Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • July 12, 1884
  • Page 3
  • ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717.
Current:

The Freemason, July 12, 1884: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemason, July 12, 1884
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CONSECRATION OF THE PORTCULLIS LODGE, No. 2038, AT LANGPORT. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717. Page 1 of 1
    Article ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717. Page 1 of 1
    Article HISTORY OF THE ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Page 1 of 1
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Consecration Of The Portcullis Lodge, No. 2038, At Langport.

The Consecrating Officer having taken his scat , appointed his officers , pro tem ., as follows : Bros . C . Fry Edwards , S . W . ; Ashley , P . P . G . J . W ., as P . G . Junior Warden ; R .-Bailey , 261 , P . P . G . R ., as I . P . M . ; J . G . Vile , 261 , D . of Cers . ; Rev . A . G . How , Prov . G . Chaplain , and J . C . Hunt , Prov . Grand Secretary . ' After the usual preliminary Masonic rites , the CONS * EURATING OFFICER addressed the brethren on the nature

of the meeting . He said they had assembled to-day for thc purpose of dedicating to Masonry a new lodge in this important town . Several zealous Masons in the neig hbourhood had for some years been anxious to make Langport a centre of Masonic life , and the time had now arrived when their wishes might be successfully carried out . The Most Worshipful the Grand Master had been pleased to grant a warrant , and , in accordance with that

warrant , they had met to consecrate this lodge . He had indulged the hope that the Right Worshipful the Provincial Grand . Master , the Earl of Carnarvon , would himself have been able to perform the ceremony ; but he was sorry to say that his lordship ' s public engagements would not permit of this . He would ,, therefore , himself at once proceed with the ceremony , with the assistance of . the Provincial Officers present .

The ceremony was then impressively performed by the Consecrating Officer , the sacred elements being borne by Bros . R . C . Else , the Rev . A . G . How , Prov . G . Chap . ; and T . Jelley , P . M . * 79 6 ; and J . Cornwall , P . M . 762 , both P . P . G . S . W ' s . The incidental music during the ceremony was ably performed by the P . P . G . Organist , Bro . Nosworthy , and the following

anthems were sung by the brethren -. Before the consecration— " Behold , how pleasant and how good ; " during the ceremony—Weldon ' s " O praise God in His Holiness ; " after the ceremony—Haydn's "The Spacious Firmament on High . " The Rev . A . G . How , the Prov . Grand Chaplain , delivered an oration on the nature and principles of the institution .

The lodge having then been duly constituted , the assembled ( brethren sang the National Anthem , and the dedication ceremony proper terminated . The lodge then proceeded lo instal the W . M . designate , Bro . John Hughes , as first W . M . of the lodge . The ceremony of installation was performed by the R . W . P . P . G . M ., Bro . R . C . Else . The newly-Installed Master then appointed and invested the following officers : Bros . Wm . Trevena , P . M .

1255 , P . P . G . D . C , S . W . ; W . E . Bennett , 814 , J . W . ; Morgan , S . D . ; Hobbs , J . D . ; Vincent , I . G . ; and Webber , Tyler . The lodge passed votes of thanks to the Consecrating and Installing Officers , and to the officers of Grand Lodge , and then adjourned to a banquet at the Langport Arms , which was served up in admirable style by Bro . Baring . The menu included every delicacy of the season . The W . M ., Bro . Dr . Hughes , presided , and was supported by the P . P . G . M ., Bro . R . C

Else , and many officers , Past and Present , of Provincial Grand Lodge . The usual Masonic ' toast list was subsequently gone through , and after dinner the sum of £ 5 5 s . was subscribed to the Masonic Charities , in the names of the _ Masters of the lodge , who will thus have two votes annually lo the Masonic schools . We may mention that the lodge volume of the Sacred Laws , so essential to the ceremonies , was presented to the lodge by Mrs . Barling . The founders of Lodge Portcullis are Bros . John Hughes , W . E . Bennett , J . Vincent , A . E . Hobbs , Trevena , Morgan , and Barling .

English Freemasonry Before 1717.

ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717 .

The recent discussions which have taken place in regard to pre-1717 Freemasonry in England have led me to put into a connected form a few notes-on the subject which have been accumulating for some time . We have a ' great difficulty to contend with when we seek to construct a . system , or order , of Masonic life and continuance before 1717 , from which the movement in 1717 naturally or specifically emerged . I repudiate " ex irno corde "

the absurd , inconsistent , and ridiculous 1717 theory , as it is termed , as not only contradicted critically by every fact we have of archaeology and history but most derogatory to the dignity of our Order even to discuss . That any one can seriously propound the theory that our Freemasonry is the outcome of a convivial club in 1717 hasalways appeared tome such an aberration from right reason , and Such a perverse paradox , that I have always felt it was beneath

our dignity ' as Masonic writers seriously for one single moment to dilate upon it . But the outlook is very hazy indeed when we seek to link on the Grand Lodge of 1717 with any form of seventeenth century English Freemasonry . One of our most patent difficulties is the little knowledge we have of what took place in 1717 . VVe have , so far , no contemporary account of the proceedings as known to exist , and none apparently earlier than 1738 , 21

years afterwards . We have , indeed , in 1723 some Regulations drawn up by Payne in 1722 , and by implication . we may , I think , fairly assume that such are older Regulations than 1717 , that Payne did not draft them afresh , and that therefore we have in them traces of earlier legislation , customs , precedents , Masonic usages , and Masonic verbiage . Payne does not seemingly treat them as new matter ,. and there appears lo be running through

almost all a sort of silent witness , —if I may so say , —of previous laws and earlier enactments . If so , that would take us back before 1700 , with Freemasonry under some form of legislative provisions for the supreme . body and for private lodges . Some think they observe traces of a two-fold government , —a Northern and a Southern system , —but I confess , though the probability of such a state of things need not be denied , its traces to me appear

very doubtful indeed . I know of no earlier minute than one of 1722 in a lodge minute book , " and that merely seems to confirm Anderson ' s statement as to four lodges meeting in 1717 . But even its verbiage requires careful study , as it is not quite clear that only four lodges are intended by the words . But of the proceedings of 1717 , as I said before , or 171 S , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , except this partial minute , no record so far as is known at present

is extant . I say so far as known , because so great have been the apathy and le ' thargy of our lod ges in . these respects , that many collections of records are still untouched and unopened , and are lying in lumber rooms , in dirty boxes , stowed away anywhere , perishing often with mildew and decay . . I for one never could understand why , with our professions of light , we should guard our old minute books like the apples of the gardens of the Hesperides , or why practically we should imitate the

perverse and childish conduct of some of our older forefathers , who burnt Alasonic records . From 1700 lo 1717 is , as older writers have it , "hiatus valde defiendus , " a Masonic chasm , which at present we cannot bridge over , or fill up satisfactorily , . and therefore , " a fortiori , " the difficulty as we seak to get into the seventeenth century becomes more serious and intense . We have evidence indeed quite early in the eighteenth century of a lodge at Alnwick , and if Preston is correct , and the minute book he mentions turns up of 1705 at York , we inay learn much of that period of our annals . But so far as we have discovered this is all our present or available evidence

English Freemasonry Before 1717.

in the early , say , eighteenth century of an existing body , and of this evidence so far only the bit of Alnwick evidence is verifiable . What then can we say as regards the seventeenth century Freemasonry ? The answer to this query I propose to give in the next Freemason , as I do not think it wise to increase this paper , and I am well aware how few Freemasons read these

archaeological contributions , and feel that except to a few earnest students they present but little attraction . But still , unless the Freemason is to degenerate into a mere publication of lodge reports and after-dinner speeches , not the most intellectual form of Masonic study or thought , some such essays as these must from time to time appear . DRYASDUST .

History Of The Royal Masonic Institution For Boys.

HISTORY OF THE ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS .

CHAPTER VIII . FROM THE- INAUGURATION OV THE SCHOOL AT WOOD ' GREEN TO THAT OI * THE NEW BUILDING , 1857-1865 .

( Continued from page 331 . ) We are now entering upon what many brethren at the time must have regarded as the most critical epoch in the history of thc Institution . Hitherto the Executive had succeeded in performing their allotted duties with

exemplary skill . Their management of . the funds had been both economical and liberal . They had carefull y watched over their young charges and had done the best which the means at their disposal permitted in educating them . But this latter part of their duty had been of necessity entrusted to a number of agents—namely , the Masters of the different schools at which the boys were entered . They had thus acquired little or no practical experience

of school management or school disci pline , beyond what the parents or guardians of all children may be supposed to possess . Now they were about to have a school of their own , with an educational staff appointed and paid by themselves . By a stroke of the pen , as it were , they found themselves suddenly transmuted from a governing body with no establishment to govern ' into a proprietary body with the full powers to regulate everything of material

importance , from theduties and emoluments of the Master , Matron , and the subordinate staff to making contracts for the supply of food and clothing , from electing new and retiring old pupils to settling the character of their training and the discipline to which they should be subjected . There may have been some misgivings as to whether they would figure so successfully in their new as in their old . capacity . But a very short time sufficed to

prove the efficacy of the system they adopted , and from the day when thc premises at Wood Green were opened as a School till now , when it 1 ms been resolved for the fourth , filth , or sixth time to enlarge them , so as to provide more accommodation for the ever-increasing number of applicants for the benefits of the Charity , but little doubt has arisen asto the capacity of the Executive to fulfil their important duties . It may not always have been

clear whence the nioney that was needed year by year was to come , but there has never been experienced any want of confidence in the ability . and faithfulness of the Committee to discharge its trust . The School , as distinguished from the Institution , of which at first it was only the smaller part , began well ,-and _ has gone on prospering more and more abundantly ever since . It was wisely started as an experiment with Only 25 of the boys .

as inmates , the" other 45 remaining under the old system . It is now a large * and successful educational establishment , the cases in which a boy ' s parents or guardians withhold their consent to his being received into the School being of the rarest occurrence There is , in short , only one regret we feel in contrasting the old and the new order of . things . It is that , with the evidence ever present before them of the gdbd resulting in the

Girls _ School from having the children lodged under one roof , the adoption of a similar plan in the case of this Institution was delayed so long by the conscientious , but unwise , scruples of sundry brethren of influence and standing , not only in the Craft , but on the School Executive . However , the change , if resolved on late , was promptly and effectively carried out , and , as we have said before , no doubt has ever since arisen as to * its wisdom .

Having made their purchase , the Committee resolutely set about organising the necessary arrangements , adapting the premises for the reception ot 25 pupils , electing a Master and Matron , and appointing a House Committee with power to superintend the conduct of the School . This Committee at first consisted of 12 brethren chosen from the General Committee , with the Treasurer , Trustees , and the Chairman , for the' time

being , of the General Committee , as ex-officio members . An Audit Committee was also appointed , to consist of 12 Governors and Subscribers not on the House . Committee . The Committees were chosen at an early date , that of Finance and Audit consisting , however , of only five members . The Rev . C Woodward and Mrs . Woodward were elected to the offices of Master and Matron respectively , their duties and emoluments having been

previously settled . The rules and regulations were carefully revised so as to suit the altered arrangements , and the children that wcre found eligible to be received at Wood Green having been placed in readiness , the new building was formally and ceremoniously inaugurated on the 15 th August , 1857 , Divine service at Tottenham Church , with a sermon by the Rev . J . E . . Cox , G . C , being a part of the celebration , while the pupils of the Girls '

School took part in the musical portion of the proceedings . On 15 th October , the House Committee attended at Wood Green and admitted the boys into residence , and some short time later the customary votes of thanks were passed to all who had taken part in the joyous event . In February , 1858 , the report for the previous year was submitted , the Committee strenuously insisting on the necessity for making further exertions with a view to

enlarging the School . It was provided that the children elected under the ' old system should ; remain as before if their parents and guardians preferred it , and at the same time it was pointed out , as a principal reason for having more boys resident , that the same supervision on the part of the Committee as regarded the 45 non-resident was impossible . . The attention of the Craft generally was further drawn to the apparent indifference of the provinces to the requirements of the Charity , it being at the same time pointed out

that out of the 70 boys in the establishment , no less than 36 hailed from the country , of whom 15 were at Wood Green , while the remaining 21 continued under the old system . Moreover , cases were constantly being recommended to the Committee by Provincial Grand Oflicers , who contributed nothing , nor did their lodges contribute in any way , towards the funds of the Institution , and the hope was expressed that a greater amount of practical sympathy might be shown by the provincial Craft . ( To be continued . )

“The Freemason: 1884-07-12, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 28 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_12071884/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
CONTENTS. Article 1
Untitled Article 1
MASONIC CEREMONY AT REDHILL. Article 2
CONSECRATION OF THE PORTCULLIS LODGE, No. 2038, AT LANGPORT. Article 2
ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717. Article 3
HISTORY OF THE ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Article 3
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 4
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
Untitled Ad 5
To Correspondents. Article 5
Untitled Article 5
Original Correspondence. Article 5
REVIEWS Article 5
Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 6
LADIES' MASONIC FESTIVAL. Article 6
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 6
Royal Arch. Article 8
Mark Masonry. Article 8
CONSECRATION OF THE APOLLO LODGE, No. 2042. Article 8
THE PAPAL AND PRIESTLY FULMINATIONS. Article 9
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Article 9
WEST LANCASHIRE MASONIC EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION. Article 10
ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 10
SCOTTISH FREEMASONRY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN. Article 10
THE COLLEGIA ROMANA. Article 10
MASONIC AND GENERAL TIDINGS Article 10
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

4 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

12 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

13 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

5 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

5 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

5 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

6 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Consecration Of The Portcullis Lodge, No. 2038, At Langport.

The Consecrating Officer having taken his scat , appointed his officers , pro tem ., as follows : Bros . C . Fry Edwards , S . W . ; Ashley , P . P . G . J . W ., as P . G . Junior Warden ; R .-Bailey , 261 , P . P . G . R ., as I . P . M . ; J . G . Vile , 261 , D . of Cers . ; Rev . A . G . How , Prov . G . Chaplain , and J . C . Hunt , Prov . Grand Secretary . ' After the usual preliminary Masonic rites , the CONS * EURATING OFFICER addressed the brethren on the nature

of the meeting . He said they had assembled to-day for thc purpose of dedicating to Masonry a new lodge in this important town . Several zealous Masons in the neig hbourhood had for some years been anxious to make Langport a centre of Masonic life , and the time had now arrived when their wishes might be successfully carried out . The Most Worshipful the Grand Master had been pleased to grant a warrant , and , in accordance with that

warrant , they had met to consecrate this lodge . He had indulged the hope that the Right Worshipful the Provincial Grand . Master , the Earl of Carnarvon , would himself have been able to perform the ceremony ; but he was sorry to say that his lordship ' s public engagements would not permit of this . He would ,, therefore , himself at once proceed with the ceremony , with the assistance of . the Provincial Officers present .

The ceremony was then impressively performed by the Consecrating Officer , the sacred elements being borne by Bros . R . C . Else , the Rev . A . G . How , Prov . G . Chap . ; and T . Jelley , P . M . * 79 6 ; and J . Cornwall , P . M . 762 , both P . P . G . S . W ' s . The incidental music during the ceremony was ably performed by the P . P . G . Organist , Bro . Nosworthy , and the following

anthems were sung by the brethren -. Before the consecration— " Behold , how pleasant and how good ; " during the ceremony—Weldon ' s " O praise God in His Holiness ; " after the ceremony—Haydn's "The Spacious Firmament on High . " The Rev . A . G . How , the Prov . Grand Chaplain , delivered an oration on the nature and principles of the institution .

The lodge having then been duly constituted , the assembled ( brethren sang the National Anthem , and the dedication ceremony proper terminated . The lodge then proceeded lo instal the W . M . designate , Bro . John Hughes , as first W . M . of the lodge . The ceremony of installation was performed by the R . W . P . P . G . M ., Bro . R . C . Else . The newly-Installed Master then appointed and invested the following officers : Bros . Wm . Trevena , P . M .

1255 , P . P . G . D . C , S . W . ; W . E . Bennett , 814 , J . W . ; Morgan , S . D . ; Hobbs , J . D . ; Vincent , I . G . ; and Webber , Tyler . The lodge passed votes of thanks to the Consecrating and Installing Officers , and to the officers of Grand Lodge , and then adjourned to a banquet at the Langport Arms , which was served up in admirable style by Bro . Baring . The menu included every delicacy of the season . The W . M ., Bro . Dr . Hughes , presided , and was supported by the P . P . G . M ., Bro . R . C

Else , and many officers , Past and Present , of Provincial Grand Lodge . The usual Masonic ' toast list was subsequently gone through , and after dinner the sum of £ 5 5 s . was subscribed to the Masonic Charities , in the names of the _ Masters of the lodge , who will thus have two votes annually lo the Masonic schools . We may mention that the lodge volume of the Sacred Laws , so essential to the ceremonies , was presented to the lodge by Mrs . Barling . The founders of Lodge Portcullis are Bros . John Hughes , W . E . Bennett , J . Vincent , A . E . Hobbs , Trevena , Morgan , and Barling .

English Freemasonry Before 1717.

ENGLISH FREEMASONRY BEFORE 1717 .

The recent discussions which have taken place in regard to pre-1717 Freemasonry in England have led me to put into a connected form a few notes-on the subject which have been accumulating for some time . We have a ' great difficulty to contend with when we seek to construct a . system , or order , of Masonic life and continuance before 1717 , from which the movement in 1717 naturally or specifically emerged . I repudiate " ex irno corde "

the absurd , inconsistent , and ridiculous 1717 theory , as it is termed , as not only contradicted critically by every fact we have of archaeology and history but most derogatory to the dignity of our Order even to discuss . That any one can seriously propound the theory that our Freemasonry is the outcome of a convivial club in 1717 hasalways appeared tome such an aberration from right reason , and Such a perverse paradox , that I have always felt it was beneath

our dignity ' as Masonic writers seriously for one single moment to dilate upon it . But the outlook is very hazy indeed when we seek to link on the Grand Lodge of 1717 with any form of seventeenth century English Freemasonry . One of our most patent difficulties is the little knowledge we have of what took place in 1717 . VVe have , so far , no contemporary account of the proceedings as known to exist , and none apparently earlier than 1738 , 21

years afterwards . We have , indeed , in 1723 some Regulations drawn up by Payne in 1722 , and by implication . we may , I think , fairly assume that such are older Regulations than 1717 , that Payne did not draft them afresh , and that therefore we have in them traces of earlier legislation , customs , precedents , Masonic usages , and Masonic verbiage . Payne does not seemingly treat them as new matter ,. and there appears lo be running through

almost all a sort of silent witness , —if I may so say , —of previous laws and earlier enactments . If so , that would take us back before 1700 , with Freemasonry under some form of legislative provisions for the supreme . body and for private lodges . Some think they observe traces of a two-fold government , —a Northern and a Southern system , —but I confess , though the probability of such a state of things need not be denied , its traces to me appear

very doubtful indeed . I know of no earlier minute than one of 1722 in a lodge minute book , " and that merely seems to confirm Anderson ' s statement as to four lodges meeting in 1717 . But even its verbiage requires careful study , as it is not quite clear that only four lodges are intended by the words . But of the proceedings of 1717 , as I said before , or 171 S , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , except this partial minute , no record so far as is known at present

is extant . I say so far as known , because so great have been the apathy and le ' thargy of our lod ges in . these respects , that many collections of records are still untouched and unopened , and are lying in lumber rooms , in dirty boxes , stowed away anywhere , perishing often with mildew and decay . . I for one never could understand why , with our professions of light , we should guard our old minute books like the apples of the gardens of the Hesperides , or why practically we should imitate the

perverse and childish conduct of some of our older forefathers , who burnt Alasonic records . From 1700 lo 1717 is , as older writers have it , "hiatus valde defiendus , " a Masonic chasm , which at present we cannot bridge over , or fill up satisfactorily , . and therefore , " a fortiori , " the difficulty as we seak to get into the seventeenth century becomes more serious and intense . We have evidence indeed quite early in the eighteenth century of a lodge at Alnwick , and if Preston is correct , and the minute book he mentions turns up of 1705 at York , we inay learn much of that period of our annals . But so far as we have discovered this is all our present or available evidence

English Freemasonry Before 1717.

in the early , say , eighteenth century of an existing body , and of this evidence so far only the bit of Alnwick evidence is verifiable . What then can we say as regards the seventeenth century Freemasonry ? The answer to this query I propose to give in the next Freemason , as I do not think it wise to increase this paper , and I am well aware how few Freemasons read these

archaeological contributions , and feel that except to a few earnest students they present but little attraction . But still , unless the Freemason is to degenerate into a mere publication of lodge reports and after-dinner speeches , not the most intellectual form of Masonic study or thought , some such essays as these must from time to time appear . DRYASDUST .

History Of The Royal Masonic Institution For Boys.

HISTORY OF THE ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS .

CHAPTER VIII . FROM THE- INAUGURATION OV THE SCHOOL AT WOOD ' GREEN TO THAT OI * THE NEW BUILDING , 1857-1865 .

( Continued from page 331 . ) We are now entering upon what many brethren at the time must have regarded as the most critical epoch in the history of thc Institution . Hitherto the Executive had succeeded in performing their allotted duties with

exemplary skill . Their management of . the funds had been both economical and liberal . They had carefull y watched over their young charges and had done the best which the means at their disposal permitted in educating them . But this latter part of their duty had been of necessity entrusted to a number of agents—namely , the Masters of the different schools at which the boys were entered . They had thus acquired little or no practical experience

of school management or school disci pline , beyond what the parents or guardians of all children may be supposed to possess . Now they were about to have a school of their own , with an educational staff appointed and paid by themselves . By a stroke of the pen , as it were , they found themselves suddenly transmuted from a governing body with no establishment to govern ' into a proprietary body with the full powers to regulate everything of material

importance , from theduties and emoluments of the Master , Matron , and the subordinate staff to making contracts for the supply of food and clothing , from electing new and retiring old pupils to settling the character of their training and the discipline to which they should be subjected . There may have been some misgivings as to whether they would figure so successfully in their new as in their old . capacity . But a very short time sufficed to

prove the efficacy of the system they adopted , and from the day when thc premises at Wood Green were opened as a School till now , when it 1 ms been resolved for the fourth , filth , or sixth time to enlarge them , so as to provide more accommodation for the ever-increasing number of applicants for the benefits of the Charity , but little doubt has arisen asto the capacity of the Executive to fulfil their important duties . It may not always have been

clear whence the nioney that was needed year by year was to come , but there has never been experienced any want of confidence in the ability . and faithfulness of the Committee to discharge its trust . The School , as distinguished from the Institution , of which at first it was only the smaller part , began well ,-and _ has gone on prospering more and more abundantly ever since . It was wisely started as an experiment with Only 25 of the boys .

as inmates , the" other 45 remaining under the old system . It is now a large * and successful educational establishment , the cases in which a boy ' s parents or guardians withhold their consent to his being received into the School being of the rarest occurrence There is , in short , only one regret we feel in contrasting the old and the new order of . things . It is that , with the evidence ever present before them of the gdbd resulting in the

Girls _ School from having the children lodged under one roof , the adoption of a similar plan in the case of this Institution was delayed so long by the conscientious , but unwise , scruples of sundry brethren of influence and standing , not only in the Craft , but on the School Executive . However , the change , if resolved on late , was promptly and effectively carried out , and , as we have said before , no doubt has ever since arisen as to * its wisdom .

Having made their purchase , the Committee resolutely set about organising the necessary arrangements , adapting the premises for the reception ot 25 pupils , electing a Master and Matron , and appointing a House Committee with power to superintend the conduct of the School . This Committee at first consisted of 12 brethren chosen from the General Committee , with the Treasurer , Trustees , and the Chairman , for the' time

being , of the General Committee , as ex-officio members . An Audit Committee was also appointed , to consist of 12 Governors and Subscribers not on the House . Committee . The Committees were chosen at an early date , that of Finance and Audit consisting , however , of only five members . The Rev . C Woodward and Mrs . Woodward were elected to the offices of Master and Matron respectively , their duties and emoluments having been

previously settled . The rules and regulations were carefully revised so as to suit the altered arrangements , and the children that wcre found eligible to be received at Wood Green having been placed in readiness , the new building was formally and ceremoniously inaugurated on the 15 th August , 1857 , Divine service at Tottenham Church , with a sermon by the Rev . J . E . . Cox , G . C , being a part of the celebration , while the pupils of the Girls '

School took part in the musical portion of the proceedings . On 15 th October , the House Committee attended at Wood Green and admitted the boys into residence , and some short time later the customary votes of thanks were passed to all who had taken part in the joyous event . In February , 1858 , the report for the previous year was submitted , the Committee strenuously insisting on the necessity for making further exertions with a view to

enlarging the School . It was provided that the children elected under the ' old system should ; remain as before if their parents and guardians preferred it , and at the same time it was pointed out , as a principal reason for having more boys resident , that the same supervision on the part of the Committee as regarded the 45 non-resident was impossible . . The attention of the Craft generally was further drawn to the apparent indifference of the provinces to the requirements of the Charity , it being at the same time pointed out

that out of the 70 boys in the establishment , no less than 36 hailed from the country , of whom 15 were at Wood Green , while the remaining 21 continued under the old system . Moreover , cases were constantly being recommended to the Committee by Provincial Grand Oflicers , who contributed nothing , nor did their lodges contribute in any way , towards the funds of the Institution , and the hope was expressed that a greater amount of practical sympathy might be shown by the provincial Craft . ( To be continued . )

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 10
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy