Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • Aug. 24, 1872
  • Page 3
Current:

The Freemason, Aug. 24, 1872: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemason, Aug. 24, 1872
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article NOTES ON THE " UNITED ORDERS OF THE TEMPLE AND HOSPITAL." ← Page 2 of 4
    Article NOTES ON THE " UNITED ORDERS OF THE TEMPLE AND HOSPITAL." Page 2 of 4
    Article NOTES ON THE " UNITED ORDERS OF THE TEMPLE AND HOSPITAL." Page 2 of 4 →
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

affiliated comprised persons of ah ranks of society , and of both sexes , who , desiring to assist the Order , or to share in the advantages connected with it , such for instance , as the exemption

from the effects of interdict enjoyed by the Templars , were permitted to join the Order , without assuming its habit , its hardships , and Us dangers , on taking certain vows , as that of

chastity , and engaging to leave their property to the Templars on their death . The great Pope , Innocent III ., did not disdain to declare himself

as standing in this position to the society , in one of his bulls . The Donates and Oblates were either children destined to the service of the

Order , or persons who . engaged to promote its welfare to the best of their power while they lived—princes were to be found among the lastmentioned class . The very duty of the Knight

Templar to fi g ht the enemies of his faith by compelling him to mix continual y and largely with the world , prevented him from observing the strictness of the rules set down for his

governance , and as a very natural consequence , his conduct was no doubt often sufficiently lax when he had no such excuses ^ to plead . Wallen , in his book , which T have before

quoted , admits that at the time of the suppression of the Templars the Hospitallers were become equally lax in their [ discipline . He says

" it must be acknowledged that their increasing power and influence made them unlace themselelves from the strictness of their first

institution , and rendered them loose and licentious . Richard de Everton , in 1 ,-527 , was appointed as a visitor , for the purpose of repressing the religious intolerance of the Knights , and enforcing

a better observance of their spiritual duties . Indeed , a proposition was made to Benedict XI . to form a new military order , and to grant it the property transferred to the Hospitallers on the

suppression of the Templars . To this he would not accede , but his successor , Clement VI ., after having ascertained the truth of many ofthe accusations brought against tlie Hospitallers , wrote a

letter to them , which had the ellect of inducing a great reformation of manners in the Order . Tlie two Orders , in fact , had the same faults in common , and there was no more reason for

suppressing the one than the other . If they had remained poor , they would in all probability have been unmolested , but being rich , they were doomed .

It is not intended that this lecture ( the substance onl y of which was delivered before the fratres of my own encampment ) should be considered in anv sense as exhaustive , in treating of

the Knights Templar . J am only a student , a seeker after li ght , and 1 only desire to create the same feeling of interest in the Templars and

ourselves , their successors , in the minds of youi readers generally , iu tho hope that good fruits ma ) follow- —good results ensue .

If each Templar and each Mason would only contribute one fact to elucidate the history ot our Order , and to open out the mysterious past , we . should all be greatly benefitted , and in

the hope that some abler brother may assist or correct me , i pen these lines . Among the rules of of the Templars , which seem to have been most reli giously observed were those of oPcdienee , at least the punishment

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

was very severe for any breach of such rules . We are reminded of this by the sight ofthe penitential cell of the Temple , which is formed within the solid thickness of the wall of the

church , and measures only four feet and a half 111 length by two and a half in breadth , so that thc unhappy prisoner could not lie down , except by drawing his limbs together . One act of merc y

however , there was for him to be thankful for . During divine service , he could hear and participate in all that was passing , through one of " squints , " as they are termed by

architects , looking into the church . If the secrets of this prison house could be made known , they would be , doubtless , appalling , for the meagre facts that have oozed out in the light of day are

sufficiently terrible . Here Walter le Bachelor , Grand Preceptor of Ireland , was fettered by order of the Master , till he died of the severity of his punishment . The corpse was : hen taken

out at daybreak , and buried in the court between the church and the hall . Besides imprisonment , which was either temporary orperpetual , according as seemed expedient to the Master , the Templars

were occasionally scourged on the bare shoulders by the Master ' s own hand , in the hall , or even whipped in thc church on Sunday , before the congregation .

A knight of the name of Yalaincourt once quitted the Order , but unable , most probably , to stifle the whisperings of his conscience that he did wrong , returned , and submitted himself

cheerfully to whatever penance the Master thought fit to impose . He was accordingly condemned to eat on the ground for a year with dogs , to fast four days in every week on bread and

water , and every Sunday to bc scourged in the church before all assembled . A public exhibition such as this no doubt had a double ellect , and edified the world as much as it punished the criminal .

The Order for along time was , as it deserved , highly popular , for its piety , bravery , and humility , aud the visual consequences of populatity in those davs followed . Great men desired t : i be

buried among them , which could only be accomplished by connection with their society , in one of the available modes alread y mentioned . Lands , manors , houses , privileges , were showered upon

them , money was deposited with them in cases of peculiar danger ; and one monarch at a critical time deposited himself in their community . I

need hardly say I refer to King John , who during the period of the arrangements connected with the signing of Magna Charta resided here . Numerous documents of the Kimr ' s are dated

from the Temple . Among other distinguished visitors was one the Templars must have , been glad to get rid of , Martin , tlie Pope ' s Nuncio , of whom Matthew Paris says " He made , whilst

residing at London in the New Temple unheard of extortions of money am ! valuables . He imperiousl y intimated to the abbots antl priors thai they must send him ieh presents , desirable

palfreys , sumptuous services for the table , rich clothing j which being done that y-. uivj -Martin sent back word that the thhuis sent were

insufficient , and he commanded the g ivers thereof to forward hiin belter things , on pain of excommunication . " The treasure deposited in the Temple must have been frequently immense , from the

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

quality of the depositors or the circumstances of the deposit . Fully trustworth ) , enjoying the privilege of sanctuary , and able so well to defend personally whatever was in their charge , the

Templars became distinguished as the safest of guardians on all extraordinary ] occasions . The King , his court , and chief ecclesiastics , all made

the Temple their bank when they pleased , and here too , were brought all monies collected for the Christian service in Palestine . The most

remarkable record on this subject is connected with the great Earl of Kent , Hubert de Burgh , on whose disgrace and committal to the Tower the King began to look shrewdly after the captive s

Treasures . Matthew Paris says , " lt was suggested to the King , that Hubert had no small amount of treasure deposited in the New Temple under the custody of the Templars . The King

accordingly summoning to his presence the Master of the Temple , briefly demanded of him if it was so . He indeed , not daring to deny the truth to the Kin " , confessed that he had money

ol the said Hubert , which had been confidentially connected to the keeping of himself and brethren but of the quantity and amount hc was altogether ignorant . Then the King endeavoured with

threats to obtain from thc brethren the surrender to him of the aforesaid money , asserting that it had been fraudulently substracled from his treasury . But they answered to the King , that

money confided to them in trust they would deliver no man , without the permission of him who had instrusted it to be kept in thc Temple . And the King , since the above mentioned money

had been placed under their protection , ventured not to take it by force . He sent , therefore , the treasure 1- of his court , with his justices of the Exchequer . to Hubert who had already been placed

in fetters in the Tower of London , that they mig ht exact from him au assignment of the entire sum to the King . But when these messengers had explained to Hubert the object of

their coming , he immediately answered that he would submit himself and all belonging to him to the good p leasure of his sovereign . He therefore petitioned the brethren of the chivalry

of the-Temple , that they would , in his behalf , present all his keys to his lord tlie King , that he might do what he pleased wilh the things

deposited in the Temple . This being cone , thc King ordered the money , faithfully counted , to be placed in his treasury , and the amount of all the thi uws found to be reduced to writinsr and

exhibited before him . The King s clerks , indeed , and the Treasurer , acting with them , found deposited in the Temple gold and silver vases of

inestimable price , and money , and many precious gems , an enumeration whereof woultl in truth astonish the beavers . "

{) f the eminent persons who caused their bodies lo be here interred , some very interesting memorials are preserved , vi / .. -. The two ranges of monumental effigies of great men reposing in

lheir habits as ihey lived , one of live figures on lhe north side of the entrance to the oblong part of lhe eh ' . nrSi , the other of four , and a coped stone , the top of a coliin on the . south . Kni ght

informs us that the fust figure on the lelt in the range here shown is that of Geoffrey de Magnavillo , the bold bad sou of the Norman baron of that name who disliiiiniishcd himself at the

“The Freemason: 1872-08-24, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 30 Dec. 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_24081872/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 1
SPIRIT AGENCY. Article 1
NOTES ON THE " UNITED ORDERS OF THE TEMPLE AND HOSPITAL." Article 2
Masonic Tidings. Article 5
Multum in Parbo, or Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 5
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
THE ROYAL ORDER OF SCOTLAND. Article 6
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 6
MIDDLESEX. Article 8
GRAND CHAPTER OF THE ROSE CROIX DEGREE FOR IRELAND. Article 9
Original Correspondence. Article 10
BRO. EARA HOLMES AND THE GOOD TEMPLARS. Article 11
Obituary. Article 12
NEW ZEALAND. Article 13
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

10 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

4 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

4 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

6 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

20 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

affiliated comprised persons of ah ranks of society , and of both sexes , who , desiring to assist the Order , or to share in the advantages connected with it , such for instance , as the exemption

from the effects of interdict enjoyed by the Templars , were permitted to join the Order , without assuming its habit , its hardships , and Us dangers , on taking certain vows , as that of

chastity , and engaging to leave their property to the Templars on their death . The great Pope , Innocent III ., did not disdain to declare himself

as standing in this position to the society , in one of his bulls . The Donates and Oblates were either children destined to the service of the

Order , or persons who . engaged to promote its welfare to the best of their power while they lived—princes were to be found among the lastmentioned class . The very duty of the Knight

Templar to fi g ht the enemies of his faith by compelling him to mix continual y and largely with the world , prevented him from observing the strictness of the rules set down for his

governance , and as a very natural consequence , his conduct was no doubt often sufficiently lax when he had no such excuses ^ to plead . Wallen , in his book , which T have before

quoted , admits that at the time of the suppression of the Templars the Hospitallers were become equally lax in their [ discipline . He says

" it must be acknowledged that their increasing power and influence made them unlace themselelves from the strictness of their first

institution , and rendered them loose and licentious . Richard de Everton , in 1 ,-527 , was appointed as a visitor , for the purpose of repressing the religious intolerance of the Knights , and enforcing

a better observance of their spiritual duties . Indeed , a proposition was made to Benedict XI . to form a new military order , and to grant it the property transferred to the Hospitallers on the

suppression of the Templars . To this he would not accede , but his successor , Clement VI ., after having ascertained the truth of many ofthe accusations brought against tlie Hospitallers , wrote a

letter to them , which had the ellect of inducing a great reformation of manners in the Order . Tlie two Orders , in fact , had the same faults in common , and there was no more reason for

suppressing the one than the other . If they had remained poor , they would in all probability have been unmolested , but being rich , they were doomed .

It is not intended that this lecture ( the substance onl y of which was delivered before the fratres of my own encampment ) should be considered in anv sense as exhaustive , in treating of

the Knights Templar . J am only a student , a seeker after li ght , and 1 only desire to create the same feeling of interest in the Templars and

ourselves , their successors , in the minds of youi readers generally , iu tho hope that good fruits ma ) follow- —good results ensue .

If each Templar and each Mason would only contribute one fact to elucidate the history ot our Order , and to open out the mysterious past , we . should all be greatly benefitted , and in

the hope that some abler brother may assist or correct me , i pen these lines . Among the rules of of the Templars , which seem to have been most reli giously observed were those of oPcdienee , at least the punishment

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

was very severe for any breach of such rules . We are reminded of this by the sight ofthe penitential cell of the Temple , which is formed within the solid thickness of the wall of the

church , and measures only four feet and a half 111 length by two and a half in breadth , so that thc unhappy prisoner could not lie down , except by drawing his limbs together . One act of merc y

however , there was for him to be thankful for . During divine service , he could hear and participate in all that was passing , through one of " squints , " as they are termed by

architects , looking into the church . If the secrets of this prison house could be made known , they would be , doubtless , appalling , for the meagre facts that have oozed out in the light of day are

sufficiently terrible . Here Walter le Bachelor , Grand Preceptor of Ireland , was fettered by order of the Master , till he died of the severity of his punishment . The corpse was : hen taken

out at daybreak , and buried in the court between the church and the hall . Besides imprisonment , which was either temporary orperpetual , according as seemed expedient to the Master , the Templars

were occasionally scourged on the bare shoulders by the Master ' s own hand , in the hall , or even whipped in thc church on Sunday , before the congregation .

A knight of the name of Yalaincourt once quitted the Order , but unable , most probably , to stifle the whisperings of his conscience that he did wrong , returned , and submitted himself

cheerfully to whatever penance the Master thought fit to impose . He was accordingly condemned to eat on the ground for a year with dogs , to fast four days in every week on bread and

water , and every Sunday to bc scourged in the church before all assembled . A public exhibition such as this no doubt had a double ellect , and edified the world as much as it punished the criminal .

The Order for along time was , as it deserved , highly popular , for its piety , bravery , and humility , aud the visual consequences of populatity in those davs followed . Great men desired t : i be

buried among them , which could only be accomplished by connection with their society , in one of the available modes alread y mentioned . Lands , manors , houses , privileges , were showered upon

them , money was deposited with them in cases of peculiar danger ; and one monarch at a critical time deposited himself in their community . I

need hardly say I refer to King John , who during the period of the arrangements connected with the signing of Magna Charta resided here . Numerous documents of the Kimr ' s are dated

from the Temple . Among other distinguished visitors was one the Templars must have , been glad to get rid of , Martin , tlie Pope ' s Nuncio , of whom Matthew Paris says " He made , whilst

residing at London in the New Temple unheard of extortions of money am ! valuables . He imperiousl y intimated to the abbots antl priors thai they must send him ieh presents , desirable

palfreys , sumptuous services for the table , rich clothing j which being done that y-. uivj -Martin sent back word that the thhuis sent were

insufficient , and he commanded the g ivers thereof to forward hiin belter things , on pain of excommunication . " The treasure deposited in the Temple must have been frequently immense , from the

Notes On The " United Orders Of The Temple And Hospital."

quality of the depositors or the circumstances of the deposit . Fully trustworth ) , enjoying the privilege of sanctuary , and able so well to defend personally whatever was in their charge , the

Templars became distinguished as the safest of guardians on all extraordinary ] occasions . The King , his court , and chief ecclesiastics , all made

the Temple their bank when they pleased , and here too , were brought all monies collected for the Christian service in Palestine . The most

remarkable record on this subject is connected with the great Earl of Kent , Hubert de Burgh , on whose disgrace and committal to the Tower the King began to look shrewdly after the captive s

Treasures . Matthew Paris says , " lt was suggested to the King , that Hubert had no small amount of treasure deposited in the New Temple under the custody of the Templars . The King

accordingly summoning to his presence the Master of the Temple , briefly demanded of him if it was so . He indeed , not daring to deny the truth to the Kin " , confessed that he had money

ol the said Hubert , which had been confidentially connected to the keeping of himself and brethren but of the quantity and amount hc was altogether ignorant . Then the King endeavoured with

threats to obtain from thc brethren the surrender to him of the aforesaid money , asserting that it had been fraudulently substracled from his treasury . But they answered to the King , that

money confided to them in trust they would deliver no man , without the permission of him who had instrusted it to be kept in thc Temple . And the King , since the above mentioned money

had been placed under their protection , ventured not to take it by force . He sent , therefore , the treasure 1- of his court , with his justices of the Exchequer . to Hubert who had already been placed

in fetters in the Tower of London , that they mig ht exact from him au assignment of the entire sum to the King . But when these messengers had explained to Hubert the object of

their coming , he immediately answered that he would submit himself and all belonging to him to the good p leasure of his sovereign . He therefore petitioned the brethren of the chivalry

of the-Temple , that they would , in his behalf , present all his keys to his lord tlie King , that he might do what he pleased wilh the things

deposited in the Temple . This being cone , thc King ordered the money , faithfully counted , to be placed in his treasury , and the amount of all the thi uws found to be reduced to writinsr and

exhibited before him . The King s clerks , indeed , and the Treasurer , acting with them , found deposited in the Temple gold and silver vases of

inestimable price , and money , and many precious gems , an enumeration whereof woultl in truth astonish the beavers . "

{) f the eminent persons who caused their bodies lo be here interred , some very interesting memorials are preserved , vi / .. -. The two ranges of monumental effigies of great men reposing in

lheir habits as ihey lived , one of live figures on lhe north side of the entrance to the oblong part of lhe eh ' . nrSi , the other of four , and a coped stone , the top of a coliin on the . south . Kni ght

informs us that the fust figure on the lelt in the range here shown is that of Geoffrey de Magnavillo , the bold bad sou of the Norman baron of that name who disliiiiniishcd himself at the

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 14
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy