-
Articles/Ads
Article GRAND LODGE AND THE NEW RULES. Page 1 of 2 Article GRAND LODGE AND THE NEW RULES. Page 1 of 2 →
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Grand Lodge And The New Rules.
GRAND LODGE AND THE NEW RULES .
BY some a protracted sitting of Grand Lodge was expected on Wednesday evening , when the adjourned meeting was held to consider the Revised Book of Constitutions . This anticipation was not realised , and rarely have we seen a more business-like temper displayed than was exhibited on the occasion we refer to . About two
hours and a half sufficed to get through rules from 184 to 308 inclusive , and yet there did not appear to be any undue baste , and certainly no brother was debarred from having his say . Bro . Lord Holmesdale , P . G . M . Kent , presided , and conducted the business with skill and courtesy .
Bro . Rev . B . J . Simpson P . G . C , who officiated as Grand Senior Warden , was inclined to be garrulous , but he was kindly checked , and in that spirit of obedience which long acquaintance with the laws of the Craft enjoins , he submitted with grace . Bro the Rev . Ambrose W . Hall , also a
P . G . Chaplain , occupied the Grand Junior Warden ' s chair , While giving due credit to the admirable tone that prevailed , we must add that the comparatively small attendance , and the strong element of Provincial brethren present , helped the progress of business considerably . There was no lack of interest , bat the members from the
conntry were too strongly represented to make opposition formidable , had there been a desire to contest many points . There was , however , a serious discussion on the question as to the position of Past Masters who upon leaving their own localities join other Lodges . It was stoutly
contended that at present these brethren were placed at a disadvantage , that they lost rank in consequence of circumstances over which they had no control . Many brethren who had done good suit and service in their mother Lodges were deprived of the proud place they had attained by long and
valuable labours , and it was held that they should , as a matter of ri ght , take rank , under certain conditions , of P . M . of any Lodge they might join , without necessarily passing ihrongh the chair again . On the other hand , it was urged that the Constitution assigns the position of
P . M . of the Lodge and of P . M . in the Lodge , and that Private Lodges had the power to give honour to any joining Brother who , being a P . M . of another Lodge , might be considered entitled to merit . This point was
questioned , and the Grand Rpgistrar was appealed to . He said it was a fact that Private Lodges had conferred positions upon joining Past Masfers , and that there was no written law against the practice . He declined to go farther , and as his statement was not held to be conclusive ,
the discnssion was continued . It was advanced that even if no such power existed Private Lodges conld recognise distinctive worth by electing a joining P . M . to the chair , but the retort came that that would be unjust to those "who were working up to position , by putting them back a
year . Ultimately the following resolution was carried : " Every such joining member , if a Past MaBter , shall have the rank and position of a Past Master of the Lodge , ranking next after the then jnnior Past Master and the Worshi pfnl Master of that Lodge , provided he ha <* not ceased
to subscribe to a Lodge for twelve months . " There 'a no ambiguity about this , and if the rule is to stand , a great revolution , and we fear much heartburning will ensue . It is right that service should be recognised , but now is it to be judged ? If all Past Masters were alike
Grand Lodge And The New Rules.
worthy the difficulty would not be so great . Even if that were so , it would not be wise to deprive Private Lodges of the right to determine the rank a joining P . M . of another Lodge should occupy . By the hard and fast rale now adopted by Grand Lodge a new right is created , and
Private Lodges , where they consider self-defence necessary , will have no other resource than exclusion . The ballot will be called into requisition in a manner little calculated to promote peace and goodwill , and tho obnoxious ^ system of blackballing will assume a power we should sincerely
regret . It is a pity that the matter was not left for Private Lodges to deal with , especially as it was recorded that they have , in some cases at least , awarded honour where they considered it was due . We cannot see in what way a Past Master is prejudiced by the present usage . He is a Past
Master wherever he goes , provided he has complied with the necessary and recognised conditions of the Craft , and no subsequent honour can equal that conferred upon him by his mother Lodge . By this new rale he takes a status he has not earned . It is all very well to say that
he laboured in another field ; true , and he got his reward at the hands of those he so well and honourably served . It is assumed that all Past Masters are equally worthy , but that is a contention that will not hold good for a moment . Great inequalities exist , but the rule Ave are discussing
places all on a level , and if private Lodges accept ^ them as joining members in the future , they have no choice but to give them a rank to which they may or may not be really entitled—that is , so far as merit is concerned . Trades Unions go upon the theory of fixing the minimum wages
a man shall receive ; he may get more if ho can , but he must not take less . This new rule is more arbitrary Btill , and allows no choice except the acceptance or rejection of a joining Past Master . Inequalities will be legalised , and the privileges of private Lodges seriously curtailed .
Besides , there is something mean in taking a position for which nothing has been done , except the payment of a sum of money . There are many brethren who cannot affordto pay another joining fee , who keep up their connection with their mother Lodges out of affection for the home of
their Masonic birth . They may have done as good service as their richer brethren , quite as worthy of honour , it may be more worthy , but they must be content with their lot . We do not say that their position could be improved by any law of Grand Lodge , but we do urge
that contrasts that must be painful to them ought not to be multiplied . Were Past Masters honoured for work done in the Lodge , no such contrast would arise , and the brother removed from his Matev would not feel so acutely the distinction that the possession of money
creates . We have said nothing about the opportunity for abuse that tbe new rule will give , but it is not the least of its faults . A brother may quarrel with his Lodge , and knowing that he will only have to pay a certain sum of money , a matter in many cases of no importance to him ,
be will seek another Lodge , and if accepted will obtain the rank of Past Master of that Lodge . It is making separation easy , and like the law of divorce in the case of marriage , it is calculated to lower the sanctity of Lodge ties . We deplore the decision of Grand Lodge , and ferventlv hope that it is not too late to prevent the
consummation of what may turn out to be a grievous wrong . We cannot help observing that the anxiety for Past Masters did not extend to the poor Tyler . Some may take
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Grand Lodge And The New Rules.
GRAND LODGE AND THE NEW RULES .
BY some a protracted sitting of Grand Lodge was expected on Wednesday evening , when the adjourned meeting was held to consider the Revised Book of Constitutions . This anticipation was not realised , and rarely have we seen a more business-like temper displayed than was exhibited on the occasion we refer to . About two
hours and a half sufficed to get through rules from 184 to 308 inclusive , and yet there did not appear to be any undue baste , and certainly no brother was debarred from having his say . Bro . Lord Holmesdale , P . G . M . Kent , presided , and conducted the business with skill and courtesy .
Bro . Rev . B . J . Simpson P . G . C , who officiated as Grand Senior Warden , was inclined to be garrulous , but he was kindly checked , and in that spirit of obedience which long acquaintance with the laws of the Craft enjoins , he submitted with grace . Bro the Rev . Ambrose W . Hall , also a
P . G . Chaplain , occupied the Grand Junior Warden ' s chair , While giving due credit to the admirable tone that prevailed , we must add that the comparatively small attendance , and the strong element of Provincial brethren present , helped the progress of business considerably . There was no lack of interest , bat the members from the
conntry were too strongly represented to make opposition formidable , had there been a desire to contest many points . There was , however , a serious discussion on the question as to the position of Past Masters who upon leaving their own localities join other Lodges . It was stoutly
contended that at present these brethren were placed at a disadvantage , that they lost rank in consequence of circumstances over which they had no control . Many brethren who had done good suit and service in their mother Lodges were deprived of the proud place they had attained by long and
valuable labours , and it was held that they should , as a matter of ri ght , take rank , under certain conditions , of P . M . of any Lodge they might join , without necessarily passing ihrongh the chair again . On the other hand , it was urged that the Constitution assigns the position of
P . M . of the Lodge and of P . M . in the Lodge , and that Private Lodges had the power to give honour to any joining Brother who , being a P . M . of another Lodge , might be considered entitled to merit . This point was
questioned , and the Grand Rpgistrar was appealed to . He said it was a fact that Private Lodges had conferred positions upon joining Past Masfers , and that there was no written law against the practice . He declined to go farther , and as his statement was not held to be conclusive ,
the discnssion was continued . It was advanced that even if no such power existed Private Lodges conld recognise distinctive worth by electing a joining P . M . to the chair , but the retort came that that would be unjust to those "who were working up to position , by putting them back a
year . Ultimately the following resolution was carried : " Every such joining member , if a Past MaBter , shall have the rank and position of a Past Master of the Lodge , ranking next after the then jnnior Past Master and the Worshi pfnl Master of that Lodge , provided he ha <* not ceased
to subscribe to a Lodge for twelve months . " There 'a no ambiguity about this , and if the rule is to stand , a great revolution , and we fear much heartburning will ensue . It is right that service should be recognised , but now is it to be judged ? If all Past Masters were alike
Grand Lodge And The New Rules.
worthy the difficulty would not be so great . Even if that were so , it would not be wise to deprive Private Lodges of the right to determine the rank a joining P . M . of another Lodge should occupy . By the hard and fast rale now adopted by Grand Lodge a new right is created , and
Private Lodges , where they consider self-defence necessary , will have no other resource than exclusion . The ballot will be called into requisition in a manner little calculated to promote peace and goodwill , and tho obnoxious ^ system of blackballing will assume a power we should sincerely
regret . It is a pity that the matter was not left for Private Lodges to deal with , especially as it was recorded that they have , in some cases at least , awarded honour where they considered it was due . We cannot see in what way a Past Master is prejudiced by the present usage . He is a Past
Master wherever he goes , provided he has complied with the necessary and recognised conditions of the Craft , and no subsequent honour can equal that conferred upon him by his mother Lodge . By this new rale he takes a status he has not earned . It is all very well to say that
he laboured in another field ; true , and he got his reward at the hands of those he so well and honourably served . It is assumed that all Past Masters are equally worthy , but that is a contention that will not hold good for a moment . Great inequalities exist , but the rule Ave are discussing
places all on a level , and if private Lodges accept ^ them as joining members in the future , they have no choice but to give them a rank to which they may or may not be really entitled—that is , so far as merit is concerned . Trades Unions go upon the theory of fixing the minimum wages
a man shall receive ; he may get more if ho can , but he must not take less . This new rule is more arbitrary Btill , and allows no choice except the acceptance or rejection of a joining Past Master . Inequalities will be legalised , and the privileges of private Lodges seriously curtailed .
Besides , there is something mean in taking a position for which nothing has been done , except the payment of a sum of money . There are many brethren who cannot affordto pay another joining fee , who keep up their connection with their mother Lodges out of affection for the home of
their Masonic birth . They may have done as good service as their richer brethren , quite as worthy of honour , it may be more worthy , but they must be content with their lot . We do not say that their position could be improved by any law of Grand Lodge , but we do urge
that contrasts that must be painful to them ought not to be multiplied . Were Past Masters honoured for work done in the Lodge , no such contrast would arise , and the brother removed from his Matev would not feel so acutely the distinction that the possession of money
creates . We have said nothing about the opportunity for abuse that tbe new rule will give , but it is not the least of its faults . A brother may quarrel with his Lodge , and knowing that he will only have to pay a certain sum of money , a matter in many cases of no importance to him ,
be will seek another Lodge , and if accepted will obtain the rank of Past Master of that Lodge . It is making separation easy , and like the law of divorce in the case of marriage , it is calculated to lower the sanctity of Lodge ties . We deplore the decision of Grand Lodge , and ferventlv hope that it is not too late to prevent the
consummation of what may turn out to be a grievous wrong . We cannot help observing that the anxiety for Past Masters did not extend to the poor Tyler . Some may take