Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • Feb. 16, 1878
  • Page 9
  • THE AMENITIES OF MASONIC CORRESPONDENCE.
Current:

The Freemason, Feb. 16, 1878: Page 9

  • Back to The Freemason, Feb. 16, 1878
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE AMENITIES OF MASONIC CORRESPONDENCE. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article THE AMENITIES OF MASONIC CORRESPONDENCE. Page 2 of 2
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 1
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 1
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Amenities Of Masonic Correspondence.

alleged or practical wrong , and pour forth the angry diatribe and the bitter sarcasm and the vehement retort , without the slightest consideration for the feelings of a brother , the habit of o-entlemen , or the welfare of the brotherhood at farce ? We have often said , and we repeat it

today , that Freemasons in print often prove that not only they are mortal—most mortal , with a venereance—but make everyone also come to the conclusion that they can be if they like it the most uncharitable , the most censorious , and the most implacable of mankind . We sincerely

hope that mutual friends in India will intervene to prevent the repetition of such a scandal in the pages of professedly Masonic journals , and which can only result in greatly lowering the prestige and popularity of Freemasonry in Hindostan . But

we think it well , having said this , to lay down certain laws in respect of Masonic publications , which appear to us to be both needed and most seasonable . It is quite clear , in the first place , that any brother has a right to start and conduct a Masonic journal , be there one or ' ' many Richards

already in the field , and that no publisher has a Masonic or moral right to object to the appearance of such an "interesting little stranger . " Masonry is free , and the Masonic press is free , and we are among those who consider , that under some proper restrictions and with some

necessary limitations , ( as must always be in the assertion of first principles ) , the exextension and increase of Masonic journalism , are good things " per se . " The Freemason , for instance , has no fear of competing interests , or open opposition . It would hail all properly conducted Masonic journals as

fair rivals in an honest race of industry and experiment , and we therefore cannot conceive why any other Masonic Editor or Publisher should feel aggrieved by the appearance of another creditable Masonic journal or magazine . But unfortunately , as the great Bard has it , " here ' s the rub . " In order to start a new

Masonic paper or magazine with " eclat , ' it is considered advisable too often to condescend to sensationalism , and to inaugurate a new venture , by a personal attack on an existing and perfectly legitimate Masonic enterprise . There may be room for two or three , one or moro than one ,

and no one objects to this new " petit sujet , " but that is not enough . In order to establish a footing it is needful to " abuse the plantifFs attorney , " and to cast stones at the existing publication , which has been long well conducted , and commands a considerable amount of Masonic support and

consideration . And no doubt it is very difficult for one who has laboured hard for years when he finds his property affected and his character aspersed , not to lose his temper , and to retort . But he had far better not do so . Such attacks are generally very petty and very worthless indeed ,

and often are , yes , even very dirty . For instance—a new publication has a right to say that it is set on foot , to endeavour to gratify the wishes of many friends , and to subserve the interests of the Craft , but it has no right to come before the Order with both a

" suppressio veri , " and a " suggestio falsi . " It has no authority , morally or Masonically , to put forward deliberately mendacious assertions , and publicly to impugn the motives of a brother , who has sought to conduct a previously existing journal with probity and ability . Thus

competition has always an indisputable right of existence , but personality and the vulgar twaddle of low malignity ought to be denounced and repudiated by all true Freemasons . We are always permitted to puff ourselves , but we have no pretence to depreciate the good

wares of our nei ghbours , either to undersell them in the market , or so " place" our own . As an illustration we would say this further . If the new applicant for farno states that it proposes to improve all Masonic journalism , and ignores its predecessor ' s efforts if it asserts that for itself it is immaculate , and that the actual

possessor of the position is animated by the lowest of trade considerations ; if it declares that it henceforth will devote itself to branches of neglected study , which very branches have long formed the staple of the intelligent pages of its older rival—then it commits every offence conceivable against ' ' good form , " Masonic

The Amenities Of Masonic Correspondence.

fair play , truth , and decency , and deserves to be left in that obscurity which is its natural position . It seems a great pity that such a state of things should exist in Masonic journalism , but so it does , and we have seen several instances of it , and always deprecate it , and always deplore it ,

alike for the honour of Masonic journalism , arid the good of the Masonic body . The Freemason has never claimed any special position for itself , or objected to any extension of the Masonic press . On the contrary , it welcomes all friendly journals which conform to the laws and spirit of

Freemasonry , and seek to uphold its cause and assert its principles . But it cannot , and will not , tolerate personality , open or secret , general or particular . It can hold and does hold no intercourse with , just as it lends no recognition to , such journals , which apparently are guided and

governed only by personality , which spare no taunt , and hesitate from no insinuation , and which can only serve to render Masonic journalism a bye-word and a discredit to the outer world . Conscious in its own good motives , strong in its own strength , the Freemason pursues its prosperous

career , hoping for better days for Masonic journalism , deprecating all unseemly and unmasonic words , ever remembering that it seeks honestly to represent , as before England and the world , that good old Order , whose unchanging teaching is ever best set forth in general toler ation and brotherly good will .

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

[ We do not hold ourselves responsible for , or even as approving oi * thc opinions expressed by our correspondents , but we wish , in a spirit of fair play to all , to permit—wi'hin certain necessary imits—free discussion . —ED . *!

ROSLIN CASTf . E . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear iiir and Brother , — In your Masonic Notes ancl Queries in your valuable paper of the 2 nd inst ., a P . M . of No . 1 , S . C , asks for my authority for stating in my letter to you on Uoslin Castle , that the dignity of Grand Master Mason of Scotland

was conferred on William St . Clair by James II ., in 1455 . I simply quoted Bro . Skerr ' s own words as given by him on reading the piper on the above subject—as repoited in the Scotsman paper of December nth last , ( I think . ) If P . M . will peruse the Freemason of 2 ndinst ., page 6 S , in

the notice taken of Freemasonry in New Zealand , he would then see my statement repeated from another quarter of the universe . Will Bro . Skcrr he able to solve the subject ? With fraternal regards , I remain , yours truly , GEO . W . CHIRNSIDE .

COLE'S LIST OF LODGES . To the Editor ofthe " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , Referring to an extract from the Gloucester Journal , in your last issue , I have selected the following three lodges from " Cole ' s List , " in my province ( Cumber

land and Westmorland ) : — 120 ( no name ) , at Whitehaven , in Cumberland , second Monday March , 19 , 1740 . 261 ( no name ) , at Whitehaven , in Cumberland , second Monday May 4 , 1761 . 289 ( no name ) , at Workington , in Cumberland , first Monday Sept ., 22 , 1762 .

No . 120 is now extinct , but No . 261 , which bears the title oi Sun , Square , and Compasses , is one of the most flourishing lodges in the north of England , although many years since it was on the rocks of oblivion , and only preserved from total wreck by the strcnuos self-denying , and pecuniary efforts of two or three Past Masters , not one of whom , I believe , is alive to tell the tale . Sun , Square ,

and Compasses Lodge celebrated its centenary in 1861 , but I am not aware they have a medal . The present number is though 119 , 14 . * appears on the firing glassesandgasglobes . With regard to No . 289 , in "Cole ' s List" that lodge is defunct ; but another ( now strong in ) numbers was constituted in 1863 , Sun and Sector , No . 926 . It is interesting to note that the furniture , archives , jewels , and bible of Lodge

289 , arc now used by Lodge 9 62 , ia fact , if I remember rightly ( I was not initiated till two years later ) , it was stated in thelocil prints at the time , that thc whole of the furniture , i-cc ., were accidentally discovered locked in a box at the Green Dragon Heitc-1 , in Workington , shortly before the new charter was applied for . We have another centenarian lodge in this province , No . 129 , Union ,

