Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • April 1, 1877
  • Page 42
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, April 1, 1877: Page 42

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, April 1, 1877
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article FREEMASONRY IN FRANCE. ← Page 3 of 3
Page 42

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry In France.

its rights , ancl to unite the dogmatic with the administrative power , which it had never abandoned , appealed to all the Grand Inspectors-General of the Scottish Rite to reconstitute the Supreme Council of the Rite . Some of the scattered

brethren protested against this proceeding , amongst whom were Bros . Pyron and Muraire . But the greater number , notable amongst whom were Marshal Beurnoiiville , Comte Rampon , Marshal de Tnrante , Bros . Challan , Clement de Ris , Roettiers de MontaleauDe JolyThoryHacquetgave

, , , , in their adhesion , and on the 18 th November , 1804 , tho Grand Orient of France issued a decree by which it declared the resumption of all its rights over all the degrees of Masonry . It instituted the Bureau of the Supreme Council of Bites

for the administration of all the degrees above the Symbolic , and created a Grand Consistory of Rites , which was divided into two sections , of which one had the power to confer the 32 nd degree ancl the other the 33 rd .

This Grand Consistory was established on the 12 th September , 1815 , and inaugurated the 22 nd November following . At the same time were established nine Councils of Ch ... K ..., one Council of the 31 st degree , and eight Consistories of

Princes of the Royal Secret . In acting thus , who can gainsay the fact that the Grand Orient was entirely in the right . The Supreme Council was no longer in existence , and , moreover , according to the Constitutions of the Rite , the Sovereign Grand Inspectors-General had

authorised its reconstruction . The Concordat of 1804 , besides , had never been completely annulled , since the Grand Orient had maintained its administrative powers , and had never accepted the negotiations of 1811 . The presence of Prince

Cambaceres had only deferred its protestations , and it had otherwise maintained the exclusive government of the Lodges and Chapters . What did the ancient Supreme Council all this time ] It was in abeyance ; its

members were dispersed ; it existed no longer . Bro . Thory was scorned and Bro . | Pyron was dead . The ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite had no other centre in France than the Grand Orient ; ancl as Article o of the Constitutions of 1785

states , "in each , nation , kingdom , or empire there shall be but one Supreme Council . " No one had any right to raise up , in 1821 , a second power of the Scottish Rite besides that which had performed its functions since 1814 , supposing

even its anterior rights were not acknowledged . To this reasoning , so simple , ancl so perfectly in accord with the very principles of the Scottish Rite , Comte Muraire , one of the dissentient brethrentried to reply in a pamphlet

, , published under the auspices of the Supreme Council , but he was obliged to acknowledge the facts upon which the Grand Orient founded its claims , although saying that it had but an interrupted and disputed possession from the beginning : —

1 . By the possession of jurisdiction by the Supreme Council from its establishment . 2 . By the subsequent possession by t he Supreme Council of America , which during the dispersion of the Supreme Council of France had performed its duties and exercised its rights .

3 . By the return of the Supreme Council of France when , in 18 * 21 , the epoch of the union effected in the Scottish Rite it was perfected by the members of the Supreme Council of America .

The Supreme Council had not a constant possession of power from its origin , as stated by Comte Muraire . In effect , founded in 1804 by Bro . De Grasse Tilly , it was absorbed into the Grand Orient of France , for want oi funds . It became

subordinate to the Grand Orient of France by its Constitutions of 1806 . It had not even iu 1814 resumed the administration of the high degrees . Dissolved in 1804 it was not reconstituted till 1821 . The assertion by Comte Muraire of constant

possession is singularly haphazard . In the terms of the Constitutions of 1786 , since which time the Supreme Council no longer had , the Grand Inspectors-General might have re-united and reconstituted it , but they never did so . ( To be continued . )

“The Masonic Magazine: 1877-04-01, Page 42” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 24 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01041877/page/42/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
"DYBOTS." Article 1
Untitled Article 2
Monthly Masonic Summary. Article 3
EXTRACTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ROYAL ARCH CHAPTER OF CONCORD ATTACHED TO THE ANCHOR AND HOPE LODGE, No. 37, BOLTON. Article 4
SONNET. Article 8
LETTER OF BRO. W. J. HUGHAN, OF ENGLAND, TO THE GRAND LODGE OF OHIO. Article 8
AN OLD, OLD STORY. Article 13
THREE CHARGES. Article 14
WONDERS OF OPERATIVE MASONRY. Article 14
ON FATHER FOY'S NOTES. Article 18
A TRIP TO DAI-BUTSU. Article 19
THE HAPPY HOUR. Article 21
NOTES ON THE OLD MINUTE BOOKS OF THE BRITISH UNION LODGE, No. 114, IPSWICH. A.D. 1762. Article 21
THE QUESTION OF THE COLOURED FREEMASONS IN THE UNITED STATES. Article 24
THE JEALOUS SCEPTIC. Article 25
THE LADY MURIEL. Article 27
THE MASSORAH. Article 29
THE BRIGHT SIDE. Article 32
HOPE. Article 33
ON THE EXCESSIVE INFLUENCE OF WOMEM. Article 34
Our Archaeological Corner. Article 39
FREEMASONRY IN FRANCE. Article 40
THE ORIGIN AND REFERENCES OF THE HERMESIAN SPURIOUS FREEMASONRY. Article 43
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE AND ART. Article 46
A MASONIC ENIGMA. Article 50
BORN IN MARCH. Article 50
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

2 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

2 Articles
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

2 Articles
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

2 Articles
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

3 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

3 Articles
Page 33

Page 33

3 Articles
Page 34

Page 34

2 Articles
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

2 Articles
Page 40

Page 40

3 Articles
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

2 Articles
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

3 Articles
Page 42

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry In France.

its rights , ancl to unite the dogmatic with the administrative power , which it had never abandoned , appealed to all the Grand Inspectors-General of the Scottish Rite to reconstitute the Supreme Council of the Rite . Some of the scattered

brethren protested against this proceeding , amongst whom were Bros . Pyron and Muraire . But the greater number , notable amongst whom were Marshal Beurnoiiville , Comte Rampon , Marshal de Tnrante , Bros . Challan , Clement de Ris , Roettiers de MontaleauDe JolyThoryHacquetgave

, , , , in their adhesion , and on the 18 th November , 1804 , tho Grand Orient of France issued a decree by which it declared the resumption of all its rights over all the degrees of Masonry . It instituted the Bureau of the Supreme Council of Bites

for the administration of all the degrees above the Symbolic , and created a Grand Consistory of Rites , which was divided into two sections , of which one had the power to confer the 32 nd degree ancl the other the 33 rd .

This Grand Consistory was established on the 12 th September , 1815 , and inaugurated the 22 nd November following . At the same time were established nine Councils of Ch ... K ..., one Council of the 31 st degree , and eight Consistories of

Princes of the Royal Secret . In acting thus , who can gainsay the fact that the Grand Orient was entirely in the right . The Supreme Council was no longer in existence , and , moreover , according to the Constitutions of the Rite , the Sovereign Grand Inspectors-General had

authorised its reconstruction . The Concordat of 1804 , besides , had never been completely annulled , since the Grand Orient had maintained its administrative powers , and had never accepted the negotiations of 1811 . The presence of Prince

Cambaceres had only deferred its protestations , and it had otherwise maintained the exclusive government of the Lodges and Chapters . What did the ancient Supreme Council all this time ] It was in abeyance ; its

members were dispersed ; it existed no longer . Bro . Thory was scorned and Bro . | Pyron was dead . The ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite had no other centre in France than the Grand Orient ; ancl as Article o of the Constitutions of 1785

states , "in each , nation , kingdom , or empire there shall be but one Supreme Council . " No one had any right to raise up , in 1821 , a second power of the Scottish Rite besides that which had performed its functions since 1814 , supposing

even its anterior rights were not acknowledged . To this reasoning , so simple , ancl so perfectly in accord with the very principles of the Scottish Rite , Comte Muraire , one of the dissentient brethrentried to reply in a pamphlet

, , published under the auspices of the Supreme Council , but he was obliged to acknowledge the facts upon which the Grand Orient founded its claims , although saying that it had but an interrupted and disputed possession from the beginning : —

1 . By the possession of jurisdiction by the Supreme Council from its establishment . 2 . By the subsequent possession by t he Supreme Council of America , which during the dispersion of the Supreme Council of France had performed its duties and exercised its rights .

3 . By the return of the Supreme Council of France when , in 18 * 21 , the epoch of the union effected in the Scottish Rite it was perfected by the members of the Supreme Council of America .

The Supreme Council had not a constant possession of power from its origin , as stated by Comte Muraire . In effect , founded in 1804 by Bro . De Grasse Tilly , it was absorbed into the Grand Orient of France , for want oi funds . It became

subordinate to the Grand Orient of France by its Constitutions of 1806 . It had not even iu 1814 resumed the administration of the high degrees . Dissolved in 1804 it was not reconstituted till 1821 . The assertion by Comte Muraire of constant

possession is singularly haphazard . In the terms of the Constitutions of 1786 , since which time the Supreme Council no longer had , the Grand Inspectors-General might have re-united and reconstituted it , but they never did so . ( To be continued . )

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 41
  • You're on page42
  • 43
  • 50
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy