Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Jan. 9, 1869
  • Page 6
  • THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 9, 1869: Page 6

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 9, 1869
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS. ← Page 3 of 4 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Knights Templars.

the assistance of a counsel ; aud , if these are granted me , I shall do my best to exonerate the Order , and prove the falseness of the crimes with which it stands accused . This I will do , not only by the testimony of the

members of the Order , but also by the declarations of the kings and princes of other countries where the Order has possessions—witnesses the less suspicious , seeing that our Preceptors have often quarrelled with these potentates regarding their fiefs , and , consequently , they cannot be supposed to be biassed in our favour . Thus will the truth

be made apparent , not alone by us , but by the voice of every country in which we have possessions ; and I am ready to abide by the testimony of the kings , princes , prelates , dukes , counts , barons , and men of probity belonging to these

countries . " The Archbishop of Narboune . — " Reflect well upon your offer to defend the Order . Think wel of the avowals which yon have made regarding it and yourself . Nevertheless , we will permit you

to defend the Order if you persist in that design . Having only a lay brother with you , we cannot well refuse you some delay ; but my duty compels me to state , that , iu a matter of faith , you must speak alone , and we cannot grant yon counsel or

money . Furthermore , I warn you that , in a question of heresy , we proceed summarily , without formality , pleadings of advocates , or forms of law . You must therefore think well of it . " The Grand Master declared that no

consideration would make him abandon his design of de- fending the Order ; whereupon the Archbishop caused the Commission granted in favour of himself and lii ' s colleagues to be read . This docn- I ment contained all the infamous charges made j

against the Order . Thereafter they caused to be j read over to the Grand Master the deposition \ which , it was pretended , he had made at Paris , j and confirmed at Chiuon . He listened to the i narrative of the crimes imputed to the Order :

with astonishment ; but when he heard himself : accused of having made such a dreadful deposi- j tion he could scarcely contain his anger , and , by j making the sign of the Cross several times , aud ' by other more energetic symptoms , testified his f astonishment . After the readino- of these

documents , he answered , with a noble but indignant scorn , that those who had been placed in high authority by the Church , should have been more careful of following its precepts . Their garb

protected them from the wrath of man , but not from the justice of God . Had he owed less respect to the envoys of the Pope , or had he stood in any other position than as a prisoner , he would have given them a very different answer .

The preparation of this false deposition makes us doubt whether even the torture wrung from the other officers such odious confessions . It proves one thing clearly , that the whole charges were false . The Grand Master could ueither read

nor write—a common occurrence m that age , when such accomplishments were confined tochurchmen . The notaries who had written down the depositions had therefore composed them at the dictation of the Inquisitors , who ,

unscrupulous tools of the King , would not hesitate to affirm what the Knights denied . If it were not so , how could De Molai have had the presumption to deny what he had confessed on two occasions ? Or , if such odious crimes were so common in the Order

how could he have assumed , as the Commissioners themselves declared , such an appearance of outraged innocence . The answer of the Grand Master friahtened

the Commissioners , who do not appear to have been privy to the intrigues of the King . Indeed their conduct throughout the whole proceedings was characterised by humanity and justice . The Commissioners , imagining that the Grand Master

had defied them to mortal combat , answered , that they were not men capable of receiving such a challenge , nor were they there to hear such . To this the Grand Master bitterly replied , that they had mistaken the sense of his speech . He had

not intended challenging them ; but he added still more bitterly , that he wished to say with regard to those who were capable of such a crime as to fabricate so infamous a deposition , and

publish it as his , it would be well to establish among-Christians the custom of the Saracens and Tartars > who first cut in two the bodies of those whom they consider perverts , and then , when there was little fear of challenge , blackened the characters of their

victims . The Commissioners , applying- this answer to the punishment which the Knights had they been guilty , would have deserved , replied , that the Church , which abhored the shedding of blood , would leave that to tho secular powers when

they had convicted the Order of heresy . The Grand Master smiled contemptuously at this admission , but deigned to take no further notice of it . Returning to the question of the defence of

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1869-01-09, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 22 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_09011869/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
WHAT IS FREEMASONRY? Article 1
THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS. Article 4
LIFE-BOAT SERVICES. Article 7
GRAND LODGE OF IOWA.—II. Article 7
MASONIC PERSECUTION.—II. Article 8
MASONIC DISCIPLINE.—VI.—(contd.) Article 9
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 11
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 11
Untitled Article 13
MASONIC MEMS. Article 13
METROPOLITAN. Article 13
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
SCOTLAND. Article 15
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 16
Obituary. Article 16
REVIEWS. Article 17
LAYING THE FOUNDATION-STONE OF A NEW FREEMASONS' HALL IN DURHAM. Article 18
MASONIC LIFEBOAT FUND. Article 20
MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED SOCIETIES. Article 20
METROPOLITAN LODGE MEETINGS, ETC., FOR THE WEEK ENDING JANUARY 16TH, 1869. Article 20
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

4 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

5 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Knights Templars.

the assistance of a counsel ; aud , if these are granted me , I shall do my best to exonerate the Order , and prove the falseness of the crimes with which it stands accused . This I will do , not only by the testimony of the

members of the Order , but also by the declarations of the kings and princes of other countries where the Order has possessions—witnesses the less suspicious , seeing that our Preceptors have often quarrelled with these potentates regarding their fiefs , and , consequently , they cannot be supposed to be biassed in our favour . Thus will the truth

be made apparent , not alone by us , but by the voice of every country in which we have possessions ; and I am ready to abide by the testimony of the kings , princes , prelates , dukes , counts , barons , and men of probity belonging to these

countries . " The Archbishop of Narboune . — " Reflect well upon your offer to defend the Order . Think wel of the avowals which yon have made regarding it and yourself . Nevertheless , we will permit you

to defend the Order if you persist in that design . Having only a lay brother with you , we cannot well refuse you some delay ; but my duty compels me to state , that , iu a matter of faith , you must speak alone , and we cannot grant yon counsel or

money . Furthermore , I warn you that , in a question of heresy , we proceed summarily , without formality , pleadings of advocates , or forms of law . You must therefore think well of it . " The Grand Master declared that no

consideration would make him abandon his design of de- fending the Order ; whereupon the Archbishop caused the Commission granted in favour of himself and lii ' s colleagues to be read . This docn- I ment contained all the infamous charges made j

against the Order . Thereafter they caused to be j read over to the Grand Master the deposition \ which , it was pretended , he had made at Paris , j and confirmed at Chiuon . He listened to the i narrative of the crimes imputed to the Order :

with astonishment ; but when he heard himself : accused of having made such a dreadful deposi- j tion he could scarcely contain his anger , and , by j making the sign of the Cross several times , aud ' by other more energetic symptoms , testified his f astonishment . After the readino- of these

documents , he answered , with a noble but indignant scorn , that those who had been placed in high authority by the Church , should have been more careful of following its precepts . Their garb

protected them from the wrath of man , but not from the justice of God . Had he owed less respect to the envoys of the Pope , or had he stood in any other position than as a prisoner , he would have given them a very different answer .

The preparation of this false deposition makes us doubt whether even the torture wrung from the other officers such odious confessions . It proves one thing clearly , that the whole charges were false . The Grand Master could ueither read

nor write—a common occurrence m that age , when such accomplishments were confined tochurchmen . The notaries who had written down the depositions had therefore composed them at the dictation of the Inquisitors , who ,

unscrupulous tools of the King , would not hesitate to affirm what the Knights denied . If it were not so , how could De Molai have had the presumption to deny what he had confessed on two occasions ? Or , if such odious crimes were so common in the Order

how could he have assumed , as the Commissioners themselves declared , such an appearance of outraged innocence . The answer of the Grand Master friahtened

the Commissioners , who do not appear to have been privy to the intrigues of the King . Indeed their conduct throughout the whole proceedings was characterised by humanity and justice . The Commissioners , imagining that the Grand Master

had defied them to mortal combat , answered , that they were not men capable of receiving such a challenge , nor were they there to hear such . To this the Grand Master bitterly replied , that they had mistaken the sense of his speech . He had

not intended challenging them ; but he added still more bitterly , that he wished to say with regard to those who were capable of such a crime as to fabricate so infamous a deposition , and

publish it as his , it would be well to establish among-Christians the custom of the Saracens and Tartars > who first cut in two the bodies of those whom they consider perverts , and then , when there was little fear of challenge , blackened the characters of their

victims . The Commissioners , applying- this answer to the punishment which the Knights had they been guilty , would have deserved , replied , that the Church , which abhored the shedding of blood , would leave that to tho secular powers when

they had convicted the Order of heresy . The Grand Master smiled contemptuously at this admission , but deigned to take no further notice of it . Returning to the question of the defence of

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy