Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • May 11, 1867
  • Page 1
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, May 11, 1867: Page 1

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, May 11, 1867
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article FREEMASONRY CONSIDERED. Page 1 of 3 →
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry Considered.

FREEMASONRY CONSIDERED .

ZONDON , SATURDAY , MAT 11 , 1867 .

Bx ANTHONY ONEAL HAYE . II . In viewing Masonry as I am doing I am aware that I shall meet with little support or countenance from the members of the high grades . This I

never expected , and am prepared to meet with bitter opposition to my statements ; but the inexorable point of fact is the shield behind which I take my stand , and my own conviction is that an honest statement relative to the known origin

of the high grades would recommend them to those brethren fond of light amusement , with money to spare , and without scruples as to the taking of questionable oaths , such as the modern Templars . Furthermore , if every grade above

the Royal Arch * were declared to be totally unconnected with Masonry , and non-Masons admitted , we might , perhaps , come with more

leniency to view the fripperies of Knights Grand Crosses , Sovereign Princes of Rose Croix , Grand Pontiffs ,. Royal Axes , Sublime Princes of the Royal Secret , Puissant Sovereign Grand Commanders , and even the Misraim members of

Chaosf , a true name . But as Masonic , or springing from Masonic principles , they never can be entertained . What makes their claim to be considered a part of Masonry the more ridiculous is , the manner in which they attach themselves to

great societies , and great names of the past . The Royal Order loudly claims its institution at the hands of Robert the Bruce , the Thirty-third at the hands of Frederick of Prussia . It would take some one from the dead to make any sensible xaan . believe the truth , of either claim . Tradition and unsupported assertions will not do .

"The Rose Croix degree , " says How , in his Masonic Manual , " is alluded to in the works of Henry Cornelius Agrippa , a man of great learning and talent , of a noble family at Cologne . He was born in I 486 . His works were printed , A . D .,

1550 . " How , as usual with a certain class of Masonic writers , here makes a most ludicrous and almost unparalleled mistake . Agrippa does not make any allusion to the Rose Croix degree , but to the Society of Rosicrucians . Any one , by

consulting his works " De Incertitudine et Yanitata Scientiarum , " a title not inapplicable to the present subject , and " De Occulta Philosophia , " will satisfy themselves on this point . The Rose Croix is likely the oldest , as without doubt it is the most

interesting and beautiful of the high grades . It derives its name from " Rose "— " Cross , " and every member of the Order knows why . On the other hand , the Rosicrncian Society was one of scholars

alone , numbering among them Albertus Magnus , Aponi , Paracelsus , and others . They derived their name from Ros ( dew ) and Crux ( cross ) , the & being the Alchemic symbol for light , and dew being supposed the universal solvent . In 1614 appeared

" Fama fraternitatis , or Brotherhood of the Illustrious R . C . ( Rosy Cross ); to the Rulers , States , and Learned of Europe . Printed at Cassel , by William Wessel , " a work full of gross absurdities , and as like the Rosicrncian teachings

as a candle is to the sun . From this Society of the Rosy Cross may have sprung the present Rose > J < , ancl I am very strongly of opinion that it did . Much of the gross absurdity that characterised the former has been swept away ,

although a strong tincture of the old leaven remains . In this case the Rose > i * must be considered the oldest , as it has been considered the most important of all the high grades .

The Rosicrncian Society , as a society , never ' pretended to possess unnatural secrets . They were for the most part schoolmen , expert chemists , and profound thinkers . Their successors went astray from the purity of their teachings ,

confounding emblems with realities , and searching after the philosopher ' s stone and the water of life . These later Rosicrucians may have been the instruments of starting the Rosy Cross Brotherhood , although I much doubt it . Even with their

perversion they could scarcel y have fallen into such grave mistakes , because they were men of great mind , and clear , save on two points , perception . God never breaks his immutible and etern

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1867-05-11, Page 1” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 22 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_11051867/page/1/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
FREEMASONRY CONSIDERED. Article 1
THE NEMESIS: A TALE OF THE DAYS OF TRAJAN. Article 3
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 8
MASONIC MEMS. Article 9
ROYAL FREEMASONS' SCHOOL FOE FEMALE CHILDREN. Article 9
METROPOLITAN. Article 13
PROVINCIAL. Article 16
CHANNEL ISLANDS. Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
MARK MASONRY. Article 18
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 19
Obituary. Article 19
MEETINGS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND LEARNED SOCIETIES FOR THE WEEK ENDING MAY Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

4 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

6 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Freemasonry Considered.

FREEMASONRY CONSIDERED .

ZONDON , SATURDAY , MAT 11 , 1867 .

Bx ANTHONY ONEAL HAYE . II . In viewing Masonry as I am doing I am aware that I shall meet with little support or countenance from the members of the high grades . This I

never expected , and am prepared to meet with bitter opposition to my statements ; but the inexorable point of fact is the shield behind which I take my stand , and my own conviction is that an honest statement relative to the known origin

of the high grades would recommend them to those brethren fond of light amusement , with money to spare , and without scruples as to the taking of questionable oaths , such as the modern Templars . Furthermore , if every grade above

the Royal Arch * were declared to be totally unconnected with Masonry , and non-Masons admitted , we might , perhaps , come with more

leniency to view the fripperies of Knights Grand Crosses , Sovereign Princes of Rose Croix , Grand Pontiffs ,. Royal Axes , Sublime Princes of the Royal Secret , Puissant Sovereign Grand Commanders , and even the Misraim members of

Chaosf , a true name . But as Masonic , or springing from Masonic principles , they never can be entertained . What makes their claim to be considered a part of Masonry the more ridiculous is , the manner in which they attach themselves to

great societies , and great names of the past . The Royal Order loudly claims its institution at the hands of Robert the Bruce , the Thirty-third at the hands of Frederick of Prussia . It would take some one from the dead to make any sensible xaan . believe the truth , of either claim . Tradition and unsupported assertions will not do .

"The Rose Croix degree , " says How , in his Masonic Manual , " is alluded to in the works of Henry Cornelius Agrippa , a man of great learning and talent , of a noble family at Cologne . He was born in I 486 . His works were printed , A . D .,

1550 . " How , as usual with a certain class of Masonic writers , here makes a most ludicrous and almost unparalleled mistake . Agrippa does not make any allusion to the Rose Croix degree , but to the Society of Rosicrucians . Any one , by

consulting his works " De Incertitudine et Yanitata Scientiarum , " a title not inapplicable to the present subject , and " De Occulta Philosophia , " will satisfy themselves on this point . The Rose Croix is likely the oldest , as without doubt it is the most

interesting and beautiful of the high grades . It derives its name from " Rose "— " Cross , " and every member of the Order knows why . On the other hand , the Rosicrncian Society was one of scholars

alone , numbering among them Albertus Magnus , Aponi , Paracelsus , and others . They derived their name from Ros ( dew ) and Crux ( cross ) , the & being the Alchemic symbol for light , and dew being supposed the universal solvent . In 1614 appeared

" Fama fraternitatis , or Brotherhood of the Illustrious R . C . ( Rosy Cross ); to the Rulers , States , and Learned of Europe . Printed at Cassel , by William Wessel , " a work full of gross absurdities , and as like the Rosicrncian teachings

as a candle is to the sun . From this Society of the Rosy Cross may have sprung the present Rose > J < , ancl I am very strongly of opinion that it did . Much of the gross absurdity that characterised the former has been swept away ,

although a strong tincture of the old leaven remains . In this case the Rose > i * must be considered the oldest , as it has been considered the most important of all the high grades .

The Rosicrncian Society , as a society , never ' pretended to possess unnatural secrets . They were for the most part schoolmen , expert chemists , and profound thinkers . Their successors went astray from the purity of their teachings ,

confounding emblems with realities , and searching after the philosopher ' s stone and the water of life . These later Rosicrucians may have been the instruments of starting the Rosy Cross Brotherhood , although I much doubt it . Even with their

perversion they could scarcel y have fallen into such grave mistakes , because they were men of great mind , and clear , save on two points , perception . God never breaks his immutible and etern

  • Prev page
  • You're on page1
  • 2
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy