Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • July 21, 1860
  • Page 3
  • THE INEFFABLE WORD.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, July 21, 1860: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, July 21, 1860
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE INEFFABLE WORD. ← Page 3 of 5 →
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Ineffable Word.

similarity of rites , the same sacred name is said to 3 iai * e been used as a pass-word for the purpose of gaining admission to their mysteries . In the Brahminie mysteries of Hindostaiithe ceremony of initiation was terminated by intrusting the aspirant with the sacredtriliteral naniewhich was Aimthe

, , , three letters of which were symbolic of the creative , preservative , and destructive principles of the Supreme Deity , personified in the three manifestations of Brahma , Sii * a , and Vishnu . This word was forbidden to be pronounced aloud . It was to be the subject of silent meditation to the pious . Hindu .

In the rites of Persia an ineffable name was also communicated to the candidate after his initiation . Mithras , the principal divinity in these rites , who took the place of the Hebrew Jehovah , and represented the sun , hacl this peculiarity in his name , that the numeral value of tlie letters of which it was composed amounted to precisely 365 , the number of days which constitute a

revolution of the earth around the sun , or , as they then supposed , of the sun around the earth . In the mysteries introduced by Pythagoras into Greece , we again find the ineffable name of the Hebrews , obtained doubtless hy the Samian Sage during his visit to Babylon . The symbol adopted by him to express it was , however , somewhat different , being ten points distributed in the form of a triangle , each side containing fom- points , as in the annexed figure .

• The apex of the triangle was consequently a single point , then followed • below tivo others , then three , ancl m # lastly , the base consisted of four . These points were , by the number in • . each rank , intended , according to the Pythagorean systemto denote

-, respec tively the monad or active principle of nature , the dtutd or passive principle , the triad , or world emanating from their union , and the qitarterniad , or intellectual science ; the Avhole number of points amounting to ten , the symbol of perfection . and consummation . This figure was called bPythagorasthe tetraclgs—a word

equivay , lent in signification to the tetragrammaton , and it ivas deemed so sacred that on it the oath of secrecy and fidelity was administered to the aspirants in the Pythagorian rites .

Among , the Scandinavians , as among tlie Jewish Kabbalists , the Supreme God who was made known in their mysteries hacl twelve names , of which the principal and most sacred one was Alfiuler , the Universal Father . - Among the Druids , the sacred name of Gocl was Hit , a name . ivhich , although it is supposed , by Bryant , to have been intended by them for Noahwill be recognised

, as one of the modifications of the Hebrew tetragrammaton . It is , in fact , the masculine pronoun in Hebrew , and may be considered as the symbolization of the male , or generative , principle in nature—a sort . of modification of the system of Phallic worship . This sacred name among the Druidsreminds me of

, what is the latest , and undoubtedl y the most philosophical , speculation on the true meaning , as well as pronounciation , of the-ineffable tetragrammaton . It is from the ingenious mind of the celebrated Lanci , and I have already , in another ivork , given it to the public as I received it from his pupil , ancl my friend , Mr . Gliddon , the

distinguished archaeologist . But the results are too curious to » be ommitted Avhenever the tetragrammaton is discussed . In another article , I have very fully alluded to the prevailing sentiment among the ancients , that the j 'Supreme Deity was bisexual , or hermaphrodite , inchid- '

ing in the essence of his being the male and female principles , the generative and prolific powers of nature . This was the universal doctrine in all the ancient religions , and was very naturally developed in the symbol of the jrfialltts and cteis among the Greeks , and in the corresponding one of tlie Ungam and ijoni among the Orientalists ; from ivhich symbolsthe masonic point

, within a circle is a legitimate derivation . They all taught that God , the Creator , was both male and female . NOAV , tliis theory is undoubtedly imobjeetionoble . on the score of orthodoxy , if we view it in the spiritual sense , in which its first propounders must necessarily have intended it to be presented to the mind * and not

, in the gross , sensual meaning in which it was subsequently received . For , taking the word sex , not in its ordinary and colloquial signification , as denoting the indication of a particular physical organization , but in that purely philosophical one AA'hich alone can be used in such a connection , and which simply signifies the mere

manifestation of a poiver , it is not to be denied that the Supreme Being must possess in himself , and in himself alone , both a generative and a prolific power . Tin ' s idea , AA'hich was so extensively prevalent among all the nationsof antiquity , has also been traced in the tetragrammaton .. or name of Jehovah , with singular ingenuity , by Lanci ,.

and , ivhat is almost equally as interesting , he has , by this discovery , been enabled to demonstrate what was , in all probability , the true pronunciation of the word . In giving the details of this philological discovery , 1 will endeavour , to make it as comprehensible as it can be made to those who are not critically acquainted with the construction of the Hebrew language ; those who are , irill at orme apjireeiate its peculiar character , and will excuse the explanatory details , of course unnecessary to them .

The ineffable name , the tetragrammaton , the shem hamphorash—for it is known by all these appellationsconsists of four letters , god , lieli , van , and heh , forming the word mrr . This word , of course , in accordance with the genius of the Hebrew language , is read , as we would say , backward , or from right to left , beginning Avith god ,. [¦»] and ending with heh \ f \ .

, Of these letters , the first , yocl [>] , is equivalent to the-English i pronounced as e in the word ¦ machine . The second and fourth letter , heh [ n ] , is an aspirate ,, and has here the sound of the English h . Ancl the third letter , rem [ i ] , has the sound of open o .. Nowreading these four letters > or Iri or IIor 0 .

, , , , , and n or II , as the Hebrew requires , from right to 'left ,, we have the word run ' , equivalent in English to IH-OH , which is really as near to theprommciation as ive can well come , notwithstanding it forms neither of the seven ways in which the word is saicl to have been pronounced ,, at different times by the patriarchs .

But , thus pronounced , the word gives its no meaning , for there is no such word in Hebrew as z 7 < o /<; and , as all the Hebrew names were significative of something , it is but fairot conclude that this was not the original pronunciation , and that we miist look for another which will give a meaning to tlie word . NoivLanci proceeds to the

dis-, covery of this true pronunciation , as follows : In the Kabbala , a hidden meaning is often deduced from a word by transposing or reversing its letters , and ' it was in this way that the Kabbalists concealed many of then * mysteris .

Noiv , to reverse a word in English is to read its letters : from ri ght to left , because our normal mode of reading is from ' left lo right . But in Hebrew the contrary rules takes place , for there the normal mode of reading is = from right to left ; and therefore , to reverse the reading , of a word , is to read it from left to ri ght . .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1860-07-21, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 2 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_21071860/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
TO OUR READERS. Article 1
MASONRY IN ST. THOMAS'S. Article 1
THE INEFFABLE WORD. Article 1
CLASSICAL THEOLOGY.—XXV. Article 5
ARCHITECTURE OF DIFFERENT NATIONS. Article 7
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 8
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 9
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
THE CHARITIES. Article 12
GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTERS. Article 12
PROV . G.M. FOR BERKS AND BUCKS. Article 12
Literature. Article 13
ARRANGEMENTS IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. Article 15
Obituary. Article 15
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 16
METROPOLITAN. Article 16
PROVINCIAL. Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
AMERICA. Article 18
COLONIAL. Article 19
SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

4 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

4 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

5 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Ineffable Word.

similarity of rites , the same sacred name is said to 3 iai * e been used as a pass-word for the purpose of gaining admission to their mysteries . In the Brahminie mysteries of Hindostaiithe ceremony of initiation was terminated by intrusting the aspirant with the sacredtriliteral naniewhich was Aimthe

, , , three letters of which were symbolic of the creative , preservative , and destructive principles of the Supreme Deity , personified in the three manifestations of Brahma , Sii * a , and Vishnu . This word was forbidden to be pronounced aloud . It was to be the subject of silent meditation to the pious . Hindu .

In the rites of Persia an ineffable name was also communicated to the candidate after his initiation . Mithras , the principal divinity in these rites , who took the place of the Hebrew Jehovah , and represented the sun , hacl this peculiarity in his name , that the numeral value of tlie letters of which it was composed amounted to precisely 365 , the number of days which constitute a

revolution of the earth around the sun , or , as they then supposed , of the sun around the earth . In the mysteries introduced by Pythagoras into Greece , we again find the ineffable name of the Hebrews , obtained doubtless hy the Samian Sage during his visit to Babylon . The symbol adopted by him to express it was , however , somewhat different , being ten points distributed in the form of a triangle , each side containing fom- points , as in the annexed figure .

• The apex of the triangle was consequently a single point , then followed • below tivo others , then three , ancl m # lastly , the base consisted of four . These points were , by the number in • . each rank , intended , according to the Pythagorean systemto denote

-, respec tively the monad or active principle of nature , the dtutd or passive principle , the triad , or world emanating from their union , and the qitarterniad , or intellectual science ; the Avhole number of points amounting to ten , the symbol of perfection . and consummation . This figure was called bPythagorasthe tetraclgs—a word

equivay , lent in signification to the tetragrammaton , and it ivas deemed so sacred that on it the oath of secrecy and fidelity was administered to the aspirants in the Pythagorian rites .

Among , the Scandinavians , as among tlie Jewish Kabbalists , the Supreme God who was made known in their mysteries hacl twelve names , of which the principal and most sacred one was Alfiuler , the Universal Father . - Among the Druids , the sacred name of Gocl was Hit , a name . ivhich , although it is supposed , by Bryant , to have been intended by them for Noahwill be recognised

, as one of the modifications of the Hebrew tetragrammaton . It is , in fact , the masculine pronoun in Hebrew , and may be considered as the symbolization of the male , or generative , principle in nature—a sort . of modification of the system of Phallic worship . This sacred name among the Druidsreminds me of

, what is the latest , and undoubtedl y the most philosophical , speculation on the true meaning , as well as pronounciation , of the-ineffable tetragrammaton . It is from the ingenious mind of the celebrated Lanci , and I have already , in another ivork , given it to the public as I received it from his pupil , ancl my friend , Mr . Gliddon , the

distinguished archaeologist . But the results are too curious to » be ommitted Avhenever the tetragrammaton is discussed . In another article , I have very fully alluded to the prevailing sentiment among the ancients , that the j 'Supreme Deity was bisexual , or hermaphrodite , inchid- '

ing in the essence of his being the male and female principles , the generative and prolific powers of nature . This was the universal doctrine in all the ancient religions , and was very naturally developed in the symbol of the jrfialltts and cteis among the Greeks , and in the corresponding one of tlie Ungam and ijoni among the Orientalists ; from ivhich symbolsthe masonic point

, within a circle is a legitimate derivation . They all taught that God , the Creator , was both male and female . NOAV , tliis theory is undoubtedly imobjeetionoble . on the score of orthodoxy , if we view it in the spiritual sense , in which its first propounders must necessarily have intended it to be presented to the mind * and not

, in the gross , sensual meaning in which it was subsequently received . For , taking the word sex , not in its ordinary and colloquial signification , as denoting the indication of a particular physical organization , but in that purely philosophical one AA'hich alone can be used in such a connection , and which simply signifies the mere

manifestation of a poiver , it is not to be denied that the Supreme Being must possess in himself , and in himself alone , both a generative and a prolific power . Tin ' s idea , AA'hich was so extensively prevalent among all the nationsof antiquity , has also been traced in the tetragrammaton .. or name of Jehovah , with singular ingenuity , by Lanci ,.

and , ivhat is almost equally as interesting , he has , by this discovery , been enabled to demonstrate what was , in all probability , the true pronunciation of the word . In giving the details of this philological discovery , 1 will endeavour , to make it as comprehensible as it can be made to those who are not critically acquainted with the construction of the Hebrew language ; those who are , irill at orme apjireeiate its peculiar character , and will excuse the explanatory details , of course unnecessary to them .

The ineffable name , the tetragrammaton , the shem hamphorash—for it is known by all these appellationsconsists of four letters , god , lieli , van , and heh , forming the word mrr . This word , of course , in accordance with the genius of the Hebrew language , is read , as we would say , backward , or from right to left , beginning Avith god ,. [¦»] and ending with heh \ f \ .

, Of these letters , the first , yocl [>] , is equivalent to the-English i pronounced as e in the word ¦ machine . The second and fourth letter , heh [ n ] , is an aspirate ,, and has here the sound of the English h . Ancl the third letter , rem [ i ] , has the sound of open o .. Nowreading these four letters > or Iri or IIor 0 .

, , , , , and n or II , as the Hebrew requires , from right to 'left ,, we have the word run ' , equivalent in English to IH-OH , which is really as near to theprommciation as ive can well come , notwithstanding it forms neither of the seven ways in which the word is saicl to have been pronounced ,, at different times by the patriarchs .

But , thus pronounced , the word gives its no meaning , for there is no such word in Hebrew as z 7 < o /<; and , as all the Hebrew names were significative of something , it is but fairot conclude that this was not the original pronunciation , and that we miist look for another which will give a meaning to tlie word . NoivLanci proceeds to the

dis-, covery of this true pronunciation , as follows : In the Kabbala , a hidden meaning is often deduced from a word by transposing or reversing its letters , and ' it was in this way that the Kabbalists concealed many of then * mysteris .

Noiv , to reverse a word in English is to read its letters : from ri ght to left , because our normal mode of reading is from ' left lo right . But in Hebrew the contrary rules takes place , for there the normal mode of reading is = from right to left ; and therefore , to reverse the reading , of a word , is to read it from left to ri ght . .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy