-
Articles/Ads
Article Original Correspondence. ← Page 3 of 3 Article Original Correspondence. Page 3 of 3 Article Reviews. Page 1 of 1 Article Reviews. Page 1 of 1 Article Masonic notes and Queries. Page 1 of 1 Article ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Page 1 of 1
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Original Correspondence.
To Hie Editor of the . " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I do not see why Bro . Stevens should ask for my real name and object to my pseudonym . It is the privilege of the Masonic press to write anonymously vtith the permission of the Editor , and , therefore , 1 beg respectfully to decline Bro . Stevens' request , and to retiin the
subscription with which I began this correspondence . 1 hat I had an object it is clear to all who do me the honour to read my humble contributions , and as I have no evil intent in it , and am trespassing on no rule of Masonic propriety and good feeling , 1 claim the liberty , always rightly accorded in your open and honest pages to any discreet Mason . I confess that 1 am more in a haze than ever , and
there I probably shall slay , as 1 r . cc no valid explanation tendered either of the real object of the movement , or why so much heat has been unnecessarily shown by our Bros . Stevens and Perceval in the matter . As Bro . Neilson truly puts it , if these , charges arc true they constitute a grave reflection on our authorities , but how or why they call for a reform of the ritual or uniformity of working I cannot , for the life of me , see . I may be the
thickest of the thick , or the densest of the dense , but , nevertheless , like Bros . Nsilson , While , and many others , I do not , and cannot , see it . For it is not contended that the abuses are wide spread or known in many lodges , and why my liberty is to be interfered with on account of somebody else ' s " laches , " I really do wish some one would kindly explain . Yours fraternally , ONE WHO WAS IN GRAND LODGE .
Dear Bro . Kenning , — I have read with a very considerable amount of interest the numerous letters that have appeared from time to time in your valuable journal upon this important subject , but at present I must confess that I am not greatly impressed with the arguments that are brought to bear against the advisability of its adoption by Grand
Lodge . My object in penning this letter is not to defend or condemn the " modus operandi" employed by our zealous Bro . Stevens in ventilating this question , but simply to respectfully suggest to several of your distinguished correspondents that there are many abuses in the Masonic ritual that might be corrected with advantage if a committee of revision for that purpose were appointed
by Grand Lodge . It is a notorious fact , and one to be deplored , that there are several so-called systems of ritual promulgated in London anil elsewhere which , in their action , are subversive of those principles of unity which should prevail among the mystic brotherhood .. It is a matter of frequent occurrence in lodges of instruction for the clement of discord to be raised in consequence of a
brother differing in his rendering of the ceremonies or in the " working " of a section from the system ventilated by the Preceptor of that particular lodge . I have frequently witnessed the most unseemly interruptions , and have heard the reverse ol fraternal language adopted by rival exponents of the various theories . If . as Bro . Stevens suggests , a College of Preceptors
could be formed under the wing of Grand Lodge , the crotchets of some of our very worthy but dogmatical instructors would cease to proveke discussion in the broad arena of Masonic teaching , because the brethren would have an opportunity of making themselves conversant with the " working " of the College , and should their rendering of the ritual at any time be questioned they could
defend themselves hy stating that such was the system recognised by Grand Lodge . I also venture to differ from the opinions strongly expressed by some of your correspondents that the matter will be shelved at the next Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge , for this reason , that there is a strong feeling among the brethren , as a body , in favour of the appointment of a committee to
consider what mig ht be done towards reforming some of the abuses of the Masonic ritual , and to propound a system of uniform working thai would meet with general approval . No sensible person can for a moment believe that in the event of Grand Lodge taking action in the matter they could , or would , attempt to enforce uniformity of litual -,
such a proceeding would , undoubtedly , create even greater difficulties and differences than those with which Freemasonry had to contend in the last century . Pending the discussion of the motion , it is certainly nor altogether the thing for prejudiced brethren to indulge in those disagreeable and uncalled for personalities , and which conduct is so emphatically condemned by your erudite editor , Bro .
Woodford , in his letter which appeared in your impression of the 3 rd inst . If the members of the metropolitan and provincial lodges are adve-rse to the motion initiated hy Bro . Stevens , the remedy lies in their own hands by their sending their representative to the next Quarterly Communication armed with full powers to oppose it ; but if , on the other hand , they arc inclined to support it , let them
instruct their substitutes to bring the matter to a triumphant result . So important a matter deserves more than the mere raging of a " paper war , " in which inglorious strife the respective combatants appear to lose sight of the point at iisuc , and frequently indulge- in a rhodomontade of nonsense , "full of sound and lury , signifying nothing . " Like
many other popular and flnuiishing institutions , freemasonry has its enemies , who art- alw : iys on the aler ' . to I ' mil some loophole wherewith to point and discharge the heavy artillery of malice and contumely against its professions , and who would eagerly embrace the opportunity of
raising a pa-an of triumph should : my serious rupture arise in its councils . The public hurling of invectives and the casting of animadversions upon the conduct or principles of a brother can only lead to that discreditable result , so ably defined by your reverend correspondent , of affecting "the non-
Original Correspondence.
Masonic mind with the gravest doubts of the reality and worth of our Masonic professions . " Apologising for occupying so much of your valuable space , I remain , yours fraternally , T . C . W ., P . G . S . B . Middx ., etc .
THE LAST QUARTERLY MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Though sorry [ or many reasons to see so much " personality " apparent in certain proceedings and circulars , notably , alluded to at that assembly , I yet think they may do good , in that they will disgust all gentlemanly
minded Masons at the truly un-Masonic tone of such suggestions and such imputations . I am one of those who think that some means should be taken publicly to show to our worthy and hard working Grand Treasurer the sense the brethren really entertain of his unrivalled exertions on behalf o the best interests of our great Charities . It would be a fitting reply to all this childish and petulant outburst of circular and correspondence . Yours fraternally , T .
BRO . WILSON AND THE BOYS' SCHOOL . To the Editor of the " Fretmason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Mr . Wilson is taking a great deal of unnecessary trouble in carrying on a correspondence in the Freemason upon the subject of his disputed claim , and in sending out circulars to certain brethren previous to the
General Committee meeting of Saturday last , and at which he did not himself think well to attend . It is not the usual method of settling such matters , and in this instance he will undoubtedly find it ineffectual , because the House Committee have a public duty to perform , and they will not be deterred by any appeal to the Craft , who cannot possibly form a judgment without a knowledge of all
circumstances , Mr . Wilson was repeatedly invited to attend the House Committee to give an explanation of a certain charge in one of the estimates , but at the last moment he always sent some excuse , either through impoitant business or otherwise , which prevented his doing so . If Mr . Wilson would devote his time and attention to
satisfying the reasonable requirements of the House Committee , instead of wasting his efforts in a newspaper correspondence , I think he would find his claim would be fairly and properly considered . The matter is very simple . Mr . Wilson sent in a long account for professional services rendered at different periods , and charged a lump sum at the end , instead of
making a distinct charge for each item of service , or professional work ; and payments were made to him from time to time as the work proceeded , so that the Committee did not expect there could be much if anything due , and that Mr . Wilson ' s claim was excessive ; he has , therefore , been repeatedly asked to render an amended account , showing what he charges for each item ( or in other words
to show how he arrives at the lump sum ) , for the purpose of enabling the Committee to investigate the matter further . This Mr . Wilson declines to do , and prefers appealing to the Craft ; therefore any delay entirely rests with himself . Without the information asked the account cannot be dealt with , and . Mr . Wilson can of course bring
an action , when he will be compelled to render an account in detail . 1 will not occupy your soacc by replying to the other matters contained in Mr . Wilson ' s last letter to you , because they are quite outside the question . 1 am , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally ,
WILLIAM ROEBUCK . Chairman for the month of the House Committee and General Committee .
West L . dge , Acton , W ., January Sth , 1880 . [ The above was received on the 8 th inst ., but too late for publication ] .
Reviews.
Reviews .
THE STEPPING STONES . An Allegory . Kctliy anil l ' . ndcan , 190 , Oxford-street . Wc have been much struck with this most pleasant little book . Wc can earnestly commend it to the notice of those who are seeking books for the young . Its language is lucid , its ideas elevated , and its moral good in
every sense , and it forcibly appeals to the best sentiments of the young , and will , as it may well do , improve the tendencies of the minds of the youth of both sexes ; nay , and for the matter of that , it may be most profitably read by those more mature in life , more advanced in years . Our young friends must not be deterred by the mere seriousness of its
aspect or the solidity of its sentences , or apprehend , to use the slang vernacular of the hour , that it is " too goodygoody " for them . On the contrary , if they only persevere in reading it , let them believe us when wc say they will rise from the perusal refreshed , gratified , and edified . It often makes us sad to think , ( as we too well know ) , of some of
the absolute " trash " which is profusely put before our youth to-day , and which youth ' s facile mind too eagerly devours . It is equally lamentable to think that any sound and religious books should be considered by many " too goody-goody" for the young . The best thanks of the
community are due to publishers like Kerby and Endean , who are nut afraid or ashamed to issue books whose sound and benevolent aim is the moral elevation of the religious character of tin- young . We trust that they may meet with the success they deserve in these , their laudable efforts to advance and disseminate good juvenile literature .
THE MASONIC AGE . Louisville , Kentucky , U . S . This is a new aspirant for Masonic and public favour , edited by Bro . Ben . Chase . It is No . 1 of Vol . 1 . We
Reviews.
heartily hail it and approve of it . It is carefully edited , contains a variety of interesting matter , and is a valuable addition to serial Masonic literature . We cannot understand why in America with its 700 , 000 Masons there can ever be any difficulty in maintaining an efficient Masonic magazine and a Masonic press . But from what we read
the same drawback exists in the United States as in Englaud—want of interest in Mosonry , archa'ologically , scientifically , and historically . Thus it appears to us that we want a little Masonic education and the foundation if possible of Masonic libraries , museums , and reading
rooms . Let us hope that a better future and a revival of Masonic literature may revive the cfiiorts of despairing editors and recoup the sacrifices of weary publishers . Until that " good time comes " wc arc pleased to greet fraternally such excellent representations of our Masonic literature as " The Masonic Age . "
THE INDUSTRIOUS LITTLE BUILDERS . By T . J . A . Jociu .-iSE . Keiby and Endean . This is a charming little story for our young , for which we venture to predict much well-deserved popularity . It is animated and agreeable , frank and fresh in style , and its tone is admirable , in that it subserves an healthy morality ,
and gently " preaches" usefulness and activity . It is quite refreshing to iurn over its cheery and sensible pages , instead of much of that formidable nonsense which lies too often now in the pathway of our youth as a pitfall and a stumbling-block , a mockery , and a delusion , and a snare . We beg to urge on numerous
young friends the propriety of obtaining for themselves this little book , not only as really worth reading , but as suggesting feelings and actions , motives and considerations which , under God ' s blessing , may do them much good wherever their lot in life may be . It is a thoroughly recommendable book for mothers to procure .
THE LIBERAL FREEMASON . 223 , Washingtonstreet , Boston , U . S . This excellent periodical , edited by our esteemed Bro . Alfred F . Chapman , is always full of interest for the American Freemason . Its articles are thoughful , and careful editing marks its normal course . It has reached No . 9 , Vol . III ., and we wish it all success . It certainly well deserves patronage and will as assuredly reward perusal .
Masonic Notes And Queries.
Masonic notes and Queries .
CURIOUS BOOKS ANENT MASONRY . There is a very rare little German tract , published at Frankfort in 173 S , which is a translation of W . Smiths Freemasons' Pocket Companion of 1 73 d . It has omitted the " General Regulations " and the songs , but preserves the list of lodges , and adds some original chapters on the
condition of Freemasonry in England , France , Germany , Holland , and Italy . It is a tract hostile to Freemasonry , and contains some statements relative to foreign Freemasonry which are either intolerantly false , or the mere effort of abject audacity . At the same time in some of the " high grades , " now happily extinct , many very foolish things were said and done . MASONIC STUDENT .
THREE MEMO'S . 1 . Those interested in the " ancient" minute book in the possession of the Rev . Bro . Woodford , and which formerly belonged to No . 194 , "Ancients" ( 110111 143 , London ) , will find a short article on the subject in the " Masonic Magazine . " The Middlesex Lodge will surely be glad to avail itself of the kind offer of Bro . Woodford ' s to return
the volume to its original owner . The lodge ( as , indeed , till the lodges of the "Ancients" ) is noted in the invaluable work by Bro . R . F . Gould on the " Alholl Lodges , " about which I shall want to say a little as soon as time permits . 2 . 1 am longing to see an exact transcript of the old " Inigo Jones MS ., " and so must defer any remarks on
that subject until then , save to point out that my reference was not to the Cm ml Lodge M . S ., from which Bro . Woodford quotes in the Freemason for the 27 th ult ., but to that knows as Stone's MS ., said to have been burnt in 1721 , and a short extract from which will be fouud in our " Old Charges , " obtained from the " Book of Constitutions , " by Dr . Anderson .
3 . If any brother knows of old MSS . not yet made public he will confer a great boon on Masonic students by furnishing particulars and , if possible , full details . W . J . HUGHAN .
Royal Masonic Institution For Boys.
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS .
The Quarterly Court of the Governors and Subscribers of this Institution was held on Monday , at Freemasons' Hall , Col . Creaton in the chair . There were also present Bros . S . Rawson , Don . M . Dewar , William Roebuck , Rev .
A . F . A . Woodford , F . Adlard , Arther E . Gladwell , R . Warner Wheeler , W . H . I ' erryman , W . 11 . llamann , Thos . Meggy , F . Binekes ( Secretary ) , and H . Massey { Freemason ) . Twenty vacancies and eighty caudie ' ates were declared fjr next election .
The matter of Bro . S . B . Wilson ' s dispute with the Institution was discussed , and the correspondence read , and the whole subject was , on the motion of Bro . the Rev . A . F . A . Woodford , seconded by Bro . R . Warner Wheeler , referred back to the I louse Committee to _ ec if they could settle it . This concluded the business 0 ! the meeting .
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Original Correspondence.
To Hie Editor of the . " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I do not see why Bro . Stevens should ask for my real name and object to my pseudonym . It is the privilege of the Masonic press to write anonymously vtith the permission of the Editor , and , therefore , 1 beg respectfully to decline Bro . Stevens' request , and to retiin the
subscription with which I began this correspondence . 1 hat I had an object it is clear to all who do me the honour to read my humble contributions , and as I have no evil intent in it , and am trespassing on no rule of Masonic propriety and good feeling , 1 claim the liberty , always rightly accorded in your open and honest pages to any discreet Mason . I confess that 1 am more in a haze than ever , and
there I probably shall slay , as 1 r . cc no valid explanation tendered either of the real object of the movement , or why so much heat has been unnecessarily shown by our Bros . Stevens and Perceval in the matter . As Bro . Neilson truly puts it , if these , charges arc true they constitute a grave reflection on our authorities , but how or why they call for a reform of the ritual or uniformity of working I cannot , for the life of me , see . I may be the
thickest of the thick , or the densest of the dense , but , nevertheless , like Bros . Nsilson , While , and many others , I do not , and cannot , see it . For it is not contended that the abuses are wide spread or known in many lodges , and why my liberty is to be interfered with on account of somebody else ' s " laches , " I really do wish some one would kindly explain . Yours fraternally , ONE WHO WAS IN GRAND LODGE .
Dear Bro . Kenning , — I have read with a very considerable amount of interest the numerous letters that have appeared from time to time in your valuable journal upon this important subject , but at present I must confess that I am not greatly impressed with the arguments that are brought to bear against the advisability of its adoption by Grand
Lodge . My object in penning this letter is not to defend or condemn the " modus operandi" employed by our zealous Bro . Stevens in ventilating this question , but simply to respectfully suggest to several of your distinguished correspondents that there are many abuses in the Masonic ritual that might be corrected with advantage if a committee of revision for that purpose were appointed
by Grand Lodge . It is a notorious fact , and one to be deplored , that there are several so-called systems of ritual promulgated in London anil elsewhere which , in their action , are subversive of those principles of unity which should prevail among the mystic brotherhood .. It is a matter of frequent occurrence in lodges of instruction for the clement of discord to be raised in consequence of a
brother differing in his rendering of the ceremonies or in the " working " of a section from the system ventilated by the Preceptor of that particular lodge . I have frequently witnessed the most unseemly interruptions , and have heard the reverse ol fraternal language adopted by rival exponents of the various theories . If . as Bro . Stevens suggests , a College of Preceptors
could be formed under the wing of Grand Lodge , the crotchets of some of our very worthy but dogmatical instructors would cease to proveke discussion in the broad arena of Masonic teaching , because the brethren would have an opportunity of making themselves conversant with the " working " of the College , and should their rendering of the ritual at any time be questioned they could
defend themselves hy stating that such was the system recognised by Grand Lodge . I also venture to differ from the opinions strongly expressed by some of your correspondents that the matter will be shelved at the next Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge , for this reason , that there is a strong feeling among the brethren , as a body , in favour of the appointment of a committee to
consider what mig ht be done towards reforming some of the abuses of the Masonic ritual , and to propound a system of uniform working thai would meet with general approval . No sensible person can for a moment believe that in the event of Grand Lodge taking action in the matter they could , or would , attempt to enforce uniformity of litual -,
such a proceeding would , undoubtedly , create even greater difficulties and differences than those with which Freemasonry had to contend in the last century . Pending the discussion of the motion , it is certainly nor altogether the thing for prejudiced brethren to indulge in those disagreeable and uncalled for personalities , and which conduct is so emphatically condemned by your erudite editor , Bro .
Woodford , in his letter which appeared in your impression of the 3 rd inst . If the members of the metropolitan and provincial lodges are adve-rse to the motion initiated hy Bro . Stevens , the remedy lies in their own hands by their sending their representative to the next Quarterly Communication armed with full powers to oppose it ; but if , on the other hand , they arc inclined to support it , let them
instruct their substitutes to bring the matter to a triumphant result . So important a matter deserves more than the mere raging of a " paper war , " in which inglorious strife the respective combatants appear to lose sight of the point at iisuc , and frequently indulge- in a rhodomontade of nonsense , "full of sound and lury , signifying nothing . " Like
many other popular and flnuiishing institutions , freemasonry has its enemies , who art- alw : iys on the aler ' . to I ' mil some loophole wherewith to point and discharge the heavy artillery of malice and contumely against its professions , and who would eagerly embrace the opportunity of
raising a pa-an of triumph should : my serious rupture arise in its councils . The public hurling of invectives and the casting of animadversions upon the conduct or principles of a brother can only lead to that discreditable result , so ably defined by your reverend correspondent , of affecting "the non-
Original Correspondence.
Masonic mind with the gravest doubts of the reality and worth of our Masonic professions . " Apologising for occupying so much of your valuable space , I remain , yours fraternally , T . C . W ., P . G . S . B . Middx ., etc .
THE LAST QUARTERLY MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Though sorry [ or many reasons to see so much " personality " apparent in certain proceedings and circulars , notably , alluded to at that assembly , I yet think they may do good , in that they will disgust all gentlemanly
minded Masons at the truly un-Masonic tone of such suggestions and such imputations . I am one of those who think that some means should be taken publicly to show to our worthy and hard working Grand Treasurer the sense the brethren really entertain of his unrivalled exertions on behalf o the best interests of our great Charities . It would be a fitting reply to all this childish and petulant outburst of circular and correspondence . Yours fraternally , T .
BRO . WILSON AND THE BOYS' SCHOOL . To the Editor of the " Fretmason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Mr . Wilson is taking a great deal of unnecessary trouble in carrying on a correspondence in the Freemason upon the subject of his disputed claim , and in sending out circulars to certain brethren previous to the
General Committee meeting of Saturday last , and at which he did not himself think well to attend . It is not the usual method of settling such matters , and in this instance he will undoubtedly find it ineffectual , because the House Committee have a public duty to perform , and they will not be deterred by any appeal to the Craft , who cannot possibly form a judgment without a knowledge of all
circumstances , Mr . Wilson was repeatedly invited to attend the House Committee to give an explanation of a certain charge in one of the estimates , but at the last moment he always sent some excuse , either through impoitant business or otherwise , which prevented his doing so . If Mr . Wilson would devote his time and attention to
satisfying the reasonable requirements of the House Committee , instead of wasting his efforts in a newspaper correspondence , I think he would find his claim would be fairly and properly considered . The matter is very simple . Mr . Wilson sent in a long account for professional services rendered at different periods , and charged a lump sum at the end , instead of
making a distinct charge for each item of service , or professional work ; and payments were made to him from time to time as the work proceeded , so that the Committee did not expect there could be much if anything due , and that Mr . Wilson ' s claim was excessive ; he has , therefore , been repeatedly asked to render an amended account , showing what he charges for each item ( or in other words
to show how he arrives at the lump sum ) , for the purpose of enabling the Committee to investigate the matter further . This Mr . Wilson declines to do , and prefers appealing to the Craft ; therefore any delay entirely rests with himself . Without the information asked the account cannot be dealt with , and . Mr . Wilson can of course bring
an action , when he will be compelled to render an account in detail . 1 will not occupy your soacc by replying to the other matters contained in Mr . Wilson ' s last letter to you , because they are quite outside the question . 1 am , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally ,
WILLIAM ROEBUCK . Chairman for the month of the House Committee and General Committee .
West L . dge , Acton , W ., January Sth , 1880 . [ The above was received on the 8 th inst ., but too late for publication ] .
Reviews.
Reviews .
THE STEPPING STONES . An Allegory . Kctliy anil l ' . ndcan , 190 , Oxford-street . Wc have been much struck with this most pleasant little book . Wc can earnestly commend it to the notice of those who are seeking books for the young . Its language is lucid , its ideas elevated , and its moral good in
every sense , and it forcibly appeals to the best sentiments of the young , and will , as it may well do , improve the tendencies of the minds of the youth of both sexes ; nay , and for the matter of that , it may be most profitably read by those more mature in life , more advanced in years . Our young friends must not be deterred by the mere seriousness of its
aspect or the solidity of its sentences , or apprehend , to use the slang vernacular of the hour , that it is " too goodygoody " for them . On the contrary , if they only persevere in reading it , let them believe us when wc say they will rise from the perusal refreshed , gratified , and edified . It often makes us sad to think , ( as we too well know ) , of some of
the absolute " trash " which is profusely put before our youth to-day , and which youth ' s facile mind too eagerly devours . It is equally lamentable to think that any sound and religious books should be considered by many " too goody-goody" for the young . The best thanks of the
community are due to publishers like Kerby and Endean , who are nut afraid or ashamed to issue books whose sound and benevolent aim is the moral elevation of the religious character of tin- young . We trust that they may meet with the success they deserve in these , their laudable efforts to advance and disseminate good juvenile literature .
THE MASONIC AGE . Louisville , Kentucky , U . S . This is a new aspirant for Masonic and public favour , edited by Bro . Ben . Chase . It is No . 1 of Vol . 1 . We
Reviews.
heartily hail it and approve of it . It is carefully edited , contains a variety of interesting matter , and is a valuable addition to serial Masonic literature . We cannot understand why in America with its 700 , 000 Masons there can ever be any difficulty in maintaining an efficient Masonic magazine and a Masonic press . But from what we read
the same drawback exists in the United States as in Englaud—want of interest in Mosonry , archa'ologically , scientifically , and historically . Thus it appears to us that we want a little Masonic education and the foundation if possible of Masonic libraries , museums , and reading
rooms . Let us hope that a better future and a revival of Masonic literature may revive the cfiiorts of despairing editors and recoup the sacrifices of weary publishers . Until that " good time comes " wc arc pleased to greet fraternally such excellent representations of our Masonic literature as " The Masonic Age . "
THE INDUSTRIOUS LITTLE BUILDERS . By T . J . A . Jociu .-iSE . Keiby and Endean . This is a charming little story for our young , for which we venture to predict much well-deserved popularity . It is animated and agreeable , frank and fresh in style , and its tone is admirable , in that it subserves an healthy morality ,
and gently " preaches" usefulness and activity . It is quite refreshing to iurn over its cheery and sensible pages , instead of much of that formidable nonsense which lies too often now in the pathway of our youth as a pitfall and a stumbling-block , a mockery , and a delusion , and a snare . We beg to urge on numerous
young friends the propriety of obtaining for themselves this little book , not only as really worth reading , but as suggesting feelings and actions , motives and considerations which , under God ' s blessing , may do them much good wherever their lot in life may be . It is a thoroughly recommendable book for mothers to procure .
THE LIBERAL FREEMASON . 223 , Washingtonstreet , Boston , U . S . This excellent periodical , edited by our esteemed Bro . Alfred F . Chapman , is always full of interest for the American Freemason . Its articles are thoughful , and careful editing marks its normal course . It has reached No . 9 , Vol . III ., and we wish it all success . It certainly well deserves patronage and will as assuredly reward perusal .
Masonic Notes And Queries.
Masonic notes and Queries .
CURIOUS BOOKS ANENT MASONRY . There is a very rare little German tract , published at Frankfort in 173 S , which is a translation of W . Smiths Freemasons' Pocket Companion of 1 73 d . It has omitted the " General Regulations " and the songs , but preserves the list of lodges , and adds some original chapters on the
condition of Freemasonry in England , France , Germany , Holland , and Italy . It is a tract hostile to Freemasonry , and contains some statements relative to foreign Freemasonry which are either intolerantly false , or the mere effort of abject audacity . At the same time in some of the " high grades , " now happily extinct , many very foolish things were said and done . MASONIC STUDENT .
THREE MEMO'S . 1 . Those interested in the " ancient" minute book in the possession of the Rev . Bro . Woodford , and which formerly belonged to No . 194 , "Ancients" ( 110111 143 , London ) , will find a short article on the subject in the " Masonic Magazine . " The Middlesex Lodge will surely be glad to avail itself of the kind offer of Bro . Woodford ' s to return
the volume to its original owner . The lodge ( as , indeed , till the lodges of the "Ancients" ) is noted in the invaluable work by Bro . R . F . Gould on the " Alholl Lodges , " about which I shall want to say a little as soon as time permits . 2 . 1 am longing to see an exact transcript of the old " Inigo Jones MS ., " and so must defer any remarks on
that subject until then , save to point out that my reference was not to the Cm ml Lodge M . S ., from which Bro . Woodford quotes in the Freemason for the 27 th ult ., but to that knows as Stone's MS ., said to have been burnt in 1721 , and a short extract from which will be fouud in our " Old Charges , " obtained from the " Book of Constitutions , " by Dr . Anderson .
3 . If any brother knows of old MSS . not yet made public he will confer a great boon on Masonic students by furnishing particulars and , if possible , full details . W . J . HUGHAN .
Royal Masonic Institution For Boys.
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS .
The Quarterly Court of the Governors and Subscribers of this Institution was held on Monday , at Freemasons' Hall , Col . Creaton in the chair . There were also present Bros . S . Rawson , Don . M . Dewar , William Roebuck , Rev .
A . F . A . Woodford , F . Adlard , Arther E . Gladwell , R . Warner Wheeler , W . H . I ' erryman , W . 11 . llamann , Thos . Meggy , F . Binekes ( Secretary ) , and H . Massey { Freemason ) . Twenty vacancies and eighty caudie ' ates were declared fjr next election .
The matter of Bro . S . B . Wilson ' s dispute with the Institution was discussed , and the correspondence read , and the whole subject was , on the motion of Bro . the Rev . A . F . A . Woodford , seconded by Bro . R . Warner Wheeler , referred back to the I louse Committee to _ ec if they could settle it . This concluded the business 0 ! the meeting .