Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Jan. 9, 1869
  • Page 12
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 9, 1869: Page 12

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 9, 1869
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CORRESPONDENCE. ← Page 2 of 2
Page 12

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

append to it . Tet , allow me to state , that no one more heartily than myself joins in the honours paid at all Masonic meetings to evince respect for the noble head of the Craft in England , on many grounds , among which may be enumerated the dignity and authority conferred upon us by his high rank , his

long services of a quarter of a century , the appreciation of which will shortly be marked in so signal a manner by the contributions to a memorial fund of large amount ; his kind and courteous bearing to all who come into contact with him , his successful endeavours to maintain harmony and good feeling

amongst us , and to reconcile all differences ; his patronage and support of the charities ( the great ornaments of the society ) , and many other considerations . On no account should these high qualities be ignored , nor should any other Grand Master be proposed in his place so long as he is able

and willing to occupy the position he has so ably filled . This should not , however , shut our eyes to the disadvantages of so long a tenure of office , nor preclude the enactment of a law that any future appointments should be limited in point of duration of office , so as occasionally to infuse new blood into our proceedings

to prevent matters falling too much into a groove from which it is difficult to depart ; to allow those who entertain other views on any subjects opportunities of bringing them forward in an authoritative manner and of having them discussed ; to increase and extend the interest in the Craft bconferring the

y highest rank on men whose ambition would lead them to aspire to it , who are eminently qualified in point of ability and influence , and who would confer equal honour on our institution .

The article published this day does treat of other points of Masonic discipline , in the opinions respecting which I can fully concur . It has always appeared to me monstrous that the appointment of all the officers except Treasurer and Tyler should lie with the W . M ., and I have seen cases in which ,

presumably from personal feelings of friendship , the promotion to Wardenships of brethren who have filled only the lower offices or no office at all , above the heads of deserving brethren who have fully discharged their duties , has caused such dissatisfaction as to lead to the secession of some of the best members of a lod

ge , to cause unpleasant feelings to arise , and even to imperil its existence . I quite approve of the amended rule for the election of officers proposed by the writer of the article at the close of the last paragraph but one of his article , if only the words " ¦ competent and" be inserted before " willing to take the chair "

. Especially do I consider that the Wardenships , as necessary qualifications for the Masterships , should be at the command of the lodge rather than of the W . M .

Instances have occurred within my knowledge , in which , owing to social position or popularity , a brother has been placed in the chair of a lodge , who has at the time had no knowledge of the ceremonies , and of whom it was not expected that he would acquire it . As a natural he has felt an

consequence , unwillingness to expose himself before the members , and has therefore been very irregular in his attendance , leaving the management of the lodge to chance . Such a Master nevertheless afterwards receives all the honour arising from his past rank , however little he

merits it . It appears to me that some restrictions are desirable to prevent any one from being installed as W . M . who has not proved his competency to carry out the rituals . In fact , I cannot understand how a candidate for the chair , who is quite ignorant of the ceremonies , can conscientiously on his installation

reply in the affirmative to the question as to his ability to undertake the management of the lodge . There is still another matter connected with the election of W . M . which requires to be more definitively laid down . At page 59 , clause 2 , of the Book of Constitutions , it is stated , — " Every lodge

shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot . " This is very indefinite . In many lodges a list of those legally eligible for the chair is printed , and each members puts into the box a slip of paper bearing the name of the brother for whom he votes . As a result , I lately saw a W . M . elected by only seven votes out of eighteen , not even a majority of the whole . In other cases I have known brethren

rise to propose and second candidates selected from the printed list , and the ballot taken only for those so nominated . I prefer the latter course , in the absence of any definite law , as most likely to ensure a good majority , and to place the new W . M . at his ease in ruling the lodge . In my own case I have always

refused to accept any office ( and I have six times filled the highest in lodge and chapter ) unless unanimously elected . The last point the writer who has suggested this letter touched upon was the re-election of a W . M . or other officer to the position he has occupied during

the previous year , which is a manifest injustice to aspiring brethren of lower rank , who feel that they are competent to fulfil higher duties . A case has come under my notice during the last week , iu which the Past Masters of a lodge endeavoured to establish as a rule the retention of the first chair by each occupant for two years . As a result , either the Wardens

must do the same , or at every biennial change of Master , four Wardens become legally qualified , and thus three out of the four lose all chance of ever obtaining the headship of a lodge , and the probability is that they will throw up membership and give up Masonry in disgust , or gain admission into another

lodge . This I have known to be the effect of such disappointments . Iu the particular case alluded to , the attempt , which had succeeded two years previously , was defeated by the votes of the subordinate officers and members , which obtained a majority of two for the S . W ., a most worthy brother , in the

instruction and preparation of whom for the several offices he has effectively filled , I had a large share . I am pleased to find that lie was duly installed a few days ago . Concluding with thanks to the writer on "Masonic Discipline , " for his criticisms , I remain , Tours fraternally , P . M . Jan . 2 , 1 SG 9 .

THE annual hall of the Old Concord Lodge ( No . 172 ) is appointed to take placo on Wednesday , February 3 rd , iu tliu new grand hall and suite or' rooms at the 1 'reeniasons' Tavern . As this ball is always numerously attended , it is requisite that early application lie made for tickets , which can be obtained from Bro . John Einraens , Hon . Sec , or the Stewards .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1869-01-09, Page 12” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_09011869/page/12/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
WHAT IS FREEMASONRY? Article 1
THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS. Article 4
LIFE-BOAT SERVICES. Article 7
GRAND LODGE OF IOWA.—II. Article 7
MASONIC PERSECUTION.—II. Article 8
MASONIC DISCIPLINE.—VI.—(contd.) Article 9
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 11
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 11
Untitled Article 13
MASONIC MEMS. Article 13
METROPOLITAN. Article 13
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
SCOTLAND. Article 15
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 16
Obituary. Article 16
REVIEWS. Article 17
LAYING THE FOUNDATION-STONE OF A NEW FREEMASONS' HALL IN DURHAM. Article 18
MASONIC LIFEBOAT FUND. Article 20
MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED SOCIETIES. Article 20
METROPOLITAN LODGE MEETINGS, ETC., FOR THE WEEK ENDING JANUARY 16TH, 1869. Article 20
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

4 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

5 Articles
Page 12

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

append to it . Tet , allow me to state , that no one more heartily than myself joins in the honours paid at all Masonic meetings to evince respect for the noble head of the Craft in England , on many grounds , among which may be enumerated the dignity and authority conferred upon us by his high rank , his

long services of a quarter of a century , the appreciation of which will shortly be marked in so signal a manner by the contributions to a memorial fund of large amount ; his kind and courteous bearing to all who come into contact with him , his successful endeavours to maintain harmony and good feeling

amongst us , and to reconcile all differences ; his patronage and support of the charities ( the great ornaments of the society ) , and many other considerations . On no account should these high qualities be ignored , nor should any other Grand Master be proposed in his place so long as he is able

and willing to occupy the position he has so ably filled . This should not , however , shut our eyes to the disadvantages of so long a tenure of office , nor preclude the enactment of a law that any future appointments should be limited in point of duration of office , so as occasionally to infuse new blood into our proceedings

to prevent matters falling too much into a groove from which it is difficult to depart ; to allow those who entertain other views on any subjects opportunities of bringing them forward in an authoritative manner and of having them discussed ; to increase and extend the interest in the Craft bconferring the

y highest rank on men whose ambition would lead them to aspire to it , who are eminently qualified in point of ability and influence , and who would confer equal honour on our institution .

The article published this day does treat of other points of Masonic discipline , in the opinions respecting which I can fully concur . It has always appeared to me monstrous that the appointment of all the officers except Treasurer and Tyler should lie with the W . M ., and I have seen cases in which ,

presumably from personal feelings of friendship , the promotion to Wardenships of brethren who have filled only the lower offices or no office at all , above the heads of deserving brethren who have fully discharged their duties , has caused such dissatisfaction as to lead to the secession of some of the best members of a lod

ge , to cause unpleasant feelings to arise , and even to imperil its existence . I quite approve of the amended rule for the election of officers proposed by the writer of the article at the close of the last paragraph but one of his article , if only the words " ¦ competent and" be inserted before " willing to take the chair "

. Especially do I consider that the Wardenships , as necessary qualifications for the Masterships , should be at the command of the lodge rather than of the W . M .

Instances have occurred within my knowledge , in which , owing to social position or popularity , a brother has been placed in the chair of a lodge , who has at the time had no knowledge of the ceremonies , and of whom it was not expected that he would acquire it . As a natural he has felt an

consequence , unwillingness to expose himself before the members , and has therefore been very irregular in his attendance , leaving the management of the lodge to chance . Such a Master nevertheless afterwards receives all the honour arising from his past rank , however little he

merits it . It appears to me that some restrictions are desirable to prevent any one from being installed as W . M . who has not proved his competency to carry out the rituals . In fact , I cannot understand how a candidate for the chair , who is quite ignorant of the ceremonies , can conscientiously on his installation

reply in the affirmative to the question as to his ability to undertake the management of the lodge . There is still another matter connected with the election of W . M . which requires to be more definitively laid down . At page 59 , clause 2 , of the Book of Constitutions , it is stated , — " Every lodge

shall annually elect its Master and Treasurer by ballot . " This is very indefinite . In many lodges a list of those legally eligible for the chair is printed , and each members puts into the box a slip of paper bearing the name of the brother for whom he votes . As a result , I lately saw a W . M . elected by only seven votes out of eighteen , not even a majority of the whole . In other cases I have known brethren

rise to propose and second candidates selected from the printed list , and the ballot taken only for those so nominated . I prefer the latter course , in the absence of any definite law , as most likely to ensure a good majority , and to place the new W . M . at his ease in ruling the lodge . In my own case I have always

refused to accept any office ( and I have six times filled the highest in lodge and chapter ) unless unanimously elected . The last point the writer who has suggested this letter touched upon was the re-election of a W . M . or other officer to the position he has occupied during

the previous year , which is a manifest injustice to aspiring brethren of lower rank , who feel that they are competent to fulfil higher duties . A case has come under my notice during the last week , iu which the Past Masters of a lodge endeavoured to establish as a rule the retention of the first chair by each occupant for two years . As a result , either the Wardens

must do the same , or at every biennial change of Master , four Wardens become legally qualified , and thus three out of the four lose all chance of ever obtaining the headship of a lodge , and the probability is that they will throw up membership and give up Masonry in disgust , or gain admission into another

lodge . This I have known to be the effect of such disappointments . Iu the particular case alluded to , the attempt , which had succeeded two years previously , was defeated by the votes of the subordinate officers and members , which obtained a majority of two for the S . W ., a most worthy brother , in the

instruction and preparation of whom for the several offices he has effectively filled , I had a large share . I am pleased to find that lie was duly installed a few days ago . Concluding with thanks to the writer on "Masonic Discipline , " for his criticisms , I remain , Tours fraternally , P . M . Jan . 2 , 1 SG 9 .

THE annual hall of the Old Concord Lodge ( No . 172 ) is appointed to take placo on Wednesday , February 3 rd , iu tliu new grand hall and suite or' rooms at the 1 'reeniasons' Tavern . As this ball is always numerously attended , it is requisite that early application lie made for tickets , which can be obtained from Bro . John Einraens , Hon . Sec , or the Stewards .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 11
  • You're on page12
  • 13
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy