Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Sept. 1, 1856
  • Page 25
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Sept. 1, 1856: Page 25

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Sept. 1, 1856
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article COKBESPONMINCE. ← Page 6 of 10 →
Page 25

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Cokbesponmince.

No . 528 . I know full well that I have incurred the bitter enmity ( this is their Masonry ) of many members of the Lodge of Honour for my uncompromising opposition to the un-Masonic custom of drawing a distinction between tradesmen and gentlemen . I pride myself upon following in the steps of our respected and esteemed P . M . Bro . Haseler , and of being instrumental in overthrowing one

of the greatest curses which ever befell Masonry in Bath . But for many years in our Lodge this distinction has been done away ^ for we hold that every man is a gentleman so long as he acts as one , and men are or ought to be judged by their actions , not by their trades or professions ; and if the possession of this feeling of caste , which would do honour to a Brahmin , is Dr . Falconer ' s public exposition of his feelings as a Mason , I can only say , in all * charity , I trust it may die with him .

The Prov . Grand Lodge minutes will show that I did propose that a committee should be appointed to inquire into the affairs of this Province , and that I included the names of the committee in that motion ; the Prov . G-. M . wished me to insert my own name , which I declined , because I was not a Master or P . M ., or a Provincial officer . A few more words , and I have done with Dr . Falconer . I would thus publicly ask him , why he , as W . M . of'No . 528 , in 1853 , allowed the Dep . Prov . G . M . to confer upon the S . W . of his Lodg-e , Bro . Allen , the collar of Prov . S . G . W ., and upon Bro . Adair , a newly-raised M . M ., the collar of Prov . S . G . D . ? Upon that occasion another M . M ., a member of No . 528 , of a few months'

standing , was made Registrar , and he himself J . G . W . If the custom of Grand Lodge , which ought to govern Prov . Grand Lodges , be followed , the office of Prov . G . Reg . can only be conferred upon a Master or P . M ., for in the event of any dispute , the Registrar ought to be able to consult with , and if needs be , advise the Prov . G . M . Surely , as a Master in the Craft , Dr . Falconer ought not to have sanctioned , at least in two instances , a violation of the constitutions ; and your readers can now understand why he evades the reiterated statements of " Justitia , " by saying that in this Brother ' s letters there is a certain approximation to truth !

With regard to Bro . C . W . Oliver , I would ask him why , if he objects so much to anonymous letters , he did not advise his friend " A . Z . " to sign his name ; and why , as he furnished information to this writer , he did not reply to Bro . Peach ' s letter , signed "J . W ., " challenging him to substantiate the grave charges he brought against me ? I fearlessly and truthfully assert , that your correspondent did leave the Royal Cumberland Lodge , because he was offered the collar of Dir . Cer ., and because

our present S . W . was placed before him , as he told me that he deserved this office , being better qualified to fill it than Bro . Bagshawe . Your correspondent has given several versions of the cause which induced him to tender his resignation ; all of which I could give , —but the true one , and the one on which he acted , was that stated above . I presume that Bro . Oliver , who implies that his qualifications are at least equal to those of our esteemed S . W ., ought not to be the

judge of his own abilities . Our W . M ., and the board of Past Masters , did not consider them . so . Now I am well aware ( and this I coolly write as the result of long observation ) that BrO . C . W . Oliver thinks very few equal to himself , though I never heard or saw him fulfil the duties of any office I ever asked him to take without making some egregious blunder , and marring my ceremony ; and I may , without being accused of vanity , assert that no one will deny that I am competent to give an opinion upon this matter .

Now , about the collar of Prov . CI . Reg ., which was offered to me in 1854 , and about which so much lias been written . What I said was , that as W . M . of No . 48 , I could not take that collar , because the year before I had refused the collar of J . G . W . —not being entitled to accept it ; and as one of our P . Ms , was told by the Dep . Prov . G . M ., that when I was-W . M . of No . 48 , I had , under the circumstances every right to expect the collar of Prov . S . G . W ., I did , and do maintain , that to offer me the collar of Registrar in open Lodge , when I told the Prov . G . M . before Lodge was opened , through his deputy , that I refused it , was to say the least of it , a gratuitous insult , and done to prevent my saying that the purple had never been offered to me ! VOL . II , 4 Jv

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1856-09-01, Page 25” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 31 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/frm_01091856/page/25/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE MARK DEGREE. Article 1
PENCILLINGS FROM THE SKETCH-BOOK OF A MADRAS OFFICER. Article 3
THE MONK OF ST. DUNSTAN. Article 10
A MASONIC BURIAL AT SEA. Article 13
MASONIC BONG. Article 14
TO THE OCEAN. Article 14
REVIEWS OF UEW BOOKS. Article 15
MUSIC. Article 18
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 20
MASONS IN THEIR HOURS OF RELAXATION. Article 29
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 30
METROPOLITAN. Article 31
PROVINCIAL. Article 32
SURREY. Article 46
ROYAL ARCH. Article 50
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 53
MARK MASONRY. Article 53
SCOTLAND. Article 54
COLONIAL. Article 55
INDIA. Article 56
AMERICA. Article 58
SUMMARY OE NEWS FOR AUGUST. Article 61
Obituary. Article 63
NOTICE. Article 64
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

2 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

2 Articles
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

1 Article
Page 52

Page 52

1 Article
Page 53

Page 53

3 Articles
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

2 Articles
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

2 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 25

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Cokbesponmince.

No . 528 . I know full well that I have incurred the bitter enmity ( this is their Masonry ) of many members of the Lodge of Honour for my uncompromising opposition to the un-Masonic custom of drawing a distinction between tradesmen and gentlemen . I pride myself upon following in the steps of our respected and esteemed P . M . Bro . Haseler , and of being instrumental in overthrowing one

of the greatest curses which ever befell Masonry in Bath . But for many years in our Lodge this distinction has been done away ^ for we hold that every man is a gentleman so long as he acts as one , and men are or ought to be judged by their actions , not by their trades or professions ; and if the possession of this feeling of caste , which would do honour to a Brahmin , is Dr . Falconer ' s public exposition of his feelings as a Mason , I can only say , in all * charity , I trust it may die with him .

The Prov . Grand Lodge minutes will show that I did propose that a committee should be appointed to inquire into the affairs of this Province , and that I included the names of the committee in that motion ; the Prov . G-. M . wished me to insert my own name , which I declined , because I was not a Master or P . M ., or a Provincial officer . A few more words , and I have done with Dr . Falconer . I would thus publicly ask him , why he , as W . M . of'No . 528 , in 1853 , allowed the Dep . Prov . G . M . to confer upon the S . W . of his Lodg-e , Bro . Allen , the collar of Prov . S . G . W ., and upon Bro . Adair , a newly-raised M . M ., the collar of Prov . S . G . D . ? Upon that occasion another M . M ., a member of No . 528 , of a few months'

standing , was made Registrar , and he himself J . G . W . If the custom of Grand Lodge , which ought to govern Prov . Grand Lodges , be followed , the office of Prov . G . Reg . can only be conferred upon a Master or P . M ., for in the event of any dispute , the Registrar ought to be able to consult with , and if needs be , advise the Prov . G . M . Surely , as a Master in the Craft , Dr . Falconer ought not to have sanctioned , at least in two instances , a violation of the constitutions ; and your readers can now understand why he evades the reiterated statements of " Justitia , " by saying that in this Brother ' s letters there is a certain approximation to truth !

With regard to Bro . C . W . Oliver , I would ask him why , if he objects so much to anonymous letters , he did not advise his friend " A . Z . " to sign his name ; and why , as he furnished information to this writer , he did not reply to Bro . Peach ' s letter , signed "J . W ., " challenging him to substantiate the grave charges he brought against me ? I fearlessly and truthfully assert , that your correspondent did leave the Royal Cumberland Lodge , because he was offered the collar of Dir . Cer ., and because

our present S . W . was placed before him , as he told me that he deserved this office , being better qualified to fill it than Bro . Bagshawe . Your correspondent has given several versions of the cause which induced him to tender his resignation ; all of which I could give , —but the true one , and the one on which he acted , was that stated above . I presume that Bro . Oliver , who implies that his qualifications are at least equal to those of our esteemed S . W ., ought not to be the

judge of his own abilities . Our W . M ., and the board of Past Masters , did not consider them . so . Now I am well aware ( and this I coolly write as the result of long observation ) that BrO . C . W . Oliver thinks very few equal to himself , though I never heard or saw him fulfil the duties of any office I ever asked him to take without making some egregious blunder , and marring my ceremony ; and I may , without being accused of vanity , assert that no one will deny that I am competent to give an opinion upon this matter .

Now , about the collar of Prov . CI . Reg ., which was offered to me in 1854 , and about which so much lias been written . What I said was , that as W . M . of No . 48 , I could not take that collar , because the year before I had refused the collar of J . G . W . —not being entitled to accept it ; and as one of our P . Ms , was told by the Dep . Prov . G . M ., that when I was-W . M . of No . 48 , I had , under the circumstances every right to expect the collar of Prov . S . G . W ., I did , and do maintain , that to offer me the collar of Registrar in open Lodge , when I told the Prov . G . M . before Lodge was opened , through his deputy , that I refused it , was to say the least of it , a gratuitous insult , and done to prevent my saying that the purple had never been offered to me ! VOL . II , 4 Jv

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 24
  • You're on page25
  • 26
  • 64
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy