Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Dec. 6, 1862
  • Page 9
  • GRAND LODGE.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 6, 1862: Page 9

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 6, 1862
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article GRAND LODGE. ← Page 2 of 5 →
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

mportant to them , that every hrotner should have the fullest and most ample means of voting for those who were to form the members of that Committee , and to express their opinion as to the way in which it should be composed . Their ordinary rule in the appointment of Committees was that tliey should be elected by ballot , and the great advantage to be derived from an election by ballot was , that it could be taken while the other business of Grand Lodge

was being proceeded with , and enabled every member to give his vote as to how such Committees should be appointed . Their M . AV . Grand Master held a strong opinion as to the propriety of that course of election , and in ivhich he ( the R . W . JXG . M . ) most heartily concurred , and to give an opportunity to every brother of voting the M . W . G . M ., had directed balloting papers to be prepared in order to conduct the election in that manner . The G . M ., liowever , was not desirous that such a step should be

taken unless in unison with Grand Lodge , and with that view had not given directions that the election should be taken in tha manner , but had directed him ( the D . G . M . ) to bring the subjec under the notice of Grand Lodge , and to take its opinion whether the election should be proceeded with in the manne he had suggested . As the Committee would be one of th reatest importance , he thought the subject should not b a postponed until they could proceed it bnotice of motio

upon y as it would then he much later in the evening , and many of th brethren who came from long distances would be prevented from voting for the sixteen names on the list already proposed . It would be also in the power of any brother to propose other names , which would require to be put separately , and they might have as many as sixteen divisions , and if that were to be the case the business would be prolonged to a late hour , and

many brethren would be prevented from taking part or voting on this important question . Therefore he had the commands from the G . M . to submit the question to Grand Lodge , believing that it ivould be better to pursue the method ordinarily adopted in the appointment of standing committees which commended itself to their approval , and in this case they would have the additional advantage of the votes of their brethren from the country , who went away early ; but if it were to come on late , they would have no opportunity of giving their votes and

recording their opinions on this question . As to the notice of motion of their brother the Rev . A . AVoodford , which stood on the paper , he could assure him that it would be out of no disrespect to him if they adopted the suggestion of the G . M . He would , therefore , now leave the question in the hands of Grand Lodge , but with the strong expression of his own opinion in favour of it . The GIIAKD REGISTRAR said , he had no words to add to the

very forcible observations of their R . AV . Dep . G . M ., in all of which he entirely concurred , and would at once move that Grand Lodge do proceed to the election of the Committee by way of ballot . Bro . HERBERT LIOYD , P . S . G . D ., seconded the motion . Bro . the Rev . J . K . R . BEDFORD , G . Chap ., said , he gave his concurrence in allthat had been stated by the D . G . M ., in reference to their provincial brethren , but he wished to go further . He was

sorry to expresshisfeelings , whenhe said he regretted that the provinces were not more adequately represented , in either of the lists which ivere then before them , ancl on tbe part of the five hundred lodges in the provinces he wished to ask the D . G . M . if there was any regulation in the Pooh of Constitutions to prevent the issuing of the balloting papers to them , as many of their members could not he present to vote on this question . No doubt there were many that evening who had come upwards of

two-hundred miles to be present , but that could not be repeated without almost the possession of a large fortune ancl an unlimited amount of time at their command . Therefore he wished to ask the D . G . M . if voting papers could be issued to the provinces and that the time for the appointment of the Committee should be extended further than that evening . The D . GRAND MASTER expressed the greatest desire that their provincial brethren should be represented , being himself

a Provincial Grand Master , but such a course as that proposed by their respected brother ivould be unprecedented , ancl therefore , they could not do so consistently with their usual mode of procedure . The motion was then put and carried unanimously . The D . G . MASTEB said he had then another proposition to make , which was that the names of the sixteen brethren which appeared on the notice paper , which was in the hands of every brother present , should be taken as proposed and seconded , and

then there would be no necessity whatever for proposing and seconding the names of those brethren that anpeared on the paper , and thus save the time of Grand Lodge . The names proposed were as follows . —Bros . John Havers , J . G . W ., and P . M 7 No . 5 ; John Llewellyn Evans , S . G . D . and P . M . No . 54 ; John Hervey , P . S . G . D . and P . M . No . 7 ; John Savage , P . S . G . D . and P . M . "No . 19 ; Joseph Rankin Stebbing , P . M . No . 152 George Plucknett ( No . 32-1 ) PMNo 70

; , .. . ; Henry Grissell , J . W . No . 2 ., Alexander Dobie , Prov . G . M . Surrey , and P . M . No . 1 ; Herbert Lloyd , P . S . G . D ., and P . M . No . 14 ; Henry AA ellington Yallanee , " P . M . No . 275 ; David Henry Stone , P . M . No . 1 ; Colonel AVestern , P . M . No . 2 ; Charles Tyler , P . M . No . 79 ; Joseph Taylor , P . M . No . 18 : AVilliam Yen-all , P . M . No . 338 ; Stephen Barton AVilson , P . J . G . D ., and P . M . No . 125 .

Bro . VERSAEL , P . M . NO . 338 , said he felt his own incompetency to perform the duties , and as he saw many names of brethren on the list far better qulified , he begged to withdraw his name . Bro . HERBERT LIOYD , P . S . G . D ., said he also wished to withdraw his name . ( Loud cries of no , no . ) ! _; Bro . BEDFORD said , after the opinion he had expressed , the D . G . M . would perhaps xiardon him if he proposed an additional name , which was that of Bro . Colonel Bowyer , Prov . G . M . for Oxfordshire .

Bro . MEYMOTT wished that the various names should he proposed , and then that they should speak and vote upon them . The D . G . MASTER said he must uphold the unanimous decision which had been come to by Grand Lodge , and they could not proceed by any other way than by ballot , but it ivas competent for any brother to propose any one beyond those whose names appeared on the list . Bro . MEYMO IT hsgged to propose that Bro . Blake he a

member of the committee . Bro . the Rev . A . F . AVOODFORD rose to order and said , under the ruling of the D . G . M . no brother could say a word in pro-Xiosing ths names of candidates . The D . G . MASTER said it was not competent for any brother to speak on the propositions which wero oh the paper . Bro . MEYMOTT said he had risen to propose Bro . Blake , and for this reason , that he had a humble but earnest wish that

the expression of their M . W . G . 'ML . on the last occasion should he carried out , which was , that the brethren who were elected to form that committee should be those in whom the whole body of the craft would have confidence , and who would give the question a fair and impartial consideration , so that the result of their labours should be acceptable to the craft generally . He ivould take that opportunity of saying that a short time since he was requested to attend a meeting summoned bthe Grand

y Reg ., and ivhich was attended by the J . G . W . and others , hut he disapproved of that proceeding , as he thought an undue influence was brought to bear on this question . Bro . GREGORY , P . G . D ., rose to order . The subject of a private meeting was not before Grand Lodge . The D . G . MASTER said he must hold that Bro . Meymott was out of order .

Bro . Blake , J . G . D ., rose ancl declined to be placed on the list of candidates . Bro . MEYMOTT then said that he would propose that Bro . Dobie , Prov . G . M . for Surrey , should be a member of the Committee ( laughter ) . The D . GEASD MASTER , said that Bro . Meymott was again out of order , as the name was already on the list . Bro . BEDFORD said when he proposed the name of Bro . Colonel

Bowyer , he thought he had his consent to do so , but he now begged to withdraw the name . A BROTHER proposed that B . to . Harcourt , D . Prov . G . M ., of Surrey , should be a member of the Committee , and was proceeding to make a speech on-his proposition , when Bro . RAMUS' STEBEING rose to order and said if every brother was to be at liberty to make a speech in proposing a name , he hoped the same privilege ivould be given to the other members

in respect to every one of the sixteen names on the list . The D . GRASD MASTER said he could not rule in the way suggested by Bro . Stebbing . Bro . SARGOOD rose to order but upon another ground , and begged to ask whether it was right that any brother should be proposed as a member of the Committee , until that brother had obtained the consent of the person proposed , and that he had intimated his concurrence and consent to serve . The D . GRAND MASTER said it ivould be most desirable hefore

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1862-12-06, Page 9” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 1 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_06121862/page/9/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE LANCASHIRE DISTRESS. Article 1
THE GRAND LODGE PROPERTY. Article 1
FREEMASONRY AND THE PROFANE. BY AN OLD P.M. Article 2
THE LODGE MILITANT. Article 3
NEW MASONIC HALL IN JERSEY. Article 4
ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT. Article 5
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 6
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 7
SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES. Article 7
THE ROSE CROIX DEGREE. Article 8
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 8
GRAND LODGE. Article 8
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 14
SCOTLAND. Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 16
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 17
Obituary. Article 17
Poetry. Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

4 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

4 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

mportant to them , that every hrotner should have the fullest and most ample means of voting for those who were to form the members of that Committee , and to express their opinion as to the way in which it should be composed . Their ordinary rule in the appointment of Committees was that tliey should be elected by ballot , and the great advantage to be derived from an election by ballot was , that it could be taken while the other business of Grand Lodge

was being proceeded with , and enabled every member to give his vote as to how such Committees should be appointed . Their M . AV . Grand Master held a strong opinion as to the propriety of that course of election , and in ivhich he ( the R . W . JXG . M . ) most heartily concurred , and to give an opportunity to every brother of voting the M . W . G . M ., had directed balloting papers to be prepared in order to conduct the election in that manner . The G . M ., liowever , was not desirous that such a step should be

taken unless in unison with Grand Lodge , and with that view had not given directions that the election should be taken in tha manner , but had directed him ( the D . G . M . ) to bring the subjec under the notice of Grand Lodge , and to take its opinion whether the election should be proceeded with in the manne he had suggested . As the Committee would be one of th reatest importance , he thought the subject should not b a postponed until they could proceed it bnotice of motio

upon y as it would then he much later in the evening , and many of th brethren who came from long distances would be prevented from voting for the sixteen names on the list already proposed . It would be also in the power of any brother to propose other names , which would require to be put separately , and they might have as many as sixteen divisions , and if that were to be the case the business would be prolonged to a late hour , and

many brethren would be prevented from taking part or voting on this important question . Therefore he had the commands from the G . M . to submit the question to Grand Lodge , believing that it ivould be better to pursue the method ordinarily adopted in the appointment of standing committees which commended itself to their approval , and in this case they would have the additional advantage of the votes of their brethren from the country , who went away early ; but if it were to come on late , they would have no opportunity of giving their votes and

recording their opinions on this question . As to the notice of motion of their brother the Rev . A . AVoodford , which stood on the paper , he could assure him that it would be out of no disrespect to him if they adopted the suggestion of the G . M . He would , therefore , now leave the question in the hands of Grand Lodge , but with the strong expression of his own opinion in favour of it . The GIIAKD REGISTRAR said , he had no words to add to the

very forcible observations of their R . AV . Dep . G . M ., in all of which he entirely concurred , and would at once move that Grand Lodge do proceed to the election of the Committee by way of ballot . Bro . HERBERT LIOYD , P . S . G . D ., seconded the motion . Bro . the Rev . J . K . R . BEDFORD , G . Chap ., said , he gave his concurrence in allthat had been stated by the D . G . M ., in reference to their provincial brethren , but he wished to go further . He was

sorry to expresshisfeelings , whenhe said he regretted that the provinces were not more adequately represented , in either of the lists which ivere then before them , ancl on tbe part of the five hundred lodges in the provinces he wished to ask the D . G . M . if there was any regulation in the Pooh of Constitutions to prevent the issuing of the balloting papers to them , as many of their members could not he present to vote on this question . No doubt there were many that evening who had come upwards of

two-hundred miles to be present , but that could not be repeated without almost the possession of a large fortune ancl an unlimited amount of time at their command . Therefore he wished to ask the D . G . M . if voting papers could be issued to the provinces and that the time for the appointment of the Committee should be extended further than that evening . The D . GRAND MASTER expressed the greatest desire that their provincial brethren should be represented , being himself

a Provincial Grand Master , but such a course as that proposed by their respected brother ivould be unprecedented , ancl therefore , they could not do so consistently with their usual mode of procedure . The motion was then put and carried unanimously . The D . G . MASTEB said he had then another proposition to make , which was that the names of the sixteen brethren which appeared on the notice paper , which was in the hands of every brother present , should be taken as proposed and seconded , and

then there would be no necessity whatever for proposing and seconding the names of those brethren that anpeared on the paper , and thus save the time of Grand Lodge . The names proposed were as follows . —Bros . John Havers , J . G . W ., and P . M 7 No . 5 ; John Llewellyn Evans , S . G . D . and P . M . No . 54 ; John Hervey , P . S . G . D . and P . M . No . 7 ; John Savage , P . S . G . D . and P . M . "No . 19 ; Joseph Rankin Stebbing , P . M . No . 152 George Plucknett ( No . 32-1 ) PMNo 70

; , .. . ; Henry Grissell , J . W . No . 2 ., Alexander Dobie , Prov . G . M . Surrey , and P . M . No . 1 ; Herbert Lloyd , P . S . G . D ., and P . M . No . 14 ; Henry AA ellington Yallanee , " P . M . No . 275 ; David Henry Stone , P . M . No . 1 ; Colonel AVestern , P . M . No . 2 ; Charles Tyler , P . M . No . 79 ; Joseph Taylor , P . M . No . 18 : AVilliam Yen-all , P . M . No . 338 ; Stephen Barton AVilson , P . J . G . D ., and P . M . No . 125 .

Bro . VERSAEL , P . M . NO . 338 , said he felt his own incompetency to perform the duties , and as he saw many names of brethren on the list far better qulified , he begged to withdraw his name . Bro . HERBERT LIOYD , P . S . G . D ., said he also wished to withdraw his name . ( Loud cries of no , no . ) ! _; Bro . BEDFORD said , after the opinion he had expressed , the D . G . M . would perhaps xiardon him if he proposed an additional name , which was that of Bro . Colonel Bowyer , Prov . G . M . for Oxfordshire .

Bro . MEYMOTT wished that the various names should he proposed , and then that they should speak and vote upon them . The D . G . MASTER said he must uphold the unanimous decision which had been come to by Grand Lodge , and they could not proceed by any other way than by ballot , but it ivas competent for any brother to propose any one beyond those whose names appeared on the list . Bro . MEYMO IT hsgged to propose that Bro . Blake he a

member of the committee . Bro . the Rev . A . F . AVOODFORD rose to order and said , under the ruling of the D . G . M . no brother could say a word in pro-Xiosing ths names of candidates . The D . G . MASTER said it was not competent for any brother to speak on the propositions which wero oh the paper . Bro . MEYMOTT said he had risen to propose Bro . Blake , and for this reason , that he had a humble but earnest wish that

the expression of their M . W . G . 'ML . on the last occasion should he carried out , which was , that the brethren who were elected to form that committee should be those in whom the whole body of the craft would have confidence , and who would give the question a fair and impartial consideration , so that the result of their labours should be acceptable to the craft generally . He ivould take that opportunity of saying that a short time since he was requested to attend a meeting summoned bthe Grand

y Reg ., and ivhich was attended by the J . G . W . and others , hut he disapproved of that proceeding , as he thought an undue influence was brought to bear on this question . Bro . GREGORY , P . G . D ., rose to order . The subject of a private meeting was not before Grand Lodge . The D . G . MASTER said he must hold that Bro . Meymott was out of order .

Bro . Blake , J . G . D ., rose ancl declined to be placed on the list of candidates . Bro . MEYMOTT then said that he would propose that Bro . Dobie , Prov . G . M . for Surrey , should be a member of the Committee ( laughter ) . The D . GEASD MASTER , said that Bro . Meymott was again out of order , as the name was already on the list . Bro . BEDFORD said when he proposed the name of Bro . Colonel

Bowyer , he thought he had his consent to do so , but he now begged to withdraw the name . A BROTHER proposed that B . to . Harcourt , D . Prov . G . M ., of Surrey , should be a member of the Committee , and was proceeding to make a speech on-his proposition , when Bro . RAMUS' STEBEING rose to order and said if every brother was to be at liberty to make a speech in proposing a name , he hoped the same privilege ivould be given to the other members

in respect to every one of the sixteen names on the list . The D . GRASD MASTER said he could not rule in the way suggested by Bro . Stebbing . Bro . SARGOOD rose to order but upon another ground , and begged to ask whether it was right that any brother should be proposed as a member of the Committee , until that brother had obtained the consent of the person proposed , and that he had intimated his concurrence and consent to serve . The D . GRAND MASTER said it ivould be most desirable hefore

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 8
  • You're on page9
  • 10
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy