Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Dec. 22, 1860
  • Page 18
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 22, 1860: Page 18

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 22, 1860
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. ← Page 3 of 4 →
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Knights Templar.

brother had been restored to his privileges in the lodge ; but he hacl also notified his intention of appealing to the Most AA ' orshipful the Grand Jlaster of England against the decision of the officiating Prov . G . M . He had been informed , in reply , that the officiating Prov . G . JL , on receiving the appeal , would forward it to England , ancl in the meantime would furnish him with copies of any documents he might require for the preparation of it . The officiating Prov . G . JI . added that the lodge , having carried out his order ,

might continue to hold its meetings , awaiting the receipt of a reply to its appeal . The report of the Finance Committee was read and adopted . The balance in hand on account of the General Fund was Rs . 3499 2 7 , and the Fund of Benevolence , Rs . 2627 10 11 . The result was considered satisfactory , showing a floating balance , on the 30 th June , I 860 , of Rs . 255 l " l 5 11 , and an average expenditure of Rs . 41 less than the current average receipts .

AA'ith reference to the case of Bros . E . Delamer and J . Freeman , ex-members of the Kussowlie Lodge Triune Brotherhood ( Xo . 984 ) , the consideration of which had been postponed at the last quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , a letter was read from the Master of the lodge explaining how those brethren came to be admitted into Freemasonry . Bros . Delamer and Freeman having hacl ample time to submit their defence , of which they hacl not availed themselves , it was

proposed by Bro . Jennings , seconded by Bro . Clark , that they should be expelled from the Craft . The motion was unanimously carried , ancl the sentence of expulsion was formally proclaimed by the Prov . G . Purs , in the East , AA ' est , and South . The officiating Prov . G . JI . stated that it was his duty to lay before the District Grancl Lodge another ease in which a brother was charged with having seriously violated his JIasonie obligations . The brother alluded to was Bro . It . Berrill , an old P . M . ; and the charges against him had been preferred by the lodge at Allahabad , Independence with Philanthropy ( No . 550 ) . On the evidence produced , Bro . Berrill had been excluded from the lodtre , and the

officiating Prov . G . JI . hacl confirmed the sentence . But the lodge were further of opinion that Bro . Berrill's position in the Craft itself was equally affected by the proved charges against him . The lodge had , therefore , passed a resolution strongly recommending the District Grand Lodge to expel Bro . Berrill from Freemasonry . A committee appointed by the officiating Prov . G . AI , of which he himself was the President , after taking the whole case fully into consideration , hacl come to the conclusion that there were good

grounds for the recommendation of the lodge . In a letter to the officiating Prov . G . JL , dated 2 Sth August , Bro . Berrill bad begged that no steps might be taken in his case , pending the receipt of a reply to a reference which he said he had made to Bro . C . H . AA'ilson ( a member of lodge 265 , and formerly a member of the Allahabad Lodge ) . Bro . AA'ilson , being present in the District Grand Lodge ( having been specially summoned to appear ) , gave all the information in

his possession , but stated that no reference had been made to him by Bro . Berrill . After much discussion , the following resolution was moved by Bro . P . Anderson , seconded by Bro . H . Howe , ami carried by a majority , namely , that in order to give Bro . Berrill ample time to submit his defence , the consideration of his case be postponed till the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , ivhen the discussion shall be resinned at the point at which it has now broken off .

It was intimated that tae following brethren had been excluded from their respective lodges for uniiiasonic conduct , and that the sentences had been confirmed by the officiatiuct Prov . G . JL : —Bro . C . E . Falk , from Lodge JLu-ine ' ( Xo . 282 ) , Calcutta , and Bro . J . AV . Guthrie , from Lodge True Brothers ( No . 609 ) , Dinapore . Referring to the correspondence with Bro . Douglas , read at the last quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , and to the resolution then passed , postponing the consideration of the

case , the officiating Prov . G . JI . stated that , ou the 31 st inst ., the returns of the late Lodge Kilwinning in the East ( No . 7-10 ) , for the first and second quarters of 1859 , had been received by the Prov . G . Sec ., but had been sent back to Bro . Douglas for revision . Several names and dates , ancl the amount of the 10 per cent , assessment , had been omitted ; and in one instance only the initials of a brother had been entered . From time to time , Bro . Douglas had assigned various reasons for deferring the submission of the returns ;

and now , after the lapse of a year and some months , those sent in by him were very defective , and bore marks of very careless preparation . The officiating Prov . G . JI . further considered it a matter for regret that , through the laches of the JIaster , who was responsible , brethren initiated in the late Lodge 7-10 should be kept out of the possession of the Grand Lodge Certificates , for which they hacl paid . It was proposed by Bro . Howe , seconded by Bro . Sandeman , that the amount clue by the late Lodge Kilwinning in the East ( No . 740 )

to the District Grancl Lodge should be written oft' to " Profit ancl Loss . " Before the motion could he put to the vote , Bro . John AA ' . Brown , Prov . G . S . B ., mentioned the substance of a conversation which he had had with Bro . Douglas on the above subject ,- ancl it wns then proposed by Bro . Ladlie , as an amendment , that Bro . Douglas should be distinctly given to understand that , unless he furnished the returns for wliich he was responsible , ancl paid the amount due .

to the District Grand Lodge before the next quarterly communication , his case would be finally disposed of , ancl he would be severely dealt with . The amendment having been seconded by Bro . Jennings ,, was put to the vote , and was carried . The following correspondence on the subject of nominating some brother for the office of Prov . G . JL of Bengal , in succession to R . AA ' - Bro . Ramsay , was read : — To W . II . Hoff ; Esq ., Provincial Grand Secretary .

DEAR SIR AXD A ' . W . BJIOTUEK , —I believe it is requisite thatnotice in writing should be given to the G . Sec . of any intention of bringing forward a motion in the Grand Lodge , and I accordingly beg to inform " you that it is my intention at the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge to give notice of a motion that , at the succeeding quarterly communication in December next the members of the District Grand Lodge proceed , to the ballot , for the , purpose of electing , for nomination to the Grand JIaster of England , a'Prey . G . JI . of Bengal , in succession to R . AA ' . Bro . Tlamsflv .

I am , Dear Sir and V . AV . Bro ., yours fraternall y , Calcutta , Sept . Ill , I 860 . H . HOWE , JIaster , Lodge No . 80 . To It . Have , Esq ., Master of Lodge Slur m the East ( JVo . 80 ) . DEAE Silt AXD R . AA ' . BEOTHEE , —I am directed to acknowledge the receipt of your letter , dated 7 th inst . There is no rule requiring notice to he given previously of any motion about to be brought before the District Grand Lodge . The officiating Prov . G . JL ,

however , appreciates the courtesy winch has prompted you to inform , him of your intention to give notice at the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge— " That , at the quarterly communication to be held in December next , the members of the District Grancl Lodge proceed to the ballot , for the purpose of electing , for nomination to the Grancl JIaster of England , a Prov . G . M . of Bengal , in succession to R . AA' . Bro . Ramsay . " Having regard to the peculiar difficulties which now beset the question of

making a permanent provision for the government of this province ,, ancl which have induced tiie JI . AA ' . the Earl of Zetland to maintain the , present teiapov . uy avi-augcmeiA for sonic time past , the officiating Prov . G . JL has long been of opinion that the best plan which the brethren could adopt would he to fix upon a successor to R . AA ' . Bro . Ramsay , and to submit his name to tho central , authority in England . But thequestionis oneof such importance that the officiating Prov . G . JI . is of opinion that the sense of the ivhole

province should be taken ; for when a brother has been elected in whom ifc is unequivocally shown , by a great preponderance of votes ,, that a large amount of confidence is placed , the disadvantages under which the country lodges labour , owing to their inability toseud representatives to the District Grand Lodge , will , in some measure , be counterbalanced . In Ensland , where there are great

facilities of travelling rapidly and at small expense , thc provincial lodges are always able to have themselves represented in the Grand Lodge and in their respective Prov . Grand Lodges . But this is not the case in India , ivhere it is only ivhen a JIaster , a Past Jlaster , or a AA ' arden of a country lodge is on a chance visit to Calcutta , that he attends the Prov . Grand Lodge and exercises his privilege as a member of it . Hence , since the country lodges are necessarily almost wholldebarred from such a privilegethere is the greater

y , need that the head of the Executive in this province , from the authority vested in whom " emanates" the Prov . Grand Lodge itself , should be one in whom general confidence is reposed , crone whom the JI . AA ' . the Grand Master , from his oivn sources of information , judges to be worthy of his confidence . The propriety therefore , of giving every brother in the province a voice in the election ( since an election is now desirable , and perhaps unavoidable ) ,

is apparent ; and the officiating Prov . G . JI . would justly incur the blame of not having protected the interests of the country lodges if he were to allow it to take place in the District Grand Lodge , in which the province is so partially represented . There aro in Calcutta ancl Howra 9 Craft lodges ; tho country lodges are 20 in number . And , under the English Constitution proxies are not allowed as in Scotland . But there is another objection which has equal weight with the officiating Prov . G . JI . The appointment ofthe Prov . G . M . is the

prero gative of the JI . AA ' . the Earl of Zetland ; and it behoves the officiating Prov . G . JL to be very careful how he actsin such a delicate matter . The whole body of JIasons composing the Craft lodges may very reasonably make known their wishes to the G . JL ; but the officiating Piov G . JAL is of opinion that the election should not bear on it anything like an official stamp . It must not form a part of

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1860-12-22, Page 18” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 11 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_22121860/page/18/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
FREEMASONRY AND THE PRESS. Article 1
STRAY THOUGHTS ON THE ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF THE FINE ARTS. Article 3
ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHÆOLOGY. Article 4
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
Literature. Article 7
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 9
Poetry. Article 11
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 12
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 12
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
MARK MASONRY. Article 16
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 16
INDIA. Article 16
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

5 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

2 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Knights Templar.

brother had been restored to his privileges in the lodge ; but he hacl also notified his intention of appealing to the Most AA ' orshipful the Grand Jlaster of England against the decision of the officiating Prov . G . M . He had been informed , in reply , that the officiating Prov . G . JL , on receiving the appeal , would forward it to England , ancl in the meantime would furnish him with copies of any documents he might require for the preparation of it . The officiating Prov . G . JI . added that the lodge , having carried out his order ,

might continue to hold its meetings , awaiting the receipt of a reply to its appeal . The report of the Finance Committee was read and adopted . The balance in hand on account of the General Fund was Rs . 3499 2 7 , and the Fund of Benevolence , Rs . 2627 10 11 . The result was considered satisfactory , showing a floating balance , on the 30 th June , I 860 , of Rs . 255 l " l 5 11 , and an average expenditure of Rs . 41 less than the current average receipts .

AA'ith reference to the case of Bros . E . Delamer and J . Freeman , ex-members of the Kussowlie Lodge Triune Brotherhood ( Xo . 984 ) , the consideration of which had been postponed at the last quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , a letter was read from the Master of the lodge explaining how those brethren came to be admitted into Freemasonry . Bros . Delamer and Freeman having hacl ample time to submit their defence , of which they hacl not availed themselves , it was

proposed by Bro . Jennings , seconded by Bro . Clark , that they should be expelled from the Craft . The motion was unanimously carried , ancl the sentence of expulsion was formally proclaimed by the Prov . G . Purs , in the East , AA ' est , and South . The officiating Prov . G . JI . stated that it was his duty to lay before the District Grancl Lodge another ease in which a brother was charged with having seriously violated his JIasonie obligations . The brother alluded to was Bro . It . Berrill , an old P . M . ; and the charges against him had been preferred by the lodge at Allahabad , Independence with Philanthropy ( No . 550 ) . On the evidence produced , Bro . Berrill had been excluded from the lodtre , and the

officiating Prov . G . JI . hacl confirmed the sentence . But the lodge were further of opinion that Bro . Berrill's position in the Craft itself was equally affected by the proved charges against him . The lodge had , therefore , passed a resolution strongly recommending the District Grand Lodge to expel Bro . Berrill from Freemasonry . A committee appointed by the officiating Prov . G . AI , of which he himself was the President , after taking the whole case fully into consideration , hacl come to the conclusion that there were good

grounds for the recommendation of the lodge . In a letter to the officiating Prov . G . JL , dated 2 Sth August , Bro . Berrill bad begged that no steps might be taken in his case , pending the receipt of a reply to a reference which he said he had made to Bro . C . H . AA'ilson ( a member of lodge 265 , and formerly a member of the Allahabad Lodge ) . Bro . AA'ilson , being present in the District Grand Lodge ( having been specially summoned to appear ) , gave all the information in

his possession , but stated that no reference had been made to him by Bro . Berrill . After much discussion , the following resolution was moved by Bro . P . Anderson , seconded by Bro . H . Howe , ami carried by a majority , namely , that in order to give Bro . Berrill ample time to submit his defence , the consideration of his case be postponed till the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , ivhen the discussion shall be resinned at the point at which it has now broken off .

It was intimated that tae following brethren had been excluded from their respective lodges for uniiiasonic conduct , and that the sentences had been confirmed by the officiatiuct Prov . G . JL : —Bro . C . E . Falk , from Lodge JLu-ine ' ( Xo . 282 ) , Calcutta , and Bro . J . AV . Guthrie , from Lodge True Brothers ( No . 609 ) , Dinapore . Referring to the correspondence with Bro . Douglas , read at the last quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge , and to the resolution then passed , postponing the consideration of the

case , the officiating Prov . G . JI . stated that , ou the 31 st inst ., the returns of the late Lodge Kilwinning in the East ( No . 7-10 ) , for the first and second quarters of 1859 , had been received by the Prov . G . Sec ., but had been sent back to Bro . Douglas for revision . Several names and dates , ancl the amount of the 10 per cent , assessment , had been omitted ; and in one instance only the initials of a brother had been entered . From time to time , Bro . Douglas had assigned various reasons for deferring the submission of the returns ;

and now , after the lapse of a year and some months , those sent in by him were very defective , and bore marks of very careless preparation . The officiating Prov . G . JI . further considered it a matter for regret that , through the laches of the JIaster , who was responsible , brethren initiated in the late Lodge 7-10 should be kept out of the possession of the Grand Lodge Certificates , for which they hacl paid . It was proposed by Bro . Howe , seconded by Bro . Sandeman , that the amount clue by the late Lodge Kilwinning in the East ( No . 740 )

to the District Grancl Lodge should be written oft' to " Profit ancl Loss . " Before the motion could he put to the vote , Bro . John AA ' . Brown , Prov . G . S . B ., mentioned the substance of a conversation which he had had with Bro . Douglas on the above subject ,- ancl it wns then proposed by Bro . Ladlie , as an amendment , that Bro . Douglas should be distinctly given to understand that , unless he furnished the returns for wliich he was responsible , ancl paid the amount due .

to the District Grand Lodge before the next quarterly communication , his case would be finally disposed of , ancl he would be severely dealt with . The amendment having been seconded by Bro . Jennings ,, was put to the vote , and was carried . The following correspondence on the subject of nominating some brother for the office of Prov . G . JL of Bengal , in succession to R . AA ' - Bro . Ramsay , was read : — To W . II . Hoff ; Esq ., Provincial Grand Secretary .

DEAR SIR AXD A ' . W . BJIOTUEK , —I believe it is requisite thatnotice in writing should be given to the G . Sec . of any intention of bringing forward a motion in the Grand Lodge , and I accordingly beg to inform " you that it is my intention at the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge to give notice of a motion that , at the succeeding quarterly communication in December next the members of the District Grand Lodge proceed , to the ballot , for the , purpose of electing , for nomination to the Grand JIaster of England , a'Prey . G . JI . of Bengal , in succession to R . AA ' . Bro . Tlamsflv .

I am , Dear Sir and V . AV . Bro ., yours fraternall y , Calcutta , Sept . Ill , I 860 . H . HOWE , JIaster , Lodge No . 80 . To It . Have , Esq ., Master of Lodge Slur m the East ( JVo . 80 ) . DEAE Silt AXD R . AA ' . BEOTHEE , —I am directed to acknowledge the receipt of your letter , dated 7 th inst . There is no rule requiring notice to he given previously of any motion about to be brought before the District Grand Lodge . The officiating Prov . G . JL ,

however , appreciates the courtesy winch has prompted you to inform , him of your intention to give notice at the next quarterly communication of the District Grand Lodge— " That , at the quarterly communication to be held in December next , the members of the District Grancl Lodge proceed to the ballot , for the purpose of electing , for nomination to the Grancl JIaster of England , a Prov . G . M . of Bengal , in succession to R . AA' . Bro . Ramsay . " Having regard to the peculiar difficulties which now beset the question of

making a permanent provision for the government of this province ,, ancl which have induced tiie JI . AA ' . the Earl of Zetland to maintain the , present teiapov . uy avi-augcmeiA for sonic time past , the officiating Prov . G . JL has long been of opinion that the best plan which the brethren could adopt would he to fix upon a successor to R . AA ' . Bro . Ramsay , and to submit his name to tho central , authority in England . But thequestionis oneof such importance that the officiating Prov . G . JI . is of opinion that the sense of the ivhole

province should be taken ; for when a brother has been elected in whom ifc is unequivocally shown , by a great preponderance of votes ,, that a large amount of confidence is placed , the disadvantages under which the country lodges labour , owing to their inability toseud representatives to the District Grand Lodge , will , in some measure , be counterbalanced . In Ensland , where there are great

facilities of travelling rapidly and at small expense , thc provincial lodges are always able to have themselves represented in the Grand Lodge and in their respective Prov . Grand Lodges . But this is not the case in India , ivhere it is only ivhen a JIaster , a Past Jlaster , or a AA ' arden of a country lodge is on a chance visit to Calcutta , that he attends the Prov . Grand Lodge and exercises his privilege as a member of it . Hence , since the country lodges are necessarily almost wholldebarred from such a privilegethere is the greater

y , need that the head of the Executive in this province , from the authority vested in whom " emanates" the Prov . Grand Lodge itself , should be one in whom general confidence is reposed , crone whom the JI . AA ' . the Grand Master , from his oivn sources of information , judges to be worthy of his confidence . The propriety therefore , of giving every brother in the province a voice in the election ( since an election is now desirable , and perhaps unavoidable ) ,

is apparent ; and the officiating Prov . G . JI . would justly incur the blame of not having protected the interests of the country lodges if he were to allow it to take place in the District Grand Lodge , in which the province is so partially represented . There aro in Calcutta ancl Howra 9 Craft lodges ; tho country lodges are 20 in number . And , under the English Constitution proxies are not allowed as in Scotland . But there is another objection which has equal weight with the officiating Prov . G . JI . The appointment ofthe Prov . G . M . is the

prero gative of the JI . AA ' . the Earl of Zetland ; and it behoves the officiating Prov . G . JL to be very careful how he actsin such a delicate matter . The whole body of JIasons composing the Craft lodges may very reasonably make known their wishes to the G . JL ; but the officiating Piov G . JAL is of opinion that the election should not bear on it anything like an official stamp . It must not form a part of

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 17
  • You're on page18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy