Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Feb. 27, 1864
  • Page 18
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Feb. 27, 1864: Page 18

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Feb. 27, 1864
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE WEEK. Page 1 of 3 →
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Week.

THE WEEK .

THE COTTET . —The Queen and younger members of the Royal Family have returned to Windsor . His Royal Highness Prince Arthur visited his Royal mother on Tuesday , and afterwards returned to Greenwich . The Prince and Princess of Wales have also returned to town from St . Leonard's . IJIPEEIAIJ PAELIAMEJJT . —In the HOUSE OE LOBDS on Thursday , ISth inst ., the Earl of Powis advocated the necessity

of the establishment of a museum and library for patents ; and the Earl of Romney c .-. lled attention to the state of the law affecting the removal of clerks of the peace . Earl Granville said fche former subject was under the consideration of the Government . ISTo business of interest was transacted onFriday or Monday , beyond throwing out a private bill for making an arcade

befcweenRegent-street and Conduit-street . On Tuesday a discussion took place on the question of secondary punishments , in which Lords Salisbury , Granville , Carnarvon , Wodchouse , and Grey took part . Lord Salisbury was inaudible in the gallery , and we cannot , therefore , sfcate the purport of his remarks , but the other speakers , with the exception of Lord Wodchouse , while

differing in some respects as to fche form whieh punishment for serious offences should assume , appeared to assent to the principle that it is wise to hold out to the prisoner , as an inducement to good behaviour , theprospeefcof a remission of his sentence . In the HOUSE OF COMMOXS on Thursday , ISth insfc ., after explanations hy the Attorney-General as to the course of

proceeding of fche Government when an English merchant vessel was captured by an American ship of war in the harbour of a neutral State ; and by Mr . Layard , respecting the offer of Portugal to mediate between this country and Brazil ; Sir G . Grey moved for leave to bring in a bill to amend the Penal Servitude Acts . He referred to the alarm which was felt in the

eastern colonies of Australia at fche prospect of Western Australia becoming a penal settlement , and which feeling he censured as unreasonable . He protested against the rights of the inhabitants on the east of the continent to dictate to Her Majesty the course which should he pursued with regard to a colony that was hundreds of miles from them , and where what was proposed to be done was entirely with the assent of the

inhabitants . The right hon . gentleman also canvassed at some length the various recommendations contained in the Royal Commissioners' Report , which hacl been carried out to a certain extent , and upon which the main provisions of the bill were founded . A debate ensued , which lasted to a late hour , and leave was given to bring in the bill . On Friday , Mr .

Layard , in reply to several questions , stated thafc no official information hacl been received of the burning of the British ship , Martaian , by the Alabama ; that no communication had been addressed to the Government with a view to the recognition of an empire in Mexico , —a subject on which the Government had hitherto declined to express an opinion ; and that

negotiations were still in progress with foreign nations , with the view of securing a reduction of their export duties upon rags . —In answer to a question from Mr . ! Newclegate , Lord Palmerston said no authoritative information hacl been received of the intention of the Austrians and Prussians to invade Jutland ; hut , if such an invasion should take place , it would

be an aggravation of thafc " violent outrage "—the occupation of Schleswig . He declined , however , to say what policy the Government would adopt in the event of the allied army entering Jutland . —Sir John Hay moved that an address be presented to the Queen praying that Her Majesty would be pleased to nominate Wakefield as the assize town for the West Riding . Sir George Grey opposed the motion , urging that tho matter

should be left in the hands of the Privy Council ; and , after a long discussion , the House divided , when Sir John Hay's motion was rejected by a majority of 19 . —In reply to a question from Mr . Haliburfcon relative to the capture of a ship under the Confederate flag hy a Federal vessel of war , within the harbour of Pankbar , in TSova Scotia , Mr . Layard stated that Mr . Seward had expressed

his regret at the occurrence , and promised reparation . — Mr . Kinglake called attention to the circumstance that on the day the treaty of London was signed Baron Bvunnow , who signed the instrument on behalf of Russia , addressed a note to the Danish Minister afc Sfc . James ' s . That note , he urged , was in effect a secret article annexed to the treaty , ancl

amounted to a revival of the protocol of Warsaw , which embodies a reservation to fche effect that , if fche succession of fche Glueksburg dynasty shoald not take effect , or their male line should fail , the rights of tho Emperor of Russia , as chief of the IIolsfcein-Gottorp branch , would remain in full force . Mr . Layard denied that the note was a secret article appended to

the treaty , but he declined to discuss the question as to whether it revived the protocol of Warsaw , which was signed in 1851 . — Several bills were advanced a stage . On Monday , Mr . Layard . in reply to a question from Sir James Ogilvy , slated thafc Her Majesty ' s Government had been requested to use their best efforts to induce Denmark to abstain from seizing German ships

at sea , but they had declined to do anything in the way of influencing that country in its efforts to resist what Her Majesty's Government believed to be an unwarrantable aggression . The hon . gentleman added that no information of a blockade of the German ports had reached the Foreign Oflice . —On the motion for going into Committee of Supply on the Navy Estimates , Mr . Disraeli bitterly assailed the foreign policy of the

Government . Lord Palmerston , upon whose frequent absence from the House he pointedly commented , had , he said , succeeded in establishing a name which bore terror to no country but his own . He complained that the House was left without information of what the Government were doing , and insisted more especially on the early production of the Danish correspondence .

To the Government he said ifc might be a matter of indifference that " they were the derision of every Court in Europe , but the House did not desire to become the laughing-stock of our constituents . " Mr . Gladstone reminded the House of the inconvience of producing papers bearing upon questions respecting which negoeiations were pending , and insisted that there was

no ground for the charge that the Government courted secrecy . One point urged by Mr . Disraeli was that no information had been given of the evacuation of Jutland by the Germans ; ancl to this part of the right hon . gentleman's speech the Chancellor of the Exchequer replied by stating thafc the Foreign Office was still in ignorance of that movement . After some

remarks from Lord Robert Cecil , Mr . Bernal Osborne moved the . postponement ofthe consideration of fche navy estimates for three weeks , on the ground that before voting the necessary supplies the House ought to know the exact state of our relations with the belligerent powers . Sir F . Smith concurred in this view of the matter , while Mr . Roebuck declared that , with regard to its

foreign policy , the Government was not entitled to the confidence of the country . Mr . Gladstone protested against Mr , Bernal Osborne ' s motion as an attempt to take the Government by surprise , and affirmed that if clue notice were given , Ministers would be prepared to defend the policy they had pursued . Mr . Disraeli also deprecated a division on a motion of

which no notice had been given , and at a time when Lord Palmerston was absent from his place . Mr . Clay declared , on behalf of Mr . B . Osborne , that the motion was not intended as

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1864-02-27, Page 18” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 2 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_27021864/page/18/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THUNDER. Article 1
THE THREE GRAND LODGES. Article 1
THE PORTRAIT—A MASON'S STORY. Article 4
THE COMMON ORIGIN OF THE ANCIENT MYSTERIES. Article 5
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 11
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 15
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 15
MARK MASONRY. Article 16
INDIA. Article 17
MASONIC FESTIVITIES. Article 17
Obituary. Article 17
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

3 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

5 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Week.

THE WEEK .

THE COTTET . —The Queen and younger members of the Royal Family have returned to Windsor . His Royal Highness Prince Arthur visited his Royal mother on Tuesday , and afterwards returned to Greenwich . The Prince and Princess of Wales have also returned to town from St . Leonard's . IJIPEEIAIJ PAELIAMEJJT . —In the HOUSE OE LOBDS on Thursday , ISth inst ., the Earl of Powis advocated the necessity

of the establishment of a museum and library for patents ; and the Earl of Romney c .-. lled attention to the state of the law affecting the removal of clerks of the peace . Earl Granville said fche former subject was under the consideration of the Government . ISTo business of interest was transacted onFriday or Monday , beyond throwing out a private bill for making an arcade

befcweenRegent-street and Conduit-street . On Tuesday a discussion took place on the question of secondary punishments , in which Lords Salisbury , Granville , Carnarvon , Wodchouse , and Grey took part . Lord Salisbury was inaudible in the gallery , and we cannot , therefore , sfcate the purport of his remarks , but the other speakers , with the exception of Lord Wodchouse , while

differing in some respects as to fche form whieh punishment for serious offences should assume , appeared to assent to the principle that it is wise to hold out to the prisoner , as an inducement to good behaviour , theprospeefcof a remission of his sentence . In the HOUSE OF COMMOXS on Thursday , ISth insfc ., after explanations hy the Attorney-General as to the course of

proceeding of fche Government when an English merchant vessel was captured by an American ship of war in the harbour of a neutral State ; and by Mr . Layard , respecting the offer of Portugal to mediate between this country and Brazil ; Sir G . Grey moved for leave to bring in a bill to amend the Penal Servitude Acts . He referred to the alarm which was felt in the

eastern colonies of Australia at fche prospect of Western Australia becoming a penal settlement , and which feeling he censured as unreasonable . He protested against the rights of the inhabitants on the east of the continent to dictate to Her Majesty the course which should he pursued with regard to a colony that was hundreds of miles from them , and where what was proposed to be done was entirely with the assent of the

inhabitants . The right hon . gentleman also canvassed at some length the various recommendations contained in the Royal Commissioners' Report , which hacl been carried out to a certain extent , and upon which the main provisions of the bill were founded . A debate ensued , which lasted to a late hour , and leave was given to bring in the bill . On Friday , Mr .

Layard , in reply to several questions , stated thafc no official information hacl been received of the burning of the British ship , Martaian , by the Alabama ; that no communication had been addressed to the Government with a view to the recognition of an empire in Mexico , —a subject on which the Government had hitherto declined to express an opinion ; and that

negotiations were still in progress with foreign nations , with the view of securing a reduction of their export duties upon rags . —In answer to a question from Mr . ! Newclegate , Lord Palmerston said no authoritative information hacl been received of the intention of the Austrians and Prussians to invade Jutland ; hut , if such an invasion should take place , it would

be an aggravation of thafc " violent outrage "—the occupation of Schleswig . He declined , however , to say what policy the Government would adopt in the event of the allied army entering Jutland . —Sir John Hay moved that an address be presented to the Queen praying that Her Majesty would be pleased to nominate Wakefield as the assize town for the West Riding . Sir George Grey opposed the motion , urging that tho matter

should be left in the hands of the Privy Council ; and , after a long discussion , the House divided , when Sir John Hay's motion was rejected by a majority of 19 . —In reply to a question from Mr . Haliburfcon relative to the capture of a ship under the Confederate flag hy a Federal vessel of war , within the harbour of Pankbar , in TSova Scotia , Mr . Layard stated that Mr . Seward had expressed

his regret at the occurrence , and promised reparation . — Mr . Kinglake called attention to the circumstance that on the day the treaty of London was signed Baron Bvunnow , who signed the instrument on behalf of Russia , addressed a note to the Danish Minister afc Sfc . James ' s . That note , he urged , was in effect a secret article annexed to the treaty , ancl

amounted to a revival of the protocol of Warsaw , which embodies a reservation to fche effect that , if fche succession of fche Glueksburg dynasty shoald not take effect , or their male line should fail , the rights of tho Emperor of Russia , as chief of the IIolsfcein-Gottorp branch , would remain in full force . Mr . Layard denied that the note was a secret article appended to

the treaty , but he declined to discuss the question as to whether it revived the protocol of Warsaw , which was signed in 1851 . — Several bills were advanced a stage . On Monday , Mr . Layard . in reply to a question from Sir James Ogilvy , slated thafc Her Majesty ' s Government had been requested to use their best efforts to induce Denmark to abstain from seizing German ships

at sea , but they had declined to do anything in the way of influencing that country in its efforts to resist what Her Majesty's Government believed to be an unwarrantable aggression . The hon . gentleman added that no information of a blockade of the German ports had reached the Foreign Oflice . —On the motion for going into Committee of Supply on the Navy Estimates , Mr . Disraeli bitterly assailed the foreign policy of the

Government . Lord Palmerston , upon whose frequent absence from the House he pointedly commented , had , he said , succeeded in establishing a name which bore terror to no country but his own . He complained that the House was left without information of what the Government were doing , and insisted more especially on the early production of the Danish correspondence .

To the Government he said ifc might be a matter of indifference that " they were the derision of every Court in Europe , but the House did not desire to become the laughing-stock of our constituents . " Mr . Gladstone reminded the House of the inconvience of producing papers bearing upon questions respecting which negoeiations were pending , and insisted that there was

no ground for the charge that the Government courted secrecy . One point urged by Mr . Disraeli was that no information had been given of the evacuation of Jutland by the Germans ; ancl to this part of the right hon . gentleman's speech the Chancellor of the Exchequer replied by stating thafc the Foreign Office was still in ignorance of that movement . After some

remarks from Lord Robert Cecil , Mr . Bernal Osborne moved the . postponement ofthe consideration of fche navy estimates for three weeks , on the ground that before voting the necessary supplies the House ought to know the exact state of our relations with the belligerent powers . Sir F . Smith concurred in this view of the matter , while Mr . Roebuck declared that , with regard to its

foreign policy , the Government was not entitled to the confidence of the country . Mr . Gladstone protested against Mr , Bernal Osborne ' s motion as an attempt to take the Government by surprise , and affirmed that if clue notice were given , Ministers would be prepared to defend the policy they had pursued . Mr . Disraeli also deprecated a division on a motion of

which no notice had been given , and at a time when Lord Palmerston was absent from his place . Mr . Clay declared , on behalf of Mr . B . Osborne , that the motion was not intended as

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 17
  • You're on page18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy