impression , I observe the following sentence— " ' What better theme than Masonry ? ' says a good old poetic brother , now , alas ! no longer to the fore . "

As the author of the Masonic song bearing the title quoted , I am , naturally enough , surprised to find myself referred to in the above named terms , for , whatever qualities may be credited to me by your contributor , as I am only now about to celebrate my jubilee , I do not

think the second adjective altogether applicable , and as to the remainder of the sentence , it reads like a lament over one departed , which , I thank the G . A . O . T . U ., is not yet my case . Of course 1 presume your contributor really refers to my song , the title ot which , " What

better Theme , & c , ' I have always believed to be original , never having met with any similar words in any of my Masonic researches . If otherwise , and he will kindly inform me thereof , he will confer a favour which will quite

Satisfy me for the surprise his remarks have occasioned . If , on the contrary , he does allude to me , I should wish it to be known , that if I am " no longer to the fore , " I am not far in the rear , and am as ready for service in the vanguard of

Freemasonry as ever . Yours truly and fraternally , J AMES STEVENS . P . M ., P . Z ., & c .

Clapham , August 29 , 1874 . [ We apologise to our most excellent and worthy Bro . Stevens for taking away his due honours from him , and inadvertently consigning him to the " limbus poetarium . " The truth is

we made a slight " beefsteak , " and confounded our living Bro . Stevens , with our defunct and regretted Bro . Carpenter . Will Bro . Stevens , on the Masonic principle of returning good for evil , favour us with a little " refrain" for the next Free mason . —E u . ]

THE SECRECY OF FREEMASONRY . To the Editor ofthe Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , In my former letter I suggested that the first objection which can with any degree of reason be urged against Freemasonry arises from the fact of its being a secret society . In other

words , that this is an inherent objection to any society , however innocent or even praiseworthy its objects may be , whose meetings are held in private , and whose members have a bond of union , known only to themselves , and kept concealed from the world at large .

Now if in reply to this broad assertion we ask , ' What is the objection , " or , why is there such objection ? we get from some of our opponents , generally people of a pragmatical disposition , the same sort of answer as ladies sometimes give

to the question asked by their male friends , Why is smoking an ungentlemanly habit ? " Because it is . " In other words , such persons entertain an objection which they cannot express in words , but which is sufficiently apparent to themselves , and valid enough to keep them out-

Original Correspondence.

side the pale of our Order . And such a feeling ought by all means lo be respected . God forbid that Masons above all men should mock at a difficulty , honestly felt and consistently regarded ! But surely we may demand that an attempt should at least be made to formalise the objection ,

in order that we may , in our turn , have the opportunity of attempting a reply to it . Let me then state the objection thus , " * Much mischief , political and religious , has been wrought by secret societies , therefore secret societies are mischievous . " Now we will examine the logic

of this reasoning presently , but first let us observe that it is " nihil ad rem . " In granting that there are , and have been , at home and abroad , secret societies of men , banded together to promote civil and religious discord , Freemasonry has nothing in common with these , " But , "

pursues our objector , " Freemasonry abroad has been actually forbidden in some countries , because of its fomenting political strife ; and as Freemasonry is one and indivisible , the stigma attaches to the whole body . " To which we reply , " Freemasonry is one and indivisible in

this sense only , a Freemason in London is a Freemason in Paris , or Vienna , or any where else . But each country his its distinct constitution , and if foreign Masons allow their Craft to be prostituted to civil purposes , it in no way affects us , whose Masonic constitution absolutely forbids

anything of the kind . Nay , further ; if any English Mason was visiting a lodge , say in Vienna , and he found that any plotting against the government were going on therein , it would be his bounden duty , as a Freemason , to leave that lodge at once , because he is bound not to

propose , or in any way to encourage any act which may tend to subvert the peace and good order of society , and to render a due obedience to the laws of any state which may for a time become the place of his residence , or afford him its protection . "

Let me now put the objection grounded on the secrecy of Freemasonry in a syllogistic form . It will run thus , " All secret societies are mischievous ; Freemasonry is a secret society , therefore Freemasonry is mischievous . " My good friend , I deny your major premiss . I have

shown you that we have nothing to do with any mischief-plotting abroad ; and to turn our eyes homewards , what secret societies are there here , absolutely unsuspected of any mischievous tendency ! You must modify your major premiss , and so vitiate your conclusion . Granted that

some secret societies are or have been troublesome inchurch or stateygranted even Freemasonry abroad has been so abused in troublous times , we assert that there are many secret societies in England at the present time , not only illegal , but allowed and protected by the law . What

are the Odd Fellows , Druids , Foresters , Good Templars , but secret societies ? And has any one ever laid political or religious disturbance to their charge ? On the contrary , are not their objects well known , and innocent , or even laudable ? If members of Benefit or Temperance

Societies may , without detriment to the commonwealth , league themselves together by the tie of a common secret and a solemn obligation , surely the Masonic body may do the same , whose object is not to receive a " quid pro quo" for their subscriptions , or to pick out one only virtue for

practice , one only vice for abhorrence , but who are bound by the strongest ties to the fear of God , obedience to the laws , and the practice of every moral and social virtue . Nay more ; if once political or religious discussion were admitted into our lodges , the very framework of our

Order would fall to pieces , our obligations must be altered , our ceremonies re-modelled , our ancient charges abandoned , our exhortations and lectures scattered to the winds , in one word , Masonry would be Masonry no more . Of all men Masons have reason to cry , " Give peace in

our time , O Lord , " because when men are excited by the heat of religious or political animosity , they are not in a suitable frame of mind for the duties of a Masonic lodge . So then , we may triumphantly reply to all such

objectors , " yes , Freemasonry is a secret society ; its members , dispersed over the face of earth and water , need no letter of recommendation or introduction ; wherever there i . s civilisation , there is Freemasonry , and there every Mason , however

Original Correspondence.

poor , may find friends and a home . " Publish our secrets to the world;—we need not blush ; they are harmless in every respect—but by doing so you take away the very charm nnd recommendation of Freemasonry , you destroy the mystic tie which binds brother to brother ; you deprive us of

our means of mutual intercommunication , with which no stranger intermeddleth . Who dare venture to raise any objection to a husband and wife , or father and children , separated by the changes of life , communicating , if they choose , by means of a cypher , in order that the expression of their

secret thoughts might not become legible or intelligible to any one in the world ? Why then find fault with us Masons , in the North , East , South , and West , bound together by ties , which strangers cannot comprehend , because we have the power of making ourselves known to each

other , in a way which you cannot divine ? There is no secrecy in our objects , in the time and placer of our lodge ' s assembling , in our long roll-call of members , in our fidelity to the constitution and laws , in our brotherly concord and mutual affection . Our only secret , dear to us as life

itself , is the chain whose links of magic sympathy bind us each to the other . Join us , thenj become partakers of our secrets , work heartily with us , explore our mysteries , become imbued with our spirit , so far as we are ourselves worthy * of our Order , and you will find that , not for one

moment , or by the breadth of one single hair , will you be a less faithful servant of God , a less dutiful subject of the Queen , a less loving husband , a less tender father , a less firm and abiding friend , a less honest and upright man . Sir , even as I write , I feel assured that these poor words of mine will awaken an echo in thousands of

Masonic breasts , and that they will add their testimony to mine that , though we would face death , God helping us , rather than betray the secrets of our Order , yet , so far as we are concerned , we need no fear the publication of our secrets to the whole

world-Nothing is said in a Masonic lodge which would raise a blush on the purest cheek ,, nothing done therein which the most scrupulous penitent need fear to acknowledge in the Confessional . Nay , if strangers could be admitted within our walls , and witness there our labours ,

begun in order , conducted in peace , and closed in harmony , the shame would be to our detractors , and the ready blush would mantle on many a cheek among those who , in their ignorance or prejudice , have censured that they which they knew not , and derided that which they did not understand .

Sir ; there are other secrets besides those of Freemasonry , which the Roman Priest in the Confessional , forbidden by the laws of his church to be either husband or father , cannot fathom or comprehend ; and the authorities of that church , may with as much reason forbid the sacramental tie of marriage , as the deep mysterious bond of

fraternal love , as forbid her children to be Masons , because we are bound together by ties in . which the church and the world have no share . I am , Dear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , P . PROV . G . C . OXON , CHAPLAIN AND SEC , 489 .

PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGES . To the Editor ofthe Freemason . Dear Sir and Brother , — In your leader of the 22 nd inst ., yon again draw attention to the title " Grand Lodge " being applied to " Prov . Grand Lodges , " and I quite agree with you , that it is very objectionable .

Can you ; however , be surprised at the mistake being made , when the chief organ of the Craft , The Freemason , in its reports of tbe meetings , uses the same incorrect title . In those cases where the words of the speaker are given , I suppose , he ( the speaker ) must be held responsible , though even in this case , I

would suggest , the editor mi ght correct the error , but in many instances the title of Grand Lodge is used when reference is being made to what takes place , and is not an extract ofa speech . In one report of the Prov . Grand Lodge of Devon ( which indeed calls forth the remarks in question ) you say , in speaking of thu

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 7
  • You're on page8
  • 9
  • 12
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy