-
Articles/Ads
Article PARLIAMENTARY ANALYSIS. ← Page 6 of 6
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Parliamentary Analysis.
season ; and that it could not be expectetl from him that the very dayafter the news of the decease of the Emperor of Austria had been received , he could be prepared to mention what were tbe subjects to be negociated with the present possessor of the Austrian throne .
13 th . —Lord BROUGHAM moved the first reading of a Bill to Consolidate the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of England and AArales . The LORD CHANCELLOR suggested a postponement of the Bill , as a similar one ivas before the House of Commons , to which Lord BROUGHAM assented . In reply to the Duke of CUMBERLAND , Lord BROUGHAM said that the difference between his Bill and that of the House of Commons was , that the latter contained nothing about church-rates and wills . — The Abolition of Oaths Bill was read a second time , and ordered to be committed on the 16 th .
16 th . —The Marquess of LONDONDERRY , after alluding to the debate in the House of Commons on Friday night , respecting the embassy to St . Petersburg !! , said , that without having had any communication , direct or indirect , with any one of the King ' s ministers , he had come to the determination , upon hearing of that discussion , that no consideration should induce him to accept the appointment of Ambassador to the Russian Court . —The Oaths Abolition Bill went through Committee .
nth . —The Earl of ABERDEEN , in reply to the Earl of Mulgrave , confirmed the statements with respect to the favourable working of the new system in Jamaica , and to the abundance of the new crops . —The East India Indemnity Bill was read a third time ancl passed . ISth . —The Earl of ABERDEEN , in reply to Lord Mulgrave , stated that a decision had been come to on the subject of Canada , and that Viscount Canterbury had been appointed commissioner to investigate the complaint .
19 th . —Ihe LORD CHANCELLOR presented the first report of the Church Inquiry ( England ) . Ordered to be printed . —Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from Canada , complaining of the Governor . 20 th . —Royal Assent was given by commission to the Transfer of Aids Bill , the Exchequer Bills Bill , the Newspaper Stamp Regulation Bill , and the Chester Criminal Execution Bill . —The Duke of WELLINGTON laid on the table of the House the Report of the Committee on
Lay Patronage . —Lord BROUGHAM held in his hand a petition . He ivould merely move that it be read , as lie did not intend to make himself answerable for the statements in any petition he might ever present . The petition was to the same effect as was presented by Mr . Tooke in the House of Commons a few days since , praying that they would allow a sort of half-pay to unbeneficed and superannuated clergy . 2 ith . —The Earl of ABERDEEN presented a petition from Montreal , praying for certain amendments in the constitution of tlle Canadas .
27 th . —The . Marquess of AVESTMINSTER inquired whether it was the intention of Government to confine the construction of those houses to one architect . —The Duke of WELLINGTON said that the House had not decided upon the plan , and it was understood that the matter was still open to competition .
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Parliamentary Analysis.
season ; and that it could not be expectetl from him that the very dayafter the news of the decease of the Emperor of Austria had been received , he could be prepared to mention what were tbe subjects to be negociated with the present possessor of the Austrian throne .
13 th . —Lord BROUGHAM moved the first reading of a Bill to Consolidate the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of England and AArales . The LORD CHANCELLOR suggested a postponement of the Bill , as a similar one ivas before the House of Commons , to which Lord BROUGHAM assented . In reply to the Duke of CUMBERLAND , Lord BROUGHAM said that the difference between his Bill and that of the House of Commons was , that the latter contained nothing about church-rates and wills . — The Abolition of Oaths Bill was read a second time , and ordered to be committed on the 16 th .
16 th . —The Marquess of LONDONDERRY , after alluding to the debate in the House of Commons on Friday night , respecting the embassy to St . Petersburg !! , said , that without having had any communication , direct or indirect , with any one of the King ' s ministers , he had come to the determination , upon hearing of that discussion , that no consideration should induce him to accept the appointment of Ambassador to the Russian Court . —The Oaths Abolition Bill went through Committee .
nth . —The Earl of ABERDEEN , in reply to the Earl of Mulgrave , confirmed the statements with respect to the favourable working of the new system in Jamaica , and to the abundance of the new crops . —The East India Indemnity Bill was read a third time ancl passed . ISth . —The Earl of ABERDEEN , in reply to Lord Mulgrave , stated that a decision had been come to on the subject of Canada , and that Viscount Canterbury had been appointed commissioner to investigate the complaint .
19 th . —Ihe LORD CHANCELLOR presented the first report of the Church Inquiry ( England ) . Ordered to be printed . —Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from Canada , complaining of the Governor . 20 th . —Royal Assent was given by commission to the Transfer of Aids Bill , the Exchequer Bills Bill , the Newspaper Stamp Regulation Bill , and the Chester Criminal Execution Bill . —The Duke of WELLINGTON laid on the table of the House the Report of the Committee on
Lay Patronage . —Lord BROUGHAM held in his hand a petition . He ivould merely move that it be read , as lie did not intend to make himself answerable for the statements in any petition he might ever present . The petition was to the same effect as was presented by Mr . Tooke in the House of Commons a few days since , praying that they would allow a sort of half-pay to unbeneficed and superannuated clergy . 2 ith . —The Earl of ABERDEEN presented a petition from Montreal , praying for certain amendments in the constitution of tlle Canadas .
27 th . —The . Marquess of AVESTMINSTER inquired whether it was the intention of Government to confine the construction of those houses to one architect . —The Duke of WELLINGTON said that the House had not decided upon the plan , and it was understood that the matter was still open to competition .