Kendal , instituted in 1764 , the year after the publication of " Cole ' s List , " referred to . A few days ago , casually looking over that magnificent work of Bro . D . Murray Lyon , the Grand Secretary of Scotland , on "The History of the Lodge of Edinburgh , ( Mary's Chapel ) , " I find it noted that the third oldest lodge in Cumberland and

Westmoreland ( Union , No . , 310 , Carlisle ) , oiiginally had its charter , elated 1784 , from the Grand Lodge of Scotland , the only instance , as Bro . Lyon observes of Scotch Grand Lodge coming over the borders . Thirteen years later , however , Union Lodge applied to the -Grand Lodge of England for a charter , under which they have worked since

Original Correspondence.

1797 . Another remark , and I have done . My mother lodge , ( Skiddaw , No . 1002 ) , was instituted , in 1 SG 4 , and about that time , I heard it mentioned that a lodge had existed fifty or sixty years previously in Cockermouth , thc name of which could not be remembered , although it was stated very authoritatively that the locale was thc Ship Inn . Referring to a newspaper clipping recording

thc consecration of Skiddaw , I notice that thc charter of thc old lodge at Cockermouth , is . stated to have been transferred to Batley , in Yorkshire ; Lodge No . 264 , in that town , dates its charter from 1788 . Dors any old brother in Batley know -whether there is any truth in such a statement . Has our energetic and erudite Brother W . J . Hughan , in his possession a later

list of lodges than 1763 , that is to say , approaching the last decade of thc eighteenth century . I had one myself years since , formerly belonging to my grandfather , a P . M . of Lodge St . John , No . 92 , Banff , S . C . ; but whether it was English or Scotch I cannot remember , being only a school boy at the time . However , it is lost , more likely destroyed . I have in my possession my grandfather ' s apron ,

now well on to a century old , but m excellent preservation , and a decided curiosity in its way . My object in mentioning these matters in connection with the lodges in Cumberland ancl Westmorland , but more especially the reputed old lodge at Cockermouth , is that it is my intention shortly to publish a little brochure on the history of Craft and Royal Arch Masonry in the two counties . Yours fraternally , W . F . LAMONBY , P . M . 1002 . P . G . Reg . Cumberland and Westmorland .

PROVINCIAL SCHOOLS . To Ihe Editor ofthe " Freemason " Dear Sir and Brother , — As your columns have been open to one 0 ! my provincial confreres , to permit of his making known his desire to sec more general and immediate result from our charitable donations , I have no doubt you will grant me

space to endorse his views . The brother in question has been stirring us up , as he states in his second letter . Some of us don't like it , but while we refrain from giving cut absolute adhesion to the project of a Provincial Educational Fund at present , we do not venture to offer very effective opposition . Wc seem to have a tacit understanding that something of thc sort is wanted , but who will

undertaketo put the affair in motion in face of that official inertia of the powers above , that quietly wears out the " go " in any movement not emanating from the aforesaid powers , by the simple method of putting it out of their consideration— " cutting" it , in fact . The brother in question has ventured to perform the operation commonl y known as " taking the hull by the horns , " ancl the rest of us watch

with some curiosity the result of his endeavour . * . If successful in leading the animal into pleasant and profitable pastures , we will go and share his honour . If the intractabiliytof the animal prove too powerful , and the cause is consequently relinquished , we can but afford the usual consolation— " I told you so . " But seriously , sir , I am one of those who arc of opinion that it is quite possible to effect

a great benefit by educating our unsuccessful orphan dependents in thc provinces , without diminishing the resources of our grand London Institutions , whose benefits are only too well-known to myself . For if it bc said that any provincial movement will injure the schools , hy taking away some of the subscriptions , may it not be retorted that by enforc ' ng such costlv and cumbrous elections

as have frequently been necessary to secure admission , they arc doing an injury to those who have a ri ght to their benefits hy the sheer waste of money ( in purchasing or securing votes ) which would educate a child during the whole period it would need education . The schools are now , or shortly will be , enlarged , and it will be known definitely how many children they will be able to

accommodate . Why not let that number be adopted as the maximum , so that the normal expenses may be ascertained and the various provinces may know what is annually required for their support ? I am sure the amount would never fall short , and thc local Institutions would receive the surplus contributions of the brethren . Let purchasing of votes be abolished , and

some means be adopted , say ballot , by which admission may be secured , without ths present turmoil , for any vacancies that arise . If , as you suggest , there could be schools , each to be maintained by one , two , or three provinces , from which children could be drafted by ballot to the central schools , and at which thc unsuccessful candidates could be retained until future election ,

or an opportunity for placing them out in the world , I believe there would be more real benefit accrue and less disappointment , not to say ill-feeling . The various " vested interests " will not see things in this light ; but the time will shortly come when the continued want of success will disgust the brethren , who now waste their energies and mean 1- , and isolated movements to remedy the evil will be inactive till the schools will find their own

resources falling off , from no reason but their own inaptitude to note thc signs of the times . Let the maiter be fairly anel impartially considered by the school authorities and some of our leading metropolitan and provincial Craftsmen , and an arrangement may bc come to which will effect mutual benefit to schools and provinces , without rausing * any one to fear they are treading on anybody else ' s toes . I am , dear Sit and Brother , yours fraternally , P . M . LINUS .

Recordership of London . —At Tuesdays meeting of the Court of Aldermen it was decided to make no alteration in the oflice and duties of Recorder , as defined in 1856 . The resignation of Mr . Russell Gurney , Q . C , M . P ., was referred to the Common Council .

“The Freemason: 1878-02-16, Page 9” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 20 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_16021878/page/9/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
CONTENTS. Article 1
ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 1
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 3
Reviews. Article 7
PROVINCIAL GRAND CHAPTER OF HAMPSHIRE AND THE ISLE OF WIGHT. Article 7
COMPLIMENTARY CONCERT TO A LIVERPOOL FREEMASON. Article 7
NOTES ON ART, &c. Article 7
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Article 8
Answers to Correspondents. Article 8
Births , Marriages and Deaths. Article 8
Untitled Article 8
THE FESTIVAL OF THE ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 8
THE INSTALLATION ENGRAVING. Article 8
THE SCOTTISH RITE. Article 8
THE DEATH OF THE POPE Article 8
THE AMENITIES OF MASONIC CORRESPONDENCE. Article 8
Original Correspondence. Article 9
Multum in Parbo ,or Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 10
Obituary. Article 10
LIVERPOOL MASONIC HALL. Article 10
FREEMASONRY IN AUSTRALIA. Article 10
PUBLIC NIGHT OF THE PRUDENT BRETHREN CHAPTER, No. 145. Article 10
ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 13
Masonic and General Tidings. Article 13
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 13
MASONIC MEETINGS IN WEST LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE. Article 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

13 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

6 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

4 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

9 Articles
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Amenities Of Masonic Correspondence.

alleged or practical wrong , and pour forth the angry diatribe and the bitter sarcasm and the vehement retort , without the slightest consideration for the feelings of a brother , the habit of o-entlemen , or the welfare of the brotherhood at farce ? We have often said , and we repeat it

today , that Freemasons in print often prove that not only they are mortal—most mortal , with a venereance—but make everyone also come to the conclusion that they can be if they like it the most uncharitable , the most censorious , and the most implacable of mankind . We sincerely

hope that mutual friends in India will intervene to prevent the repetition of such a scandal in the pages of professedly Masonic journals , and which can only result in greatly lowering the prestige and popularity of Freemasonry in Hindostan . But

we think it well , having said this , to lay down certain laws in respect of Masonic publications , which appear to us to be both needed and most seasonable . It is quite clear , in the first place , that any brother has a right to start and conduct a Masonic journal , be there one or ' ' many Richards

already in the field , and that no publisher has a Masonic or moral right to object to the appearance of such an "interesting little stranger . " Masonry is free , and the Masonic press is free , and we are among those who consider , that under some proper restrictions and with some

necessary limitations , ( as must always be in the assertion of first principles ) , the exextension and increase of Masonic journalism , are good things " per se . " The Freemason , for instance , has no fear of competing interests , or open opposition . It would hail all properly conducted Masonic journals as

fair rivals in an honest race of industry and experiment , and we therefore cannot conceive why any other Masonic Editor or Publisher should feel aggrieved by the appearance of another creditable Masonic journal or magazine . But unfortunately , as the great Bard has it , " here ' s the rub . " In order to start a new

Masonic paper or magazine with " eclat , ' it is considered advisable too often to condescend to sensationalism , and to inaugurate a new venture , by a personal attack on an existing and perfectly legitimate Masonic enterprise . There may be room for two or three , one or moro than one ,

and no one objects to this new " petit sujet , " but that is not enough . In order to establish a footing it is needful to " abuse the plantifFs attorney , " and to cast stones at the existing publication , which has been long well conducted , and commands a considerable amount of Masonic support and

consideration . And no doubt it is very difficult for one who has laboured hard for years when he finds his property affected and his character aspersed , not to lose his temper , and to retort . But he had far better not do so . Such attacks are generally very petty and very worthless indeed ,

and often are , yes , even very dirty . For instance—a new publication has a right to say that it is set on foot , to endeavour to gratify the wishes of many friends , and to subserve the interests of the Craft , but it has no right to come before the Order with both a

" suppressio veri , " and a " suggestio falsi . " It has no authority , morally or Masonically , to put forward deliberately mendacious assertions , and publicly to impugn the motives of a brother , who has sought to conduct a previously existing journal with probity and ability . Thus

competition has always an indisputable right of existence , but personality and the vulgar twaddle of low malignity ought to be denounced and repudiated by all true Freemasons . We are always permitted to puff ourselves , but we have no pretence to depreciate the good

wares of our nei ghbours , either to undersell them in the market , or so " place" our own . As an illustration we would say this further . If the new applicant for farno states that it proposes to improve all Masonic journalism , and ignores its predecessor ' s efforts if it asserts that for itself it is immaculate , and that the actual

possessor of the position is animated by the lowest of trade considerations ; if it declares that it henceforth will devote itself to branches of neglected study , which very branches have long formed the staple of the intelligent pages of its older rival—then it commits every offence conceivable against ' ' good form , " Masonic

The Amenities Of Masonic Correspondence.

fair play , truth , and decency , and deserves to be left in that obscurity which is its natural position . It seems a great pity that such a state of things should exist in Masonic journalism , but so it does , and we have seen several instances of it , and always deprecate it , and always deplore it ,

alike for the honour of Masonic journalism , arid the good of the Masonic body . The Freemason has never claimed any special position for itself , or objected to any extension of the Masonic press . On the contrary , it welcomes all friendly journals which conform to the laws and spirit of

Freemasonry , and seek to uphold its cause and assert its principles . But it cannot , and will not , tolerate personality , open or secret , general or particular . It can hold and does hold no intercourse with , just as it lends no recognition to , such journals , which apparently are guided and

governed only by personality , which spare no taunt , and hesitate from no insinuation , and which can only serve to render Masonic journalism a bye-word and a discredit to the outer world . Conscious in its own good motives , strong in its own strength , the Freemason pursues its prosperous

career , hoping for better days for Masonic journalism , deprecating all unseemly and unmasonic words , ever remembering that it seeks honestly to represent , as before England and the world , that good old Order , whose unchanging teaching is ever best set forth in general toler ation and brotherly good will .

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

[ We do not hold ourselves responsible for , or even as approving oi * thc opinions expressed by our correspondents , but we wish , in a spirit of fair play to all , to permit—wi'hin certain necessary imits—free discussion . —ED . *!

ROSLIN CASTf . E . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear iiir and Brother , — In your Masonic Notes ancl Queries in your valuable paper of the 2 nd inst ., a P . M . of No . 1 , S . C , asks for my authority for stating in my letter to you on Uoslin Castle , that the dignity of Grand Master Mason of Scotland

was conferred on William St . Clair by James II ., in 1455 . I simply quoted Bro . Skerr ' s own words as given by him on reading the piper on the above subject—as repoited in the Scotsman paper of December nth last , ( I think . ) If P . M . will peruse the Freemason of 2 ndinst ., page 6 S , in

the notice taken of Freemasonry in New Zealand , he would then see my statement repeated from another quarter of the universe . Will Bro . Skcrr he able to solve the subject ? With fraternal regards , I remain , yours truly , GEO . W . CHIRNSIDE .

COLE'S LIST OF LODGES . To the Editor ofthe " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , Referring to an extract from the Gloucester Journal , in your last issue , I have selected the following three lodges from " Cole ' s List , " in my province ( Cumber

land and Westmorland ) : — 120 ( no name ) , at Whitehaven , in Cumberland , second Monday March , 19 , 1740 . 261 ( no name ) , at Whitehaven , in Cumberland , second Monday May 4 , 1761 . 289 ( no name ) , at Workington , in Cumberland , first Monday Sept ., 22 , 1762 .

No . 120 is now extinct , but No . 261 , which bears the title oi Sun , Square , and Compasses , is one of the most flourishing lodges in the north of England , although many years since it was on the rocks of oblivion , and only preserved from total wreck by the strcnuos self-denying , and pecuniary efforts of two or three Past Masters , not one of whom , I believe , is alive to tell the tale . Sun , Square ,

and Compasses Lodge celebrated its centenary in 1861 , but I am not aware they have a medal . The present number is though 119 , 14 . * appears on the firing glassesandgasglobes . With regard to No . 289 , in "Cole ' s List" that lodge is defunct ; but another ( now strong in ) numbers was constituted in 1863 , Sun and Sector , No . 926 . It is interesting to note that the furniture , archives , jewels , and bible of Lodge

289 , arc now used by Lodge 9 62 , ia fact , if I remember rightly ( I was not initiated till two years later ) , it was stated in thelocil prints at the time , that thc whole of the furniture , i-cc ., were accidentally discovered locked in a box at the Green Dragon Heitc-1 , in Workington , shortly before the new charter was applied for . We have another centenarian lodge in this province , No . 129 , Union ,

Kendal , instituted in 1764 , the year after the publication of " Cole ' s List , " referred to . A few days ago , casually looking over that magnificent work of Bro . D . Murray Lyon , the Grand Secretary of Scotland , on "The History of the Lodge of Edinburgh , ( Mary's Chapel ) , " I find it noted that the third oldest lodge in Cumberland and

Westmoreland ( Union , No . , 310 , Carlisle ) , oiiginally had its charter , elated 1784 , from the Grand Lodge of Scotland , the only instance , as Bro . Lyon observes of Scotch Grand Lodge coming over the borders . Thirteen years later , however , Union Lodge applied to the -Grand Lodge of England for a charter , under which they have worked since

Original Correspondence.

1797 . Another remark , and I have done . My mother lodge , ( Skiddaw , No . 1002 ) , was instituted , in 1 SG 4 , and about that time , I heard it mentioned that a lodge had existed fifty or sixty years previously in Cockermouth , thc name of which could not be remembered , although it was stated very authoritatively that the locale was thc Ship Inn . Referring to a newspaper clipping recording

thc consecration of Skiddaw , I notice that thc charter of thc old lodge at Cockermouth , is . stated to have been transferred to Batley , in Yorkshire ; Lodge No . 264 , in that town , dates its charter from 1788 . Dors any old brother in Batley know -whether there is any truth in such a statement . Has our energetic and erudite Brother W . J . Hughan , in his possession a later

list of lodges than 1763 , that is to say , approaching the last decade of thc eighteenth century . I had one myself years since , formerly belonging to my grandfather , a P . M . of Lodge St . John , No . 92 , Banff , S . C . ; but whether it was English or Scotch I cannot remember , being only a school boy at the time . However , it is lost , more likely destroyed . I have in my possession my grandfather ' s apron ,

now well on to a century old , but m excellent preservation , and a decided curiosity in its way . My object in mentioning these matters in connection with the lodges in Cumberland ancl Westmorland , but more especially the reputed old lodge at Cockermouth , is that it is my intention shortly to publish a little brochure on the history of Craft and Royal Arch Masonry in the two counties . Yours fraternally , W . F . LAMONBY , P . M . 1002 . P . G . Reg . Cumberland and Westmorland .

PROVINCIAL SCHOOLS . To Ihe Editor ofthe " Freemason " Dear Sir and Brother , — As your columns have been open to one 0 ! my provincial confreres , to permit of his making known his desire to sec more general and immediate result from our charitable donations , I have no doubt you will grant me

space to endorse his views . The brother in question has been stirring us up , as he states in his second letter . Some of us don't like it , but while we refrain from giving cut absolute adhesion to the project of a Provincial Educational Fund at present , we do not venture to offer very effective opposition . Wc seem to have a tacit understanding that something of thc sort is wanted , but who will

undertaketo put the affair in motion in face of that official inertia of the powers above , that quietly wears out the " go " in any movement not emanating from the aforesaid powers , by the simple method of putting it out of their consideration— " cutting" it , in fact . The brother in question has ventured to perform the operation commonl y known as " taking the hull by the horns , " ancl the rest of us watch

with some curiosity the result of his endeavour . * . If successful in leading the animal into pleasant and profitable pastures , we will go and share his honour . If the intractabiliytof the animal prove too powerful , and the cause is consequently relinquished , we can but afford the usual consolation— " I told you so . " But seriously , sir , I am one of those who arc of opinion that it is quite possible to effect

a great benefit by educating our unsuccessful orphan dependents in thc provinces , without diminishing the resources of our grand London Institutions , whose benefits are only too well-known to myself . For if it bc said that any provincial movement will injure the schools , hy taking away some of the subscriptions , may it not be retorted that by enforc ' ng such costlv and cumbrous elections

as have frequently been necessary to secure admission , they arc doing an injury to those who have a ri ght to their benefits hy the sheer waste of money ( in purchasing or securing votes ) which would educate a child during the whole period it would need education . The schools are now , or shortly will be , enlarged , and it will be known definitely how many children they will be able to

accommodate . Why not let that number be adopted as the maximum , so that the normal expenses may be ascertained and the various provinces may know what is annually required for their support ? I am sure the amount would never fall short , and thc local Institutions would receive the surplus contributions of the brethren . Let purchasing of votes be abolished , and

some means be adopted , say ballot , by which admission may be secured , without ths present turmoil , for any vacancies that arise . If , as you suggest , there could be schools , each to be maintained by one , two , or three provinces , from which children could be drafted by ballot to the central schools , and at which thc unsuccessful candidates could be retained until future election ,

or an opportunity for placing them out in the world , I believe there would be more real benefit accrue and less disappointment , not to say ill-feeling . The various " vested interests " will not see things in this light ; but the time will shortly come when the continued want of success will disgust the brethren , who now waste their energies and mean 1- , and isolated movements to remedy the evil will be inactive till the schools will find their own

resources falling off , from no reason but their own inaptitude to note thc signs of the times . Let the maiter be fairly anel impartially considered by the school authorities and some of our leading metropolitan and provincial Craftsmen , and an arrangement may bc come to which will effect mutual benefit to schools and provinces , without rausing * any one to fear they are treading on anybody else ' s toes . I am , dear Sit and Brother , yours fraternally , P . M . LINUS .

Recordership of London . —At Tuesdays meeting of the Court of Aldermen it was decided to make no alteration in the oflice and duties of Recorder , as defined in 1856 . The resignation of Mr . Russell Gurney , Q . C , M . P ., was referred to the Common Council .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 8
  • You're on page9
  • 10
  • 14
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy