Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • June 22, 1859
  • Page 2
  • OUR ARCHITECTURAL CHAPTER.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 22, 1859: Page 2

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 22, 1859
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article OUR ARCHITECTURAL CHAPTER. ← Page 2 of 5 →
Page 2

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Our Architectural Chapter.

Now , strange as it may appear to Bro . Tweddell , and though it is inconsistent with his letter , the incriminated passage does not contain anything incompatible with the fact that Oddfellowship is a very benevolent and useful institution—and has no reference to the character of its members . The j » assage simply expresses disapproval of

the Master and brethren of a Masonic Lodge accepting an invitation to dine in their official capacity with the congress of Odd Fellows , on the ground that the countenance of mock Masonry by the constituted authorities of Masonry is only calculated to confirm the imblic iu the belief that there is no difference between them .

We did not object to Bro . Earl Howe , or Bro . Lord Curzon being an Odd Fellow or a Forester , or presiding over their meetings ; wo do not object to Bro . Tweddell , or any other brother belonging to those bodies , or to any benevolent institution whatever its name ; we did not deny that the objects of the Odd Fellows , as a brotherhood ,

were the diffusion of peace and good will , and that the amount of good they effected by their wide spread society is very considerable . We are aware that the Manchester organization of the Odd Fellows constitutes one of the most important and best conducted benefit societies in the country , although the oiiinion of Mr . Tidd Pratt , the Registrar of

Benefit Societies , has been given in his annual reports , that it is desirable for the invested funds to bo increased ; and also that the benefit of the institution is much curtailed by the absorption of tho funds in club expenses . We know , besides , that the Odd Fellows , Foresters , and Druids , besides enrolling largo bodies of the workingclasses , have the countenance and co-operation of men of great

benevolence and of high character . We do , however , labour under what Bro . Tweddell now informs us , is a delusion—but one wo may tell him common among old Masons , and not without its effect upon young ones—that the Odd Fellows arc old enough to be em-olled among the mock Masonic societies of the last

century . The public are under the belief that Odd Fellows are a kind of Masons , and that Masons are like the Odd Fellows , and that the regalia of the Odd Fellows may be regarded as of like dignity with the regalia of the Masons . Under this state of circumstances , we protest against any act on the part of authorities or members of the Craft ,

which countenances the public in the belief that the institutions of Masonry , are of the like character with those of Oddfellowship . We protest against Bro . Clephan , Worshipful Master of the John of Gaunt Lodge , appearing in such capacity with his brethren at any dinner , procession , or meeting of Odd Fellows , or in company or co-operation with them , or responding to any toast of the " Worshirtful Master and

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1859-06-22, Page 2” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 27 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_22061859/page/2/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
OUR ARCHITECTURAL CHAPTER. Article 1
BRO. BINCKES ON THINGS IN GENERAL. Article 6
SECRET SOCIETIES OF THE MIDDLE AGES.—IV. Article 9
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 14
WRITTEN IN HEAVEN. Article 16
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 17
"MASONIC MISSIONS." Article 20
TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE AND MASONIC MIRROR. Article 21
THE GRAND OFFICERS. Article 22
THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY. Article 23
MASONIC LITERATURE. Article 25
THE PROVINCE OF DORSET. Article 26
METROPOLITAN. Article 27
PROVINCIAL. Article 32
ROYAL ARCH. Article 40
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 41
NEW SOUTH WALES. Article 41
THE WEEK. Article 43
Obituary. Article 48
NOTICES. Article 48
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 48
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

2 Articles
Page 21

Page 21

2 Articles
Page 22

Page 22

2 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

2 Articles
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

2 Articles
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

2 Articles
Page 41

Page 41

3 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

2 Articles
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

3 Articles
Page 2

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Our Architectural Chapter.

Now , strange as it may appear to Bro . Tweddell , and though it is inconsistent with his letter , the incriminated passage does not contain anything incompatible with the fact that Oddfellowship is a very benevolent and useful institution—and has no reference to the character of its members . The j » assage simply expresses disapproval of

the Master and brethren of a Masonic Lodge accepting an invitation to dine in their official capacity with the congress of Odd Fellows , on the ground that the countenance of mock Masonry by the constituted authorities of Masonry is only calculated to confirm the imblic iu the belief that there is no difference between them .

We did not object to Bro . Earl Howe , or Bro . Lord Curzon being an Odd Fellow or a Forester , or presiding over their meetings ; wo do not object to Bro . Tweddell , or any other brother belonging to those bodies , or to any benevolent institution whatever its name ; we did not deny that the objects of the Odd Fellows , as a brotherhood ,

were the diffusion of peace and good will , and that the amount of good they effected by their wide spread society is very considerable . We are aware that the Manchester organization of the Odd Fellows constitutes one of the most important and best conducted benefit societies in the country , although the oiiinion of Mr . Tidd Pratt , the Registrar of

Benefit Societies , has been given in his annual reports , that it is desirable for the invested funds to bo increased ; and also that the benefit of the institution is much curtailed by the absorption of tho funds in club expenses . We know , besides , that the Odd Fellows , Foresters , and Druids , besides enrolling largo bodies of the workingclasses , have the countenance and co-operation of men of great

benevolence and of high character . We do , however , labour under what Bro . Tweddell now informs us , is a delusion—but one wo may tell him common among old Masons , and not without its effect upon young ones—that the Odd Fellows arc old enough to be em-olled among the mock Masonic societies of the last

century . The public are under the belief that Odd Fellows are a kind of Masons , and that Masons are like the Odd Fellows , and that the regalia of the Odd Fellows may be regarded as of like dignity with the regalia of the Masons . Under this state of circumstances , we protest against any act on the part of authorities or members of the Craft ,

which countenances the public in the belief that the institutions of Masonry , are of the like character with those of Oddfellowship . We protest against Bro . Clephan , Worshipful Master of the John of Gaunt Lodge , appearing in such capacity with his brethren at any dinner , procession , or meeting of Odd Fellows , or in company or co-operation with them , or responding to any toast of the " Worshirtful Master and

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • You're on page2
  • 3
  • 48
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy