Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Magazine
  • Feb. 1, 1796
  • Page 67
Current:

The Freemasons' Magazine, Feb. 1, 1796: Page 67

  • Back to The Freemasons' Magazine, Feb. 1, 1796
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article MONTHLY CHRONICLE. ← Page 4 of 10 →
Page 67

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Monthly Chronicle.

against , had requested their Attornies lo be present at the examination . of ( he witnesses , it would not have been complied , with . How then could they admit the Attorney-General , or the Solicitor ofthe Treasury , without perjuring themselves ? If our wise ancestors had thought it fitting and ' necessary that Attornies should have access at such conjunctures . , ihe law would hav / e provided for it accordingly . The Jurors then exhorted each other to arm themselves with firm , sound , and well-grounded consciences , with clear minds , free from fear , hope , or favour , lest binconsiderately laying the basis which others to be thev worked

y on are . judged , , their own condemnation , and stand in the sightof God , the Creator and ' Judge of . all men , as unworthy of his protection . .. The Jury then sent for the Clerk ofthe Arraigns , who was desired to inform the Solicitor , that they conceived themselves competent and duly authorised ( let the indictment contain what it may ) to examine the witnesses , and therefore his ' attendance would not be admitted . ' The Clerk of the Arraigns replied , "That the Attorney General had been admitted in cases of the like ' natureand if the

, Jury had any doubts about the matter , the Court ; if applied to , would readily give their opinion . " The Foreman of the Jury , therefore / on delivering into Court the bills of indictment which had been before them , requested the opinion ofthe Lord Chief Baron , whether the Solicitor of thc Treasury , who demanded admit- ' tance during the examination of witnesses to this indictment , demanded it as a matter of right ? His Lordship replied" that the Attorney General had an undoubted riht tp

, g be admitted during such examination , and which had lately been the case on some recent indictments ; and the Solicitor may be admitted for the Attorney General , whose time was perhaps occupied by other matters ' of importance ' : " The Jury respectfully left the Court and retired to their . chamber , not at all reconciling the opinion of his Lordship to their consciences . On Thursday ' thcy entered on the indictment , which having been read , they proceeded to call the witnesseswhen , they were interrupted bthe Solicitor requesting to be admitted

, y ; which being granted , he desired the indictment , to be put off till next day , as he wished to consult the Attorney General . " - . . " ¦ The Foreman of the Jury observed , " that his request could not be complied with ; they had taken up the indictment in the usual regular manner , and should proceed to investigate the truth of the allegations contained in it . " They did so for ' some hours , and returned it to the Court a true bill . ••¦ - ' .

Feb . t . As the Royal Family were returning through Pall-mall , to Buckingham-house , from Drury-lane Theatre , some evil-disposed person thing a stone at the coach , in which were their Majesties and the Lady in waiting , with such violence as to break the window , and enter the carriage , where , after striking the Queen on the check , it fell iato-Lady Harrington ' s hip . The King took it up , aiKfcarried it with liim to Buckingham-house . A deposition on ihe above business was taken at the Secretary of . State's Office , Whitehall , before his Grace the Duke of Portlandand some ofthe Magistrates from Bowstreetwhen the stone

, - , was produced , and four of the King and Queen ' s footmen were examined as to the fact and Ihe circumstances . A rewardof ioool . has been offered for the discovery of the offenders , but hitherto ( we are sorry to say ) without effect . The Prince of Wales , the Duchess of York , and several Nob ' ilitv , paid their respects to the Royal Family on the occasion . 4 . At night , a most horrid murder was committed at Luttrelstown , in Ireland , the particulars of which are nearly as follow : two brothers of the name of M'Cormickwho bound to

, were give evidence against a principal Defender , had been lodged by Lord Carhampton in a mill-house at the corner of his Lordship's domain , in order to prevent them from being seduced or terrified' from giving their testimony ; at the hour of midnight , twenty men armed , and habited in lirown clothes , brpke into the house , and meeting a woman who resided in it . and whose fear upon their appearance acted so forcibly as to ' produce Ills , they assured her that she had no cause to be alarmed , that thev meant not in the least degree to injure her , but desired that they should " be shewn to the chamber of the M'Cormicks ; they then proceeded to the room in which those unfortunate brothers lay ,.

“The Freemasons' Magazine: 1796-02-01, Page 67” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 17 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fmm/issues/fmm_01021796/page/67/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
LONDON: Article 2
TO READERS, CORRESPONDENTS , &c. Article 3
THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE: AND CABINET OF UNIVERSAL LITERATURE, FOR FEBRUARY 1796. Article 4
AN ADDRESS FROM THE PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF MADRAS TO THE GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND. Article 6
AN ADDRESS, DELIVERED TO THE BRETHREN OF ST. JOHN'S LODGE, NO. 534, LANCASTER. Article 7
OBSERVATIONS MADE IN A VISIT TO THE TOMBS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY, Article 10
ON THE PASSIONS OF THE ANCIENTS. Article 17
THE MODERN STATE OF FRIENDSHIP. Article 20
ORIGINAL LETTER FROM OLIVERCROMWELL, Article 22
THE STAGE. Article 23
FURTHER PARTICULARS OF THE LATE THOMAS DUNCKERLEY, ESQ. Article 25
ON PARENTAL PARTIALITIES. Article 29
ACCOUNT OF DR. DEE, THE ASTROLOGER. Article 31
ON THE ABSURDITY, FOLLY, AND INCONSISTENCY OF VARIOUS FASHIONABLE CUSTOMS AND CEREMONIES Article 37
TWO LETTERS WRITTEN BY MR. ADDISON, IN THE YEAR I708, TO THE EARL OF WARWICK, Article 41
HISTORY OF MASONRY. Article 42
ON THE VARIOUS MODES OF EATING IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. Article 48
POETRY. MASONIC SONG. Article 50
SONG. Article 50
STANZAS TO WINTER. Article 51
TO FRIENDSHIP. Article 52
MONODY ON THE DEATH OF JOHN HOWARD, ESQ. Article 53
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 55
PROLOGUE TO THE WAY TO GET MARRIED, Article 56
EPILOGUE TO THE SAME. Article 57
" HISTORY OF THE THEATRES OF LONDON, Article 58
MASONIC INTELLIGENCE. Article 63
MONTHLY CHRONICLE. Article 64
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

2 Articles
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

2 Articles
Page 23

Page 23

2 Articles
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

2 Articles
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

2 Articles
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

2 Articles
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

1 Article
Page 49

Page 49

1 Article
Page 50

Page 50

2 Articles
Page 51

Page 51

2 Articles
Page 52

Page 52

2 Articles
Page 53

Page 53

2 Articles
Page 54

Page 54

1 Article
Page 55

Page 55

2 Articles
Page 56

Page 56

1 Article
Page 57

Page 57

1 Article
Page 58

Page 58

1 Article
Page 59

Page 59

1 Article
Page 60

Page 60

1 Article
Page 61

Page 61

1 Article
Page 62

Page 62

1 Article
Page 63

Page 63

2 Articles
Page 64

Page 64

1 Article
Page 65

Page 65

1 Article
Page 66

Page 66

1 Article
Page 67

Page 67

1 Article
Page 68

Page 68

1 Article
Page 69

Page 69

1 Article
Page 70

Page 70

1 Article
Page 71

Page 71

1 Article
Page 72

Page 72

1 Article
Page 73

Page 73

1 Article
Page 67

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Monthly Chronicle.

against , had requested their Attornies lo be present at the examination . of ( he witnesses , it would not have been complied , with . How then could they admit the Attorney-General , or the Solicitor ofthe Treasury , without perjuring themselves ? If our wise ancestors had thought it fitting and ' necessary that Attornies should have access at such conjunctures . , ihe law would hav / e provided for it accordingly . The Jurors then exhorted each other to arm themselves with firm , sound , and well-grounded consciences , with clear minds , free from fear , hope , or favour , lest binconsiderately laying the basis which others to be thev worked

y on are . judged , , their own condemnation , and stand in the sightof God , the Creator and ' Judge of . all men , as unworthy of his protection . .. The Jury then sent for the Clerk ofthe Arraigns , who was desired to inform the Solicitor , that they conceived themselves competent and duly authorised ( let the indictment contain what it may ) to examine the witnesses , and therefore his ' attendance would not be admitted . ' The Clerk of the Arraigns replied , "That the Attorney General had been admitted in cases of the like ' natureand if the

, Jury had any doubts about the matter , the Court ; if applied to , would readily give their opinion . " The Foreman of the Jury , therefore / on delivering into Court the bills of indictment which had been before them , requested the opinion ofthe Lord Chief Baron , whether the Solicitor of thc Treasury , who demanded admit- ' tance during the examination of witnesses to this indictment , demanded it as a matter of right ? His Lordship replied" that the Attorney General had an undoubted riht tp

, g be admitted during such examination , and which had lately been the case on some recent indictments ; and the Solicitor may be admitted for the Attorney General , whose time was perhaps occupied by other matters ' of importance ' : " The Jury respectfully left the Court and retired to their . chamber , not at all reconciling the opinion of his Lordship to their consciences . On Thursday ' thcy entered on the indictment , which having been read , they proceeded to call the witnesseswhen , they were interrupted bthe Solicitor requesting to be admitted

, y ; which being granted , he desired the indictment , to be put off till next day , as he wished to consult the Attorney General . " - . . " ¦ The Foreman of the Jury observed , " that his request could not be complied with ; they had taken up the indictment in the usual regular manner , and should proceed to investigate the truth of the allegations contained in it . " They did so for ' some hours , and returned it to the Court a true bill . ••¦ - ' .

Feb . t . As the Royal Family were returning through Pall-mall , to Buckingham-house , from Drury-lane Theatre , some evil-disposed person thing a stone at the coach , in which were their Majesties and the Lady in waiting , with such violence as to break the window , and enter the carriage , where , after striking the Queen on the check , it fell iato-Lady Harrington ' s hip . The King took it up , aiKfcarried it with liim to Buckingham-house . A deposition on ihe above business was taken at the Secretary of . State's Office , Whitehall , before his Grace the Duke of Portlandand some ofthe Magistrates from Bowstreetwhen the stone

, - , was produced , and four of the King and Queen ' s footmen were examined as to the fact and Ihe circumstances . A rewardof ioool . has been offered for the discovery of the offenders , but hitherto ( we are sorry to say ) without effect . The Prince of Wales , the Duchess of York , and several Nob ' ilitv , paid their respects to the Royal Family on the occasion . 4 . At night , a most horrid murder was committed at Luttrelstown , in Ireland , the particulars of which are nearly as follow : two brothers of the name of M'Cormickwho bound to

, were give evidence against a principal Defender , had been lodged by Lord Carhampton in a mill-house at the corner of his Lordship's domain , in order to prevent them from being seduced or terrified' from giving their testimony ; at the hour of midnight , twenty men armed , and habited in lirown clothes , brpke into the house , and meeting a woman who resided in it . and whose fear upon their appearance acted so forcibly as to ' produce Ills , they assured her that she had no cause to be alarmed , that thev meant not in the least degree to injure her , but desired that they should " be shewn to the chamber of the M'Cormicks ; they then proceeded to the room in which those unfortunate brothers lay ,.

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 66
  • You're on page67
  • 68
  • 73
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy