Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • Dec. 18, 1899
  • Page 17
Current:

The Freemason, Dec. 18, 1899: Page 17

  • Back to The Freemason, Dec. 18, 1899
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article Legal Episodes in the History of Freemasonry. ← Page 2 of 4
    Article Legal Episodes in the History of Freemasonry. Page 2 of 4 →
Page 17

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Legal Episodes In The History Of Freemasonry.

the methods , and still less of the secrets of the Craft . Hc had never during his life stood in a Lodge at labour . He had no insig ht into either our internal hierarchy , or our external organisation . How then did he compile his Ritual ? He fell back on Finch ' s stuff , which he swallowed as of unimpeachable validity .

One can imagine the degree of confidence to be reposed in an exposition of Freemasonry by an arrant outsider , disreputable in character , ancl totally ignorant of his subject ; whose source of insp iration was a contemptible apostate , doubly disreputable in

character , and legally proved to be unworthy oi credence . Yet Freemasonry has met critics who show undoubted shrewdness in thc affairs of life , but who would fain attribute substance to Carlile ' s caricature of Finch ' s fictions .

WHILE b REEMASONRV in the English capital was thus purging itself of noxious humours , Freemasonry in thc Scottish capital was rent by a schism which , at one time , bid fair to establish two rival Grand Lodges in Scotland . The Scottish Lodges are of incomparable antiquity . Like thc vieille noblesse , they pay the

penalty of pride of ancestry by claims of precedence , only too apt to engender jealousies ancl bickerings . The smouldering lire suddenly leaped into a flame in 1807 . " Grand Lodge of Scotland does not seem to have acted with its wonted wisdom . Instead of resting on the merits of the actual case , the Grand

Lodge authorities diverged into side issues of Lodge rights and Lodge precedence . Instead of resting on the sure basis of the willing obedience of the members of our volunlarv Society , they sought to enforce their disputed claims by appeals to the strong arm of the Law . The proceeding was ill-advised , and the result gives ample food for reflection .

Thc circumstances were these . In 1807 , at a time when civil excitement was inflaming men ' s minds , Dr . John Mitchell , R . W . Mastcr of the Caledonian Lodge , Edinburgh , moved in Lodge a resolution which was held , by his political opponents , to savour of the politics they abhorred . For this , Dr . Mitchell was

unfortunate enough to incur the censure of Grand Lodge . The dispute seems to the present generation to have been trivial in origin . But it became embittered as time went on . Thc Grand Lodge imported side-issues . Dr . Mitchell and the Lodges that took part with him were charged with illegality under the Secret

Societies Act of 1 799 . Considerations foreign to the original plaint were forced on . The Grand Lodge brought into theLaw Courts a case in which it was worsted . Manv Lodges had , from the first , thought thc proceedings of Grand Lodge to be harsh beyond what was warranted by established usuage . Now , they

found the claims ol that Bod y scouted by the tribunal to which it had appealed . They formed themselves , in 1 S 0 S , into a separate organisation under the designation of " The Associated

Lodges seceding from the present Grand Lodge of Scotland . " The unseeml y litigation dragged on for years . The ori ginal cause of dispute was wellnigh lost sight of amid the side issues . Everything seemed to foster the flame of disaffection . But the

kindly spirit of Scottish Freemasonry , in the long run , proved equal to the task of reconciliation . The ori ginal cause of offence , was condoned on the one hand . On the other , the ill-advised

appeal to the Law Courts was ignored . The incidental irritation engendered by the quarrel was allayed by mutual forbearance , and the most serious schism in the history of the Scottish Grand Lodge came lo an end in 181 3 .

CoNt VKKKNTLV with these events , the Grand Lodge of Ireland emerged triumphantly from a similar ordeal . Tlu : episode was much more important , from the legal point of view , than either ol those narrated above . Dragged into the Law Courts b y an ill-conditioned and ill-intentioned official , who had been

discharged for gross malfeasance , the Grand Lodge of Ireland established , once for all , the legal right of the ' Craft , as an organised Society , to govern its constituent members in accordance with its own Laws . The judicial decision was of the more importance , as it had been thought that the internal government

ol the Craft was seriously interfered with , if not altogether done away wilh , by the Secret Societies Act of 1 799 . The case took rank as a " leading ease , " and served as a precedent

afterwards in Prosecutions and Commissions of Enquiry that had fo deal with other associations . Hence , the contemporary Report "I the legal proceedings may have an interest for outsiders as Well as for ourselves .

In order lo understand the situation , a few words of explanation will not come amiss . In 179 6 , Bro . Gorges Darcy mine became ( Jrand Secretary . This ollice in the ( Jrand Lod ge of Ireland is purely Honorary , all the duties being performed

by a salaried assistant , the Deputy Grand Secretary . '"' . G . D . Irvine was a county magnate from ( he North of Ireland , "' s brolher , Colonel William Irvine , M . P ., had been for many years Provincial Grand Master of Ulster . The Deputy Grand Secretary of Ireland in 179 O was Bro . Thomas Corker , who had held

Legal Episodes In The History Of Freemasonry.

the office from 1767 . In accordance with the pernicious custom of the century , the reversion of Bro . Corker ' s appointment was in thc gift of thc ( Jrand Secretary , and , in an evil hour , was promised to Bro . Alex . Seton , a Dublin barrister . Poor Bro . Thomas Corker , " worn out with age and infirmity" died in

December , 1800 , and Seton succeeded to his post as a matter of course . Seton will probably be best known to Masonic students as the unscrupulous depredator whose first act of authority was to carry off " a hackney-coach load of papers" from poor Corker ' s ill-kept archives . Seton proved unsatisfactory in

money matters . He bitterly resented the check placed on his manuuivres by the introduction of a Deputy Grand Treasurer . He tried to embroil the Brethren by inflaming Provincial jealousies , and by misrepresenting thc attempts of ( Jrand Lodge to bring the R . A . and H . K . T . Degrees under some central

authority . He was dismissed from the post of Deputy Grand Secretary in 1806 . His patron , Gorges Darcy Irvine , not having bcen reelected to office in 1805 , the new Grand Secretary , a barrister named John Leech , appointed Wm . Francis Graham in

Seton ' s stead . Seton refused to be got rid of , illegally detained the archives of Grand Lodge , and temporarily ousted the Grand Lodge from its usual place of meeting , which formed an admirably misleading address for the floods of circulars and manifestos with which he inundated the Lod

It is difficult to overstate Seton s insolent audacity : the wonder is that Grand Lodge showed itself so forbearing . At length , in April 1807 , he was expelled , and notice of his expulsion was sent round to the Lodges in the following colourless circular .

GRAND LODOK OF IRELAND . Thursday , 2 nd April , 1 S 07 . Right Worshi pful ALEX . J AITRAY Esq ., D . G . M ., on the Throne-. BROTHER J LEECH F . SU ., Grand Secretary , informed THE GRVND LODGE that pursuant to their order made

on the 5 th of March last he had demanded the Books ancl other Muniment !; the Property of this GRVND LODGE to be given up by Brother ALEXANDER SETON , laic Deputy Grand Secretary , whicli demand bad nol been complied with .

" RESOLVED "That ALEX \ NDER SETON be expelled '' ibis Grand Lodge and Masonry in General " ALEX , [ AITRAY , D . G . M . J LEECH , G . S .

/ o . L . SwA I [ lltuni nnrj \ Ti ' invcl . jy In the cant of thc day , Seton at once " slapped an action " against ( Jrand Lodge . lie claimed ^ 2000 damages for libel , and

went to extraordinary lengths of personal malice in the preliminary proceedings . He look the precaution of laying the venue at the Omagh assizes , where his patron , Bro . Gorges Darcy Irvine , exercised unbounded influence . The action , accordingly , was tried at the Co . Tyrone assizes in 1808 . By great good

fortune , the Judge of Azzize , the Rt . lion . Justice Daly , was one of the ablest on the Irish Bench . Consequently , Seton ' s attempt to make the mailer a personal struggle between himself

ancl his successor , Bro . W . F . Graham , —an attempt onl y loo successful in the preliminary proceedings we have hinted at , —was foiled , and the case was decided on broad legal principles , to the utter discomfiture of Seton .

lt will be observed that Counsel for the plantiff mentioned the ( Jrand Lodge of England . This means the Grand Lodge of thc Antients , which worked hand in hand with the Grand Lodge of Ireland . We have got so far from the days when two Grand Lodges co-existed in England , and the pious panegyrics of the

"blessed Union of 1813 , " have given our history such a twist , that some of us seem to find it hard to understand that , at the period with which we are dealing , the title GRAND LODGI-: OF

ENGLAND meant to the great majority of English-speaking l- ' reemasons , the Grand Lodge of the Antients , and no other . Certainly , in the Minnies of the Grand Lodge of Ireland it has no other meaniii "' .

With these prefatory remarks , the following contemporary report will show the turn taken by the proceedings in Court , albeit the phraseology of the reporter could easily have bcen improved .

SETON V . GRAHAM . Tyrone Assizes [ 1808 , ] North-west Circuit . Before Rt . Hon . Mr . Justice Daly and a Common Jury . At the Assizes for the County of Tyrone , held at Omagh an action was brought bv Alexander Seton Esq ., a barrister at law

“The Freemason: 1899-12-18, Page 17” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_18121899/page/17/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Contents. Article 2
Freemasonry in 1899. Article 3
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Legal Episodes in the History of Freemasonry. Article 16
Saved by a Puff of Wind. Article 19
T' Doctor Article 20
Untitled Ad 20
The Wrights of Glasgow. Article 21
Untitled Ad 22
Brother Peter W. Gilkes. Article 23
Love and Loyalty. Article 24
Untitled Ad 32
Untitled Ad 33
Untitled Ad 34
My Grand Lodge Certificate. Article 37
Repaid. Article 38
Thomas Harper. Article 39
Untitled Ad 43
Grand Officers. Article 43
Untitled Ad 45
Untitled Ad 49
Untitled Ad 50
Occurrences of the Year. Article 53
Untitled Ad 56
Untitled Ad 57
Untitled Ad 57
Untitled Ad 58
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

3 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

4 Articles
Page 21

Page 21

2 Articles
Page 22

Page 22

3 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

2 Articles
Page 24

Page 24

2 Articles
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

2 Articles
Page 27

Page 27

2 Articles
Page 28

Page 28

2 Articles
Page 29

Page 29

2 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

2 Articles
Page 31

Page 31

2 Articles
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

3 Articles
Page 34

Page 34

3 Articles
Page 35

Page 35

2 Articles
Page 36

Page 36

2 Articles
Page 37

Page 37

3 Articles
Page 38

Page 38

2 Articles
Page 39

Page 39

3 Articles
Page 40

Page 40

2 Articles
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

2 Articles
Page 43

Page 43

3 Articles
Page 44

Page 44

2 Articles
Page 45

Page 45

3 Articles
Page 46

Page 46

2 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

2 Articles
Page 48

Page 48

2 Articles
Page 49

Page 49

3 Articles
Page 50

Page 50

3 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

2 Articles
Page 52

Page 52

2 Articles
Page 53

Page 53

3 Articles
Page 54

Page 54

2 Articles
Page 55

Page 55

2 Articles
Page 56

Page 56

3 Articles
Page 57

Page 57

4 Articles
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 17

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Legal Episodes In The History Of Freemasonry.

the methods , and still less of the secrets of the Craft . Hc had never during his life stood in a Lodge at labour . He had no insig ht into either our internal hierarchy , or our external organisation . How then did he compile his Ritual ? He fell back on Finch ' s stuff , which he swallowed as of unimpeachable validity .

One can imagine the degree of confidence to be reposed in an exposition of Freemasonry by an arrant outsider , disreputable in character , ancl totally ignorant of his subject ; whose source of insp iration was a contemptible apostate , doubly disreputable in

character , and legally proved to be unworthy oi credence . Yet Freemasonry has met critics who show undoubted shrewdness in thc affairs of life , but who would fain attribute substance to Carlile ' s caricature of Finch ' s fictions .

WHILE b REEMASONRV in the English capital was thus purging itself of noxious humours , Freemasonry in thc Scottish capital was rent by a schism which , at one time , bid fair to establish two rival Grand Lodges in Scotland . The Scottish Lodges are of incomparable antiquity . Like thc vieille noblesse , they pay the

penalty of pride of ancestry by claims of precedence , only too apt to engender jealousies ancl bickerings . The smouldering lire suddenly leaped into a flame in 1807 . " Grand Lodge of Scotland does not seem to have acted with its wonted wisdom . Instead of resting on the merits of the actual case , the Grand

Lodge authorities diverged into side issues of Lodge rights and Lodge precedence . Instead of resting on the sure basis of the willing obedience of the members of our volunlarv Society , they sought to enforce their disputed claims by appeals to the strong arm of the Law . The proceeding was ill-advised , and the result gives ample food for reflection .

Thc circumstances were these . In 1807 , at a time when civil excitement was inflaming men ' s minds , Dr . John Mitchell , R . W . Mastcr of the Caledonian Lodge , Edinburgh , moved in Lodge a resolution which was held , by his political opponents , to savour of the politics they abhorred . For this , Dr . Mitchell was

unfortunate enough to incur the censure of Grand Lodge . The dispute seems to the present generation to have been trivial in origin . But it became embittered as time went on . Thc Grand Lodge imported side-issues . Dr . Mitchell and the Lodges that took part with him were charged with illegality under the Secret

Societies Act of 1 799 . Considerations foreign to the original plaint were forced on . The Grand Lodge brought into theLaw Courts a case in which it was worsted . Manv Lodges had , from the first , thought thc proceedings of Grand Lodge to be harsh beyond what was warranted by established usuage . Now , they

found the claims ol that Bod y scouted by the tribunal to which it had appealed . They formed themselves , in 1 S 0 S , into a separate organisation under the designation of " The Associated

Lodges seceding from the present Grand Lodge of Scotland . " The unseeml y litigation dragged on for years . The ori ginal cause of dispute was wellnigh lost sight of amid the side issues . Everything seemed to foster the flame of disaffection . But the

kindly spirit of Scottish Freemasonry , in the long run , proved equal to the task of reconciliation . The ori ginal cause of offence , was condoned on the one hand . On the other , the ill-advised

appeal to the Law Courts was ignored . The incidental irritation engendered by the quarrel was allayed by mutual forbearance , and the most serious schism in the history of the Scottish Grand Lodge came lo an end in 181 3 .

CoNt VKKKNTLV with these events , the Grand Lodge of Ireland emerged triumphantly from a similar ordeal . Tlu : episode was much more important , from the legal point of view , than either ol those narrated above . Dragged into the Law Courts b y an ill-conditioned and ill-intentioned official , who had been

discharged for gross malfeasance , the Grand Lodge of Ireland established , once for all , the legal right of the ' Craft , as an organised Society , to govern its constituent members in accordance with its own Laws . The judicial decision was of the more importance , as it had been thought that the internal government

ol the Craft was seriously interfered with , if not altogether done away wilh , by the Secret Societies Act of 1 799 . The case took rank as a " leading ease , " and served as a precedent

afterwards in Prosecutions and Commissions of Enquiry that had fo deal with other associations . Hence , the contemporary Report "I the legal proceedings may have an interest for outsiders as Well as for ourselves .

In order lo understand the situation , a few words of explanation will not come amiss . In 179 6 , Bro . Gorges Darcy mine became ( Jrand Secretary . This ollice in the ( Jrand Lod ge of Ireland is purely Honorary , all the duties being performed

by a salaried assistant , the Deputy Grand Secretary . '"' . G . D . Irvine was a county magnate from ( he North of Ireland , "' s brolher , Colonel William Irvine , M . P ., had been for many years Provincial Grand Master of Ulster . The Deputy Grand Secretary of Ireland in 179 O was Bro . Thomas Corker , who had held

Legal Episodes In The History Of Freemasonry.

the office from 1767 . In accordance with the pernicious custom of the century , the reversion of Bro . Corker ' s appointment was in thc gift of thc ( Jrand Secretary , and , in an evil hour , was promised to Bro . Alex . Seton , a Dublin barrister . Poor Bro . Thomas Corker , " worn out with age and infirmity" died in

December , 1800 , and Seton succeeded to his post as a matter of course . Seton will probably be best known to Masonic students as the unscrupulous depredator whose first act of authority was to carry off " a hackney-coach load of papers" from poor Corker ' s ill-kept archives . Seton proved unsatisfactory in

money matters . He bitterly resented the check placed on his manuuivres by the introduction of a Deputy Grand Treasurer . He tried to embroil the Brethren by inflaming Provincial jealousies , and by misrepresenting thc attempts of ( Jrand Lodge to bring the R . A . and H . K . T . Degrees under some central

authority . He was dismissed from the post of Deputy Grand Secretary in 1806 . His patron , Gorges Darcy Irvine , not having bcen reelected to office in 1805 , the new Grand Secretary , a barrister named John Leech , appointed Wm . Francis Graham in

Seton ' s stead . Seton refused to be got rid of , illegally detained the archives of Grand Lodge , and temporarily ousted the Grand Lodge from its usual place of meeting , which formed an admirably misleading address for the floods of circulars and manifestos with which he inundated the Lod

It is difficult to overstate Seton s insolent audacity : the wonder is that Grand Lodge showed itself so forbearing . At length , in April 1807 , he was expelled , and notice of his expulsion was sent round to the Lodges in the following colourless circular .

GRAND LODOK OF IRELAND . Thursday , 2 nd April , 1 S 07 . Right Worshi pful ALEX . J AITRAY Esq ., D . G . M ., on the Throne-. BROTHER J LEECH F . SU ., Grand Secretary , informed THE GRVND LODGE that pursuant to their order made

on the 5 th of March last he had demanded the Books ancl other Muniment !; the Property of this GRVND LODGE to be given up by Brother ALEXANDER SETON , laic Deputy Grand Secretary , whicli demand bad nol been complied with .

" RESOLVED "That ALEX \ NDER SETON be expelled '' ibis Grand Lodge and Masonry in General " ALEX , [ AITRAY , D . G . M . J LEECH , G . S .

/ o . L . SwA I [ lltuni nnrj \ Ti ' invcl . jy In the cant of thc day , Seton at once " slapped an action " against ( Jrand Lodge . lie claimed ^ 2000 damages for libel , and

went to extraordinary lengths of personal malice in the preliminary proceedings . He look the precaution of laying the venue at the Omagh assizes , where his patron , Bro . Gorges Darcy Irvine , exercised unbounded influence . The action , accordingly , was tried at the Co . Tyrone assizes in 1808 . By great good

fortune , the Judge of Azzize , the Rt . lion . Justice Daly , was one of the ablest on the Irish Bench . Consequently , Seton ' s attempt to make the mailer a personal struggle between himself

ancl his successor , Bro . W . F . Graham , —an attempt onl y loo successful in the preliminary proceedings we have hinted at , —was foiled , and the case was decided on broad legal principles , to the utter discomfiture of Seton .

lt will be observed that Counsel for the plantiff mentioned the ( Jrand Lodge of England . This means the Grand Lodge of thc Antients , which worked hand in hand with the Grand Lodge of Ireland . We have got so far from the days when two Grand Lodges co-existed in England , and the pious panegyrics of the

"blessed Union of 1813 , " have given our history such a twist , that some of us seem to find it hard to understand that , at the period with which we are dealing , the title GRAND LODGI-: OF

ENGLAND meant to the great majority of English-speaking l- ' reemasons , the Grand Lodge of the Antients , and no other . Certainly , in the Minnies of the Grand Lodge of Ireland it has no other meaniii "' .

With these prefatory remarks , the following contemporary report will show the turn taken by the proceedings in Court , albeit the phraseology of the reporter could easily have bcen improved .

SETON V . GRAHAM . Tyrone Assizes [ 1808 , ] North-west Circuit . Before Rt . Hon . Mr . Justice Daly and a Common Jury . At the Assizes for the County of Tyrone , held at Omagh an action was brought bv Alexander Seton Esq ., a barrister at law

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 16
  • You're on page17
  • 18
  • 58
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy