Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • April 1, 1880
  • Page 21
  • THE SOCIETY OF THE ROSE CROIX.
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, April 1, 1880: Page 21

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, April 1, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE SOCIETY OF THE ROSE CROIX. ← Page 4 of 5 →
Page 21

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Society Of The Rose Croix.

quam Rex Hispania ? ex utraque India auferrat , Europa enim progunus est et robustum puerum pariet . " Valentin Andrea ? took upon himself to decide that this , robust infant , of whom Paracelsus speaks , ought to be understood not of an individual , but of a collective being or of an association . This was a point which might be well accorded to himwithout too much difficult

, y . After the successive labours of so great a number of " savans , " like Leonard Thurneyser , Adam de Bodenstein , Michel Toxitis , Valentin Antrapasus Siloranus , Pierre Severin , Gouthier d ( Andernac , Donzellini , Andre Ellinger , etc ., who all had sought to contrive separately to develope the system of Paracelsus , without being able to realise the great work , the founder of the Rose Croix might well think himself authorised to decide the

question in favour of a collective Elias represented by his paternity . The Rose Croix was then only , according to us , a reunion of enthusiastic Paracelsians constituted into a society . The founder * of this association , the editor of the manifesto , Valentin Andreas , took the title of Knight of the Rose Cross ; he even bore on his seal a cross with four roses . f By his opinions and his character , he was nevertheless far from answering

to the idea which is so commonly made of the innovators who realise in the world bad philanthropic p lans . He had no fanaticism of teaching , He was , above all , a man of mind and philanthropy . Animated by a vivid desire to perfectionate religious belief , ancl the social institutions of his age , J he sought only in persuasion and gentleness his means of " propaganda , " though espousing entirely the idea of a great man to verify them and extend them , he wished to be the first to mock at those enthusiasts who exaggerated his principles by an unintelligent zeal .

From the year 1605 , he had edited " Les Noces Chimiques , " the chemical wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz . He only composed this work to criticise and ridicule the alchemists and theosophs of that epoch . It has been urged more than once that he had equally composed in a spirit of satire and raillery the " Fama Fraternitatis , " which became the organ of the Society of the Rose Groix . § But this opinion cannot be upheld when we consider the subsequent actions of the author of this writing . In 1620 , Valentin Andrea ? laboriously

endeavoured to constitute a great relig ious society under the title of the Christian Fraternity , Fraternite Chretienne . It had for its object to separate christian theology from all the controversies which scholasticism had introduced into it , and then to arrive at a more simple and more pure religious system . Valentin Andrea ? had the idea to surround himself with all the precautions necessary to distinguish this new society from the fraternity of

the Rose Croix . || This fraternity which he had launched into the world had ended by displeasing him , and in the writing which he edited in honour of his new religious society , he turned actually into ridicule the credulity and the lies of the Rose Croix , who from that epoch commenced to play their great comed y in Germany . But vain precautions ! The success and the vague were then for the enthusiasts , and everything turned to their profit . The confusion which Andrea ? feared arrived of- itself . The Christian Fraternity was absorbed in the Society of the Rose Croix , and Andrea ? found himself , very much against his will , to have contributed to the number of these

“The Masonic Magazine: 1880-04-01, Page 21” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 10 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01041880/page/21/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE RECORDS OF AN ANCIENT LODGE. Article 1
THE DISTRICT GRAND LODGE OF NORTHERN CHINA. Article 6
A PICTURE. Article 12
THE CABALA OF THE JEWS. Article 13
THE SOCIETY OF THE ROSE CROIX. Article 18
FRENCH MASONRY.—THE SANCTUARY OF MEMPHIS. Article 22
A FANCY. Article 25
A CHURCHYARD GHOST. Article 26
DEDICATION OF A MASONIC HALL IN 1777. Article 29
MASONIC STORIES. Article 37
A SORCERER OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. Article 38
LITTLE BRITAIN. Article 40
MASONRY. Article 42
MASONIC AND GENERAL ARCHAEOLOGIA. Article 43
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

2 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

2 Articles
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

2 Articles
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 21

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Society Of The Rose Croix.

quam Rex Hispania ? ex utraque India auferrat , Europa enim progunus est et robustum puerum pariet . " Valentin Andrea ? took upon himself to decide that this , robust infant , of whom Paracelsus speaks , ought to be understood not of an individual , but of a collective being or of an association . This was a point which might be well accorded to himwithout too much difficult

, y . After the successive labours of so great a number of " savans , " like Leonard Thurneyser , Adam de Bodenstein , Michel Toxitis , Valentin Antrapasus Siloranus , Pierre Severin , Gouthier d ( Andernac , Donzellini , Andre Ellinger , etc ., who all had sought to contrive separately to develope the system of Paracelsus , without being able to realise the great work , the founder of the Rose Croix might well think himself authorised to decide the

question in favour of a collective Elias represented by his paternity . The Rose Croix was then only , according to us , a reunion of enthusiastic Paracelsians constituted into a society . The founder * of this association , the editor of the manifesto , Valentin Andreas , took the title of Knight of the Rose Cross ; he even bore on his seal a cross with four roses . f By his opinions and his character , he was nevertheless far from answering

to the idea which is so commonly made of the innovators who realise in the world bad philanthropic p lans . He had no fanaticism of teaching , He was , above all , a man of mind and philanthropy . Animated by a vivid desire to perfectionate religious belief , ancl the social institutions of his age , J he sought only in persuasion and gentleness his means of " propaganda , " though espousing entirely the idea of a great man to verify them and extend them , he wished to be the first to mock at those enthusiasts who exaggerated his principles by an unintelligent zeal .

From the year 1605 , he had edited " Les Noces Chimiques , " the chemical wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz . He only composed this work to criticise and ridicule the alchemists and theosophs of that epoch . It has been urged more than once that he had equally composed in a spirit of satire and raillery the " Fama Fraternitatis , " which became the organ of the Society of the Rose Groix . § But this opinion cannot be upheld when we consider the subsequent actions of the author of this writing . In 1620 , Valentin Andrea ? laboriously

endeavoured to constitute a great relig ious society under the title of the Christian Fraternity , Fraternite Chretienne . It had for its object to separate christian theology from all the controversies which scholasticism had introduced into it , and then to arrive at a more simple and more pure religious system . Valentin Andrea ? had the idea to surround himself with all the precautions necessary to distinguish this new society from the fraternity of

the Rose Croix . || This fraternity which he had launched into the world had ended by displeasing him , and in the writing which he edited in honour of his new religious society , he turned actually into ridicule the credulity and the lies of the Rose Croix , who from that epoch commenced to play their great comed y in Germany . But vain precautions ! The success and the vague were then for the enthusiasts , and everything turned to their profit . The confusion which Andrea ? feared arrived of- itself . The Christian Fraternity was absorbed in the Society of the Rose Croix , and Andrea ? found himself , very much against his will , to have contributed to the number of these

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 20
  • You're on page21
  • 22
  • 44
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy