Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • July 15, 1876
  • Page 7
  • ANOTHER PAMPHLET.
Current:

The Freemason, July 15, 1876: Page 7

  • Back to The Freemason, July 15, 1876
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ANOTHER PAMPHLET. Page 1 of 2
    Article ANOTHER PAMPHLET. Page 1 of 2
    Article ANOTHER PAMPHLET. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Another Pamphlet.

ANOTHER PAMPHLET .

( Communique ) .

"The cry is still they come . —Shakespeare . As another pamphlet is circulating in the good Province of West Yorkshire , and so far , not like its memorable predecessor , "suppressed , " 1 have thought it right to take upon myself the responsibility of treating it as a public , and

certainly a most personal document , and publishing it in the columns ofthe "Freemason"for the information of all whom it may concern . M y first impression was to write a letter to Bro . Kenning on the subject with " extracts , " but had 1 done so , I felt persuaded that I should have at once been

met by the asseveration that 1 had only given " garbled extracts . " I have , therefore , thought it better to publish the pamphlet in " extenso , " so that all may peruse its "ipsissima verba , " harmless as they really are in themselves , recalling the old line at once , " willing to wound , but

yet afraid to strike . " I think , too , lhat those of my brethren who read this " last pamphlet , ' * as well as those who are assailed b y it , \ vill probably laugh at it as heartily as I have done , though , with mysJf , they will feel great pity for the brother Freemason , who could pen , much less print and

circulate , so un-Masonic a pamphlet . How far such a " production " is within or without our own Masonic laws , is a matter for serious consideration , but for obvious reasons , public and personal , I feel sure that it is for the best , that

the entire Craft should have the opportunity of appreciating such a remarkable specimen of classic English and brotherly good taste . When the suppressed pamphlet appeared , ( clearly libellous and actionable ) , it ought also to have been printed for the animadversion and condemnation of '

the entire Craft , but that was not done on purely Masonic grounds , and the higher feelings of Masonic consideration . But the repetition of this odious system of pamphleteering attacks , in my opinion leaves no alternativ 2 to those who like myself , despise libellous and slanderous at

tacks , whether those of the surreptitious or the open defamer . I do not think it well to allude to any of the personal attacks on myself , as they are beneath notice , and I can well afford to leave them to the fraternal consideration of numerous friends and brethren up and down the

country , at home and abroad , who will give me credit , I know for , habitual courtesy and gentlemanly behaviour , and Masonic good feeling on all occasions . Indeed , my motto all through my life generally and Masonicall y has been , " Honour all men . " Neither do I think it befitting in me to allude to the insult offered to the Quar .

terl y Court in calling it a " packed meeting , " or b y implication to our distinguished Bro . J . Clabon , who so well presided over that numerous assembly of brethren from all parts of England . Let it be remembered that only some half-dozen , or thereabout , hands were held up , positively against the overwhelming majority of nearly 200 who voted for the needful motion of confidence

generally in the executive . Neither do I dwell upon the attack on Bro . Col . Ridgway , well able gallantly to defend himself . He was not the only brother who had to complain of unseemly interruption . Neither do I comment on the attack on the House

Committees , both . of the Boys' and the Girls ' School , nor the modest proposal , having just before praised the economical government ° f the Girls' School , to change its House Committee , as well as the Boys ' . In all 'ruth , the best answer to all these foolish

statements and suggestions is to be found , in ths determination of all other provinces in England to support the Executive authorities of the School , and to condemn that hateful personal feellng which has been introduced into this unseemly controversy . But I must ask attention to three

passages in the pamphlet . When Bro . Tew compares the Investigation Committee as he calls "» with the Charity Committee of the Province ° ver which I had the honour to preside in 1869 , ne makes use of an illustration almost too

Puerile to notice . The one was the Constitu"onal Committee of the Province , acting in aid ° F u ^ ° y s' School , under the special approval the P . G . M ., and raising money towards that e " 7 expenditure openly which has now been condemned as extravagant . The other is a

Another Pamphlet.

committee , in my opinion , unconstitutionally appointed originally , and illegal , according to the minutes of the Provincial Grand Lodge itself . But let that pass . Indeed , I for one look upon the Report as nothing but a censure cast upon the Charity Committee , and the

Provincial Grand Lodge in 186 9 , which unanimously voted s £$ oo towards the very building expenses which are now called in question . The statement at page 2 , that Bro . Tew ' s " previous pamphlets" were "replies , " in part , to Bro . Henry Watson ' s lucid and peaceful

pamphlet in 187 . 3 ( the first pamphlet in this trumpery business having been published in 1875 ) , 1 S one of the most astounding that 1 have ever read in my whole life . The naive admission also , at page 2 , that " without the private pamphlets acting as a preliminary to prepare the way , the

Investigation Committee could not have so soon come to their conclusion , " must be felt to be extremely flattering by the " Investigation Committee , ' and I recommend such a passage to the notice especially of Bfo . Gill , who knows as " " well as any one the legal value of

" ex parte' informations . With this h tle preface I leave the " last Pamphlet" to tell its own tale , in its " unadorned eloquence" and literal truthfulness . It is , indeed , a sad commentary alike on Masonic professions and Masonic brotherhood !

July 10 th , 1876 . A . F . A . W . I cannot omit one little amusing instance of the " animus" of the writer . In the fiist issue of the pamphlet , which is the copy here printed from , the D . P . G . M . of West ' Yorkshire , had stated that I was "late of the Fidelity

Lodge . " I never had the honour of belonging to the Fidelity Lodge in my life , being a member the Philanthropic , 304 , a fact which must and ought to have been known to the D . P . G . M . of a province , who has all the lodge returns before

him , and , indeed , was well known to him . In another issue of the pamphlet these words are marked through , with ink , without any acknowledgment of a private letter on the subject , or any expression of regret at so very peculiar a mistake .

, THE CHANGE , CAIII . ETON , PONTBFRACT , 30 th May , 1876 . To the Secretary of the Philanthropic Lodge , N 0 . 30 ' , Leeds . Dear Sir and Brother , I beg you will convey to the W . M . and brethren of your lodge my gratitude for their resolution received

this day , which is the more peculiarly welcome on account of the circumstances attending the Rev . F . A . Woodford's resolution of the 10 th of April before the Quarterly Court , in Freemasons' Hall . 1 rejoice to think the lodges of West Yorkshire are beginning to understand the gravity of that resolution , and

that the reception the representatives of the West Yorkshire Investigation Committee , and the other West Yorkshire brethren , met with at the hands of that reverend gentleman , and the members of the Quarterly Court , was of the rudest and most ungracious description . But it is for the lodges of West Yorkshire to say whether they will quietly

sit down under the stigma cast upon the province by that resolution , or whether , and in what manner , they will stand by the report of their own investigation into the R . M . I , for Buys at Wood Green . I , for my part , have done my duty , without fear or favour , in analysing the official reports for the

information of the Craft ; and feel that I never can again advocate the claims of the Masonic Boys' School upon the brethren of West Yorkshire unless a great reformation is accomplished in the financial , educational , and internal arrangements of that Chaiity . My convictions I shall not abate , but 1 give this

testimony that in all I have written or said , I have been influenced by the most ardent desire to promote the reformations , and the ultimate welfare of the Royal Masonic Institution for Boys , for which I feel sure that those who know i »« e best will give me credit .

I assure the brethren of your lodge that I have anxiously investigated every statement and account presented in the published authorised official reports of the school for the last six years , and in the pamphlets I have issued thereon . The various statements contained in them have never

yet been disproved , and I am convinced that those brethren who have the leisure and the will to study the past history of the Boys' School , and investigate the accounts set forth in the official reports , will not fail to arrive at the conclusion ot the Investigation Committee , that the management of the Buys' School , on moral , educational , and financial grounds , calls for a thorough remodelling .

I defend the circulation of the pamphlets and Investigation Report for thi reason that it would have been utterly hopeless to appeal to those , who through the indifference of Life Governors and other subscribers , have so long been responsible for the past and present state of affairs at the School . Those pamphlets were replies to those of Bro . Henry Watson , S . W ., No . 1386 , published 1873 ; to the letter of the Boys' School Secretary , 19 th

Another Pamphlet.

June , 1873 , his Festival Circular , 7 th July , 1873 , and to the pamphlet of June , 1875 , already openly characterized as weak , offensive , and evasive . I found out a year ago that had any one ventured to question such venerable senators as the Executive of the House Commiitee on their management , or want of management , of the institution , he would have been

voted out of order and laughed at for his enquiry , for the object of the House Committee seems to be to stifle all legitimate enquiry . The Investigation Report was a report founded on all the statements in the Official Reports , while , without the private pamphlets acting as a preliminary to prepare the way , the Investigation Committee could not have so

soon come to their conclusions ; and although Mr . Woodford ' made a great point of what he professed to consider the unconstitutional and unprecedented appointment of the West Yorkshire Committee , you cannot have failed to notice that almost in the same breath he appealed to the labours of a previous committee of the same province , in which he himself took a prominent part . With the resolutions come

to by that committee I do not in any way quarrel , they may have been perfectly justified ; but our report covers the ground subsequent to that occupied by Mr . Woodford . His investigations terminate with 186 9 , when we take up the examination , with , however , a diametrically opposite result , showing a subsequent . ' extravagance almost unparalleled in the history of such institutions .

A greater insult and slight were never cast upon a generous province than was done by the resolution of the Rev . A . F . Woodford , on the 10 th April . Thirty biethren or more from the most influential lodges in this province hastily went up to London on the invitation of this resolution , a copy of which had been received from Mr . Binckes by the D . P . G . M . of West Yorkshire only four days before

the meeting in Freemasons' Hall , one of those days being a Sunday . Was it not unfair thus to give WestYorkshire no time to organise supporters to face the Quarterly Court , which was on that occasion a packed committee on purpose to out-vote West Yorkshire , and which was determined not to hear one word the representatives of your Investigation Committee had to say?—Bro . Moss , the

clerk of the Sheffield School Board , the member of the Investigation Committee , well qualified to speak on any educational question , being rudely and violently refused a hearing , and West Yorkshire being consequently degraded in the eyes of the Craft . Our province has now £ 10 , 049 'S . invested in these Boys' Schools , and is in the possession of 214 . 5 votes . Nearly

one-seventh of the whole £ 73 , 143 18 s . 3 d . paid by the voluntary subscriptions of the Craft for the schools and the maintenance of boys , as per the Official Reports , has been contributed by West Yorkshire , leaving to all the other provinces ot Grand Lodge six-sevenths divisible amongst them . Was then the conduct of the Quarterly Court to Bro . Moss , candid or just to the representatives of such

a generous province ? Was the Rev . A . F . Woodford , the former chairman of the West Yorkshire Charity Committee , justified in forcing his resolution upon a packed meeting ? From his sacred calling , and being P . Prov . C . of West Yorkshire , he ought' to have been the first to advocate that West Yorkshire brethren should have been listened to with respect ; and had this been the case , the important information in possession of West Yorkshire

would have been brought before the court , and probably the vote upon his resolution suspended . But the London Executive were afraid of truth , and West Yorkshire was treated with the grossest disrespect . The brethren have , however , a great , a noble , and a just cause in hand , the reformation of the management of these schools , and West Yorkshire will , I doubt not , take up the matter and work out the solution in its own earnest and ready manner .

Contrast the reception which the Governors gave to the West Yorkshire brethren with that accorded to Bro . Ridgway , who , when a mild "No" was occasionally interposed in the course cf his oration , as an indication that he was outstepping the bounds of truth , and as a warning that a full contradiction was forthcoming , with a lion-like roar asserted his determination not to be " put down by clamour , "

and then refer to the list of subscriptions and donations to the Boys' School , and ascertain how much he and his province do for the institution in which he professes so loud an interest . Compare for instance the £ 37 16 s . contributed by Devonshire , with its 41 lodges and 14 chapters , in the year 1874 ( the last published account ) , in 15 donations , with the £ 662 us . contributed during the same

time by West Yorkshire , with its £ 9 lodges and 19 chapters , in 68 donations , and then say which province has shown its practical interest . in the institution—which has most stones in the building . Bro . Ridgway was the chairman of the sham Investi gation Committee which sat in Freemasons' Hall last November , and the mention of his name will remind you of

the document to which he then ' put his name , and which was intended to have the effect of endorsing the acts of the Boys' School Committee . Why was not Bro . Winn's sensible suggestion to have a professional accountant adopted ? The antecedent facts were : Under the head of " Gratuities to ( with grants and outfits for ) boys on leaving the is not

institution , " a sum amounting 10 , ^ 124 5 s . accounted for , and cannot be found in any of the authorised published Official Reports of the Boys' School , and no subsequent act of the committee can now place it there , although they may perhaps give some explanation of its absence . The money is not accounted tor in the manner in which it

should have been accounted for ; of that there can be no doubt in the mind of any one who will examine the reports , and the Select Committee must at once have discovered that fact . In this strait what did they do ? They went to some pigeon-hole in the Secretarial Office , and obtain edcertain receipts which they carefully packtted , and

“The Freemason: 1876-07-15, Page 7” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 10 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_15071876/page/7/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Article 1
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 1
Mark Masonry. Article 4
Red Cross of Constantine. Article 4
Scotland. Article 4
PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE OF HERTFORD. Article 4
ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 5
Masonic and General Tidings. Article 5
Untitled Article 6
TO OUR READERS. Article 6
TO ADVERTISERS. Article 6
Answers to Correspondents. Article 6
Births, Marriages, and Deaths. Article 6
Untitled Article 6
THE PROGRESS OF THE CONTROVERSY. Article 6
PEACE OR WAR. Article 6
NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS AND CORRESPONDENTS. Article 6
ANOTHER PAMPHLET. Article 7
Original Correspondence. Article 8
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR GIRLS. Article 9
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Article 10
Obituary. Article 10
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 10
MASONIC MEETINGS IN WEST LANCASHIRE AND CHESHIRE. Article 10
MASONIC MEETINGS IN GLASGOW AND WEST OF SCOTLAND. Article 10
MASONIC MEETINGS IN EDINBURGH AND VICINITY. Article 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

7 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

10 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

4 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

16 Articles
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Another Pamphlet.

ANOTHER PAMPHLET .

( Communique ) .

"The cry is still they come . —Shakespeare . As another pamphlet is circulating in the good Province of West Yorkshire , and so far , not like its memorable predecessor , "suppressed , " 1 have thought it right to take upon myself the responsibility of treating it as a public , and

certainly a most personal document , and publishing it in the columns ofthe "Freemason"for the information of all whom it may concern . M y first impression was to write a letter to Bro . Kenning on the subject with " extracts , " but had 1 done so , I felt persuaded that I should have at once been

met by the asseveration that 1 had only given " garbled extracts . " I have , therefore , thought it better to publish the pamphlet in " extenso , " so that all may peruse its "ipsissima verba , " harmless as they really are in themselves , recalling the old line at once , " willing to wound , but

yet afraid to strike . " I think , too , lhat those of my brethren who read this " last pamphlet , ' * as well as those who are assailed b y it , \ vill probably laugh at it as heartily as I have done , though , with mysJf , they will feel great pity for the brother Freemason , who could pen , much less print and

circulate , so un-Masonic a pamphlet . How far such a " production " is within or without our own Masonic laws , is a matter for serious consideration , but for obvious reasons , public and personal , I feel sure that it is for the best , that

the entire Craft should have the opportunity of appreciating such a remarkable specimen of classic English and brotherly good taste . When the suppressed pamphlet appeared , ( clearly libellous and actionable ) , it ought also to have been printed for the animadversion and condemnation of '

the entire Craft , but that was not done on purely Masonic grounds , and the higher feelings of Masonic consideration . But the repetition of this odious system of pamphleteering attacks , in my opinion leaves no alternativ 2 to those who like myself , despise libellous and slanderous at

tacks , whether those of the surreptitious or the open defamer . I do not think it well to allude to any of the personal attacks on myself , as they are beneath notice , and I can well afford to leave them to the fraternal consideration of numerous friends and brethren up and down the

country , at home and abroad , who will give me credit , I know for , habitual courtesy and gentlemanly behaviour , and Masonic good feeling on all occasions . Indeed , my motto all through my life generally and Masonicall y has been , " Honour all men . " Neither do I think it befitting in me to allude to the insult offered to the Quar .

terl y Court in calling it a " packed meeting , " or b y implication to our distinguished Bro . J . Clabon , who so well presided over that numerous assembly of brethren from all parts of England . Let it be remembered that only some half-dozen , or thereabout , hands were held up , positively against the overwhelming majority of nearly 200 who voted for the needful motion of confidence

generally in the executive . Neither do I dwell upon the attack on Bro . Col . Ridgway , well able gallantly to defend himself . He was not the only brother who had to complain of unseemly interruption . Neither do I comment on the attack on the House

Committees , both . of the Boys' and the Girls ' School , nor the modest proposal , having just before praised the economical government ° f the Girls' School , to change its House Committee , as well as the Boys ' . In all 'ruth , the best answer to all these foolish

statements and suggestions is to be found , in ths determination of all other provinces in England to support the Executive authorities of the School , and to condemn that hateful personal feellng which has been introduced into this unseemly controversy . But I must ask attention to three

passages in the pamphlet . When Bro . Tew compares the Investigation Committee as he calls "» with the Charity Committee of the Province ° ver which I had the honour to preside in 1869 , ne makes use of an illustration almost too

Puerile to notice . The one was the Constitu"onal Committee of the Province , acting in aid ° F u ^ ° y s' School , under the special approval the P . G . M ., and raising money towards that e " 7 expenditure openly which has now been condemned as extravagant . The other is a

Another Pamphlet.

committee , in my opinion , unconstitutionally appointed originally , and illegal , according to the minutes of the Provincial Grand Lodge itself . But let that pass . Indeed , I for one look upon the Report as nothing but a censure cast upon the Charity Committee , and the

Provincial Grand Lodge in 186 9 , which unanimously voted s £$ oo towards the very building expenses which are now called in question . The statement at page 2 , that Bro . Tew ' s " previous pamphlets" were "replies , " in part , to Bro . Henry Watson ' s lucid and peaceful

pamphlet in 187 . 3 ( the first pamphlet in this trumpery business having been published in 1875 ) , 1 S one of the most astounding that 1 have ever read in my whole life . The naive admission also , at page 2 , that " without the private pamphlets acting as a preliminary to prepare the way , the

Investigation Committee could not have so soon come to their conclusion , " must be felt to be extremely flattering by the " Investigation Committee , ' and I recommend such a passage to the notice especially of Bfo . Gill , who knows as " " well as any one the legal value of

" ex parte' informations . With this h tle preface I leave the " last Pamphlet" to tell its own tale , in its " unadorned eloquence" and literal truthfulness . It is , indeed , a sad commentary alike on Masonic professions and Masonic brotherhood !

July 10 th , 1876 . A . F . A . W . I cannot omit one little amusing instance of the " animus" of the writer . In the fiist issue of the pamphlet , which is the copy here printed from , the D . P . G . M . of West ' Yorkshire , had stated that I was "late of the Fidelity

Lodge . " I never had the honour of belonging to the Fidelity Lodge in my life , being a member the Philanthropic , 304 , a fact which must and ought to have been known to the D . P . G . M . of a province , who has all the lodge returns before

him , and , indeed , was well known to him . In another issue of the pamphlet these words are marked through , with ink , without any acknowledgment of a private letter on the subject , or any expression of regret at so very peculiar a mistake .

, THE CHANGE , CAIII . ETON , PONTBFRACT , 30 th May , 1876 . To the Secretary of the Philanthropic Lodge , N 0 . 30 ' , Leeds . Dear Sir and Brother , I beg you will convey to the W . M . and brethren of your lodge my gratitude for their resolution received

this day , which is the more peculiarly welcome on account of the circumstances attending the Rev . F . A . Woodford's resolution of the 10 th of April before the Quarterly Court , in Freemasons' Hall . 1 rejoice to think the lodges of West Yorkshire are beginning to understand the gravity of that resolution , and

that the reception the representatives of the West Yorkshire Investigation Committee , and the other West Yorkshire brethren , met with at the hands of that reverend gentleman , and the members of the Quarterly Court , was of the rudest and most ungracious description . But it is for the lodges of West Yorkshire to say whether they will quietly

sit down under the stigma cast upon the province by that resolution , or whether , and in what manner , they will stand by the report of their own investigation into the R . M . I , for Buys at Wood Green . I , for my part , have done my duty , without fear or favour , in analysing the official reports for the

information of the Craft ; and feel that I never can again advocate the claims of the Masonic Boys' School upon the brethren of West Yorkshire unless a great reformation is accomplished in the financial , educational , and internal arrangements of that Chaiity . My convictions I shall not abate , but 1 give this

testimony that in all I have written or said , I have been influenced by the most ardent desire to promote the reformations , and the ultimate welfare of the Royal Masonic Institution for Boys , for which I feel sure that those who know i »« e best will give me credit .

I assure the brethren of your lodge that I have anxiously investigated every statement and account presented in the published authorised official reports of the school for the last six years , and in the pamphlets I have issued thereon . The various statements contained in them have never

yet been disproved , and I am convinced that those brethren who have the leisure and the will to study the past history of the Boys' School , and investigate the accounts set forth in the official reports , will not fail to arrive at the conclusion ot the Investigation Committee , that the management of the Buys' School , on moral , educational , and financial grounds , calls for a thorough remodelling .

I defend the circulation of the pamphlets and Investigation Report for thi reason that it would have been utterly hopeless to appeal to those , who through the indifference of Life Governors and other subscribers , have so long been responsible for the past and present state of affairs at the School . Those pamphlets were replies to those of Bro . Henry Watson , S . W ., No . 1386 , published 1873 ; to the letter of the Boys' School Secretary , 19 th

Another Pamphlet.

June , 1873 , his Festival Circular , 7 th July , 1873 , and to the pamphlet of June , 1875 , already openly characterized as weak , offensive , and evasive . I found out a year ago that had any one ventured to question such venerable senators as the Executive of the House Commiitee on their management , or want of management , of the institution , he would have been

voted out of order and laughed at for his enquiry , for the object of the House Committee seems to be to stifle all legitimate enquiry . The Investigation Report was a report founded on all the statements in the Official Reports , while , without the private pamphlets acting as a preliminary to prepare the way , the Investigation Committee could not have so

soon come to their conclusions ; and although Mr . Woodford ' made a great point of what he professed to consider the unconstitutional and unprecedented appointment of the West Yorkshire Committee , you cannot have failed to notice that almost in the same breath he appealed to the labours of a previous committee of the same province , in which he himself took a prominent part . With the resolutions come

to by that committee I do not in any way quarrel , they may have been perfectly justified ; but our report covers the ground subsequent to that occupied by Mr . Woodford . His investigations terminate with 186 9 , when we take up the examination , with , however , a diametrically opposite result , showing a subsequent . ' extravagance almost unparalleled in the history of such institutions .

A greater insult and slight were never cast upon a generous province than was done by the resolution of the Rev . A . F . Woodford , on the 10 th April . Thirty biethren or more from the most influential lodges in this province hastily went up to London on the invitation of this resolution , a copy of which had been received from Mr . Binckes by the D . P . G . M . of West Yorkshire only four days before

the meeting in Freemasons' Hall , one of those days being a Sunday . Was it not unfair thus to give WestYorkshire no time to organise supporters to face the Quarterly Court , which was on that occasion a packed committee on purpose to out-vote West Yorkshire , and which was determined not to hear one word the representatives of your Investigation Committee had to say?—Bro . Moss , the

clerk of the Sheffield School Board , the member of the Investigation Committee , well qualified to speak on any educational question , being rudely and violently refused a hearing , and West Yorkshire being consequently degraded in the eyes of the Craft . Our province has now £ 10 , 049 'S . invested in these Boys' Schools , and is in the possession of 214 . 5 votes . Nearly

one-seventh of the whole £ 73 , 143 18 s . 3 d . paid by the voluntary subscriptions of the Craft for the schools and the maintenance of boys , as per the Official Reports , has been contributed by West Yorkshire , leaving to all the other provinces ot Grand Lodge six-sevenths divisible amongst them . Was then the conduct of the Quarterly Court to Bro . Moss , candid or just to the representatives of such

a generous province ? Was the Rev . A . F . Woodford , the former chairman of the West Yorkshire Charity Committee , justified in forcing his resolution upon a packed meeting ? From his sacred calling , and being P . Prov . C . of West Yorkshire , he ought' to have been the first to advocate that West Yorkshire brethren should have been listened to with respect ; and had this been the case , the important information in possession of West Yorkshire

would have been brought before the court , and probably the vote upon his resolution suspended . But the London Executive were afraid of truth , and West Yorkshire was treated with the grossest disrespect . The brethren have , however , a great , a noble , and a just cause in hand , the reformation of the management of these schools , and West Yorkshire will , I doubt not , take up the matter and work out the solution in its own earnest and ready manner .

Contrast the reception which the Governors gave to the West Yorkshire brethren with that accorded to Bro . Ridgway , who , when a mild "No" was occasionally interposed in the course cf his oration , as an indication that he was outstepping the bounds of truth , and as a warning that a full contradiction was forthcoming , with a lion-like roar asserted his determination not to be " put down by clamour , "

and then refer to the list of subscriptions and donations to the Boys' School , and ascertain how much he and his province do for the institution in which he professes so loud an interest . Compare for instance the £ 37 16 s . contributed by Devonshire , with its 41 lodges and 14 chapters , in the year 1874 ( the last published account ) , in 15 donations , with the £ 662 us . contributed during the same

time by West Yorkshire , with its £ 9 lodges and 19 chapters , in 68 donations , and then say which province has shown its practical interest . in the institution—which has most stones in the building . Bro . Ridgway was the chairman of the sham Investi gation Committee which sat in Freemasons' Hall last November , and the mention of his name will remind you of

the document to which he then ' put his name , and which was intended to have the effect of endorsing the acts of the Boys' School Committee . Why was not Bro . Winn's sensible suggestion to have a professional accountant adopted ? The antecedent facts were : Under the head of " Gratuities to ( with grants and outfits for ) boys on leaving the is not

institution , " a sum amounting 10 , ^ 124 5 s . accounted for , and cannot be found in any of the authorised published Official Reports of the Boys' School , and no subsequent act of the committee can now place it there , although they may perhaps give some explanation of its absence . The money is not accounted tor in the manner in which it

should have been accounted for ; of that there can be no doubt in the mind of any one who will examine the reports , and the Select Committee must at once have discovered that fact . In this strait what did they do ? They went to some pigeon-hole in the Secretarial Office , and obtain edcertain receipts which they carefully packtted , and

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 6
  • You're on page7
  • 8
  • 10
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy