Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Illustrated
  • May 1, 1902
  • Page 10
Current:

The Masonic Illustrated, May 1, 1902: Page 10

  • Back to The Masonic Illustrated, May 1, 1902
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Article The Latest Addition to the Constitutions. Page 1 of 1
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01001

MidlandGrandHotel, LONDON , N . W VenetianRoomsnowavailable forMasonicDinners,etc. Other Midland Railway Hotels at Liverpool , Leeds , Bradford , Derby , Morecombe , and Heysham . Chief Office : W . TOWLE , Midland Grand Hotel , Manager . London , N . W . M . R . Hotels , etc .

Ad01002

PERRIER=JOUET&Cos. CHAMPAGNES. FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , Hark Lane , London .

Ad01003

ISB T HMK fllUSTRATEP .

The Latest Addition To The Constitutions.

The Latest Addition to the Constitutions .

Al Grand Lodge , on March 5 th , an important addition was made to Article 175 . This article provides that when a member of a lodge allows his dues to fall into arrear , that fact shall be noted on the quarterly return , and in such case the usual quarterage shall not be paid . This provision is not permissive , nor does it exist for the sole

purpose of saving the funds of the lodge , but rather that Grand or Provincial Grand Lodge may be kept informed of the un-Masonic conduct of such defaulting brethren . The presumption is that in due course enquiries will be made whjthe lodge by-laws are not enforced against such members ,

and why they have not been excluded for non-payment of dues . The following addition to Article 175 has been approved by Grand Lodge , and will be put for confirmation at the next Communication : —

" Should a member be three years in arrear he shall thereupon cease to be a member of the lodge , and can only become a member again by regular proposition and ballot according to Rule 18 9 . The lodge may require payment of the arrears as a precedent to

election . This rule shall not prevent a lodge proceeding against any of its members under Rule 210 for non-payment of contributions according to its by-laws for a shorter period than four years . When a brother ceases to be a member under this rule , the fact shall

be forthwith notified to the Grand Secretary , and , if the lodge be within a Province or District , also to the Provincial or District Grand Lodge . The provisions

of Rules 211 , 212 , and 213 shall apply in each case , as if the brother had been excluded by vote . " That is to say , to quote the Grand Registrar , the defaulting brother shall perform the "happy dispatch" upon himself , and so save the lodge the trouble and annoyance involved in excluding him .

Before discussing the change , we might say we do not quite see how Article 211 is affected . That rule derives all its force from the words " illegally or without sufficient cause , " that is , it deals with questions of law , whereas the new rule deals exclusively with matters of fact . It may possibly be

intended to save the Grand Master ' s prerogative in cases where there has been a misrepresentation of facts , but the ipso facto nature of the new legislation is quite sufficient safeguard . There is one point which needs thinking about before the new rule becomes law . There will then be two alternative

penalties for the same offence , viz ., exclusion by vote of the lodge ad hoc , and automatic exclusion after three years by the operation of the Constitutions . We may safely say that , whatever may be in the mind of Grand Lodge to-day , no brother will ever regard these two processes as conferring the same Masonic and moral stigma . In course of time the

" sufficient cause " of Article 210 will be held to have nothing to do with arrears , and exclusion for non-payment of dues will be a thing of the past . This may or may not be a desirable consummation , all we have to do with it is to recognise the probability . We cannot see that it is desirable

to provide for the perpetuation of two classes of defaulter , for it is quite certain the distinction will be made . The new rule awaits confirmation , and , as at present drafted , there are one or two points as to which future explanation may be demanded . For instance , the exact

meaning of the word arrears should be defined . The Grand Registrar explained that the period of a brother ' s arrears depended upon the lodge by-laws , that is , whether dues were payable in advance or not . Thus it is possible that in the one case a brother gets four years' grace , in the other only

three . Again , we have known the case of a brother whose dues were paid by a vote from the charity fund . Would this be considered as an attempt to evade the law ?

We ask these questions , and there may be more such , because the penalty accrues without any effort on an } " one's part to put the law in motion . It may operate without any possibility of redress , because there is no one from whom to seek it , and this is why we consider that in course of time it may possibly cease to carry such stigma as ought to be

inflicted on a defaulting brother . It is with much diffidence that we venture to criticise a proposition that bears traces of so much care in its preparation . But it would appear as if Article 210 had been found to be insufficient to meet the case of the defaulting brother .

In many colonial lodges there has been a misapprehension which has caused this rule to be practically inoperative . A brother , after some two or three years' enjoyment of membership , goes to another part of the world and forgets all about his lodge . He has left no address , and therefore

it cannot be certain that such notice as is required by Rule 210 will ever reach him , and the lodge doubts its power to exclude him . Cases of this kind are of frequent occurrence . The new rule certainly affords a way out of the difficulty , and we know

of more than one lodge whose list of members will in a very short period be considerably curtailed by its automatic operation . Still it must not be supposed that Article 210 did not reach such cases . It has been held that a letter

forwarded to the brother s last known address was quite sufficient to meet the requirements of that rule . Some lodges , again , do not like to incur the supposed odium which may attach itself to the exclusion of its members . We confess we cannot altogether sympathise with that attitude . If a lodge has gone to the trouble of

drawing up by-laws , and takes the further trouble of reading them through once a year , as it should in open lodge , we may reasonably expect it to abide by them .

“The Masonic Illustrated: 1902-05-01, Page 10” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 30 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mil/issues/mil_01051902/page/10/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Installation of the Provincial Grand Master of Monmouthshire. Article 2
Consecration of St. Catherine's Park Lodge, No. 2899. Article 4
Consecration of Defence Lodge, No. 2839. Article 5
The late Bro. Sir Ancdrew Clarke, P. D.G.M. of Victoria. Article 6
The Water Finder. Article 6
Knight Templary in Sussex. Article 7
De Warrenne Preceptory. Article 7
Nil Sine Labore Lodge, No. 2736. Article 8
Untitled Ad 8
An Ancient Certificate. Article 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
The Latest Addition to the Constitutions. Article 10
At the Sign of the Perfect Ashlar Article 11
Bro. J. Copley Moyle, District Grand Master for Burma. Article 14
Freemasonry in Madras. Article 14
Untitled Ad 15
Consecration of the Richmond Chapter, No. 2032. Article 16
Scottish Freemasonry in Calcutta . Article 17
"Sit Lux et Lux Fuit." Article 17
Untitled Article 17
History of the Emulation Lodge of Improvement, No. 256.——(Continued). Article 18
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

4 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01001

MidlandGrandHotel, LONDON , N . W VenetianRoomsnowavailable forMasonicDinners,etc. Other Midland Railway Hotels at Liverpool , Leeds , Bradford , Derby , Morecombe , and Heysham . Chief Office : W . TOWLE , Midland Grand Hotel , Manager . London , N . W . M . R . Hotels , etc .

Ad01002

PERRIER=JOUET&Cos. CHAMPAGNES. FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , Hark Lane , London .

Ad01003

ISB T HMK fllUSTRATEP .

The Latest Addition To The Constitutions.

The Latest Addition to the Constitutions .

Al Grand Lodge , on March 5 th , an important addition was made to Article 175 . This article provides that when a member of a lodge allows his dues to fall into arrear , that fact shall be noted on the quarterly return , and in such case the usual quarterage shall not be paid . This provision is not permissive , nor does it exist for the sole

purpose of saving the funds of the lodge , but rather that Grand or Provincial Grand Lodge may be kept informed of the un-Masonic conduct of such defaulting brethren . The presumption is that in due course enquiries will be made whjthe lodge by-laws are not enforced against such members ,

and why they have not been excluded for non-payment of dues . The following addition to Article 175 has been approved by Grand Lodge , and will be put for confirmation at the next Communication : —

" Should a member be three years in arrear he shall thereupon cease to be a member of the lodge , and can only become a member again by regular proposition and ballot according to Rule 18 9 . The lodge may require payment of the arrears as a precedent to

election . This rule shall not prevent a lodge proceeding against any of its members under Rule 210 for non-payment of contributions according to its by-laws for a shorter period than four years . When a brother ceases to be a member under this rule , the fact shall

be forthwith notified to the Grand Secretary , and , if the lodge be within a Province or District , also to the Provincial or District Grand Lodge . The provisions

of Rules 211 , 212 , and 213 shall apply in each case , as if the brother had been excluded by vote . " That is to say , to quote the Grand Registrar , the defaulting brother shall perform the "happy dispatch" upon himself , and so save the lodge the trouble and annoyance involved in excluding him .

Before discussing the change , we might say we do not quite see how Article 211 is affected . That rule derives all its force from the words " illegally or without sufficient cause , " that is , it deals with questions of law , whereas the new rule deals exclusively with matters of fact . It may possibly be

intended to save the Grand Master ' s prerogative in cases where there has been a misrepresentation of facts , but the ipso facto nature of the new legislation is quite sufficient safeguard . There is one point which needs thinking about before the new rule becomes law . There will then be two alternative

penalties for the same offence , viz ., exclusion by vote of the lodge ad hoc , and automatic exclusion after three years by the operation of the Constitutions . We may safely say that , whatever may be in the mind of Grand Lodge to-day , no brother will ever regard these two processes as conferring the same Masonic and moral stigma . In course of time the

" sufficient cause " of Article 210 will be held to have nothing to do with arrears , and exclusion for non-payment of dues will be a thing of the past . This may or may not be a desirable consummation , all we have to do with it is to recognise the probability . We cannot see that it is desirable

to provide for the perpetuation of two classes of defaulter , for it is quite certain the distinction will be made . The new rule awaits confirmation , and , as at present drafted , there are one or two points as to which future explanation may be demanded . For instance , the exact

meaning of the word arrears should be defined . The Grand Registrar explained that the period of a brother ' s arrears depended upon the lodge by-laws , that is , whether dues were payable in advance or not . Thus it is possible that in the one case a brother gets four years' grace , in the other only

three . Again , we have known the case of a brother whose dues were paid by a vote from the charity fund . Would this be considered as an attempt to evade the law ?

We ask these questions , and there may be more such , because the penalty accrues without any effort on an } " one's part to put the law in motion . It may operate without any possibility of redress , because there is no one from whom to seek it , and this is why we consider that in course of time it may possibly cease to carry such stigma as ought to be

inflicted on a defaulting brother . It is with much diffidence that we venture to criticise a proposition that bears traces of so much care in its preparation . But it would appear as if Article 210 had been found to be insufficient to meet the case of the defaulting brother .

In many colonial lodges there has been a misapprehension which has caused this rule to be practically inoperative . A brother , after some two or three years' enjoyment of membership , goes to another part of the world and forgets all about his lodge . He has left no address , and therefore

it cannot be certain that such notice as is required by Rule 210 will ever reach him , and the lodge doubts its power to exclude him . Cases of this kind are of frequent occurrence . The new rule certainly affords a way out of the difficulty , and we know

of more than one lodge whose list of members will in a very short period be considerably curtailed by its automatic operation . Still it must not be supposed that Article 210 did not reach such cases . It has been held that a letter

forwarded to the brother s last known address was quite sufficient to meet the requirements of that rule . Some lodges , again , do not like to incur the supposed odium which may attach itself to the exclusion of its members . We confess we cannot altogether sympathise with that attitude . If a lodge has gone to the trouble of

drawing up by-laws , and takes the further trouble of reading them through once a year , as it should in open lodge , we may reasonably expect it to abide by them .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 9
  • You're on page10
  • 11
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy