Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • June 2, 1860
  • Page 10
  • ANCIENT SYMBOLISM ILLUSTRATED.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 2, 1860: Page 10

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, June 2, 1860
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ANCIENT SYMBOLISM ILLUSTRATED. ← Page 2 of 6 →
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ancient Symbolism Illustrated.

Evoke ! E piphanius and Clemens , of Alexandria , agree m thinking that this invocation , from its similarity to the name " Eva , " related to the great mother of mankind who was deceived by the serpent . That the serpent was worshipped with two distinct and opposite attributes , namely , as the author of good and fche

author of evil , L-olh ancient and modern history fully establish . " Men , " says the Abbe de Tressan , " perceiving the earth to be filled with good and evil , and having no longer the sacred traditions to guide them , could not believe fhafc a being , who is essentially good , could be the author of evil ; they -therefore imagined two divinities equal in powerand

, both eternal , one was called the good principle , author of all good ; the other the bad principle , author of all evil . Although all nations do not worship the evil spirit , all admit its existence , and many pi-ojiitiate him . The lower class of Chinese , who live in boats upon the water , propitiate their " Joss , " or evil spirit . To a figure of him is assigned the most

honourable post in tho boat j he is offered the choicest parts of their food , and they constantly burn incense before him by lighting what they call the joss stick . The Hindoos in like mannerdeify their good and evil spirits . Independently of the Mosaic history , the serpent possessing the most active powers of destruction in that venom which

Providence has given it for its security , has been considei-ed as a source of evil , or as producing calamity . In India the destroying jiower or death is signified by the serpent , and called Baal-Shalisha . In classic antiquity , the giants who attempted to scale heaven were figured as half serpents . Discord and envy are personified with snakes . In the

northern mythology , Lok , the genius of evil , is styled the Father of the Great Serpent , the Father of Death , the Adversary , the Accuser , the Deceiver of the Gods . The coincidence of these titles , with those of the Satan of scri pture , will be readily observed . That the serpent , the first author of evil to man , should have ever been venerated as the sotor or spirit of goodat first strikes us with amazement ; but our

, astonishment will cease when we reflect that the Nachash of Genesis , the old serpent , the father of evil which beguiled Eve , is certainly not the Saraph or flaming serpent described by Moses in the book of Numbers , and wliich 2 n oved so great a salvation to the Israelites iu the desert when used as a type of the Messiah , and which in the office of mercy

allotted to ifc , as well as by ifcs name Saraph , implies an angel of brightness . A learned Englishman , Archbishop Tennison , in the fourteenth chapter of his discourse on Idolatry , asserts that the activity and splendour of these animals may serve for an emblem of the Saraph , to express the zeal and purity of angels which scripture calls Seraphim , and which name the Hebrews gave to this species of reptile . He thinks that the

angels , when they appeared to men , assumed the form of seraphs or fl ying serpents ; that the devil spoke to Eve in this appearance and thus deceived her , she imagining him to be a saraph or angel . Sfc . Paul states , in the 2 nd Corinthians , xi . 14 , "And no marvel ; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light . " The old Chaldean Hebrew , hoivever ,

calls the serpent tempter Nachash ; while that species of serpent elevated b y Moses in the wilderness as a type of the Saviour , is written Saraph . It has been already sufficiently proved in a former chapter , that not onl y in all nations is a divine triad worshipped , but thafc in every nation under tlie sun , the generative attribute

of the Deity is acknowledged , and either venerated collectively with other attributes , or separately by itself ; thus with the serpent its faculty of easting its coat every year , and appearing with new splendour , and its occasional circular form making a cycle and thereby resembling the circles of beads and diadems , which signified perpetuity of existence , suggested the idea of its adoption as a symbol of the generative attribute , and thence it received divine honours as tlie author of good , The accompanying emblems are called the

Ovhis and Ovum Mumlanum of the Tyrians . Also that of

Ol'llIS TVHIOltUAI . the Cyelopians or first inhabitants of Sicily , the serpent and

OVUM MUNDAMIM ,

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1860-06-02, Page 10” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 9 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_02061860/page/10/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
CLASSICAL THEOLOGY.—XXI. Article 1
MASTERPIECES OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF DIFFERENT NATIONS. Article 2
RED MASONRY; OR, MASONRY AMONG THE INDIANS. Article 3
INCREASE OF MASONRY IN AMERICA. Article 4
TRUE CHARITY. Article 4
THE WORKER AND THE LOOKER-ON. Article 5
PENNSYLVANIA MASONRY. Article 5
MASONIC LITERATURE. Article 5
ARCHÆOLOGY. Article 6
A SHAKSPEARIAN BANQUET. Article 6
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 7
NOTES ON LITERATURE SCIENCE AND ART. Article 8
ANCIENT SYMBOLISM ILLUSTRATED. Article 9
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 14
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 15
METROPOLITAN. Article 16
PROVINCIAL. Article 18
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 19
AMERICA. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

4 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

5 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

4 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

5 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ancient Symbolism Illustrated.

Evoke ! E piphanius and Clemens , of Alexandria , agree m thinking that this invocation , from its similarity to the name " Eva , " related to the great mother of mankind who was deceived by the serpent . That the serpent was worshipped with two distinct and opposite attributes , namely , as the author of good and fche

author of evil , L-olh ancient and modern history fully establish . " Men , " says the Abbe de Tressan , " perceiving the earth to be filled with good and evil , and having no longer the sacred traditions to guide them , could not believe fhafc a being , who is essentially good , could be the author of evil ; they -therefore imagined two divinities equal in powerand

, both eternal , one was called the good principle , author of all good ; the other the bad principle , author of all evil . Although all nations do not worship the evil spirit , all admit its existence , and many pi-ojiitiate him . The lower class of Chinese , who live in boats upon the water , propitiate their " Joss , " or evil spirit . To a figure of him is assigned the most

honourable post in tho boat j he is offered the choicest parts of their food , and they constantly burn incense before him by lighting what they call the joss stick . The Hindoos in like mannerdeify their good and evil spirits . Independently of the Mosaic history , the serpent possessing the most active powers of destruction in that venom which

Providence has given it for its security , has been considei-ed as a source of evil , or as producing calamity . In India the destroying jiower or death is signified by the serpent , and called Baal-Shalisha . In classic antiquity , the giants who attempted to scale heaven were figured as half serpents . Discord and envy are personified with snakes . In the

northern mythology , Lok , the genius of evil , is styled the Father of the Great Serpent , the Father of Death , the Adversary , the Accuser , the Deceiver of the Gods . The coincidence of these titles , with those of the Satan of scri pture , will be readily observed . That the serpent , the first author of evil to man , should have ever been venerated as the sotor or spirit of goodat first strikes us with amazement ; but our

, astonishment will cease when we reflect that the Nachash of Genesis , the old serpent , the father of evil which beguiled Eve , is certainly not the Saraph or flaming serpent described by Moses in the book of Numbers , and wliich 2 n oved so great a salvation to the Israelites iu the desert when used as a type of the Messiah , and which in the office of mercy

allotted to ifc , as well as by ifcs name Saraph , implies an angel of brightness . A learned Englishman , Archbishop Tennison , in the fourteenth chapter of his discourse on Idolatry , asserts that the activity and splendour of these animals may serve for an emblem of the Saraph , to express the zeal and purity of angels which scripture calls Seraphim , and which name the Hebrews gave to this species of reptile . He thinks that the

angels , when they appeared to men , assumed the form of seraphs or fl ying serpents ; that the devil spoke to Eve in this appearance and thus deceived her , she imagining him to be a saraph or angel . Sfc . Paul states , in the 2 nd Corinthians , xi . 14 , "And no marvel ; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light . " The old Chaldean Hebrew , hoivever ,

calls the serpent tempter Nachash ; while that species of serpent elevated b y Moses in the wilderness as a type of the Saviour , is written Saraph . It has been already sufficiently proved in a former chapter , that not onl y in all nations is a divine triad worshipped , but thafc in every nation under tlie sun , the generative attribute

of the Deity is acknowledged , and either venerated collectively with other attributes , or separately by itself ; thus with the serpent its faculty of easting its coat every year , and appearing with new splendour , and its occasional circular form making a cycle and thereby resembling the circles of beads and diadems , which signified perpetuity of existence , suggested the idea of its adoption as a symbol of the generative attribute , and thence it received divine honours as tlie author of good , The accompanying emblems are called the

Ovhis and Ovum Mumlanum of the Tyrians . Also that of

Ol'llIS TVHIOltUAI . the Cyelopians or first inhabitants of Sicily , the serpent and

OVUM MUNDAMIM ,

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 9
  • You're on page10
  • 11
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy