Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • May 15, 1880
  • Page 1
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, May 15, 1880: Page 1

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, May 15, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article VISIT OF H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES TO TRURO. Page 1 of 1
    Article THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY AND G.L. OF MASSACHUSETTS. Page 1 of 2
    Article THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY AND G.L. OF MASSACHUSETTS. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Visit Of H.R.H. The Prince Of Wales To Truro.

VISIT OF H . R . H . THE PRINCE OF WALES TO TRURO .

BRETHREN intending to visit Trnro on the occasion of the laying of the foundation-stone of the Truro Cathedral by H . R . H . the Grand Master -will be glad to learn that the Great Western Railway Company will issue first , second and third class return tickets from any station

on their extensive system of railways to Truro , at a single fare and a-quarter for the double journey—such tickets being available ( except in the case of tickets issued from

London ) from the 19 th to the 21 st inst . inclusive . Tickets issued in London will bo available from tho 18 th to the 22 nd inclusive .

Special meetings of the Exeter , Plymouth and Plympton Lodges will be held on tho 19 th inst ., and a similar concession ( but in this case restricted to first and second class passengers ) is announced by the Great Western Company

m favour of visitors to those Lodges , the tickets being available from the 18 th . to the 21 st inst . inclusive . Holders of tickets from London to Truro may break their journey at Plymouth . The only voucher required will be the card of admission , or Lodge summons , as the case may be .

The Symbolism Of Freemasonry And G.L. Of Massachusetts.

THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY AND G . L . OF MASSACHUSETTS .

THE brethren of tho Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , at the last Quarterly Communication of that body , held at the Masonic Temple , Boston , on Wednesday , 10 th March , had before them the question of changing the seal of the Grand Lodge . It appears that in March 1857 a Committee was appointed on the same subject , and at the

meeting held m the month of Jane following they submitted a report , wherein they remarked that the seal so long in use was so much effaced that it gave but a very imperfect impression , and that in its best state it bore nothing significant of Freemasonry , saving the arms of the city of York

England . The supporters they described as two nondescript animals , perhaps beavers , perhaps lizards , while they characterised the motto , " Follow Reason , " as being in still worse taste . They therefore took upon themselves to entirely change tho old seal , and adopted one which they

hoped would be deemed to be in better taste , and of greater Masonic significance . The shield they proposed was divided into two parts , one representing the arms of Massachusetts , the other those of the city of York , that being the acknowledged source from which originated their denomination

of Ancient York Masons . Tho crest they decided upon was a dove , with the olive branch , symbolical of the peaceful mission they as Freemasons professed , and the supporters , in the form of two angels , were meant to represent Justice and Truth . We will not trouble our readers with the

technical description of the arms ; suffice it to say that the report was accepted and its recommendations adopted , without , it would seem , any discussion or objection , and up to the present time tho alteration then made has been in force . Now , however , the brethren—who

w the meantime have learned better to understand the meaning of the old arms—desire that their use should be resumed . In tho report submitted by tho Committee who at present have tho matter in hand , ¦ We have some very interesting particulars concerning the seals and armorial bearings of various Masonic bodies ,

The Symbolism Of Freemasonry And G.L. Of Massachusetts.

which are well worthy of perusal , as moro particularly evidencing the care with which every minute detail was arranged by our earlier brethren . Very many of tho acts attributed to the founders of Freemasonry have been at one time or another held up to ridicule , and aro

not unfrequently pronounced as being nothing but trivial items , having no meaning , and utterly unworthy of being retained as a part of our Masonic system . For this reason passages have from time to time been expunged from our Ritual , and alterations made , many of which we have no

doubt found their way into our ceremonial law for a good purpose , but which , from a want of perception on the part of those who undertook the part of " improvers , " and who did not or could not understand them , were pronounced valueless . This it appears is the case as regards the

" supporters " of the old Massachusetts Grand Lodge Arms , which , in 1857 , were pronounced by a duly appointed committee as nondescript animals ; certainly they went near the mark when they described them as being something like beavers , for such they havo since been

pronounced by competent authorities , who , in support of their decision , give the very good reason , for their adoption that beavers , well known for their building powers , wero emblematic of industry . As a consequence , the Committee who now have the matter in hand recommend that the old

seal be again adopted , without any change save the addition of the Arms of tho State of Massachusetts . Attached to tho report is a lengthened statement by Bro . W . T . R .

Marvin , who most exhaustively treats tho question from an heraldic point of view , citing the best authorities on the subject , and embodying in his remarks the opinions of tho various brethren who havo devoted their attention to it .

The consideration of this subject may be regarded by many as being of trifling importance ; but we look upon it as one of the many opportunities which are made to alter , or , as it is generally termed , amend , our ceremonies and ritual . Wo are not among tho class who object to alterations

simply because thoy involve a change ; but as wo believe that , to a certain extent , the founders of Freemasonry had an object for most of what they introduced into onr laws and ritnal , we think greater pains should be taken to

discover what was really intended before any alteration is made . It wonld be far better , before any so-called improvement is attempted , to first decide whether there was a reason for the insertion of tho matter objected to , and then discover what that reason was before it was decided

to expunge it ; if such were the case , we should not so often have to listen to the arguments of brethren who urge that uniformity of ritual , as well as the uniform observance of ceremonies , exists only in name . We have frequently heard it remarked that such and such a passage does not apply to

Freemasonry of the present day , and next we hear that the objectionable words , not being necessary , are omitted . It may be that the decisions thus arrived at are occasionally correct , but it is absurd to suppose they can be so in any but a few instances . Here in London we havo this point

plainly evidenced by the fact that we have some six or moro different styles of " recognised" working , all of which are claimed by their respective votaries as being the correct form , while in the country there arc few Provinces

but can boast their own particular style . Our views on the subject of " uniformity " aro doubtless well known to our readers , and we have no intention of taking up that question on the present occasion . All wo now urge is , that some better reason should be found for making an alteration than tho verdict of the one or two who , in their own opinion , aro wiser than lliose who introduced it , and who

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1880-05-15, Page 1” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 20 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_15051880/page/1/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
VISIT OF H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES TO TRURO. Article 1
THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY AND G.L. OF MASSACHUSETTS. Article 1
NOTES ON THE HISTORY OF THE MARK DEGREE. Article 2
DUKE OF CONNAUGHT MARK MASTER MASONS' LODGE, No. 199. Article 4
NORTHUMBERLAND AND BERWICK LODGE OF MARK MASTERS. Article 4
SIMON DE ST. LIZ LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS, No. 245. Article 4
HILDA CHAPTER ROSE CROIX. Article 4
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 5
COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. Article 5
THE LOUGHBOROUGH LODGE OF INSTRUCTION, Article 5
INSTALLATION MEETINGS, &c. Article 6
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
GRAND LODGE OF SCOTLAND. Article 8
ROYAL ARCH. Article 9
PANMURE CHAPTER, No. 720. Article 9
DRURY LANE. Article 10
NEW SADLER'S WELLS THEATRE. Article 10
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 10
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 11
SAMSON LODGE, No. 1668. Article 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

6 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

10 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

10 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

20 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

13 Articles
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Visit Of H.R.H. The Prince Of Wales To Truro.

VISIT OF H . R . H . THE PRINCE OF WALES TO TRURO .

BRETHREN intending to visit Trnro on the occasion of the laying of the foundation-stone of the Truro Cathedral by H . R . H . the Grand Master -will be glad to learn that the Great Western Railway Company will issue first , second and third class return tickets from any station

on their extensive system of railways to Truro , at a single fare and a-quarter for the double journey—such tickets being available ( except in the case of tickets issued from

London ) from the 19 th to the 21 st inst . inclusive . Tickets issued in London will bo available from tho 18 th to the 22 nd inclusive .

Special meetings of the Exeter , Plymouth and Plympton Lodges will be held on tho 19 th inst ., and a similar concession ( but in this case restricted to first and second class passengers ) is announced by the Great Western Company

m favour of visitors to those Lodges , the tickets being available from the 18 th . to the 21 st inst . inclusive . Holders of tickets from London to Truro may break their journey at Plymouth . The only voucher required will be the card of admission , or Lodge summons , as the case may be .

The Symbolism Of Freemasonry And G.L. Of Massachusetts.

THE SYMBOLISM OF FREEMASONRY AND G . L . OF MASSACHUSETTS .

THE brethren of tho Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , at the last Quarterly Communication of that body , held at the Masonic Temple , Boston , on Wednesday , 10 th March , had before them the question of changing the seal of the Grand Lodge . It appears that in March 1857 a Committee was appointed on the same subject , and at the

meeting held m the month of Jane following they submitted a report , wherein they remarked that the seal so long in use was so much effaced that it gave but a very imperfect impression , and that in its best state it bore nothing significant of Freemasonry , saving the arms of the city of York

England . The supporters they described as two nondescript animals , perhaps beavers , perhaps lizards , while they characterised the motto , " Follow Reason , " as being in still worse taste . They therefore took upon themselves to entirely change tho old seal , and adopted one which they

hoped would be deemed to be in better taste , and of greater Masonic significance . The shield they proposed was divided into two parts , one representing the arms of Massachusetts , the other those of the city of York , that being the acknowledged source from which originated their denomination

of Ancient York Masons . Tho crest they decided upon was a dove , with the olive branch , symbolical of the peaceful mission they as Freemasons professed , and the supporters , in the form of two angels , were meant to represent Justice and Truth . We will not trouble our readers with the

technical description of the arms ; suffice it to say that the report was accepted and its recommendations adopted , without , it would seem , any discussion or objection , and up to the present time tho alteration then made has been in force . Now , however , the brethren—who

w the meantime have learned better to understand the meaning of the old arms—desire that their use should be resumed . In tho report submitted by tho Committee who at present have tho matter in hand , ¦ We have some very interesting particulars concerning the seals and armorial bearings of various Masonic bodies ,

The Symbolism Of Freemasonry And G.L. Of Massachusetts.

which are well worthy of perusal , as moro particularly evidencing the care with which every minute detail was arranged by our earlier brethren . Very many of tho acts attributed to the founders of Freemasonry have been at one time or another held up to ridicule , and aro

not unfrequently pronounced as being nothing but trivial items , having no meaning , and utterly unworthy of being retained as a part of our Masonic system . For this reason passages have from time to time been expunged from our Ritual , and alterations made , many of which we have no

doubt found their way into our ceremonial law for a good purpose , but which , from a want of perception on the part of those who undertook the part of " improvers , " and who did not or could not understand them , were pronounced valueless . This it appears is the case as regards the

" supporters " of the old Massachusetts Grand Lodge Arms , which , in 1857 , were pronounced by a duly appointed committee as nondescript animals ; certainly they went near the mark when they described them as being something like beavers , for such they havo since been

pronounced by competent authorities , who , in support of their decision , give the very good reason , for their adoption that beavers , well known for their building powers , wero emblematic of industry . As a consequence , the Committee who now have the matter in hand recommend that the old

seal be again adopted , without any change save the addition of the Arms of tho State of Massachusetts . Attached to tho report is a lengthened statement by Bro . W . T . R .

Marvin , who most exhaustively treats tho question from an heraldic point of view , citing the best authorities on the subject , and embodying in his remarks the opinions of tho various brethren who havo devoted their attention to it .

The consideration of this subject may be regarded by many as being of trifling importance ; but we look upon it as one of the many opportunities which are made to alter , or , as it is generally termed , amend , our ceremonies and ritual . Wo are not among tho class who object to alterations

simply because thoy involve a change ; but as wo believe that , to a certain extent , the founders of Freemasonry had an object for most of what they introduced into onr laws and ritnal , we think greater pains should be taken to

discover what was really intended before any alteration is made . It wonld be far better , before any so-called improvement is attempted , to first decide whether there was a reason for the insertion of tho matter objected to , and then discover what that reason was before it was decided

to expunge it ; if such were the case , we should not so often have to listen to the arguments of brethren who urge that uniformity of ritual , as well as the uniform observance of ceremonies , exists only in name . We have frequently heard it remarked that such and such a passage does not apply to

Freemasonry of the present day , and next we hear that the objectionable words , not being necessary , are omitted . It may be that the decisions thus arrived at are occasionally correct , but it is absurd to suppose they can be so in any but a few instances . Here in London we havo this point

plainly evidenced by the fact that we have some six or moro different styles of " recognised" working , all of which are claimed by their respective votaries as being the correct form , while in the country there arc few Provinces

but can boast their own particular style . Our views on the subject of " uniformity " aro doubtless well known to our readers , and we have no intention of taking up that question on the present occasion . All wo now urge is , that some better reason should be found for making an alteration than tho verdict of the one or two who , in their own opinion , aro wiser than lliose who introduced it , and who

  • Prev page
  • You're on page1
  • 2
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy