Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • April 30, 1870
  • Page 8
Current:

The Freemason, April 30, 1870: Page 8

  • Back to The Freemason, April 30, 1870
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 1
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 1
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 1
Page 8

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

The Editor is not responsible for llic opinions expressed by Correspondents . LODGE ST . JOHN , MELROSE ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER . —I observe that there is a copy of a " Report of the Historical Committee appointed by the Lodge of St . John , Glasgow , to inquire into the historical evidence and data of the antiquity of said lodge . " Appearing in your

columns , this document is signed by Bro . AV . P . Buchan , as Convenor , in which it is said : " It was reported that the Masons of Melrose , St . John Lodge , held documents of very ancient date , but the oldest they could show to your deputation was an old Minute Book , beginning in the year 1674 . "

Now , in regard to the books of the Lodge St . John , Melrose , I beg to say , clearly and distinctly , that anything coming from Bro . AV . P . Buchan does not come from him in an . authorised manner from the Lodge St . John , Melrose , and are merely words of his own . No authority has ever been given by

this Lodge to Bro . AV . P . Buchan to inspect their books , nor has he yet seen them all , as there are older books in their possession . The fact is simply this : Bro . Buchan paid a visit to Melrose , and called on the Secretary , who showed him some of

the books of the lodge ; but finding him very curious , did not show him everything . In regard to the history of the Lodge St . John , Melrose , I shall not say anything further in the meantime than , I believe it to be older than any other lodge in Scotland . I remain , yours fraternally , CHALMERS I . PATON .

LABOUR VERSUS REFRESHMENT IN THE LODGE . ( To the Editor of Tlic Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —In the "far north , " there has been for some time going on a desultory

sort of warfare amongst the members of some of the lodges as to whether a Masonic lodge should be held sacred to " Labour "—that is to the due performance in a solemn and respectful manner of our beautiful ceremonies ( beautiful when well done , but disgusting to every true Mason when blundered

through in a slovingly , careless , or ignorant manner ) , or whether these ceremonies should be merely looked upon as a necessary evil , and by delay thereby adding zest to the grand business of tlie evening—Refreshment ! that is toddy and tumblers ad lib . This latter view might have been excused

in Masonic meetings , previous to 1717 , before our system of Freemasonry was instituted , and when the members met for a "jolly blow out , " and to have some fun ; but now that Speculative Masonry , with its interesting ceremonies , beautiful rituals and sublime teachings , has been adopted things arc entirely

different . Before 1717 , there was little or nothing to particularly interest the members of Masonic lodges or friendly societies in thc intellectual way , any more than amongst other co-existent Craft societies or social clubs , but now all this is altered ; a lodge when constituted is " consecrated " and its

members pledged to do all in their power to advance the interests of the Order , it is expected of them that they will do nothing to lower its status , but on the contrary by example as well as by precept show that they appreciate and value the noble principles inculcated . A desire to carry out these

latter ideas in their integrity naturally leads to an antagonism between thc fiiends of " Labour" in the lodge and the partisans of " Refreshment . " The former find that any good . r : \ . 'ct which is produced by the noble ideas and sublime teachings of the ceremonies is almost or altogether , soon thereafter ,

nullified by thc scenes , incidents , or effects of " Refreshment . " They see the best of their candidates come up , get made—then disappear ! How is this ? they ask , and thc answer is—wc admire your ceremonies and principles , but wc cannot lend our countenance to your drinkingctistoms ; wc are not

tea-totalters , but thc tone of . society is now happily altered for the better , hard drinking being rather at a discount , and we consider it altogether inconsistent for a Masonic lodge whicb has been dedicated to thc honour of the Great Architect of the Universe , and in which prayer and praise has been

offered up to llim , to be in a few minutes thereafter systematically desecrated by being turned into a sort of half-licensed shebeen , or a temple of Bacchus ! Allow me to quote a few words which show an episode in the warfare , " If Bro . had his

way , the ceremonies would be conducted so solemnly that we could not with any good grace go into refreshment in the lodge afterwards at all . " This remark was really made in open lodge about three years ago , and giving the rein to our fancy , wc can easily imagine thc response such a remark would meet with in many quarters . Thc cry would

Original Correspondence.

soon get up , more or less audible as the case might be , " Refreshment for ever , long life to the old landmarks / " Then " General AVhisky , " smiling benignly upon his supporters , bravely unfurls his standard , and rallying his votaries around him , duly pledges them in the very best Glenlivet ; earnestly charging them to stand true to their colours and boldly face

the advancing foe , manfully challenging all and sundry , who even dare to attempt to deprive them of their glories and ancient privileges , then waxing warm with the spirit of his dram he breaks out into the soul-inspiring refrain of '' AVe are 11 a foil , we ' re no that fou , But just a drappie in our ee ;

The cock may craw , the day may daw , An' aye we'll taste the barley bree . " I am yours fraternally ,

LEO . A MASONIC RELIC . ( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —AVhen I was in last Scotland I visited the St . Mark's Lodge , Glasgow , and bad the pleasure of seeing a very old carved oak Masonic chair in that lodge : but I could not

obtain the history of it . I believe it belongs to the sixteenth century , and was found in St . Mungo ' s Cathedral Church . As your columns are open on the subject of Masonic antiquities , perhaps some of the Scotch brethren would give me the history of this veiy interesting relic . Yours fraternally , ISAAC BANKS , AV . M . Lodge 73 . . H . K . T ., I . C .

A QUERY . ( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —Can you or any of your North Country brethren tell me who was Vicar of Newcastle on the 10 th of August , 1 S 14 ? It is recorded that " a grand Masonic procession took place in Newcastle ( on that day ) on account of the Union of the Athol and St . Nicholas Lodges .

There were about 600 in procession , amongst whom were Sir J . E . Swinburne , Bart ., P . G . M . ; Sir M . W . Ridley , Bart ., M . P . ; Cuthbert Ellison , Esq ., M . P . ; AA ^ illiam Lorraine , Esq ., Isaac Cookson , Esq ., the Rev . John Collinson , Rector of Gateshead ; the Rev . Mr . AA ' asney , & c , & c . The then A ^ icar of

St . Nicholas ( Newcastle ) having refused the use of his church for divine service , the procession marched to Gateshead Church , where , after service , , £ 112 16 s . lod . was collected for the benefit of the Newcastle Infirmary . " I am , dear Sir and Brother , Yours faithfully and fraternally , TAURUS .

AFFILIATION . ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I have perused with some interest the letter of Bro . Hughan in your impression of thc 16 th inst . lie calls attention to the greater facilities being given m thc method of affiliating and obligating brethren in Scotland than

in England . As it may lead to something more satisfactory , take my own case , for instance : I was made a AA ' . M . last year in Scotland during a visit , and am naturally anxious to affiliate myself to a lodge in town , but have no means of ascertaining the joining fee and subscription , and at a loss for a proposer , for I am informed that the members of a lodge have a reluctance in proposing a brother

made in Scotland . If such is the case , it seems to me out of harmony with what thc Order inculcates . I contend when once a Mason , no matter where made , every facility should be given to affiliate onc ' s-self to a lodge in whatever town that may best suit you , in th . e absence of which , it makes me reluctant to forward my mite ( as I should have done ) towards thc Life Boat Fund . 1 am , Sir . vours fraternally , RECIPROCITY .

London April rrolh . 1870 , FREEMASONS' LIFE BOAT . ( To the Editor of The freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I see in THE FREEMASON a good deal of correspondence about the Masonic Life Boat Fund .

At page 35 of Vol . A II . of thc Journal of the National Life Boat Institution , you will find among thc Life Boat Funds in progress the acknowledgment of the receipt towards the Masonic Life Boat of the sum of £ 52 iSs . 6 d ., received from Clarke ancl Smith , 1 S 6 9 .

In the Freemason's Magazine of April 16 th , there is also a further list of subscriptions towards thc same f ' Mu \ . If this were made known to those brethren who are getting up a distinct fund for the same purpose , it might induce them to make one common fund towards thc Masonic Life Boat , although the subscriptions may be collected by different committees . Yours fraternally , II . CLERK , P . M . Royal Arsenal , April 25 , 1870 .

Original Correspondence.

( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —It is quite refreshing to read the straightforward , business-like , and gentlemanly letter that you published in your last edition , emanating from the pen of P . M . 200 . He does not beat about the bush , but comes to the point at once , by stating that his lodge sent / 10

3 s . 6 d . to " AV . Smith , Esq ., " who , upon subsequent inquiry , acknowledged receiving the same , but refers him to " Bro . Hyde Clarke" for further information . " Bro . Clarke , " in reply , states that " he has a slight recollection of receiving such an amount , " & c . I think with him that those persons should be

made to give an account of their stewardship . P . M . went the proper way to obtain it , by asking those who acknowledged having received the money . But upon what grounds P . M . can endorse the letter of AV . M . in respect of Bro . Gottheil furnishing particulars or rendering assistance in a matter of which he is entirely ignorant is a puzzle to me

and to many other readers of his letter . Is it because that gentleman kindly devotes his time and energy to this movement that he is to be made a target for such implications as are conveyed in the letters of AV . M . ? Bro . Gotthiel , as well as myself , distinctly denied having had any knowledge of a previous movement in this direction , or of the

persons connected therewith . A statement to that effect was duly published in your columns . AVhen suchan assertion remainsuncontradicted , it then becomes simply an insult for any individual , as in the case of AV . M ., who has the pertinacity in his letters to endeavour to convey the idea that we were responsible for the doings or misdoings of the

former committee . As the leader in the present movement , I heartily thank P . M . for the opportunity he has given me to point out that it was in consequence of rumours respecting a previous movement , as stated by him , that this committee thought it advisable to insert in their circulars that we had no connection with anything of the same

kind that might have been previously attempted . In reply to the couplet of P . M ., I have only to remark , if" he has found his old love false he will find his new love true . " In conclusion , I beg leave to state that we court inquiry . Our committee room is open to the visit of any brother , and I shall be pleased to meet P . M .

and AA . M . there on thc 5 th of May next , when they will have an opportunity of judging for themselves what has already been done by us . I feel assured that they will regret as men and brothers having deviated from that excellent injunction , " Do unto others as you would have others do unto you , " and whicb maxim , in my humble opinion , has not been

applied to thc case of Bvo . Gottheil . Hoping you will excuse the length of my letter , but with your usual kindness insert this in your next impression , I have thc honour to remain , clear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , S . DAVIS , 141 , Hon . Treas . to Committee .

SOLOMON'S TEMPLE . ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , — AA'ho were the masons that prepared the stones for the building of King Solomon's Temple ? Thc scriptural part of this subject is to me a great difficulty . Moses commanded the children

of Israel in building to God that they were not to use any iron tool to the stones ( Dcut . xxvii . 5 ) . No doubt Solomon obeyed that command , for wc read ( 1 Kings vi . 7 ) , " Ancl the house when it was building was built of stones made ready before , " & c . pj ^

Thc Hebrew words arc yD ^ ^ pN " the whole stones as drawn , " which means as they took them out of their places , without any preparation ; but the question is , How and by what means had these stones been hewn out of thc mountain if iron was not to be used on them ?

The Jews bave a tradition that when God finished creating the world , on thc last day ( Friday ) before sunset , * Hc created ten things extra . One of them

is an insect called "VTiAUn hasmir , to engrave the names in the stones of the Ephod ( Ex . xxviii . 9 , n ) and to hew the stones for King Solomon's Temple ( see Talmud , book Aboth , chap . 5 , page 20 ; book Jobba , c . 9 , p . 48 ; book Gittin , c . 7 , p . 68 ) . Rabbi Jarchi and Kimchi believe in the story and explain the passage that the " insect" was laid on thc stones

and split it , and was sent down for the building of the Temple nnd no iron lool was used at them at all , and since the destruction of thc Temple that little "insect" is lost . Thc passage in 1 Kings v . 18 , they explain that those stones were used in the building of Solomon ' s own house only ( see v ' u . 8 , 9 ) . Now we have no such "insect " in Masonry , how were those stones in 1 Kings vi . 7 hewn , as the

Hebrew word ^ DD means unhewn stone ? We have it in the English version " made ready before it . " Yours fraternally , D . STOLZ .

“The Freemason: 1870-04-30, Page 8” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 21 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_30041870/page/8/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Article 1
FREEMASONRY in ENGLAND. Article 1
Reviews. Article 1
THE LEGEND of JOSHUA and the SOLAR and LUNAR MIRACLE. Article 2
UNITED GRAND LODGE. Article 3
Reports of Masonic Meetings. Article 3
ROYAL ARCH. Article 4
ORDERS OF CHIVALRY. Article 4
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 4
PROVINCE OF DEVON. Article 5
SCOTLAND. Article 5
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Births, Marriages, and Deaths. Article 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Ad 6
Untitled Article 6
Untitled Article 6
POSTPONEMENT of the GRAND FESTIVAL. Article 6
BOARD OF BENEVOLENCE. Article 6
Multum in Parbo, or Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 7
ROSICRUCIAN SOCIETY of ENGLAND. Article 7
Original Correspondence. Article 8
Jottings from Masonic Journals. Article 9
PHOTOGRAPHY & FREEMASONRY. Article 9
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS Article 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Page 1

Page 1

5 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

5 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

6 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

11 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

20 Articles
Page 8

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

The Editor is not responsible for llic opinions expressed by Correspondents . LODGE ST . JOHN , MELROSE ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER . —I observe that there is a copy of a " Report of the Historical Committee appointed by the Lodge of St . John , Glasgow , to inquire into the historical evidence and data of the antiquity of said lodge . " Appearing in your

columns , this document is signed by Bro . AV . P . Buchan , as Convenor , in which it is said : " It was reported that the Masons of Melrose , St . John Lodge , held documents of very ancient date , but the oldest they could show to your deputation was an old Minute Book , beginning in the year 1674 . "

Now , in regard to the books of the Lodge St . John , Melrose , I beg to say , clearly and distinctly , that anything coming from Bro . AV . P . Buchan does not come from him in an . authorised manner from the Lodge St . John , Melrose , and are merely words of his own . No authority has ever been given by

this Lodge to Bro . AV . P . Buchan to inspect their books , nor has he yet seen them all , as there are older books in their possession . The fact is simply this : Bro . Buchan paid a visit to Melrose , and called on the Secretary , who showed him some of

the books of the lodge ; but finding him very curious , did not show him everything . In regard to the history of the Lodge St . John , Melrose , I shall not say anything further in the meantime than , I believe it to be older than any other lodge in Scotland . I remain , yours fraternally , CHALMERS I . PATON .

LABOUR VERSUS REFRESHMENT IN THE LODGE . ( To the Editor of Tlic Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —In the "far north , " there has been for some time going on a desultory

sort of warfare amongst the members of some of the lodges as to whether a Masonic lodge should be held sacred to " Labour "—that is to the due performance in a solemn and respectful manner of our beautiful ceremonies ( beautiful when well done , but disgusting to every true Mason when blundered

through in a slovingly , careless , or ignorant manner ) , or whether these ceremonies should be merely looked upon as a necessary evil , and by delay thereby adding zest to the grand business of tlie evening—Refreshment ! that is toddy and tumblers ad lib . This latter view might have been excused

in Masonic meetings , previous to 1717 , before our system of Freemasonry was instituted , and when the members met for a "jolly blow out , " and to have some fun ; but now that Speculative Masonry , with its interesting ceremonies , beautiful rituals and sublime teachings , has been adopted things arc entirely

different . Before 1717 , there was little or nothing to particularly interest the members of Masonic lodges or friendly societies in thc intellectual way , any more than amongst other co-existent Craft societies or social clubs , but now all this is altered ; a lodge when constituted is " consecrated " and its

members pledged to do all in their power to advance the interests of the Order , it is expected of them that they will do nothing to lower its status , but on the contrary by example as well as by precept show that they appreciate and value the noble principles inculcated . A desire to carry out these

latter ideas in their integrity naturally leads to an antagonism between thc fiiends of " Labour" in the lodge and the partisans of " Refreshment . " The former find that any good . r : \ . 'ct which is produced by the noble ideas and sublime teachings of the ceremonies is almost or altogether , soon thereafter ,

nullified by thc scenes , incidents , or effects of " Refreshment . " They see the best of their candidates come up , get made—then disappear ! How is this ? they ask , and thc answer is—wc admire your ceremonies and principles , but wc cannot lend our countenance to your drinkingctistoms ; wc are not

tea-totalters , but thc tone of . society is now happily altered for the better , hard drinking being rather at a discount , and we consider it altogether inconsistent for a Masonic lodge whicb has been dedicated to thc honour of the Great Architect of the Universe , and in which prayer and praise has been

offered up to llim , to be in a few minutes thereafter systematically desecrated by being turned into a sort of half-licensed shebeen , or a temple of Bacchus ! Allow me to quote a few words which show an episode in the warfare , " If Bro . had his

way , the ceremonies would be conducted so solemnly that we could not with any good grace go into refreshment in the lodge afterwards at all . " This remark was really made in open lodge about three years ago , and giving the rein to our fancy , wc can easily imagine thc response such a remark would meet with in many quarters . Thc cry would

Original Correspondence.

soon get up , more or less audible as the case might be , " Refreshment for ever , long life to the old landmarks / " Then " General AVhisky , " smiling benignly upon his supporters , bravely unfurls his standard , and rallying his votaries around him , duly pledges them in the very best Glenlivet ; earnestly charging them to stand true to their colours and boldly face

the advancing foe , manfully challenging all and sundry , who even dare to attempt to deprive them of their glories and ancient privileges , then waxing warm with the spirit of his dram he breaks out into the soul-inspiring refrain of '' AVe are 11 a foil , we ' re no that fou , But just a drappie in our ee ;

The cock may craw , the day may daw , An' aye we'll taste the barley bree . " I am yours fraternally ,

LEO . A MASONIC RELIC . ( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —AVhen I was in last Scotland I visited the St . Mark's Lodge , Glasgow , and bad the pleasure of seeing a very old carved oak Masonic chair in that lodge : but I could not

obtain the history of it . I believe it belongs to the sixteenth century , and was found in St . Mungo ' s Cathedral Church . As your columns are open on the subject of Masonic antiquities , perhaps some of the Scotch brethren would give me the history of this veiy interesting relic . Yours fraternally , ISAAC BANKS , AV . M . Lodge 73 . . H . K . T ., I . C .

A QUERY . ( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —Can you or any of your North Country brethren tell me who was Vicar of Newcastle on the 10 th of August , 1 S 14 ? It is recorded that " a grand Masonic procession took place in Newcastle ( on that day ) on account of the Union of the Athol and St . Nicholas Lodges .

There were about 600 in procession , amongst whom were Sir J . E . Swinburne , Bart ., P . G . M . ; Sir M . W . Ridley , Bart ., M . P . ; Cuthbert Ellison , Esq ., M . P . ; AA ^ illiam Lorraine , Esq ., Isaac Cookson , Esq ., the Rev . John Collinson , Rector of Gateshead ; the Rev . Mr . AA ' asney , & c , & c . The then A ^ icar of

St . Nicholas ( Newcastle ) having refused the use of his church for divine service , the procession marched to Gateshead Church , where , after service , , £ 112 16 s . lod . was collected for the benefit of the Newcastle Infirmary . " I am , dear Sir and Brother , Yours faithfully and fraternally , TAURUS .

AFFILIATION . ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I have perused with some interest the letter of Bro . Hughan in your impression of thc 16 th inst . lie calls attention to the greater facilities being given m thc method of affiliating and obligating brethren in Scotland than

in England . As it may lead to something more satisfactory , take my own case , for instance : I was made a AA ' . M . last year in Scotland during a visit , and am naturally anxious to affiliate myself to a lodge in town , but have no means of ascertaining the joining fee and subscription , and at a loss for a proposer , for I am informed that the members of a lodge have a reluctance in proposing a brother

made in Scotland . If such is the case , it seems to me out of harmony with what thc Order inculcates . I contend when once a Mason , no matter where made , every facility should be given to affiliate onc ' s-self to a lodge in whatever town that may best suit you , in th . e absence of which , it makes me reluctant to forward my mite ( as I should have done ) towards thc Life Boat Fund . 1 am , Sir . vours fraternally , RECIPROCITY .

London April rrolh . 1870 , FREEMASONS' LIFE BOAT . ( To the Editor of The freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I see in THE FREEMASON a good deal of correspondence about the Masonic Life Boat Fund .

At page 35 of Vol . A II . of thc Journal of the National Life Boat Institution , you will find among thc Life Boat Funds in progress the acknowledgment of the receipt towards the Masonic Life Boat of the sum of £ 52 iSs . 6 d ., received from Clarke ancl Smith , 1 S 6 9 .

In the Freemason's Magazine of April 16 th , there is also a further list of subscriptions towards thc same f ' Mu \ . If this were made known to those brethren who are getting up a distinct fund for the same purpose , it might induce them to make one common fund towards thc Masonic Life Boat , although the subscriptions may be collected by different committees . Yours fraternally , II . CLERK , P . M . Royal Arsenal , April 25 , 1870 .

Original Correspondence.

( To the Editor of Thc Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —It is quite refreshing to read the straightforward , business-like , and gentlemanly letter that you published in your last edition , emanating from the pen of P . M . 200 . He does not beat about the bush , but comes to the point at once , by stating that his lodge sent / 10

3 s . 6 d . to " AV . Smith , Esq ., " who , upon subsequent inquiry , acknowledged receiving the same , but refers him to " Bro . Hyde Clarke" for further information . " Bro . Clarke , " in reply , states that " he has a slight recollection of receiving such an amount , " & c . I think with him that those persons should be

made to give an account of their stewardship . P . M . went the proper way to obtain it , by asking those who acknowledged having received the money . But upon what grounds P . M . can endorse the letter of AV . M . in respect of Bro . Gottheil furnishing particulars or rendering assistance in a matter of which he is entirely ignorant is a puzzle to me

and to many other readers of his letter . Is it because that gentleman kindly devotes his time and energy to this movement that he is to be made a target for such implications as are conveyed in the letters of AV . M . ? Bro . Gotthiel , as well as myself , distinctly denied having had any knowledge of a previous movement in this direction , or of the

persons connected therewith . A statement to that effect was duly published in your columns . AVhen suchan assertion remainsuncontradicted , it then becomes simply an insult for any individual , as in the case of AV . M ., who has the pertinacity in his letters to endeavour to convey the idea that we were responsible for the doings or misdoings of the

former committee . As the leader in the present movement , I heartily thank P . M . for the opportunity he has given me to point out that it was in consequence of rumours respecting a previous movement , as stated by him , that this committee thought it advisable to insert in their circulars that we had no connection with anything of the same

kind that might have been previously attempted . In reply to the couplet of P . M ., I have only to remark , if" he has found his old love false he will find his new love true . " In conclusion , I beg leave to state that we court inquiry . Our committee room is open to the visit of any brother , and I shall be pleased to meet P . M .

and AA . M . there on thc 5 th of May next , when they will have an opportunity of judging for themselves what has already been done by us . I feel assured that they will regret as men and brothers having deviated from that excellent injunction , " Do unto others as you would have others do unto you , " and whicb maxim , in my humble opinion , has not been

applied to thc case of Bvo . Gottheil . Hoping you will excuse the length of my letter , but with your usual kindness insert this in your next impression , I have thc honour to remain , clear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , S . DAVIS , 141 , Hon . Treas . to Committee .

SOLOMON'S TEMPLE . ( To the Editor of The Freemason . ) DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , — AA'ho were the masons that prepared the stones for the building of King Solomon's Temple ? Thc scriptural part of this subject is to me a great difficulty . Moses commanded the children

of Israel in building to God that they were not to use any iron tool to the stones ( Dcut . xxvii . 5 ) . No doubt Solomon obeyed that command , for wc read ( 1 Kings vi . 7 ) , " Ancl the house when it was building was built of stones made ready before , " & c . pj ^

Thc Hebrew words arc yD ^ ^ pN " the whole stones as drawn , " which means as they took them out of their places , without any preparation ; but the question is , How and by what means had these stones been hewn out of thc mountain if iron was not to be used on them ?

The Jews bave a tradition that when God finished creating the world , on thc last day ( Friday ) before sunset , * Hc created ten things extra . One of them

is an insect called "VTiAUn hasmir , to engrave the names in the stones of the Ephod ( Ex . xxviii . 9 , n ) and to hew the stones for King Solomon's Temple ( see Talmud , book Aboth , chap . 5 , page 20 ; book Jobba , c . 9 , p . 48 ; book Gittin , c . 7 , p . 68 ) . Rabbi Jarchi and Kimchi believe in the story and explain the passage that the " insect" was laid on thc stones

and split it , and was sent down for the building of the Temple nnd no iron lool was used at them at all , and since the destruction of thc Temple that little "insect" is lost . Thc passage in 1 Kings v . 18 , they explain that those stones were used in the building of Solomon ' s own house only ( see v ' u . 8 , 9 ) . Now we have no such "insect " in Masonry , how were those stones in 1 Kings vi . 7 hewn , as the

Hebrew word ^ DD means unhewn stone ? We have it in the English version " made ready before it . " Yours fraternally , D . STOLZ .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 7
  • You're on page8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy