Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Scotland.
were used in reference to the actings of one who was not only entitled to be respected in virtue of Ms position in the province , but as being the representative of the Supreme Grand Chapter itself . Not only , however , were these passages allowed to pass without censure , but the parties making use of them were apparentlencouraged bthe Supreme Grand Chapter .
y y In this respect the Supreme Chapter was unquestionably guilty of failing to support the dignity of those whom she employed to execute her commands . If anything could add to the utter failure in duty on the part of the Supreme Chapter , which these statements imply , it would certainly be found in this—that the
vulgar and improper language above quoted was addressed chiefly to a companion , than whom there is none more honourable in the Order , and no one who has done more for Eoyal Arch Masonry in Scotland . 7 th . "When the Supreme Grand Chapter ultimately made a remit to Comp . Dr . Walker Arnotthe
, naturally inferred that the granting of that remit carried with it the powers requisite to carry it out with effect , and accordingly that he was quo ad hoc invested with the powers of the Supreme Chapter itself . There can be no doubt that this is the proper interpretation of the remit , because , on a former occasion ,
the Supreme Chapter recognised that right , and even , on this occasion , the Supreme Chapter , decided that any companion to whom a remit was made by Supreme Chapter had , by virtue of said remit for inquiry , the same powers , so far as said inquiry was concerned , as the Supreme Chapter itself possessed . In virtue of the powers conferred on him by the remit , before mentioned , Comp . Arnott , in the exercise of a sound
discretion , sent his Scribe E . to Ayr with a request for the books of the petitioner's chapter , which were given up to him at once . These books were examined and returned within four days . Iu the meantime , however , a petition and complaint had been forwarded to the Supreme Chapter , and the Supreme Chapter ultimately pronounced a deliverancein
, which they characterised the proceedings of Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott , referred to as uncalled for in the circumstances , and unauthorised by the laws of the Supreme Chapter . This , in effect , amounted to a vote of censure on Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott for doing that which Avas not only proper and
requisite , but quite Avithin the sphere of his authority . In this respect the Supreme Chapter were guilty again of failing to support the dignity and honour of the companion who , holding office under her , was entitled to her protection and support . The result of all these proceedings was that Dr . Walker
Arnott felt . himself so much aggrieved that he has resigned all connection with Eoyal Arch Masonry in Scotland , and his exertions have accordingly been lost to Eoyal Arch Masonry . II . Because of thefailure , on the part of the Supreme Chapter , to afford any redress to a remonstrance
by a large and influential portion of the companions of the West , ancl the disrespect shown to those companions in reference thereto , as shoAvn by the following statements . 1 st . In consequence of the manner in which Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott had been treated , and of the dissatisfaction felt by the Companions of the West , at the conduct of the Supreme Chapter ; an open meeting Avas called of the Conmanions of . the
Western Province to consider whether any , and if so , what steps should he taken in the matter . This meeting Avas attended by upwards of sixty Companions . At that meeting a committee was appointed to frame a report upon the Avhole matter . A report was accordingly drawn up and submitted to the several chapters in the West . Said
report Avas approved of , and adopted by the following Chapters , viz ., Nos . IS , 22 , 35 , 50 , 67 , 73 , 76 , 78 , and 87 . A copy of said report was also transmitted to the Scribe E . of the Supreme Chapter . Thereafter the Supreme Chapter deiAianded to know if these chapters continued to adhere to the report , when it was found
that they did . 2 nd . As the Supreme Chapter failed to afford redress , ' another open meeting was held , attended by upwards of eighty Companions . At this meeting resolutions Avere adopted expressing the vieAvs of the Companions in the West , as to the
matter which had given rise to the dispute , and as to making proAdsion for the future government of the Supreme Chapter . The resolutions Avere fonvarded to the Supreme Chapter , but that body have neither signified their intention of carrying out the terms of these resolutions , nor have they taken the slightest notice of their having been received , thereby treating
the Companions of the West Avith marked disrespect . 3 rd . Because of the illegal acts of the Supreme Chapter in suspending certain Chapters and Companions , these circumstances , in the face of the proceedings before narrated , and in consequence of them , the Supreme Grand Chapter did , at their last meetingwithout notice to the partiesand without
, , trial , most illegally and unconstitutionally suspend four Chapters of the Western district , and thirteen Companions , the Chapters ancl Companions suspended "being those who took the leading part in the proceedings before mentioned . The Chapters suspended were all at the time of suspension in a highl
y pros perous state , and the Companions suspended are amongst the most respected and zealous Eoyal Arch Masons in the Western Province . 4 th . Because the history of all these proceedings , proves that a desire exists in the Supreme Grand Chapter to cripple the efforts and destroy the
usefulness of the Provincial Grand Chapter , and its office-bearers and members—a state ' of matters opposed to the principles , and inimical to the true interests of Eoyal Arch Masons . Signed at Glasgow , the twenty-sixth day of December , eighteen hundred and sixty-tAvo , and following days : ^ -
Donald Campbell , P . Z . No . 50 , D . H . Miller , 50 , P . G . Steward . late P . G . H ., P . G . J , for Scot- D . Liddle , late P . G . Steward . land . J . Pollock , 50 , P . G . TVler . D . Sutherland , 67 , P . Z . 279 , E . W . Pritchard , M . D ., 50 P . Prov . G . J . James Cowan , 50 K . Wallace , 50 , late P . G . Sc . E . Robert Clugston , J . 67 H . Campbell , 69 , H . 50 , P . G . N . H . Marshall , P . H ., Scribe E . 67 J . Muir , P . Z . 67 , late P . G . T . James Horn , P . H . 50
N . B . Dalveene , P . Z . 67 , late James Campbell , P . Z . 69 P . G . 1 st Soj . J . Davidson , 50 , P . P . Z . 79 J . Laurie , N . 50 , late P . G . Andrew Bell , 67 2 nd Soj . Thos . Mc . K . Campbell , Z . 69 J . Batraatyne , 69 , late P . G . Andrew Dougall , Z . 67 3 rd Soj . Donald Moss , 69 A . McDonald , late P . G . Jeweller . Thomas D . Pairley , J . 76 A . Purdie , late P . G . Chan . James Wallace , 79 A . Ritcliie , 69 , P . G . St . Bearer .: David Haire , 50 B . McKendriok , 69 , P . G . St . B . Andrew Logan , 50
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.
Scotland.
were used in reference to the actings of one who was not only entitled to be respected in virtue of Ms position in the province , but as being the representative of the Supreme Grand Chapter itself . Not only , however , were these passages allowed to pass without censure , but the parties making use of them were apparentlencouraged bthe Supreme Grand Chapter .
y y In this respect the Supreme Chapter was unquestionably guilty of failing to support the dignity of those whom she employed to execute her commands . If anything could add to the utter failure in duty on the part of the Supreme Chapter , which these statements imply , it would certainly be found in this—that the
vulgar and improper language above quoted was addressed chiefly to a companion , than whom there is none more honourable in the Order , and no one who has done more for Eoyal Arch Masonry in Scotland . 7 th . "When the Supreme Grand Chapter ultimately made a remit to Comp . Dr . Walker Arnotthe
, naturally inferred that the granting of that remit carried with it the powers requisite to carry it out with effect , and accordingly that he was quo ad hoc invested with the powers of the Supreme Chapter itself . There can be no doubt that this is the proper interpretation of the remit , because , on a former occasion ,
the Supreme Chapter recognised that right , and even , on this occasion , the Supreme Chapter , decided that any companion to whom a remit was made by Supreme Chapter had , by virtue of said remit for inquiry , the same powers , so far as said inquiry was concerned , as the Supreme Chapter itself possessed . In virtue of the powers conferred on him by the remit , before mentioned , Comp . Arnott , in the exercise of a sound
discretion , sent his Scribe E . to Ayr with a request for the books of the petitioner's chapter , which were given up to him at once . These books were examined and returned within four days . Iu the meantime , however , a petition and complaint had been forwarded to the Supreme Chapter , and the Supreme Chapter ultimately pronounced a deliverancein
, which they characterised the proceedings of Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott , referred to as uncalled for in the circumstances , and unauthorised by the laws of the Supreme Chapter . This , in effect , amounted to a vote of censure on Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott for doing that which Avas not only proper and
requisite , but quite Avithin the sphere of his authority . In this respect the Supreme Chapter were guilty again of failing to support the dignity and honour of the companion who , holding office under her , was entitled to her protection and support . The result of all these proceedings was that Dr . Walker
Arnott felt . himself so much aggrieved that he has resigned all connection with Eoyal Arch Masonry in Scotland , and his exertions have accordingly been lost to Eoyal Arch Masonry . II . Because of thefailure , on the part of the Supreme Chapter , to afford any redress to a remonstrance
by a large and influential portion of the companions of the West , ancl the disrespect shown to those companions in reference thereto , as shoAvn by the following statements . 1 st . In consequence of the manner in which Comp . Dr . Walker Arnott had been treated , and of the dissatisfaction felt by the Companions of the West , at the conduct of the Supreme Chapter ; an open meeting Avas called of the Conmanions of . the
Western Province to consider whether any , and if so , what steps should he taken in the matter . This meeting Avas attended by upwards of sixty Companions . At that meeting a committee was appointed to frame a report upon the Avhole matter . A report was accordingly drawn up and submitted to the several chapters in the West . Said
report Avas approved of , and adopted by the following Chapters , viz ., Nos . IS , 22 , 35 , 50 , 67 , 73 , 76 , 78 , and 87 . A copy of said report was also transmitted to the Scribe E . of the Supreme Chapter . Thereafter the Supreme Chapter deiAianded to know if these chapters continued to adhere to the report , when it was found
that they did . 2 nd . As the Supreme Chapter failed to afford redress , ' another open meeting was held , attended by upwards of eighty Companions . At this meeting resolutions Avere adopted expressing the vieAvs of the Companions in the West , as to the
matter which had given rise to the dispute , and as to making proAdsion for the future government of the Supreme Chapter . The resolutions Avere fonvarded to the Supreme Chapter , but that body have neither signified their intention of carrying out the terms of these resolutions , nor have they taken the slightest notice of their having been received , thereby treating
the Companions of the West Avith marked disrespect . 3 rd . Because of the illegal acts of the Supreme Chapter in suspending certain Chapters and Companions , these circumstances , in the face of the proceedings before narrated , and in consequence of them , the Supreme Grand Chapter did , at their last meetingwithout notice to the partiesand without
, , trial , most illegally and unconstitutionally suspend four Chapters of the Western district , and thirteen Companions , the Chapters ancl Companions suspended "being those who took the leading part in the proceedings before mentioned . The Chapters suspended were all at the time of suspension in a highl
y pros perous state , and the Companions suspended are amongst the most respected and zealous Eoyal Arch Masons in the Western Province . 4 th . Because the history of all these proceedings , proves that a desire exists in the Supreme Grand Chapter to cripple the efforts and destroy the
usefulness of the Provincial Grand Chapter , and its office-bearers and members—a state ' of matters opposed to the principles , and inimical to the true interests of Eoyal Arch Masons . Signed at Glasgow , the twenty-sixth day of December , eighteen hundred and sixty-tAvo , and following days : ^ -
Donald Campbell , P . Z . No . 50 , D . H . Miller , 50 , P . G . Steward . late P . G . H ., P . G . J , for Scot- D . Liddle , late P . G . Steward . land . J . Pollock , 50 , P . G . TVler . D . Sutherland , 67 , P . Z . 279 , E . W . Pritchard , M . D ., 50 P . Prov . G . J . James Cowan , 50 K . Wallace , 50 , late P . G . Sc . E . Robert Clugston , J . 67 H . Campbell , 69 , H . 50 , P . G . N . H . Marshall , P . H ., Scribe E . 67 J . Muir , P . Z . 67 , late P . G . T . James Horn , P . H . 50
N . B . Dalveene , P . Z . 67 , late James Campbell , P . Z . 69 P . G . 1 st Soj . J . Davidson , 50 , P . P . Z . 79 J . Laurie , N . 50 , late P . G . Andrew Bell , 67 2 nd Soj . Thos . Mc . K . Campbell , Z . 69 J . Batraatyne , 69 , late P . G . Andrew Dougall , Z . 67 3 rd Soj . Donald Moss , 69 A . McDonald , late P . G . Jeweller . Thomas D . Pairley , J . 76 A . Purdie , late P . G . Chan . James Wallace , 79 A . Ritcliie , 69 , P . G . St . Bearer .: David Haire , 50 B . McKendriok , 69 , P . G . St . B . Andrew Logan , 50