Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • March 12, 1864
  • Page 6
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 12, 1864: Page 6

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 12, 1864
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. ← Page 2 of 3 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Notes And Queries.

ascertaining . We are led to believe , from certain passages of Scripture , that the deportation was not complete . * Calmet says that Nebuchadnezzar carried away only the principal inhabitants , the warriors and artizans of every kind ( which would , of course , include tlie masons ) , and that he left the husbandmen , the labourersandin generalthe poorer classes that

, , , constituted the great body of the people . Among the prisoners of distinction , Josephus mentions the high priest , Seraiah , and Zephaniah , the priest that was next him , with the three rulers that guarded the temple , the eunuch who was over the armed men , seven friends of Zedekiah , his scribe ancl sixty other

rulers . Zedekiah , the king , had attempted to escape , previous to the termination of the siege , but being pursued was captured and carried to Eiblah , the headquarters of . Nebuchadnezzar , where , having first been compelled to behold the slaughter of his children , his eyes were then put out , and he was

conducted in chains to Babylon . t A Masonic tradition informs us that the captive Jews were bound by their conquerors with triangular chaius , and that this was done by the Chaldeans as an additional insult , because the Jewish masons were known to esteem the triangle as an emblem of the sacred name of God , ancl must have considered its appropriation to the form of their fetters as a desecration of the Tetragrammaton .

Of the road pursued by the Chaldeans with their prisoners we can judge only from conjecture . It is , however , recorded that they were carried by Nebuzaraclan , the captain of [ Nebuchadnezzar ' s army , direct from Jerusalem to Eiblah , -where [ Nebuchadnezzar had fixed his headquarters . Eiblah w as situated on the northern border of Palestineabout two

, hundred miles north-east of Jerusalem , and was the city through which the Babylonians were accustomed to pass in their eruptions into and departures from Judea .

From Jerusalem to Eiblah , the journey is necessarily through Damascus , and . the route from Eiblah was direct to Palmyra . Hence , we have every reason for supposing that the Chaldean army , with the cap fives , took that route whieh is described by Heeren , J and which would have conducted them from Jerusalem , through Damascus , to Eiblah in a northerly direction . Here [ Nebuchadnezzar commanded Seraiah

the high priest , and the rulers , to the amount of seventy , to be put to death . Thence directing their course to the north-east , they arrived at Thapsacus , an important commercial town on the Euphrates , which river they crossed somewhat lower down , at a place called Oircesium . They then journey eel in a southerly directionthrough the Median wall and

, along the east bank of the Euphrates to Babylon . By this route they avoided making a large circuit to the north , or crossing an extensive dessert which could supply no water . The condition of Jerusalem after the departure of

the captives is worthy of consideration . Previous to the departure from Jerusalem , Nebuzaradan appointed Gedaliali , who was the son of Ahikam , a person of an illustrious family , the governor of the remnant of the Jews who were left behind . Gedaliali is described by the Jewish historian as being of " a gentle and rihteous disposition . " He established his seat

g of government at Mispah , and induced those who had fled during the siege , and who were scattered over the country , to return and cultivate the land , promising them protection and favour if they consented to continue peaceable and pay a small tribute to the king of Babylon .

Among those who had fled on the approach of the-Chaldean army was Ishmael , one of the royal family , a wicked and crafty man , who , during the siege of Jerusalem , had sought protection at the court of the King of the Ammorites . Ishmael was secretly instigated by Bealis , the Ammoritish monarch , to slay

Gedaliali , that , as one of the royal family , he might himself ascend the throne of David . Notwithstanding that Gedaliali was informed of this nefarious design , he refused , in his unsuspecting temper , to believe the report , and consequently fell a victim to the treachery of Ishmael , who slew him while

partaking of his hospitality . Ishmael then attempted to carry the inhabitants of Mispah into captivity , and , fled with them to the King of the Ammorites ; but being overtaken by the friends of Gedaliali , who had armed themselves to avenge his death , the captives were rescued and Ishmael put to flight . The Jews , fearing that if they remained they would be punished by the Babylonians for the murder of Gedaliali ,

retired to Egypt . Five years after , Nebuchadnezzar , having invaded and conquered Egypt , carried all the Jews whom he found there to Babylon . " And such , " says Josephus , " was the end of the nation of the Hebrews . " Jerusalem was now desolate . Its king and its people were removed to Babylon , but it remained unpopulated by foreign coloniesperhapsas

, , Whiston suggests , " as au indication of Providence that the Jews were to re-people it without opposition themselves . " Let us turn now to the more immediate object of tin ' s lecture , ancl examine the condition ofthe captivesduring their sojourn in Babylon .

Notwithstanding the ignominious mode of their conveyance from Jerusalem , and the vindictiveness dis 2 ilayed by their conqueror in the destruction of their city and temple , they do not appear , on their arrival at Babylon , to have been subjected to any of the extreme rigours of slavery . They were distributed

into various parts of the empire ; some remaining bathe city , while others were sent into the provinces . The latter probably devoted themselves to agriculturalpursuits , while the former were engaged in commerceor in the labours of architecture . Anderson says , that Nebuchadnezzar , having applied himself to the

design of finishing his buildings at Babylon , engaged therein all tlie able artistsof Judea and other captives to join his own Chaldean masons . * They werepermittedto retain their personal property , and even to purchase lauds ancl erect houses . Their civil and religious government was not utterly destroyed , for they retained a regular succession of kings and high priests , one of each of whom returned witli them , as will be seen

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1864-03-12, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 22 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_12031864/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
LIGHTNING. Article 1
THE BOYS' SCHOOL. Article 1
ROYAL BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 1
THE MASONIC UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY. Article 1
THE SPIRIT OF GOTHIC ART. Article 3
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 5
TEMPLAR FUNERAL SERVICE. Article 8
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 11
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
ROYAL ARCH. Article 15
CHANNEL ISLANDS. Article 15
INDIA. Article 15
Obituary. Article 16
THE WEEK. Article 17
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

5 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Masonic Notes And Queries.

ascertaining . We are led to believe , from certain passages of Scripture , that the deportation was not complete . * Calmet says that Nebuchadnezzar carried away only the principal inhabitants , the warriors and artizans of every kind ( which would , of course , include tlie masons ) , and that he left the husbandmen , the labourersandin generalthe poorer classes that

, , , constituted the great body of the people . Among the prisoners of distinction , Josephus mentions the high priest , Seraiah , and Zephaniah , the priest that was next him , with the three rulers that guarded the temple , the eunuch who was over the armed men , seven friends of Zedekiah , his scribe ancl sixty other

rulers . Zedekiah , the king , had attempted to escape , previous to the termination of the siege , but being pursued was captured and carried to Eiblah , the headquarters of . Nebuchadnezzar , where , having first been compelled to behold the slaughter of his children , his eyes were then put out , and he was

conducted in chains to Babylon . t A Masonic tradition informs us that the captive Jews were bound by their conquerors with triangular chaius , and that this was done by the Chaldeans as an additional insult , because the Jewish masons were known to esteem the triangle as an emblem of the sacred name of God , ancl must have considered its appropriation to the form of their fetters as a desecration of the Tetragrammaton .

Of the road pursued by the Chaldeans with their prisoners we can judge only from conjecture . It is , however , recorded that they were carried by Nebuzaraclan , the captain of [ Nebuchadnezzar ' s army , direct from Jerusalem to Eiblah , -where [ Nebuchadnezzar had fixed his headquarters . Eiblah w as situated on the northern border of Palestineabout two

, hundred miles north-east of Jerusalem , and was the city through which the Babylonians were accustomed to pass in their eruptions into and departures from Judea .

From Jerusalem to Eiblah , the journey is necessarily through Damascus , and . the route from Eiblah was direct to Palmyra . Hence , we have every reason for supposing that the Chaldean army , with the cap fives , took that route whieh is described by Heeren , J and which would have conducted them from Jerusalem , through Damascus , to Eiblah in a northerly direction . Here [ Nebuchadnezzar commanded Seraiah

the high priest , and the rulers , to the amount of seventy , to be put to death . Thence directing their course to the north-east , they arrived at Thapsacus , an important commercial town on the Euphrates , which river they crossed somewhat lower down , at a place called Oircesium . They then journey eel in a southerly directionthrough the Median wall and

, along the east bank of the Euphrates to Babylon . By this route they avoided making a large circuit to the north , or crossing an extensive dessert which could supply no water . The condition of Jerusalem after the departure of

the captives is worthy of consideration . Previous to the departure from Jerusalem , Nebuzaradan appointed Gedaliali , who was the son of Ahikam , a person of an illustrious family , the governor of the remnant of the Jews who were left behind . Gedaliali is described by the Jewish historian as being of " a gentle and rihteous disposition . " He established his seat

g of government at Mispah , and induced those who had fled during the siege , and who were scattered over the country , to return and cultivate the land , promising them protection and favour if they consented to continue peaceable and pay a small tribute to the king of Babylon .

Among those who had fled on the approach of the-Chaldean army was Ishmael , one of the royal family , a wicked and crafty man , who , during the siege of Jerusalem , had sought protection at the court of the King of the Ammorites . Ishmael was secretly instigated by Bealis , the Ammoritish monarch , to slay

Gedaliali , that , as one of the royal family , he might himself ascend the throne of David . Notwithstanding that Gedaliali was informed of this nefarious design , he refused , in his unsuspecting temper , to believe the report , and consequently fell a victim to the treachery of Ishmael , who slew him while

partaking of his hospitality . Ishmael then attempted to carry the inhabitants of Mispah into captivity , and , fled with them to the King of the Ammorites ; but being overtaken by the friends of Gedaliali , who had armed themselves to avenge his death , the captives were rescued and Ishmael put to flight . The Jews , fearing that if they remained they would be punished by the Babylonians for the murder of Gedaliali ,

retired to Egypt . Five years after , Nebuchadnezzar , having invaded and conquered Egypt , carried all the Jews whom he found there to Babylon . " And such , " says Josephus , " was the end of the nation of the Hebrews . " Jerusalem was now desolate . Its king and its people were removed to Babylon , but it remained unpopulated by foreign coloniesperhapsas

, , Whiston suggests , " as au indication of Providence that the Jews were to re-people it without opposition themselves . " Let us turn now to the more immediate object of tin ' s lecture , ancl examine the condition ofthe captivesduring their sojourn in Babylon .

Notwithstanding the ignominious mode of their conveyance from Jerusalem , and the vindictiveness dis 2 ilayed by their conqueror in the destruction of their city and temple , they do not appear , on their arrival at Babylon , to have been subjected to any of the extreme rigours of slavery . They were distributed

into various parts of the empire ; some remaining bathe city , while others were sent into the provinces . The latter probably devoted themselves to agriculturalpursuits , while the former were engaged in commerceor in the labours of architecture . Anderson says , that Nebuchadnezzar , having applied himself to the

design of finishing his buildings at Babylon , engaged therein all tlie able artistsof Judea and other captives to join his own Chaldean masons . * They werepermittedto retain their personal property , and even to purchase lauds ancl erect houses . Their civil and religious government was not utterly destroyed , for they retained a regular succession of kings and high priests , one of each of whom returned witli them , as will be seen

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy