Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Feb. 14, 1891
  • Page 3
  • CORRESPONDENCE.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Feb. 14, 1891: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Feb. 14, 1891
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CORRESPONDENCE. Page 1 of 1
    Article CORRESPONDENCE. Page 1 of 1
    Article KNARESBRO' A MASONIC CENTRE. Page 1 of 1
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

CORRESPONDENCE .

We have b ou requested to insert the following letter : — To the Editor 0 / the Freemason . D S IR AND BuorHEi * , —Iu the early part of fche year 1890 you were good enough to publish two letters of mine , on the subject of the Grand Lodge movement in New Zealand , in whioh I commented on the illegal measures r < soTr , "d to , a » d tha usurpation of power by

Bro . T . S . Graham , the I > 3 tri ; c Grand Master of Otago and Southland , & o ., to crush the movement . The earlier of my two letters was , however , rendered practically pointless by yonr non . publioation of the correspondence accompanying it . I regret that yon have nofc since referred to the matter , either in approval or disapproval of the District Grand Master ' s action , aa it is one of the most striking

incidents in the movement . I wrote again at a later date , comment-Jog on a speech made by the District Grand Master in defence of his action , but as my letter haa neither been published nor acknowledged in your columns , I fear it must havo been mislaid by yon . I am moved again to write to yon because I see , from articles in your numbers of 9 th and 16 th August , yon have reopened fche question .

I shall not now attempt in any way to argue in justification of -the establishment of a Grand Lodge of New Zealand , bufc will merely attempt to show that , if practical unanimity haa not been attained , and if Masonio schism exists , some part of the responsibility for this unhappy state of affairs lies with the District Grand Masters ( especially with Bro . T . S . Graham ) , with the Grand Secretary of

England , and indirectly with the Grand Lodge of England . It ia universally admitted thafc in a country such as one of our self-governing colonies the Craft , by act of the Lodges , has tho right of establishing a Grand Lodge . The Grand Lodge of England has affirmed that right in the cases of South Australia , New South Wales , and Victoria , by cordially granting its recognition to the Grand Lodges

so formed therein . One of the conditions to be observed iu the establishment of a Grand Lodge beforo ifc obtains recognition , has over and over again been emphatically stated by the Grand Lodge of England to be thafc the Lodges must have given their consent to its creation . It therefore follows that the Grand Lodge of England recognises the right of Lodges to

disonss a resolution on the subject , ai ifc is only by th « passing of resolutions in open Lodge that Lodges can give their consent , and therefore the New Zealand Lodges were not transgressing the law when they considered such resolutions . Ifc further follows that any Officer , either Grand Master or District Grand Master who , without boing so empowered by tho English Constitution , issues a

mandate forbidding the discussion of the question by Lodges , usurps powers not belonging to him , and infringes the privileges of tho Lodges . Now , Bro . T . S . Graham did issue mandates against the Lodges of his District discussing the question of tbe establishment of a Grand Lodgo of New Zealand , and fortified hia position by tho statement in District Grand Lodge ( held 18 th November 1889 ) that

the Grand Secretary of England had written to him , stating that discussion in open Lodges on the subject was not to bo allowed . Thus , although the Grand Lodge of England bas , aa I have pointed out above , affirmed the right of the Lodges to discuss a certain question , fche District Grand Master of Otago , and tho Grand Secretary of England declare thafc ifc is illegal to do so . Who can

explain away the inconsistency ? The Grand Lodge of England has assumed the responsibility by its silence , and we ara therefore supposed to accept the two conflicting doctrines that Lodges must approve of the establishment of a new Grand Lodge to render it a legal body , and that Lodges must be prevented from using the only means which they possess of expressing- approval . Absurdity cannot

further go , and if tbe consequences had not been a terrible rendering of Masonio good feeling , and a schism in the Craft , the illogical position of the Grand - Lodge of England would be laughable . The Grand Lodge of England has much to answer for in the present unhappy state of Masonry in New Zealand . The position ifc has always taken np in respect to movements on the part of its own

Lodges for independence is a most unsatisfactory one . If conservatism , or a policy of do-nothing , had nofc beeu too strong in ifc , it wonld long ago have adopted the American rule that Lodges in a Colony or Province mnst obtain the consent of their parents before attempting to erect a Grand Lodge , and that , thereafter , if a Grand Lodge is successfully established all the Lodges must fall into lino .

England , however , refuses to advise in the first instance , then allows her officials to usurp powers detrimental to Masonic feeling without reprimand , and then finally refuses to recognise the new Grand Lodge because a minority of Lodges havo nofc disobeyed the mandates of those officials . The American rule works admirably , thafc of Eng . land has invariably resulted in anarchyschismor disunion .

, , I bave a strong affection for tho Grand Lodge of England , of which I was myself for years a member , and would not willingly malign it , but it is only too evident that ifc is completely oufc of touch with its colonial Lodges , and appears unable to draw a lesson from past Masonio disasters in the Colonies . Years ago , in Victoria and New South Wales , when the movement for tho establishment of Grand

Lodges sprang up , District Grand Masters , by forbidding the right of free discussion in their Lodges , acted contrary to the rulings of the Grand Lodge of England , and plunged the Craft of these Colonies into schism . Those Officers were not , however , ever called on for an explanation . The Pro Grand Master of England visited the Colonies , and recommended the Lodges to do exactly what their District Grand Masters said was illegal , pledging them that the Grand

Lodge of England would approve . The Lodges did as they were recommended , and the Grand Lodge of England approved wifch acclamation . Yet , when a similar movement is afoot in New Zealand , the Grand Lodge of England , without a word of censure or remonstrance , allows a District ; Grand Master and the Grand Secretary ( if Bro . Graham ' s statement is correct ) to throw the precedent net by itself and its Pro Grand Master to the winds , and

Correspondence.

thereby destroy , perhaps for many years , the bonds of Masonio Brotherhood . I trust that yon will excuse the length of this letter , taking into consideration in my favonr that much has been said in yonr valuable paper on one side of the question , and that it is only fair that the Craft in England shonld have an opportunity of hearing

the other side , in order that it may form a conclusion aa on whom rests the chief blame for the creation of a Masonio schism . I do not refer to Bro . J . J . Williams * letter , aa the tone of it appears to me fco be injudicious . As Masons we may sometimes have to impnte blame , but we should not lampoon those who differ from ns . Others will doubtless deal with Bro . Williams' assertions and figures . Yours fraternally , COIONIAI : . 18 th September 1890 .

Knaresbro' A Masonic Centre.

KNARESBRO' A MASONIC CENTRE .

To the Editor of the Harrogate Advertiser . DEAR SIR , —It may interest some of tho older residents in Knaresbro' to learn that great interest at present attaches to antient Masonic seals , curio ? , data of dormant warrants , charters , and parchment certificates of Freemasonry . In the Inst century thoro was located at this antionfc market town

a Lodgo of Freemasons , meeting at tha " Crown" hostelry , nndor warrant dated SOfch October 1769 , and denominated " The Crown Lodge , " which having become extinct ( why or when it ia uncertain ) . In the year 1787 a new Lodge was formed , No . 499 , named " The Newtonian" ( probablyin compliment toits principal founder ) , whioh assembled at " The Elephant and Castlo Inn , " High Street , upon the

4 th Mondays monthly . This Lodge became exceedingly popular , and by successive re-nnmberings 490 , 408 , and 323 , ifc ultimately became extinct on 3 rd December 1851 , by erasure from tho rolls . There was formerly attached hereunto by charter , dated 15 th August 1788 , a Royal Arch Chapter , named " Tho Holy Cross , " No . 62 , which history informs ua " also became extinct ; in the year 1823 . " Greafc

difficulty has existed for many years pasfc ( by tho Fraternity ) to discover beyond the merest trace of tho above , and other Lodgep , existing afc thafc period afc Harewood Bridge , Ofcley , Wefcherby , Ripon , and at Pateley Bridge , yefc members of the Graft ; in theso neighbourhoods will , I am sure , ba delighted to loarn that afc lost aomo moro tangible proof of these old associations have come to light . Through

the courtesy of Bro . W . P . Bell , Old Bank , Knaresbro ( who has been favoured by the owner with temporary possession of tho samo ) , I am now enabled to copy , verbatim et literatim , the two parchruonfc certificates , and describe the apron , & o . " To all to whom theso presents shall come greeting—We , the Worshipful Master , Wardong , nnd Secretary of the Newtonian Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons ,

No . 408 , late 499 , hold at Knaresbrougb , in the county of York , do hereby certify tbat Bro . Richard Smithson , was regularly raised to the degree of a Master Mason in our said Lodge , on 27 th Nov . 1809 , aged 22 years . In witness whereof wo have hereunto set our hands and seal of our Lodge , this 15 th day of May 1810 . Peter Lomaa W . M ., Tho . Ouram S . W ., Tho . Foxton J . W ., Benson Lund Secretary . "

The seal , which is about the size of a florin , is ( upon a black watered ribbon , interlaced throngh the margin of the parchment ) from a well out die , a square and compasses , with G in centre , No . 499 Newtonian Lodge , Knaresbro' tho impression is now incomplete ( portions being broken off ) , yot doubtless ore long tho dio itself will be unearthed .

Accompanying fche above is an apron of white lambskin , beautifully illustrated ( evidently from a copper-place ) , with Masonio embloraa and allegorical designs , representing " Faifch , Hope , and Charity , " nnder the flap of the apron ia written as follows : — " The gift of Bro . Joseph Smithson , of Leeds , to his Bro . Richard Smithson , of Knaresborongh . —Leeds , 11 th Sep . 1821 . "

The other is a certificate of the United Grand Lodge of Antient Free and Accepted Masons of England . His Mosfc Gracious Majosty King George the Fourth patron . His Royal Highness the Duko of Sussex Grand Master . " To all whom ifc may concern : These aro to certify that our Brother Richard Smithson , who hath signed his name in the margin hereof , was regularly received into Freemasonry on

the 25 th day of September , A . L . 5809 , and was admitted to the third degree on the 27 th day of November 5809 , in the Newtonian Lodge , No . 490 , Knaresbro ' , and that he is duly registered in the books of the Grand Lodge , accordingly . In testimony whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names , and affixed the seal of the Grand Lodge at London , the 15 th day of January A . L . 5822 , A . D . 1822 . Thia

certificate shall not entitle a brother to admission into any Lodge without due examination . William H . White , Edward Harper , G . Sees , Richard Smithson , Ne Varietur . " The seal is exactly the same aa that in nse by Grand Lodge at the present time , as also the form of embellishment in allegory and Latin transcription , whioh was adopted at tho Union , 27 th December 1813 ( St . John ' s Day ) .

Quoting from Dr . Granville's " Spas of the North of England 1841 , " we learn that " The new Spa and Baths at Starbeck , near Knaresborongh , wero opened in 1822 , when the Freemasons walked in procession ( and regalia ) with the promoters . " With theso facts , names , and data before him , the local antiquary now has a now field of Masonic research opened out , and , by the kindness of local families ,

may discover further traces , in the shape of documents , furniture , or paraphernalia , formerly in nse by members of the Masonio Craffc in this neighbourhood , and more especially of manuscript scrolls of parchment , usually about 6 or 7 inches in width , rolled up to several feet in length . Some of theso documents have a purchase val no at

the present time , whilst even a sight of them would at all times be esteemed a favonr by , Youra fraternally , JOHN RICHABDSON . " The Exchange , " Harrogate , 25 fch January 1891 .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1891-02-14, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 4 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_14021891/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
DISAPPOINTED YOUNGSTERS. Article 1
THE NEW HALL AT THE GIRLS' SCHOOL. Article 1
GRAND LODGE OF SCOTLAND. Article 2
A NEW HALL FOR WADEBRIDGE. Article 2
THE "BON REPOS" SOIREE AND DANCE. Article 2
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 3
KNARESBRO' A MASONIC CENTRE. Article 3
Untitled Article 4
Untitled Ad 6
MARK MASONRY. Article 7
ROYAL ARCH. Article 7
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
MASONRY IN THE FOREGROUND. Article 8
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Article 11
Untitled Article 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
INSTRUCTION. Article 12
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
LIST OF RARE AND VALUABLE WORKS ON FREEMASONRY. Article 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
THE THEATRES, AMUSEMENTS, &c. Article 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Article 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

5 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

8 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

5 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

4 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

8 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

13 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

14 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

CORRESPONDENCE .

We have b ou requested to insert the following letter : — To the Editor 0 / the Freemason . D S IR AND BuorHEi * , —Iu the early part of fche year 1890 you were good enough to publish two letters of mine , on the subject of the Grand Lodge movement in New Zealand , in whioh I commented on the illegal measures r < soTr , "d to , a » d tha usurpation of power by

Bro . T . S . Graham , the I > 3 tri ; c Grand Master of Otago and Southland , & o ., to crush the movement . The earlier of my two letters was , however , rendered practically pointless by yonr non . publioation of the correspondence accompanying it . I regret that yon have nofc since referred to the matter , either in approval or disapproval of the District Grand Master ' s action , aa it is one of the most striking

incidents in the movement . I wrote again at a later date , comment-Jog on a speech made by the District Grand Master in defence of his action , but as my letter haa neither been published nor acknowledged in your columns , I fear it must havo been mislaid by yon . I am moved again to write to yon because I see , from articles in your numbers of 9 th and 16 th August , yon have reopened fche question .

I shall not now attempt in any way to argue in justification of -the establishment of a Grand Lodge of New Zealand , bufc will merely attempt to show that , if practical unanimity haa not been attained , and if Masonio schism exists , some part of the responsibility for this unhappy state of affairs lies with the District Grand Masters ( especially with Bro . T . S . Graham ) , with the Grand Secretary of

England , and indirectly with the Grand Lodge of England . It ia universally admitted thafc in a country such as one of our self-governing colonies the Craft , by act of the Lodges , has tho right of establishing a Grand Lodge . The Grand Lodge of England has affirmed that right in the cases of South Australia , New South Wales , and Victoria , by cordially granting its recognition to the Grand Lodges

so formed therein . One of the conditions to be observed iu the establishment of a Grand Lodge beforo ifc obtains recognition , has over and over again been emphatically stated by the Grand Lodge of England to be thafc the Lodges must have given their consent to its creation . It therefore follows that the Grand Lodge of England recognises the right of Lodges to

disonss a resolution on the subject , ai ifc is only by th « passing of resolutions in open Lodge that Lodges can give their consent , and therefore the New Zealand Lodges were not transgressing the law when they considered such resolutions . Ifc further follows that any Officer , either Grand Master or District Grand Master who , without boing so empowered by tho English Constitution , issues a

mandate forbidding the discussion of the question by Lodges , usurps powers not belonging to him , and infringes the privileges of tho Lodges . Now , Bro . T . S . Graham did issue mandates against the Lodges of his District discussing the question of tbe establishment of a Grand Lodgo of New Zealand , and fortified hia position by tho statement in District Grand Lodge ( held 18 th November 1889 ) that

the Grand Secretary of England had written to him , stating that discussion in open Lodges on the subject was not to bo allowed . Thus , although the Grand Lodge of England bas , aa I have pointed out above , affirmed the right of the Lodges to discuss a certain question , fche District Grand Master of Otago , and tho Grand Secretary of England declare thafc ifc is illegal to do so . Who can

explain away the inconsistency ? The Grand Lodge of England has assumed the responsibility by its silence , and we ara therefore supposed to accept the two conflicting doctrines that Lodges must approve of the establishment of a new Grand Lodge to render it a legal body , and that Lodges must be prevented from using the only means which they possess of expressing- approval . Absurdity cannot

further go , and if tbe consequences had not been a terrible rendering of Masonio good feeling , and a schism in the Craft , the illogical position of the Grand - Lodge of England would be laughable . The Grand Lodge of England has much to answer for in the present unhappy state of Masonry in New Zealand . The position ifc has always taken np in respect to movements on the part of its own

Lodges for independence is a most unsatisfactory one . If conservatism , or a policy of do-nothing , had nofc beeu too strong in ifc , it wonld long ago have adopted the American rule that Lodges in a Colony or Province mnst obtain the consent of their parents before attempting to erect a Grand Lodge , and that , thereafter , if a Grand Lodge is successfully established all the Lodges must fall into lino .

England , however , refuses to advise in the first instance , then allows her officials to usurp powers detrimental to Masonic feeling without reprimand , and then finally refuses to recognise the new Grand Lodge because a minority of Lodges havo nofc disobeyed the mandates of those officials . The American rule works admirably , thafc of Eng . land has invariably resulted in anarchyschismor disunion .

, , I bave a strong affection for tho Grand Lodge of England , of which I was myself for years a member , and would not willingly malign it , but it is only too evident that ifc is completely oufc of touch with its colonial Lodges , and appears unable to draw a lesson from past Masonio disasters in the Colonies . Years ago , in Victoria and New South Wales , when the movement for tho establishment of Grand

Lodges sprang up , District Grand Masters , by forbidding the right of free discussion in their Lodges , acted contrary to the rulings of the Grand Lodge of England , and plunged the Craft of these Colonies into schism . Those Officers were not , however , ever called on for an explanation . The Pro Grand Master of England visited the Colonies , and recommended the Lodges to do exactly what their District Grand Masters said was illegal , pledging them that the Grand

Lodge of England would approve . The Lodges did as they were recommended , and the Grand Lodge of England approved wifch acclamation . Yet , when a similar movement is afoot in New Zealand , the Grand Lodge of England , without a word of censure or remonstrance , allows a District ; Grand Master and the Grand Secretary ( if Bro . Graham ' s statement is correct ) to throw the precedent net by itself and its Pro Grand Master to the winds , and

Correspondence.

thereby destroy , perhaps for many years , the bonds of Masonio Brotherhood . I trust that yon will excuse the length of this letter , taking into consideration in my favonr that much has been said in yonr valuable paper on one side of the question , and that it is only fair that the Craft in England shonld have an opportunity of hearing

the other side , in order that it may form a conclusion aa on whom rests the chief blame for the creation of a Masonio schism . I do not refer to Bro . J . J . Williams * letter , aa the tone of it appears to me fco be injudicious . As Masons we may sometimes have to impnte blame , but we should not lampoon those who differ from ns . Others will doubtless deal with Bro . Williams' assertions and figures . Yours fraternally , COIONIAI : . 18 th September 1890 .

Knaresbro' A Masonic Centre.

KNARESBRO' A MASONIC CENTRE .

To the Editor of the Harrogate Advertiser . DEAR SIR , —It may interest some of tho older residents in Knaresbro' to learn that great interest at present attaches to antient Masonic seals , curio ? , data of dormant warrants , charters , and parchment certificates of Freemasonry . In the Inst century thoro was located at this antionfc market town

a Lodgo of Freemasons , meeting at tha " Crown" hostelry , nndor warrant dated SOfch October 1769 , and denominated " The Crown Lodge , " which having become extinct ( why or when it ia uncertain ) . In the year 1787 a new Lodge was formed , No . 499 , named " The Newtonian" ( probablyin compliment toits principal founder ) , whioh assembled at " The Elephant and Castlo Inn , " High Street , upon the

4 th Mondays monthly . This Lodge became exceedingly popular , and by successive re-nnmberings 490 , 408 , and 323 , ifc ultimately became extinct on 3 rd December 1851 , by erasure from tho rolls . There was formerly attached hereunto by charter , dated 15 th August 1788 , a Royal Arch Chapter , named " Tho Holy Cross , " No . 62 , which history informs ua " also became extinct ; in the year 1823 . " Greafc

difficulty has existed for many years pasfc ( by tho Fraternity ) to discover beyond the merest trace of tho above , and other Lodgep , existing afc thafc period afc Harewood Bridge , Ofcley , Wefcherby , Ripon , and at Pateley Bridge , yefc members of the Graft ; in theso neighbourhoods will , I am sure , ba delighted to loarn that afc lost aomo moro tangible proof of these old associations have come to light . Through

the courtesy of Bro . W . P . Bell , Old Bank , Knaresbro ( who has been favoured by the owner with temporary possession of tho samo ) , I am now enabled to copy , verbatim et literatim , the two parchruonfc certificates , and describe the apron , & o . " To all to whom theso presents shall come greeting—We , the Worshipful Master , Wardong , nnd Secretary of the Newtonian Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons ,

No . 408 , late 499 , hold at Knaresbrougb , in the county of York , do hereby certify tbat Bro . Richard Smithson , was regularly raised to the degree of a Master Mason in our said Lodge , on 27 th Nov . 1809 , aged 22 years . In witness whereof wo have hereunto set our hands and seal of our Lodge , this 15 th day of May 1810 . Peter Lomaa W . M ., Tho . Ouram S . W ., Tho . Foxton J . W ., Benson Lund Secretary . "

The seal , which is about the size of a florin , is ( upon a black watered ribbon , interlaced throngh the margin of the parchment ) from a well out die , a square and compasses , with G in centre , No . 499 Newtonian Lodge , Knaresbro' tho impression is now incomplete ( portions being broken off ) , yot doubtless ore long tho dio itself will be unearthed .

Accompanying fche above is an apron of white lambskin , beautifully illustrated ( evidently from a copper-place ) , with Masonio embloraa and allegorical designs , representing " Faifch , Hope , and Charity , " nnder the flap of the apron ia written as follows : — " The gift of Bro . Joseph Smithson , of Leeds , to his Bro . Richard Smithson , of Knaresborongh . —Leeds , 11 th Sep . 1821 . "

The other is a certificate of the United Grand Lodge of Antient Free and Accepted Masons of England . His Mosfc Gracious Majosty King George the Fourth patron . His Royal Highness the Duko of Sussex Grand Master . " To all whom ifc may concern : These aro to certify that our Brother Richard Smithson , who hath signed his name in the margin hereof , was regularly received into Freemasonry on

the 25 th day of September , A . L . 5809 , and was admitted to the third degree on the 27 th day of November 5809 , in the Newtonian Lodge , No . 490 , Knaresbro ' , and that he is duly registered in the books of the Grand Lodge , accordingly . In testimony whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names , and affixed the seal of the Grand Lodge at London , the 15 th day of January A . L . 5822 , A . D . 1822 . Thia

certificate shall not entitle a brother to admission into any Lodge without due examination . William H . White , Edward Harper , G . Sees , Richard Smithson , Ne Varietur . " The seal is exactly the same aa that in nse by Grand Lodge at the present time , as also the form of embellishment in allegory and Latin transcription , whioh was adopted at tho Union , 27 th December 1813 ( St . John ' s Day ) .

Quoting from Dr . Granville's " Spas of the North of England 1841 , " we learn that " The new Spa and Baths at Starbeck , near Knaresborongh , wero opened in 1822 , when the Freemasons walked in procession ( and regalia ) with the promoters . " With theso facts , names , and data before him , the local antiquary now has a now field of Masonic research opened out , and , by the kindness of local families ,

may discover further traces , in the shape of documents , furniture , or paraphernalia , formerly in nse by members of the Masonio Craffc in this neighbourhood , and more especially of manuscript scrolls of parchment , usually about 6 or 7 inches in width , rolled up to several feet in length . Some of theso documents have a purchase val no at

the present time , whilst even a sight of them would at all times be esteemed a favonr by , Youra fraternally , JOHN RICHABDSON . " The Exchange , " Harrogate , 25 fch January 1891 .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy