-
Articles/Ads
Article COMESFONDEIfE ← Page 2 of 4 →
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Comesfondeife
Brighton and elsewhere in the proving the materiah The material for what ?^ 4 m the promotion of a better understanding between Lodges ; less rivalry ; a , kindher feeling , without the portals brother , man and man ; and a recognition of merit and usefulness froinposition or worldly wea
take a pattern from to assuredly quickly dawn . I have slightly digressed from the actual question , whether the London and county tioh of meetings , & e ., should withhold the sanie ? Here I would remark ( leaving comments to your valuable advocacy ) .-: ^ th $ tt , !; a ^; : for as Brighton is concerned , no mention has ever been made in the local j ourhals to the injury ofMj ^ o ^^}^ : Graft in general , or ^ contrary , its assistance has been
Li conclusion , let nre suggest that if Bro . ™~ - ^ or any other brother is ashamed of his attendance being recorded former for usefulness , the benefits of which are daily experienced from cliihe to clime ; and the latter a ^ fr truthfidhess v cehsure from
that the course is open Qf afc ^ your journal and the local press , oim I had not ilie opportu Grand Lodge of Sussexyoy ^ ^ m freedom of the Bress . ^
I have abstained that the observations of the subject , which I presume will be reported in your journal , may not be lost on the Brethren at large . I am , dear Sir and Brother , Brighton , Yours fraternally , Sept . 27 th , 1858 . Alpha .
GRAND LODGE OF SUSSEX * TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE AND MASQNfIC MtKRQR . Dear Sir ani > Bbotjiek . —Being present at the Provincial ; Grand Lodge of Sussex , held at the Old Ship Hotel , at Brighton , on Friday last , I was much surprised and amused at the liberal views of Bro . Stuckey , r . Prov . G . P ., and you , sir , must have felt highly complimented with the remarks he made . I think if Bro . S . would more frequently look into your journal , he would perhaps not give way to such absurd remarks , when it is well known it is so far recognized by the Grand Lodge of England , that it publishes the proceedings , with the sanction of the Grand Master . Surely ,, on the same ground , Prov . Grand Lodges and private Lodges may enjoy the same privileges .
J am pleased to say I am a-subscriber to your journal , and make it . a rule to peruse it on all occasions , as well as other journals that contain toy Masonic intelligence , and what with the information contained m your leading articles , and the pages of interesting matter from all parts of the world , I can assure you I consider it worthy of any Brother's study , and I think it would do away with those narrow-minded notions entertainqd by some p & rties . I cannot understand when Bro . S . states that the reports
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Comesfondeife
Brighton and elsewhere in the proving the materiah The material for what ?^ 4 m the promotion of a better understanding between Lodges ; less rivalry ; a , kindher feeling , without the portals brother , man and man ; and a recognition of merit and usefulness froinposition or worldly wea
take a pattern from to assuredly quickly dawn . I have slightly digressed from the actual question , whether the London and county tioh of meetings , & e ., should withhold the sanie ? Here I would remark ( leaving comments to your valuable advocacy ) .-: ^ th $ tt , !; a ^; : for as Brighton is concerned , no mention has ever been made in the local j ourhals to the injury ofMj ^ o ^^}^ : Graft in general , or ^ contrary , its assistance has been
Li conclusion , let nre suggest that if Bro . ™~ - ^ or any other brother is ashamed of his attendance being recorded former for usefulness , the benefits of which are daily experienced from cliihe to clime ; and the latter a ^ fr truthfidhess v cehsure from
that the course is open Qf afc ^ your journal and the local press , oim I had not ilie opportu Grand Lodge of Sussexyoy ^ ^ m freedom of the Bress . ^
I have abstained that the observations of the subject , which I presume will be reported in your journal , may not be lost on the Brethren at large . I am , dear Sir and Brother , Brighton , Yours fraternally , Sept . 27 th , 1858 . Alpha .
GRAND LODGE OF SUSSEX * TO THE EDITOR OF THE FREEMASONS' MAGAZINE AND MASQNfIC MtKRQR . Dear Sir ani > Bbotjiek . —Being present at the Provincial ; Grand Lodge of Sussex , held at the Old Ship Hotel , at Brighton , on Friday last , I was much surprised and amused at the liberal views of Bro . Stuckey , r . Prov . G . P ., and you , sir , must have felt highly complimented with the remarks he made . I think if Bro . S . would more frequently look into your journal , he would perhaps not give way to such absurd remarks , when it is well known it is so far recognized by the Grand Lodge of England , that it publishes the proceedings , with the sanction of the Grand Master . Surely ,, on the same ground , Prov . Grand Lodges and private Lodges may enjoy the same privileges .
J am pleased to say I am a-subscriber to your journal , and make it . a rule to peruse it on all occasions , as well as other journals that contain toy Masonic intelligence , and what with the information contained m your leading articles , and the pages of interesting matter from all parts of the world , I can assure you I consider it worthy of any Brother's study , and I think it would do away with those narrow-minded notions entertainqd by some p & rties . I cannot understand when Bro . S . states that the reports