Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Sept. 1, 1856
  • Page 23
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Sept. 1, 1856: Page 23

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Sept. 1, 1856
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article COKBESPONMINCE. ← Page 4 of 10 →
Page 23

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Cokbesponmince.

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASON ' S * MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROR . Dear Sir and Brother , —My attention has been directed to a letter published in your May number of this year signed A , and dated Bombay , 5 th March last . Without commenting upon the un-Masonic style of the production , or upon the disgraceful expressions with which it teems , I have no hesitation in declaring the letter to be full of the most gross misstatements , and I challenge the writer to declare his name , as I do mine . —I am , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally , Henry D . Cartwright , Bombay , 20 th June , 1856 . Prov . G . M . of Western India .

pendent a body upon our deliberations . For instance , the Canada question affects the whole Craft . If Canada secedes , it will be a disgrace to the whole Grand Lodge , —not to the London members only . I would therefore propose that this question should be discussed by country Brethren in Lodge , and- that petitions to Grand Lodge should embody the result of such discussions ; the moral effect of such a course would be incalculable . Again , Lord Carnarvon has given notice of a motion , the effect of which will he to communicate to country Brethren the business to be brought forward in London , in time for them to attend its discussion . This is a point which affects them very nearly , and is a fit subject for deliberation amongst themselves , and upon which to petition Grand Lodge . —lam , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally , P . M .

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROR . Dear Sir and Brother , —So long as I was simply referred to as Past Master of the Lodge No . 48 , by your Correspondents " Justitia , " " A . Z ., " and " Sile , " it was my duty , in deference to the former , to remain quiet ; but as my name has been brought publicly before the world by Brs . Tunstall and Falconer , and C . W . Oliver , in your magazine for June , I should be unjust to myself if I did not take the place of " Justitia , " and reply to these three letters . I trust your own sense of justice will permit me this opportunity of placing a right and proper construction upon certain statements adduced by them . In the first place , allow

rne to observe , that they evade to a great extent most ot the tacts stated by u Justitia , " and content themselves by introducing new matter , in many cases quite irrelevant to Masonry : —Knight Templarism , for instance . Had your correspondents from the commencement contented themselves with adhering to the subject matter of " Justitia ' s " letter , the affair would not have branched off and assumed its present limits ; but I must take matters as I find them , and in common justice assume , that such statements of the latter as are not contradicted must be considered to be proved and incontrovertible facts . Now , I would preface my letter by stating that I am not going to use hard names nor indulge in any un-Masonic or ungentlemanly language , but content myself with writing a plain unvarnished tale .

I will first begin with Dr . Tunstall : the Brother who hissed me whilst I was acting as W . M . was Bro . Win . Smith , and he made it his business , prior to the commission of this act , to go round to the P . Ms , and other member ? , of my Lodge , and in eon junction with another Brother , endeavoured to get up a party against me ; but , thanks to the Brethren of my Lodge , he could not succeed . This Brother did not hiss mo , for f had merged in the Master of No . 48 , and as its representative he

l nsulted the Lodge . Prior to his being led out of the Lodge , however , my Dir . ( Jer ., Bro . Bngshawe , entreated him to be allowed in his name to apologize ; but this Bro . Smith indignantly refused , and left the Lodge , saying to me that he would never put foot inside the room again . Now , with regard to sumo members of my Lodge hissing Dr . Tunstall : he was invited by our W . M ., contrary to my advice , as one of the banquet stewards , to be present at the annual festival . I was surprised to see him , as some time before 1 had written to him and told him he had

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1856-09-01, Page 23” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 3 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/frm_01091856/page/23/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE MARK DEGREE. Article 1
PENCILLINGS FROM THE SKETCH-BOOK OF A MADRAS OFFICER. Article 3
THE MONK OF ST. DUNSTAN. Article 10
A MASONIC BURIAL AT SEA. Article 13
MASONIC BONG. Article 14
TO THE OCEAN. Article 14
REVIEWS OF UEW BOOKS. Article 15
MUSIC. Article 18
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 20
MASONS IN THEIR HOURS OF RELAXATION. Article 29
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 30
METROPOLITAN. Article 31
PROVINCIAL. Article 32
SURREY. Article 46
ROYAL ARCH. Article 50
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 53
MARK MASONRY. Article 53
SCOTLAND. Article 54
COLONIAL. Article 55
INDIA. Article 56
AMERICA. Article 58
SUMMARY OE NEWS FOR AUGUST. Article 61
Obituary. Article 63
NOTICE. Article 64
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

2 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

2 Articles
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

3 Articles
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

2 Articles
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

2 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 23

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Cokbesponmince.

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASON ' S * MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROR . Dear Sir and Brother , —My attention has been directed to a letter published in your May number of this year signed A , and dated Bombay , 5 th March last . Without commenting upon the un-Masonic style of the production , or upon the disgraceful expressions with which it teems , I have no hesitation in declaring the letter to be full of the most gross misstatements , and I challenge the writer to declare his name , as I do mine . —I am , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally , Henry D . Cartwright , Bombay , 20 th June , 1856 . Prov . G . M . of Western India .

pendent a body upon our deliberations . For instance , the Canada question affects the whole Craft . If Canada secedes , it will be a disgrace to the whole Grand Lodge , —not to the London members only . I would therefore propose that this question should be discussed by country Brethren in Lodge , and- that petitions to Grand Lodge should embody the result of such discussions ; the moral effect of such a course would be incalculable . Again , Lord Carnarvon has given notice of a motion , the effect of which will he to communicate to country Brethren the business to be brought forward in London , in time for them to attend its discussion . This is a point which affects them very nearly , and is a fit subject for deliberation amongst themselves , and upon which to petition Grand Lodge . —lam , dear Sir and Brother , yours fraternally , P . M .

TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROR . Dear Sir and Brother , —So long as I was simply referred to as Past Master of the Lodge No . 48 , by your Correspondents " Justitia , " " A . Z ., " and " Sile , " it was my duty , in deference to the former , to remain quiet ; but as my name has been brought publicly before the world by Brs . Tunstall and Falconer , and C . W . Oliver , in your magazine for June , I should be unjust to myself if I did not take the place of " Justitia , " and reply to these three letters . I trust your own sense of justice will permit me this opportunity of placing a right and proper construction upon certain statements adduced by them . In the first place , allow

rne to observe , that they evade to a great extent most ot the tacts stated by u Justitia , " and content themselves by introducing new matter , in many cases quite irrelevant to Masonry : —Knight Templarism , for instance . Had your correspondents from the commencement contented themselves with adhering to the subject matter of " Justitia ' s " letter , the affair would not have branched off and assumed its present limits ; but I must take matters as I find them , and in common justice assume , that such statements of the latter as are not contradicted must be considered to be proved and incontrovertible facts . Now , I would preface my letter by stating that I am not going to use hard names nor indulge in any un-Masonic or ungentlemanly language , but content myself with writing a plain unvarnished tale .

I will first begin with Dr . Tunstall : the Brother who hissed me whilst I was acting as W . M . was Bro . Win . Smith , and he made it his business , prior to the commission of this act , to go round to the P . Ms , and other member ? , of my Lodge , and in eon junction with another Brother , endeavoured to get up a party against me ; but , thanks to the Brethren of my Lodge , he could not succeed . This Brother did not hiss mo , for f had merged in the Master of No . 48 , and as its representative he

l nsulted the Lodge . Prior to his being led out of the Lodge , however , my Dir . ( Jer ., Bro . Bngshawe , entreated him to be allowed in his name to apologize ; but this Bro . Smith indignantly refused , and left the Lodge , saying to me that he would never put foot inside the room again . Now , with regard to sumo members of my Lodge hissing Dr . Tunstall : he was invited by our W . M ., contrary to my advice , as one of the banquet stewards , to be present at the annual festival . I was surprised to see him , as some time before 1 had written to him and told him he had

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 22
  • You're on page23
  • 24
  • 64
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy