Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • March 6, 1880
  • Page 1
  • CONTENTS.
Current:

The Freemason, March 6, 1880: Page 1

  • Back to The Freemason, March 6, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CONTENTS. Page 1 of 1
    Article UNITED GRAND LODGE. Page 1 of 3
    Article UNITED GRAND LODGE. Page 1 of 3
    Article UNITED GRAND LODGE. Page 1 of 3 →
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Contents.

CONTENTS .

. } Grand Lodge ...... 3 ^ , or M ASONIC M . . - jaft Masonry •••¦¦•¦ ^ , * I ) HRS ' rtlSl'OSDE . VCE .- — __ „ , lon Masonic Charity Association . 09

Ke Discoveries at Cleopatra s Needle 109 Lfdenboig ian Rite to 9 Lval Masonic Benevolent Institution ro 9 f Maneiininm " and the Emulation Lodge of Improvement 109 Lj Swcdcnborg a Mason ? 109 L „ ., log Mew 5 * Umc Notes and Queries 109

5 T mirv i . ro Gfoiv Masonic Charity Association no irvon and M . zpah Ball no Sonic Ball in Liverpool 111 ranic Dramatic fcntcrtainments in oval Society of Ancient Britons 1 n [ it M asonry m

, val Arch ; IIr JlMasonry—Continued in miction in ^ crucian Society of England 112 . sonic and General Tidings , 112 Ere Meetings for Next Week 112 Soiisements i .. " ¦ , i" ., »' ., v ., vi .

United Grand Lodge.

UNITED GRAND LODGE .

The Quarterly Communication of United Grand Lodge is held on Wednesday evening , at Freemasons' Hall . ic Right Hon . the Earl of Carnarvon , Most Worshipful g Gram ! Master , presided . Lord Tentenlen , Past Grand nior Warden , occupied the Grand Senior Warden's lit . Major-General the Hon . Somerset G . Calthorpe ,

lior Grand Warden of the year , was Junior Grand anion . Bro . W . W . Beach , M . I ' ., Provincial Grand istcr for Surrey , acted as Deputy Grand Master , and 0 , Montague Guest , Provincial Grand Master for xsit , as Past Grand Master . Among the other Grand i Past Grand Officers present were Bros . Lord ¦ rcington , Senior G . W . ; Rev . C . W . Spencer

mhope , M . A ., G . Chap . ; Col . Creaton , G . cas . ; / Eneas J . Mclntyre , Q . C ., G . Reg . ; J . B . Moncki ( Town Clerk ) , Pres . B . G . P . ; Col . Shadwell H . Clerke , , Scc ; H . G . Buss , Asst . G . Sec ; E . E . Wendt , G . Sec . trmau Correspondence ; Reginald Bird , S . G . D . ; atthew Clark , J . G . D . ; Sir Albeit Woods ( Garter ) , and Dir . of Cer . ; George Burt , Asst . Grand Dir . of Cer . ;

Mullens , G . S . B . ; C . E . Willing , G . Org . ; W . Willi , G . Purs . ; James Kench , Asst . G . Purs . ; H . idler , Grand Tyler ; the Hon . Richard Giddy , SM Griqualand ; Edward Tyrrell Leitb , D . G . M . tinibay ; T . G . Linstcad , D . G . M . Hong Kong id South China ; Hon . J . Gibbs , P . D . G . M . Bombay ; . Murray , P . D . G . M . China ; John Whitwell , M . P .,

3 . W . ; Sir Michael Costa , P . G . W . ; Capt . W . Piatt , J . W . ; Rev . A . F . A . Woodford , P . G . C . ; Rev . R . P . 11 , l' . G . C . ; Rev . C . J . Martvn , P . G . C . ; Rev . Sir John , Hayes , P . G . C . ; Rev . C . W . Arnold , l ' . G . C . ; Rev . T . Kavmshaw , P . G . C ; H . J . 1 > . Dumas , P . G . D . ; J . Percy itn , l ' . G . D . ; E . J . Barron , P . G . D . ; Jabez Hogg , P . G . D . ; linn , P . G . D . ; Capt . N . G . Philips , P . G . D .: Raphael

Sta , P . G . D . ; Charles A . Murton , P . G . D . ; J . C . Parkin-1 , l' . G . D . ; J . Glaisher , P . G . D . ; Raynham W . Stewart , ID . j John A . Rucker , P . G . D . ; Brackstone Baker , G . D . ; William A . F . Powell , P . G . D . ; Charles W . Hutton , l ' . G . D . ; / . M . Case , P . G . D . ; John ' . Wike , P . G . D . ; Peter de Lande Long , P . G . D . ; bcit Grey , l ' . G . D . ; C . C . Dumas , P . Asst . G . D . of C . ;

» - ** Lewis Thomas , P . Assr . G . D . of C . ; F . Robinson , Asst . G . D . of C . ; W . R . Williams , P . Asst . G . D . of C ; ' tie Pollen , P . G . S . B . ; J . Mason , P . G . S . B . ; A . J . Duff « r , P . G . S . B . ; W . A . Nettleship , P . G . S . B . ; [ oshua ¦ a , P . G . S . B . ; C . A . Cottebrune , P . G . P . ; E . P . Albert , 5 . P . ; S . G . Foxall , P . G . P ., and others . '! ' --r the formal opening ot Grand Lodge , Grand

Srcrc-I rtad the regulations for the government of Grand fee ( luring the lime of public business , after which he D read the minutes of the Quarterly Communication ^' -. 'rtl December , 1879 . ° ''> re these minutes were put for confirmation Bro . Crge J . McKay , P . M . 129 , Kendal , rose to move the " ¦ confirmation of that part of them which related to Bro .

« s Stevens' motion for a committee on uniformity of a ' - In doing so he said he assumed a position which Hint very enviable , but he trusted Grand Lodge would ¦ think the manner in which he proposed the motion "hrough any disrespect , as it was only from a sense of )' ' which , as a brother , he owed to the Craft . He felt "" ' tnt that the brethren in England and the Colonies

"w 'lrprecate any attempt to enforce uniformity of ritual '' j'Shout the lodges . In the Colonies he believed it '"' be utterly impracticable , and he trusted Grand 'S ' would never assent to such a change . This ! hut a matter which concerned Grand Lodge "' luV . n alone , but it affected the Colonies also , whose £ ' 5 were one-fourth on the roll , and were

"sing j „ i | lc ratio of one-third . Grand Lodge , in ¦'¦ ' T toleration , had been content with the present ivork' ¦ ''thc last sixty-seven years , and he thought it did ' ^ tur what the working was—whether the Emulation '' ¦ Stability , as long as the essentials were preserved . ••! ruice with the ritual caused the great schism in ¦; ' -ml he believed the present was a motion which 1

he surrounded with difficulties , the magnitude and lla 'e consequences of which no one could foresee . One step might be the means of incalculable injury to Vaft , and inflict upon the Order an irreparable evil r no one could repair . With the thousands of the r j-n , they had been early taught a different ritual , com'Jtoe toa cut and dried ritual There might be a differ" > the verbiage , but Grand . Lodge would agree that

United Grand Lodge.

the essentials were practically the same . He believed no Committee could be got together to which the whole Craft would listen . He trusted some brother would second his motion , and treat the question from the archaeological point of view , and he hoped most earnestly and sincerely that Grand Lodge would retrace its steps as regarded what he considered the unwise motion of Bio . Stevens . He

asked Grand Lodge , in its wise and tolerant spirit , to let well alone . The Rev . C . W . Arnold seconded the motion . He thought it right to explain his position . He had been put on the proposed Committee , but it was right he should say his name was put there by his province , which he should be most happy to represent if appointed ; but he

had written to Bro . btevens to say he objected 111 Into to the Committee , as he believed it would be detrimental to Freemasonry . At last Grand Lodge he was obliged to leave before he had an opportunity of speaking , but on that occasion it was said that the working of the provinces was not what it ought to be . Now , he had attended London lodges and lodges in the provinces , and in his own

Province of Surrey , and he was bound to say that the working in the provinees would bear comparison with that of any of the London lodges . In his own province he had been received most kindly , and if he pointed out anything in the working which he considered not right , his suggestion of an improvement was most gladly entertained . In one lodge they were doing their work in a vety old

fashioned way , and he wrote about how a difference might be made , and the consequence was a lodge of instruction was formed , and a better form of ritual was adopted , and he believed that henceforth the working would be on the same lines as the other lodges in the province . If this could be done by other Deputy Provincial Grand

Masters he thought the differences in working would soon disappear . He believed it would be a great waste of time if Bro . Stevens' Committee was appointed . No good would be done . It would be a long time before the Committee could arrive at any conclusion , and when the result was obtained it would be a most difficult thing for Grand L'idge to interfere with the working of the different

provinces and the districts throughout the world . They would have to send peripatetic Preceptors to Tasmania , Bombay , or Gtiqualand , to show uniformity of working . But to pass to another point—there were in places many cherished customs which had been handed down from time immemorial , and the brethren of those particular lodges would not allow those old customs to be stamped out . It

would be a great interference with the lmerty of Freemasonry to insist on a change . Masons had common sense , and a sufficient amount of education to know what was good when they saw it , and he believed in time better systems of working would be introduced through the interchange of visits which took place between the lodges , and which Masons so r - . elighted to exercise . In this way

they would get rid of eccentricities which he believed was the reason why Bro . Stevens introduced this motion . Uniformity in working had greatly increased in the last , few years , as Masons were brought neartr to one another by the facilities of communication , and he believed that uniformity would be ultimately brought about . If there was not there would only be a few old traditions left which were perfectly harmless in themselves , and would not affect

the working . The Rev . R . J . Simpson , in reference to the order of these proceedings , said he was perfectly aware that the appointment of an officer and the grants of money re quired confirmation , but he wished to ask whether or not on the confirmation of minutes they were open to have a discussion of every matter that had been settled at a previous meeting .

The Earl of Carnarvon had no hesitation in saying that the mover of the no . i-confirmation of the minutes was quite in order . The Rev . R . J . Simpson ventured to think , without any reference to the merits or demerits of Bro . Stevens' proposal ,

that Grand Lodge having decided on having a Committee to settle this matter once and for ever , it was a stultification of Grand Lodge proceedings- to negative what it had done . If Bro . Stevens' proposal was so absurd and impracticable as it was represented to be , the Committee would give tffect to that opinion , and it would be decided once and for ever .

Bro . Cumberland supported Bro . Stevens . He also had been in various lodges , and he had seen working that was not in accordance with his view . He had a great many startling revelations to make with regard to what he had seen . ( Bro . Cumberland then stated a number of instances in which he had seen working different to ths ordinary working , and oi which he did not approve . ) He thought

something might be devised to do away with these eccentricities , many of which he thought to be very wrong . He believed something ought to be done to take off all these superfluous knobs and excrescences from the Order , and it would be all the better for the Craft . On these grounds he supported the confirmation of the minutes , and he did not think it a great honour for Grand Lodge at

one meeting to settle the matter , and at the next to go over the whole ground again . Bro . James Stevens thought the . whole affair might be put in a nutshell . Grand Sicretary had read the regulations for the Government of Gran : ! Lodge , one of which was that after a motion had been carried and confirmed it became law . Consequently his resolution became part

and parcel of the absolute laws to which the brethren had committed themselves . His motion was carried in 1869-1870 , and a Committee > vas to he formed . Though ten years had elapsed it had not been formed , and with all due deference he asserted that there was , therefore , a law on their books which had not been fulfilled . He had been charged with taking Grand Lodge by surprise , but due notice had been given , and the brethren were aware of what

United Grand Lodge.

was intended . After his motion in 186 9 was carried , the formation of a Committee was adjourned sine die . EJeven years had elapsed , and a great many days had intervened , arid no Committee was formed . He hoped they would now form a Committee . He assured the brethren he was quite single-minded in the matter , and it the brethren decided against him he should let the matter drop , and go

away with the conviction that he had at least done his duty as a Mason . He thought it would have been better if Bro . Arnold , instead of refusing now to be on the Committee , had written him first to say that he would not . The Rev . C , W . Arnold said he objected to the Committee , but as he had been appointed by the Province he should consider it his duty to serve .

Bro . Stevens , continuing , said he only asked for a Committee of Inquiry , and , if the Committee was formed , they would say whether uniformity of ritual was practicable or not . If they said it was not he should be satisfied . He had never known any attempt to stifle inquiry when there was not something to be inquired into . It there was anything behind which the brethren did not know the

Committee would find it out , and the Commkte would report to its fullest extent . The Rev . A . F . A . Woodford had not intended to speak , the brethren having listened to him so kindly on the previous occasion . It was utterly incorrect to say that in 186 9 the fullest discussion was given to this question . Bro . Stevens thought it was out of order to refer to

proceedings ten years ago . The Rev . A . F . A . Woodford believed he was perfectly in order . Though the resolution was carried in 1869 it had no : received adequate discussion . It came on at the fag end of a very exciting night , when the present Grand Master was introduced to English Freemasons for the first time . If Bro . Stevens would look over the report of the

proceedings he would sec that the reporter added the significant words that Bros . Stebbing , Browse , and MattheiV Cooke all said a few words , and then the motion was carried . At the next meeting a distinguished member of the Order expressed his regret that the subject had been so hastily carried . The Grand Lodge then referred the appointment of a Committee till the

meeting in June , when Bro . Horace Lloyd moved that the Committee should not be appointed . This was carried , and it would be seen by the minutes that Grand Lodge refused to appoint the Committee . How any one could venture to say it was a stultification of the proceedings of Grand Lodge to do as was proposed hy the present motion he was at a loss to understand . He therefore earnestly

supported Bro . McKay ' s motion , as he felt sure , from long provincial experience , that any interference with the harmless liberty of numberless lodges would be productive of the most serious consequences . He might say , on the part of the Masters of lodges of England , there was no body of men more willing to do their duty according to the ancient landmarks , or less willing to do anything contrary to the

old and cherished traditions , than the country brethren . The effect of Bro . Stevens' proposal would be greater than even he and his friends anticipated , and he trusted that Grand Lodge , by a large majority , would non-confirm a hasty resolution . Bro . W . R . Marsh submitted that the Committee asked for was only to be appointed for tlv purpose of enquiry ,

and if the minutes were confirmed Grand Lo lge would not be pledged to any principle . It would be quite lime enough when the Committee made its report to raise any discussion as to the formation of the ritual . The Earl of Carnarvon having put the motion to the meeting , Bro . McKay ' s amendment was carried , and the minutes , with the exception of that part which related to Bro . Stevens' motion , were confirmed by an immense

majority . Bro . Frank Richardson , W . M . Grand Stewards' Lodge , then rose and said : Most Worshipful Pro Grand Master and brethren , at the last Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge I had the distinguished honour to nominate the Grand Master for the ensuing year . It is necessary , according to the Book of Constitutions , that the motion

must be put as a substantive motion , and carried at a subsequent Grand Lodge . In rising , therefore , to propose that H . K . H . the Prince of Wales shall he appointed Grand Master for the ensuing year , 1 feel that I have an easy task , and I will not weary you in performing it . We all know how ably H . R . H . discharges the duties of his high and important office , and how ready he is at all times , no

doubt as often as personal convenience will allow him , to devote himself to the general good of our Order . As an instance of this , I may refer to the fact that H . R . H . has consented to journey into Cornwall in the month of May to lay the foundation stone of Truro Cathedral with Masonic honours . This , I believe , is the first time , at least in this portion of Her Majesty ' s dominions , that H . R . H .

has performed such a ceremony . 1 believe you will all unite with me in thinking that H . R . H . should be re-elected to the Throne of Grand Lodge , which he so much adorns , and in which position he will continue to maintain the affection of his Masonic subjects . I beg to propose the election of His Royal Highness as Most Worshipful Grand Master of English Freem .-. sons for the year ensuing . ( Loud

and general applause . ) Bro . Alderman Ellis , P . M . No . 1 : Most Worshipful Pro Grand Master , I h . eg to second the election of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales as Most Worshipful Grand Master for the ensuing year . After the eloquent words which Bro . Richardson has made use of , and which , I am sure , will permeate the heart of every Mason , it is

happily unnecessary for me to add one word beyond this . The nomination , I am sure , of His Royal Highness will be received with acclamation . ( Cheers . ) The Earl of Carnarvon : Brethren , this is a motion which is made in the formal course of business , and involves no discussion or difference of opinion , and I shall , therefore , when I put the motion , which I now place before

“The Freemason: 1880-03-06, Page 1” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_06031880/page/1/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
CONTENTS. Article 1
UNITED GRAND LODGE. Article 1
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 3
To Correspondents. Article 6
Births, Marriages, and Deaths. Article 6
PERMANENT ENLARGEMENT OF THE "FREEMASON." Article 6
KENNING'S MASONIC CYCLOPÆDIA. Article 6
THE FREEMASON. Article 6
Original Correspondence. Article 7
Reviews. Article 7
Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 7
ANOTHER MS. CONSTITUTION. Article 8
Obituary. Article 8
LONDON MASONIC CHARITY ASSOCIATION. Article 8
CARNARVON AND MIZPAH BALL. Article 8
MASONIC BALL IN LIVERPOOL. Article 9
MASONIC DRAMATIC ENTERTAINMENTS. Article 9
LOYAL SOCIETY OF ANCIENT BRITONS. Article 9
Mark Masonry. Article 9
Royal Arch. Article 9
Untitled Article 9
ROSICRUCIAN SOCIETY OF ENGLAND. Article 10
Masonic and General Tidings. Article 10
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS Article 10
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

4 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

6 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

6 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

7 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

7 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

5 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

9 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

15 Articles
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Contents.

CONTENTS .

. } Grand Lodge ...... 3 ^ , or M ASONIC M . . - jaft Masonry •••¦¦•¦ ^ , * I ) HRS ' rtlSl'OSDE . VCE .- — __ „ , lon Masonic Charity Association . 09

Ke Discoveries at Cleopatra s Needle 109 Lfdenboig ian Rite to 9 Lval Masonic Benevolent Institution ro 9 f Maneiininm " and the Emulation Lodge of Improvement 109 Lj Swcdcnborg a Mason ? 109 L „ ., log Mew 5 * Umc Notes and Queries 109

5 T mirv i . ro Gfoiv Masonic Charity Association no irvon and M . zpah Ball no Sonic Ball in Liverpool 111 ranic Dramatic fcntcrtainments in oval Society of Ancient Britons 1 n [ it M asonry m

, val Arch ; IIr JlMasonry—Continued in miction in ^ crucian Society of England 112 . sonic and General Tidings , 112 Ere Meetings for Next Week 112 Soiisements i .. " ¦ , i" ., »' ., v ., vi .

United Grand Lodge.

UNITED GRAND LODGE .

The Quarterly Communication of United Grand Lodge is held on Wednesday evening , at Freemasons' Hall . ic Right Hon . the Earl of Carnarvon , Most Worshipful g Gram ! Master , presided . Lord Tentenlen , Past Grand nior Warden , occupied the Grand Senior Warden's lit . Major-General the Hon . Somerset G . Calthorpe ,

lior Grand Warden of the year , was Junior Grand anion . Bro . W . W . Beach , M . I ' ., Provincial Grand istcr for Surrey , acted as Deputy Grand Master , and 0 , Montague Guest , Provincial Grand Master for xsit , as Past Grand Master . Among the other Grand i Past Grand Officers present were Bros . Lord ¦ rcington , Senior G . W . ; Rev . C . W . Spencer

mhope , M . A ., G . Chap . ; Col . Creaton , G . cas . ; / Eneas J . Mclntyre , Q . C ., G . Reg . ; J . B . Moncki ( Town Clerk ) , Pres . B . G . P . ; Col . Shadwell H . Clerke , , Scc ; H . G . Buss , Asst . G . Sec ; E . E . Wendt , G . Sec . trmau Correspondence ; Reginald Bird , S . G . D . ; atthew Clark , J . G . D . ; Sir Albeit Woods ( Garter ) , and Dir . of Cer . ; George Burt , Asst . Grand Dir . of Cer . ;

Mullens , G . S . B . ; C . E . Willing , G . Org . ; W . Willi , G . Purs . ; James Kench , Asst . G . Purs . ; H . idler , Grand Tyler ; the Hon . Richard Giddy , SM Griqualand ; Edward Tyrrell Leitb , D . G . M . tinibay ; T . G . Linstcad , D . G . M . Hong Kong id South China ; Hon . J . Gibbs , P . D . G . M . Bombay ; . Murray , P . D . G . M . China ; John Whitwell , M . P .,

3 . W . ; Sir Michael Costa , P . G . W . ; Capt . W . Piatt , J . W . ; Rev . A . F . A . Woodford , P . G . C . ; Rev . R . P . 11 , l' . G . C . ; Rev . C . J . Martvn , P . G . C . ; Rev . Sir John , Hayes , P . G . C . ; Rev . C . W . Arnold , l ' . G . C . ; Rev . T . Kavmshaw , P . G . C ; H . J . 1 > . Dumas , P . G . D . ; J . Percy itn , l ' . G . D . ; E . J . Barron , P . G . D . ; Jabez Hogg , P . G . D . ; linn , P . G . D . ; Capt . N . G . Philips , P . G . D .: Raphael

Sta , P . G . D . ; Charles A . Murton , P . G . D . ; J . C . Parkin-1 , l' . G . D . ; J . Glaisher , P . G . D . ; Raynham W . Stewart , ID . j John A . Rucker , P . G . D . ; Brackstone Baker , G . D . ; William A . F . Powell , P . G . D . ; Charles W . Hutton , l ' . G . D . ; / . M . Case , P . G . D . ; John ' . Wike , P . G . D . ; Peter de Lande Long , P . G . D . ; bcit Grey , l ' . G . D . ; C . C . Dumas , P . Asst . G . D . of C . ;

» - ** Lewis Thomas , P . Assr . G . D . of C . ; F . Robinson , Asst . G . D . of C . ; W . R . Williams , P . Asst . G . D . of C ; ' tie Pollen , P . G . S . B . ; J . Mason , P . G . S . B . ; A . J . Duff « r , P . G . S . B . ; W . A . Nettleship , P . G . S . B . ; [ oshua ¦ a , P . G . S . B . ; C . A . Cottebrune , P . G . P . ; E . P . Albert , 5 . P . ; S . G . Foxall , P . G . P ., and others . '! ' --r the formal opening ot Grand Lodge , Grand

Srcrc-I rtad the regulations for the government of Grand fee ( luring the lime of public business , after which he D read the minutes of the Quarterly Communication ^' -. 'rtl December , 1879 . ° ''> re these minutes were put for confirmation Bro . Crge J . McKay , P . M . 129 , Kendal , rose to move the " ¦ confirmation of that part of them which related to Bro .

« s Stevens' motion for a committee on uniformity of a ' - In doing so he said he assumed a position which Hint very enviable , but he trusted Grand Lodge would ¦ think the manner in which he proposed the motion "hrough any disrespect , as it was only from a sense of )' ' which , as a brother , he owed to the Craft . He felt "" ' tnt that the brethren in England and the Colonies

"w 'lrprecate any attempt to enforce uniformity of ritual '' j'Shout the lodges . In the Colonies he believed it '"' be utterly impracticable , and he trusted Grand 'S ' would never assent to such a change . This ! hut a matter which concerned Grand Lodge "' luV . n alone , but it affected the Colonies also , whose £ ' 5 were one-fourth on the roll , and were

"sing j „ i | lc ratio of one-third . Grand Lodge , in ¦'¦ ' T toleration , had been content with the present ivork' ¦ ''thc last sixty-seven years , and he thought it did ' ^ tur what the working was—whether the Emulation '' ¦ Stability , as long as the essentials were preserved . ••! ruice with the ritual caused the great schism in ¦; ' -ml he believed the present was a motion which 1

he surrounded with difficulties , the magnitude and lla 'e consequences of which no one could foresee . One step might be the means of incalculable injury to Vaft , and inflict upon the Order an irreparable evil r no one could repair . With the thousands of the r j-n , they had been early taught a different ritual , com'Jtoe toa cut and dried ritual There might be a differ" > the verbiage , but Grand . Lodge would agree that

United Grand Lodge.

the essentials were practically the same . He believed no Committee could be got together to which the whole Craft would listen . He trusted some brother would second his motion , and treat the question from the archaeological point of view , and he hoped most earnestly and sincerely that Grand Lodge would retrace its steps as regarded what he considered the unwise motion of Bio . Stevens . He

asked Grand Lodge , in its wise and tolerant spirit , to let well alone . The Rev . C . W . Arnold seconded the motion . He thought it right to explain his position . He had been put on the proposed Committee , but it was right he should say his name was put there by his province , which he should be most happy to represent if appointed ; but he

had written to Bro . btevens to say he objected 111 Into to the Committee , as he believed it would be detrimental to Freemasonry . At last Grand Lodge he was obliged to leave before he had an opportunity of speaking , but on that occasion it was said that the working of the provinces was not what it ought to be . Now , he had attended London lodges and lodges in the provinces , and in his own

Province of Surrey , and he was bound to say that the working in the provinees would bear comparison with that of any of the London lodges . In his own province he had been received most kindly , and if he pointed out anything in the working which he considered not right , his suggestion of an improvement was most gladly entertained . In one lodge they were doing their work in a vety old

fashioned way , and he wrote about how a difference might be made , and the consequence was a lodge of instruction was formed , and a better form of ritual was adopted , and he believed that henceforth the working would be on the same lines as the other lodges in the province . If this could be done by other Deputy Provincial Grand

Masters he thought the differences in working would soon disappear . He believed it would be a great waste of time if Bro . Stevens' Committee was appointed . No good would be done . It would be a long time before the Committee could arrive at any conclusion , and when the result was obtained it would be a most difficult thing for Grand L'idge to interfere with the working of the different

provinces and the districts throughout the world . They would have to send peripatetic Preceptors to Tasmania , Bombay , or Gtiqualand , to show uniformity of working . But to pass to another point—there were in places many cherished customs which had been handed down from time immemorial , and the brethren of those particular lodges would not allow those old customs to be stamped out . It

would be a great interference with the lmerty of Freemasonry to insist on a change . Masons had common sense , and a sufficient amount of education to know what was good when they saw it , and he believed in time better systems of working would be introduced through the interchange of visits which took place between the lodges , and which Masons so r - . elighted to exercise . In this way

they would get rid of eccentricities which he believed was the reason why Bro . Stevens introduced this motion . Uniformity in working had greatly increased in the last , few years , as Masons were brought neartr to one another by the facilities of communication , and he believed that uniformity would be ultimately brought about . If there was not there would only be a few old traditions left which were perfectly harmless in themselves , and would not affect

the working . The Rev . R . J . Simpson , in reference to the order of these proceedings , said he was perfectly aware that the appointment of an officer and the grants of money re quired confirmation , but he wished to ask whether or not on the confirmation of minutes they were open to have a discussion of every matter that had been settled at a previous meeting .

The Earl of Carnarvon had no hesitation in saying that the mover of the no . i-confirmation of the minutes was quite in order . The Rev . R . J . Simpson ventured to think , without any reference to the merits or demerits of Bro . Stevens' proposal ,

that Grand Lodge having decided on having a Committee to settle this matter once and for ever , it was a stultification of Grand Lodge proceedings- to negative what it had done . If Bro . Stevens' proposal was so absurd and impracticable as it was represented to be , the Committee would give tffect to that opinion , and it would be decided once and for ever .

Bro . Cumberland supported Bro . Stevens . He also had been in various lodges , and he had seen working that was not in accordance with his view . He had a great many startling revelations to make with regard to what he had seen . ( Bro . Cumberland then stated a number of instances in which he had seen working different to ths ordinary working , and oi which he did not approve . ) He thought

something might be devised to do away with these eccentricities , many of which he thought to be very wrong . He believed something ought to be done to take off all these superfluous knobs and excrescences from the Order , and it would be all the better for the Craft . On these grounds he supported the confirmation of the minutes , and he did not think it a great honour for Grand Lodge at

one meeting to settle the matter , and at the next to go over the whole ground again . Bro . James Stevens thought the . whole affair might be put in a nutshell . Grand Sicretary had read the regulations for the Government of Gran : ! Lodge , one of which was that after a motion had been carried and confirmed it became law . Consequently his resolution became part

and parcel of the absolute laws to which the brethren had committed themselves . His motion was carried in 1869-1870 , and a Committee > vas to he formed . Though ten years had elapsed it had not been formed , and with all due deference he asserted that there was , therefore , a law on their books which had not been fulfilled . He had been charged with taking Grand Lodge by surprise , but due notice had been given , and the brethren were aware of what

United Grand Lodge.

was intended . After his motion in 186 9 was carried , the formation of a Committee was adjourned sine die . EJeven years had elapsed , and a great many days had intervened , arid no Committee was formed . He hoped they would now form a Committee . He assured the brethren he was quite single-minded in the matter , and it the brethren decided against him he should let the matter drop , and go

away with the conviction that he had at least done his duty as a Mason . He thought it would have been better if Bro . Arnold , instead of refusing now to be on the Committee , had written him first to say that he would not . The Rev . C , W . Arnold said he objected to the Committee , but as he had been appointed by the Province he should consider it his duty to serve .

Bro . Stevens , continuing , said he only asked for a Committee of Inquiry , and , if the Committee was formed , they would say whether uniformity of ritual was practicable or not . If they said it was not he should be satisfied . He had never known any attempt to stifle inquiry when there was not something to be inquired into . It there was anything behind which the brethren did not know the

Committee would find it out , and the Commkte would report to its fullest extent . The Rev . A . F . A . Woodford had not intended to speak , the brethren having listened to him so kindly on the previous occasion . It was utterly incorrect to say that in 186 9 the fullest discussion was given to this question . Bro . Stevens thought it was out of order to refer to

proceedings ten years ago . The Rev . A . F . A . Woodford believed he was perfectly in order . Though the resolution was carried in 1869 it had no : received adequate discussion . It came on at the fag end of a very exciting night , when the present Grand Master was introduced to English Freemasons for the first time . If Bro . Stevens would look over the report of the

proceedings he would sec that the reporter added the significant words that Bros . Stebbing , Browse , and MattheiV Cooke all said a few words , and then the motion was carried . At the next meeting a distinguished member of the Order expressed his regret that the subject had been so hastily carried . The Grand Lodge then referred the appointment of a Committee till the

meeting in June , when Bro . Horace Lloyd moved that the Committee should not be appointed . This was carried , and it would be seen by the minutes that Grand Lodge refused to appoint the Committee . How any one could venture to say it was a stultification of the proceedings of Grand Lodge to do as was proposed hy the present motion he was at a loss to understand . He therefore earnestly

supported Bro . McKay ' s motion , as he felt sure , from long provincial experience , that any interference with the harmless liberty of numberless lodges would be productive of the most serious consequences . He might say , on the part of the Masters of lodges of England , there was no body of men more willing to do their duty according to the ancient landmarks , or less willing to do anything contrary to the

old and cherished traditions , than the country brethren . The effect of Bro . Stevens' proposal would be greater than even he and his friends anticipated , and he trusted that Grand Lodge , by a large majority , would non-confirm a hasty resolution . Bro . W . R . Marsh submitted that the Committee asked for was only to be appointed for tlv purpose of enquiry ,

and if the minutes were confirmed Grand Lo lge would not be pledged to any principle . It would be quite lime enough when the Committee made its report to raise any discussion as to the formation of the ritual . The Earl of Carnarvon having put the motion to the meeting , Bro . McKay ' s amendment was carried , and the minutes , with the exception of that part which related to Bro . Stevens' motion , were confirmed by an immense

majority . Bro . Frank Richardson , W . M . Grand Stewards' Lodge , then rose and said : Most Worshipful Pro Grand Master and brethren , at the last Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge I had the distinguished honour to nominate the Grand Master for the ensuing year . It is necessary , according to the Book of Constitutions , that the motion

must be put as a substantive motion , and carried at a subsequent Grand Lodge . In rising , therefore , to propose that H . K . H . the Prince of Wales shall he appointed Grand Master for the ensuing year , 1 feel that I have an easy task , and I will not weary you in performing it . We all know how ably H . R . H . discharges the duties of his high and important office , and how ready he is at all times , no

doubt as often as personal convenience will allow him , to devote himself to the general good of our Order . As an instance of this , I may refer to the fact that H . R . H . has consented to journey into Cornwall in the month of May to lay the foundation stone of Truro Cathedral with Masonic honours . This , I believe , is the first time , at least in this portion of Her Majesty ' s dominions , that H . R . H .

has performed such a ceremony . 1 believe you will all unite with me in thinking that H . R . H . should be re-elected to the Throne of Grand Lodge , which he so much adorns , and in which position he will continue to maintain the affection of his Masonic subjects . I beg to propose the election of His Royal Highness as Most Worshipful Grand Master of English Freem .-. sons for the year ensuing . ( Loud

and general applause . ) Bro . Alderman Ellis , P . M . No . 1 : Most Worshipful Pro Grand Master , I h . eg to second the election of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales as Most Worshipful Grand Master for the ensuing year . After the eloquent words which Bro . Richardson has made use of , and which , I am sure , will permeate the heart of every Mason , it is

happily unnecessary for me to add one word beyond this . The nomination , I am sure , of His Royal Highness will be received with acclamation . ( Cheers . ) The Earl of Carnarvon : Brethren , this is a motion which is made in the formal course of business , and involves no discussion or difference of opinion , and I shall , therefore , when I put the motion , which I now place before

  • Prev page
  • You're on page1
  • 2
  • 12
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy