Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • March 9, 1859
  • Page 24
  • THE MASONIC MIRROR.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 9, 1859: Page 24

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 9, 1859
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE MASONIC MIRROR. ← Page 4 of 17 →
Page 24

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Mirror.

that recognition of the Grand Lodge of Canada which ivould be approved of by every JIason in England . ( Cheers . ) Bro . Binckes admired the ingenuity , but not the morality , of those who sought to make the worse the better side . The Canadian brethren refused to accept a limited jurisdiction for their Grand Lodge at the hands of the Grand Lodge of England , (" no , no ! " ) and under these circumstances he considered Bro . Portal fully justified in moving the non-confirmation of the resolution iving them that jurisdiction .

g They had sent to Canada what they considered a boon to tho brethren there , hut the billows of the Atlantic had cast it back upon them with contempt . AVith what show of justice , reason , or judgment could they refuse to rescind a resolution which forced upon thoir Brethren in Canada that which they refused to accept . He therefore hoped that out of a proper deference to the feelings of the Grand Lodge of Canada , they ivould , when asked to confirm that resolution , unanimously answer—No ! ( Cheers and laughter . )

Bro . Havers said he had heard with more amazement than he could well express , the course of proceeding that evening , advocated by the brethren at the further end of the room . He would venture to lay the ivhole case , divested of verbiage , before Grand Lodge . Ho never denied , and ho ivould never deny , that the Masons of Canada had had to complain of grievous shortcomings upon the part of Grand Lodge ; but he wotild not now stop to inquire where lay the blame . The result however , was , that their Canadian brethren felt themselves compelled to throw down their

allegiance to the Grand Lodge of England . In that country , where we hacl once nearly a hundred Lodges , tho great majority ot them had left ouv banner . This change naturally created some excitement , but so soon as union was restored in Canada , the Grand Lodge of England acknowledged and recognized the independence of the Grand Lodge of that country . It was now attempted to be shown that the Canadian brethren refused that recognition . On the contrary , they accepted it , and thanked Grand Lodge for the promptitude it had displayed in making it . ( Cheers . ) If brethren had been content to wait—to spare their taunts upon

tho executive—until they had heard the correspondence , and looked at tho dates of that correspondence , they ivould have seen that such was the case . In that correspondence they pointed to the fact that Grand Lodge had limited their jurisdiction . Grand Lodge had done so , and ] had done it with its eyes open . Tho Canadian Brethren now asked Grand Lodge for that which Grand Lodge was most willing to grant , namely — to give the greatest possible opportunity for the spread of Freemasonry . They all now understood that the jurisdiction which the Grand Lodge of Canada claimed was one extending

over both provinces , and it was reasonable that it should have it . Out of the hundred Lodges of Canada , which formerly hailed from tho Grand Lodge of England , there were only two ( not six ) in Canada AA ' est , and only four ( not twelve ) in Canada East , which now acknowledged the authority of the Grand Lodge of England . The two provinces , formerly divided , had been united since 184 . 3 , and were now one territory . It was for these reasons that the Masons of Canada asked the Grand Lodgo of England to grant to their Grand Lodge Masonic

jurisdiction over all that country in wliich there were now so few English Lodges . He ivould [ now ask the brethren if they thought it consistent with the dignity and honour of Grand Lodge to maintain a nominal sovereignty over a territory iu wliich it had no Lodges . They were all anxious , for the welfare of Jlasonry , to sec new temples rise for solemnization of its mysteries , its principles spread , and never to limit it to the narrow ground under the jurisdiction of any particular Grand Lodge . Canada had spoken , and spoken with a loud voice , upon this question ;

and within the last four and twenty hours a most fraternal and courteous letter had been received by tho . M . AV . Grand Master from the Grand Master of 'Canada , asking Grand Lodge to reconsider this question . Ii Bro . Portal had only allowed the M . AV . Grand Jlaster to state that in that kindness of feeling by which he was actuated to our colonial Brethren , he was prepared to remedy whatever error of description they had fallen into at the last meeting of Grand Lodge , and grant the independent Graud Lodge of Cauada a jurisdiction co-extensive with the Canadian territory—the Brethren ivould havo been spared all the useless discussion which had taken place , ( Cheers . )

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1859-03-09, Page 24” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 25 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_09031859/page/24/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
GRAND LODGE—THE CANADIAN QUESTION. Article 1
TASMANIA. Article 6
MASONIC MISSIONS. Article 7
REVIEWS OF NEW BOOKS. Article 13
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 16
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 21
PROVINCIAL. Article 37
THE WEEK. Article 45
NOTICES. Article 48
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 48
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

1 Article
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

1 Article
Page 28

Page 28

1 Article
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

1 Article
Page 31

Page 31

1 Article
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

2 Articles
Page 38

Page 38

1 Article
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

1 Article
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

1 Article
Page 45

Page 45

2 Articles
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

3 Articles
Page 24

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Mirror.

that recognition of the Grand Lodge of Canada which ivould be approved of by every JIason in England . ( Cheers . ) Bro . Binckes admired the ingenuity , but not the morality , of those who sought to make the worse the better side . The Canadian brethren refused to accept a limited jurisdiction for their Grand Lodge at the hands of the Grand Lodge of England , (" no , no ! " ) and under these circumstances he considered Bro . Portal fully justified in moving the non-confirmation of the resolution iving them that jurisdiction .

g They had sent to Canada what they considered a boon to tho brethren there , hut the billows of the Atlantic had cast it back upon them with contempt . AVith what show of justice , reason , or judgment could they refuse to rescind a resolution which forced upon thoir Brethren in Canada that which they refused to accept . He therefore hoped that out of a proper deference to the feelings of the Grand Lodge of Canada , they ivould , when asked to confirm that resolution , unanimously answer—No ! ( Cheers and laughter . )

Bro . Havers said he had heard with more amazement than he could well express , the course of proceeding that evening , advocated by the brethren at the further end of the room . He would venture to lay the ivhole case , divested of verbiage , before Grand Lodge . Ho never denied , and ho ivould never deny , that the Masons of Canada had had to complain of grievous shortcomings upon the part of Grand Lodge ; but he wotild not now stop to inquire where lay the blame . The result however , was , that their Canadian brethren felt themselves compelled to throw down their

allegiance to the Grand Lodge of England . In that country , where we hacl once nearly a hundred Lodges , tho great majority ot them had left ouv banner . This change naturally created some excitement , but so soon as union was restored in Canada , the Grand Lodge of England acknowledged and recognized the independence of the Grand Lodge of that country . It was now attempted to be shown that the Canadian brethren refused that recognition . On the contrary , they accepted it , and thanked Grand Lodge for the promptitude it had displayed in making it . ( Cheers . ) If brethren had been content to wait—to spare their taunts upon

tho executive—until they had heard the correspondence , and looked at tho dates of that correspondence , they ivould have seen that such was the case . In that correspondence they pointed to the fact that Grand Lodge had limited their jurisdiction . Grand Lodge had done so , and ] had done it with its eyes open . Tho Canadian Brethren now asked Grand Lodge for that which Grand Lodge was most willing to grant , namely — to give the greatest possible opportunity for the spread of Freemasonry . They all now understood that the jurisdiction which the Grand Lodge of Canada claimed was one extending

over both provinces , and it was reasonable that it should have it . Out of the hundred Lodges of Canada , which formerly hailed from tho Grand Lodge of England , there were only two ( not six ) in Canada AA ' est , and only four ( not twelve ) in Canada East , which now acknowledged the authority of the Grand Lodge of England . The two provinces , formerly divided , had been united since 184 . 3 , and were now one territory . It was for these reasons that the Masons of Canada asked the Grand Lodgo of England to grant to their Grand Lodge Masonic

jurisdiction over all that country in wliich there were now so few English Lodges . He ivould [ now ask the brethren if they thought it consistent with the dignity and honour of Grand Lodge to maintain a nominal sovereignty over a territory iu wliich it had no Lodges . They were all anxious , for the welfare of Jlasonry , to sec new temples rise for solemnization of its mysteries , its principles spread , and never to limit it to the narrow ground under the jurisdiction of any particular Grand Lodge . Canada had spoken , and spoken with a loud voice , upon this question ;

and within the last four and twenty hours a most fraternal and courteous letter had been received by tho . M . AV . Grand Master from the Grand Master of 'Canada , asking Grand Lodge to reconsider this question . Ii Bro . Portal had only allowed the M . AV . Grand Jlaster to state that in that kindness of feeling by which he was actuated to our colonial Brethren , he was prepared to remedy whatever error of description they had fallen into at the last meeting of Grand Lodge , and grant the independent Graud Lodge of Cauada a jurisdiction co-extensive with the Canadian territory—the Brethren ivould havo been spared all the useless discussion which had taken place , ( Cheers . )

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 23
  • You're on page24
  • 25
  • 48
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy