Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • April 27, 1861
  • Page 7
  • ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHÆOLOGY.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, April 27, 1861: Page 7

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, April 27, 1861
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHÆOLOGY. ← Page 2 of 3 →
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Architecture And Archæology.

1067 , and a considerable part of the existing ruins belong to this period : the capitals are plain and early : they have been covered over with plaster and painted . These are all the dated examples of the first half of the 11 th century that I have been able to identify . I have a list pf many others either founded or rebuilt during that period , but have not been able to ascertain what portions remain .

The churches of the Pyrenees were admirably described by Mr . Freeman , a fortnight since : they are of early character , and have belfry windows , with-mid wall shafts and balusters resembling those in England and some of them are probably of the 11 th century ; others more probably of the 12 th ; their history has not been investigated ; but in remote and mountainous districts the earlier style is generall

y continued to a later period than in more central places . In Switzerland there are two or three churches which partake of this character . The tower of St . Maurice is built of Roman materials at the beginning of the 11 th century , and the belfry windows bear a resemblance to the Saxon baluster windows , but they are formed by using Roman columns taken from some older building , and these

columns being too long for the windows , the lower part of them is built into the rubble wall , as more easy than cutting the marble columns . The church of Roman Motier has long and short work in the angles ; but this may arise only from the nature of the building material . In Germany occasional instances of resemblance are found

, but it seems to arise more from their belonging to the same rude period than that one is copied from the other . The idea that the ancient Lombards were great builders in stone , and the . predecessors in the art of the Normans , I believe will be found , on examination , to be altogether groundless . I have searched in vain in Lombardy for any work of any importance between the Roman period and the 11 th century

. The absence of any examples of this period at Rome has been already mentioned . The buildings of Pisa and Lucca , ignorantly attributed to the ancient Lombards , very commonly bear inscriptions recording their erection , and of others the history is perfectly well known .

They are the glory of the Pisan republic of thc 12 th and 13 th centuries , with sometimes portions of the older buildings of the 11 th century , or earlier , built up in them . At Ravenna , at Rome , ancl in the cities of central Italy , the buildings are almost entirely constructed of brick , cased with marble , and they present nothing whatever from which the Anglo-Saxons could have derived the peculiar features of

their buildings . I believe that the style called Lom bardic has as much to do with the ancient Lombards as the Gothic had to do with the ancient Gotlis , and no more . Both are convenient terms as indicating the races by whom they were used ; but we must be careful not to be misled by these names into erroneous notions about the dates of the buildings , which is

very frequently the case , even with popular writers who ought to know better . The buildings of Italy so constantly bear dates inscribed upon them , that a little examination is all that is required to ascertain this point . To return to England and our supposed Anglo-Saxon churches , it is remarkable that , out of nearly a hundred examples , spread over twenty-nine different counties , there

are so few of which we have any account , or even any mention in history : they arc nearly all obscure village churches . The large number of sixty-three Benedictine monasteries were founded in England before the year 1000 , but of this large number not more than three or four are found to have any existing remains of early character , and there are not altogether more than six out of the hundred early churches

that remain to us , of which we havo any mention before thc year 1000 . These are the two crypts of St . Wilfred , at Hexham and Ripon , thc walls of the church in the castle at Dover , and of tlie church at Brixwortb , both built of the fragments of some Roman building , and in the rudest manner , and some portions of similar walls at Lyminge , Kent , and at St . Martin ' s , Canterbury . These exhaust thc list of buildings which we can at all authenticate for the long period of five centuries . When we come to the 11 th century , the case

is widely different ] : the great building era now begins , and we have a number of buildings remaining which we can identify and authenticate ; and several of these are before the Norman conquest , as we have seen . The Normans did nob bring over an azmy of masons with them ; and , although many of their soldiers were masons also , there is no doubt that their buildings were erected

mainly by Saxon hands ; and , as the Norman rule was not very readily or quietly submitted to , they were obliged in the first instance to turn their attention to building castles to keep the people in subjection . Forty-nine castles ' . are enumerated in the Domesday survey , which was made about twenty years after the Conquest ; and of these one only , that of Arundel , is mentioned as having existed in the time

of Edward the Confessor . It is said that AVilliam attributed the facility of his concpiest chiefly to the circumstance of the Saxons having no strong places to keep the Norman army in check , and that he set about providing them as soon as possible . These early Norman castles are all built in the same type —a square massive keep or donjon , with the ground-floor

vaulted for store-rooms , or stables , or prisons , according to circumstances ; the entrance on the first-floor , with sometimes an external flight of stone steps ; in other cases a drawbridge to an outwork . These keeps do not appear to have been originally enclosed with stonewalls ; the custom ofraisingfortifications of a trench and vallum surmounted by wooden palisades was not yet abandoned ; in fact , it was used occasionally long afterwards , and these keeps seem to have been usually surrounded by a

double entrenchment , tho inner one enclosing the inner ballium or bailey , or principal court , in which the keep was situated , the outer ono enclosing the outer bailey or yardand this was frequently of considerable extent , in order to drive the cattle into it in case of need for protection . The custom of enclosing two courts or baileys round a castle was continued throughout the Middle Ages ; and in

later times farm buildings were erected in the outer bailey ; and by degrees in more peaceful times this was changed into the farmyard for tho Manor-house . The Norman keeps were so massive and so well built that a large number of them have been preserved in the present day , often upon no other ground than that it would cost more to pull them down , from the great strength of the

mortar , than the materials arc worth . We have , however , very few castles remaining that appear to have been completed in the time of William the the Conqueror . During the twenty-one years of his reign his hands were generally full . They seem to have been completed for the most part in the time of his successor . AVilliam the Conqueror , either from real piety , or in order

to make his peace with the Pope and with the Church , founded several magnificent abbeys , ivhich he richly endowed ; but to say that he built them is generally a mistake ; the monks erected the building with the help of tho funds which he gave them . The two most celebrated of these abbeys are at Caen , in Normandy . St . Stephen ' s , or the Abbaye aux Homines , was founded by William in 10 ( 16 , and dedicated in 1077 , which shows that in eleven years so much of the church was completed as was necessary for the performance of divine service . It was the usual custom of

the Middle Ages to consecrate a church as soon as the choir was completed , leaving the nave and other parts to be completed afterwards ; but the foundations for tho whole were generally laid at once , and the west front with one of the towers to hold the bells ; and the transepts were commonly begun at the same time as tho choir , or very soon after it : and as the monks or priests must have some place to live

in to enable them to perforin the service , thc domestic buildings of the abbey were generally begun at the same time as the choir , but they were frequently obliged to be content with temporary wooden buildings for a considerable time . A careful examination of this building shows not only that the choir has been rebuilt in the loth centuryand thc

, spires added at the sanio time , but that there is work of three periods antecedent to this , all belonging to what wc call thc Norman style , aud that the whole of thc west front , ivhich is so familiar to us from engravings , belongs to the second

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1861-04-27, Page 7” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 6 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_27041861/page/7/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
GRAND LODGE. Article 1
MEMOIRS OF THE FREEMASONS OF NAPLES. Article 2
CLASSICAL THEOLOGY.—XLII. Article 4
ARCHITECTURE AND ARCHÆOLOGY. Article 6
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 8
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 10
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
A CASE OF DISTRESS. Article 11
THE HIGH GRADES. Article 11
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 11
UNITED GRAND LODGE. Article 11
METROPOLITAN. Article 15
PROVINCIAL. Article 16
YORKSHIRE (WEST). Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 16
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 17
TURKEY. Article 18
WEST INDIES. Article 18
Poetry. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

5 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

3 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

4 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

3 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Architecture And Archæology.

1067 , and a considerable part of the existing ruins belong to this period : the capitals are plain and early : they have been covered over with plaster and painted . These are all the dated examples of the first half of the 11 th century that I have been able to identify . I have a list pf many others either founded or rebuilt during that period , but have not been able to ascertain what portions remain .

The churches of the Pyrenees were admirably described by Mr . Freeman , a fortnight since : they are of early character , and have belfry windows , with-mid wall shafts and balusters resembling those in England and some of them are probably of the 11 th century ; others more probably of the 12 th ; their history has not been investigated ; but in remote and mountainous districts the earlier style is generall

y continued to a later period than in more central places . In Switzerland there are two or three churches which partake of this character . The tower of St . Maurice is built of Roman materials at the beginning of the 11 th century , and the belfry windows bear a resemblance to the Saxon baluster windows , but they are formed by using Roman columns taken from some older building , and these

columns being too long for the windows , the lower part of them is built into the rubble wall , as more easy than cutting the marble columns . The church of Roman Motier has long and short work in the angles ; but this may arise only from the nature of the building material . In Germany occasional instances of resemblance are found

, but it seems to arise more from their belonging to the same rude period than that one is copied from the other . The idea that the ancient Lombards were great builders in stone , and the . predecessors in the art of the Normans , I believe will be found , on examination , to be altogether groundless . I have searched in vain in Lombardy for any work of any importance between the Roman period and the 11 th century

. The absence of any examples of this period at Rome has been already mentioned . The buildings of Pisa and Lucca , ignorantly attributed to the ancient Lombards , very commonly bear inscriptions recording their erection , and of others the history is perfectly well known .

They are the glory of the Pisan republic of thc 12 th and 13 th centuries , with sometimes portions of the older buildings of the 11 th century , or earlier , built up in them . At Ravenna , at Rome , ancl in the cities of central Italy , the buildings are almost entirely constructed of brick , cased with marble , and they present nothing whatever from which the Anglo-Saxons could have derived the peculiar features of

their buildings . I believe that the style called Lom bardic has as much to do with the ancient Lombards as the Gothic had to do with the ancient Gotlis , and no more . Both are convenient terms as indicating the races by whom they were used ; but we must be careful not to be misled by these names into erroneous notions about the dates of the buildings , which is

very frequently the case , even with popular writers who ought to know better . The buildings of Italy so constantly bear dates inscribed upon them , that a little examination is all that is required to ascertain this point . To return to England and our supposed Anglo-Saxon churches , it is remarkable that , out of nearly a hundred examples , spread over twenty-nine different counties , there

are so few of which we have any account , or even any mention in history : they arc nearly all obscure village churches . The large number of sixty-three Benedictine monasteries were founded in England before the year 1000 , but of this large number not more than three or four are found to have any existing remains of early character , and there are not altogether more than six out of the hundred early churches

that remain to us , of which we havo any mention before thc year 1000 . These are the two crypts of St . Wilfred , at Hexham and Ripon , thc walls of the church in the castle at Dover , and of tlie church at Brixwortb , both built of the fragments of some Roman building , and in the rudest manner , and some portions of similar walls at Lyminge , Kent , and at St . Martin ' s , Canterbury . These exhaust thc list of buildings which we can at all authenticate for the long period of five centuries . When we come to the 11 th century , the case

is widely different ] : the great building era now begins , and we have a number of buildings remaining which we can identify and authenticate ; and several of these are before the Norman conquest , as we have seen . The Normans did nob bring over an azmy of masons with them ; and , although many of their soldiers were masons also , there is no doubt that their buildings were erected

mainly by Saxon hands ; and , as the Norman rule was not very readily or quietly submitted to , they were obliged in the first instance to turn their attention to building castles to keep the people in subjection . Forty-nine castles ' . are enumerated in the Domesday survey , which was made about twenty years after the Conquest ; and of these one only , that of Arundel , is mentioned as having existed in the time

of Edward the Confessor . It is said that AVilliam attributed the facility of his concpiest chiefly to the circumstance of the Saxons having no strong places to keep the Norman army in check , and that he set about providing them as soon as possible . These early Norman castles are all built in the same type —a square massive keep or donjon , with the ground-floor

vaulted for store-rooms , or stables , or prisons , according to circumstances ; the entrance on the first-floor , with sometimes an external flight of stone steps ; in other cases a drawbridge to an outwork . These keeps do not appear to have been originally enclosed with stonewalls ; the custom ofraisingfortifications of a trench and vallum surmounted by wooden palisades was not yet abandoned ; in fact , it was used occasionally long afterwards , and these keeps seem to have been usually surrounded by a

double entrenchment , tho inner one enclosing the inner ballium or bailey , or principal court , in which the keep was situated , the outer ono enclosing the outer bailey or yardand this was frequently of considerable extent , in order to drive the cattle into it in case of need for protection . The custom of enclosing two courts or baileys round a castle was continued throughout the Middle Ages ; and in

later times farm buildings were erected in the outer bailey ; and by degrees in more peaceful times this was changed into the farmyard for tho Manor-house . The Norman keeps were so massive and so well built that a large number of them have been preserved in the present day , often upon no other ground than that it would cost more to pull them down , from the great strength of the

mortar , than the materials arc worth . We have , however , very few castles remaining that appear to have been completed in the time of William the the Conqueror . During the twenty-one years of his reign his hands were generally full . They seem to have been completed for the most part in the time of his successor . AVilliam the Conqueror , either from real piety , or in order

to make his peace with the Pope and with the Church , founded several magnificent abbeys , ivhich he richly endowed ; but to say that he built them is generally a mistake ; the monks erected the building with the help of tho funds which he gave them . The two most celebrated of these abbeys are at Caen , in Normandy . St . Stephen ' s , or the Abbaye aux Homines , was founded by William in 10 ( 16 , and dedicated in 1077 , which shows that in eleven years so much of the church was completed as was necessary for the performance of divine service . It was the usual custom of

the Middle Ages to consecrate a church as soon as the choir was completed , leaving the nave and other parts to be completed afterwards ; but the foundations for tho whole were generally laid at once , and the west front with one of the towers to hold the bells ; and the transepts were commonly begun at the same time as tho choir , or very soon after it : and as the monks or priests must have some place to live

in to enable them to perforin the service , thc domestic buildings of the abbey were generally begun at the same time as the choir , but they were frequently obliged to be content with temporary wooden buildings for a considerable time . A careful examination of this building shows not only that the choir has been rebuilt in the loth centuryand thc

, spires added at the sanio time , but that there is work of three periods antecedent to this , all belonging to what wc call thc Norman style , aud that the whole of thc west front , ivhich is so familiar to us from engravings , belongs to the second

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 6
  • You're on page7
  • 8
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy