Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • April 23, 1870
  • Page 6
  • MASONIC JOTTINGS.—No. 16.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, April 23, 1870: Page 6

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, April 23, 1870
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article "CLANNISHNESS " OF MASONRY. ← Page 3 of 3
    Article "CLANNISHNESS " OF MASONRY. Page 3 of 3
    Article MASONIC JOTTINGS.—No. 16. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

"Clannishness " Of Masonry.

ever asserted that these ceremonies had no effect to make them more observant of the duties inculcated ? And yet this is precisely what is charged against Masonry . The Christian church depends upon its rites and the frequent enunciation of its

principles to incline its members to travel in the narrow path that leads to life . But Avho ever heard it contended that these rites and lectures had an opposite effect from what is intended ? And yet this is just Avhat is charged against us as the effect of our teaching by the level and the

square . Judged by the same rules that are applied to other associations of men , it is absolutely certain that Masonry does not make its members clannish . We know that from the very nature of the case , that such a result would be impossible . But we

have another method of deciding this question that may , perhaps , be still more satisfactory and conclusive . We appeal to actual facts . We are frequently told that among the fraternity there may be nothing of this exclusive feeling , but in

the intercourse of Masons with the world , they prefer each other , and are supercillious to others . This is untrue . We defy any enemy of the lodge to prove this to be a fact in a single neig hbourhood .

They may prefer the company of brothers and their families , and associate Avith them on more intimate terms than they do Avith some others Avho are not members . That is natural . We love best those with Avhom Ave are best acquainted . As

a general rule acquaintance begets friendship . It does in the lodge where all the circumstances are favourable to the reception of g-ood imj-iressions . But the same rule holds good in families . We love our nearest relations AVIIO live near us , most .

Next come the friends AVIIO are not related to us by the ties of blood . Then those more distant and less known come in for the proper share of attention , and the general fact is , that they are clear to us in the same ratio that thev are

our intimates . But it does not folloAV because we love those Avith whom Ave most intimately associate , more than strangers , that Ave despise strangers . Neither does it prove the clannish or exclusive spirit of

Masons , that they regard those Avith whom they associate on the most intimate terms , Avith Avanner feelings than they do those Avho are comparative strangers . These are the facts in relation to the levelling

"Clannishness " Of Masonry.

principles and teachings of Masonry , and instead of fostering an exclusive , or clannish spirit they enjoin , that a worthy man , wherever found , is the peer of a member ; that virtue , honesty , and honour are the attributes that must command our

veneration , whether met Avith in or out of the pale of the fraternity . No true Mason alloAvs his heart to be shut up to the virtues and good qualities of his neighbour , because he is not an integral part in the great fraternity .

I have intended in this paper to appeal to thepractical , every day character of Masons , to sustain the position taken , but I am admonished that my alio ted space is occupied and that pointmust be deferred . —Masonic Trowel fU . S . )

Masonic Jottings.—No. 16.

MASONIC JOTTINGS . —No . 16 .

BY A PAST PROVINCIAL GRAND MASTEK . THE LODGE IN ANCIENT NATIONS . In ancient nations , when a great building was erecting , there was the lodge , and in the lodge there Avas science , and there were regulations

taken in part from the code of natural Ethics , and . there Avas religion ; and the religion was sometimes a Pantheism and sometimes a Polytheism . In the lodge of one ancient nation only the religion was a Monotheism .

In the lodge there Avas the doctrine of the soul's continuance after death and in the lodge of the nation Avhose religion Avas a Pantheism such doctrine was the Metempsychosis . But in the lodge of the nation whose religion was a

Monotheism there was no doctrine of the continuance of the soul after death , until the nation had been subdued by another nation , and its king and great men had been carried away captives , and had learnt our doctrine ef the soul ' s immortality . *—Papers of a deceased Mason . THE LEGEND OF THE CRAFT AND BROTHER

FINDEL . It is clear a Birmingham correspondent has not read Brother Finders "History of Freemasonry . " Brother Findel ' s remarks on the legend of the Craft are as follows : — " When we compare this ancient Legend Avith the genuine , authenticated

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1870-04-23, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 13 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_23041870/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
NOTES ON AMERICAN FREEMASONRY. Article 1
"CLANNISHNESS " OF MASONRY. Article 4
MASONIC JOTTINGS.—No. 16. Article 6
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 8
OUR HINDU BRETHREN. Article 9
MASONIC SAYINGS AND DOINGS ABROAD. Article 10
ST. JOHN'S DAY. Article 11
Untitled Article 12
MASONIC MEMS. Article 12
Craft Masonry. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
INDIA. Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY. Article 18
ST. KITTS, WEST INDIES. Article 18
Poetry. Article 19
GLASGOW LODGE COMMERCIAL. Article 19
SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS FOR THE WEEK. Article 20
LIST OF LODGE, MEETINGS, &c., FOR WEEK ENDING 30TH APRIL, 1870. Article 20
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

4 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

4 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

"Clannishness " Of Masonry.

ever asserted that these ceremonies had no effect to make them more observant of the duties inculcated ? And yet this is precisely what is charged against Masonry . The Christian church depends upon its rites and the frequent enunciation of its

principles to incline its members to travel in the narrow path that leads to life . But Avho ever heard it contended that these rites and lectures had an opposite effect from what is intended ? And yet this is just Avhat is charged against us as the effect of our teaching by the level and the

square . Judged by the same rules that are applied to other associations of men , it is absolutely certain that Masonry does not make its members clannish . We know that from the very nature of the case , that such a result would be impossible . But we

have another method of deciding this question that may , perhaps , be still more satisfactory and conclusive . We appeal to actual facts . We are frequently told that among the fraternity there may be nothing of this exclusive feeling , but in

the intercourse of Masons with the world , they prefer each other , and are supercillious to others . This is untrue . We defy any enemy of the lodge to prove this to be a fact in a single neig hbourhood .

They may prefer the company of brothers and their families , and associate Avith them on more intimate terms than they do Avith some others Avho are not members . That is natural . We love best those with Avhom Ave are best acquainted . As

a general rule acquaintance begets friendship . It does in the lodge where all the circumstances are favourable to the reception of g-ood imj-iressions . But the same rule holds good in families . We love our nearest relations AVIIO live near us , most .

Next come the friends AVIIO are not related to us by the ties of blood . Then those more distant and less known come in for the proper share of attention , and the general fact is , that they are clear to us in the same ratio that thev are

our intimates . But it does not folloAV because we love those Avith whom Ave most intimately associate , more than strangers , that Ave despise strangers . Neither does it prove the clannish or exclusive spirit of

Masons , that they regard those Avith whom they associate on the most intimate terms , Avith Avanner feelings than they do those Avho are comparative strangers . These are the facts in relation to the levelling

"Clannishness " Of Masonry.

principles and teachings of Masonry , and instead of fostering an exclusive , or clannish spirit they enjoin , that a worthy man , wherever found , is the peer of a member ; that virtue , honesty , and honour are the attributes that must command our

veneration , whether met Avith in or out of the pale of the fraternity . No true Mason alloAvs his heart to be shut up to the virtues and good qualities of his neighbour , because he is not an integral part in the great fraternity .

I have intended in this paper to appeal to thepractical , every day character of Masons , to sustain the position taken , but I am admonished that my alio ted space is occupied and that pointmust be deferred . —Masonic Trowel fU . S . )

Masonic Jottings.—No. 16.

MASONIC JOTTINGS . —No . 16 .

BY A PAST PROVINCIAL GRAND MASTEK . THE LODGE IN ANCIENT NATIONS . In ancient nations , when a great building was erecting , there was the lodge , and in the lodge there Avas science , and there were regulations

taken in part from the code of natural Ethics , and . there Avas religion ; and the religion was sometimes a Pantheism and sometimes a Polytheism . In the lodge of one ancient nation only the religion was a Monotheism .

In the lodge there Avas the doctrine of the soul's continuance after death and in the lodge of the nation Avhose religion Avas a Pantheism such doctrine was the Metempsychosis . But in the lodge of the nation whose religion was a

Monotheism there was no doctrine of the continuance of the soul after death , until the nation had been subdued by another nation , and its king and great men had been carried away captives , and had learnt our doctrine ef the soul ' s immortality . *—Papers of a deceased Mason . THE LEGEND OF THE CRAFT AND BROTHER

FINDEL . It is clear a Birmingham correspondent has not read Brother Finders "History of Freemasonry . " Brother Findel ' s remarks on the legend of the Craft are as follows : — " When we compare this ancient Legend Avith the genuine , authenticated

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy