Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Feb. 4, 1860
  • Page 10
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Feb. 4, 1860: Page 10

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Feb. 4, 1860
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ROYAL INSTITUTE OF BRITISH ARCHITECTS. ← Page 3 of 4
    Article Untitled Page 1 of 1
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Royal Institute Of British Architects.

ill-. Wyatt PapAvorth had fallen into many errors in reference to AVilliam of AVykeham , and among others , that he Ai-as horn at AVykeham , iu AVilts ;'"' whereas he A-.-as born sit Wykeham , in Hampshire ; he also declared that he had not been a Freemason , and quoted , iu support of his assertion , a passage occurring in the reign of Henry "VI ., whereas AVykeham had been dead sonic long time before . Mr . AA ' alcoti then proceeded to quote the opinions of Professor AVillis , of Cambridge , and also of Mr . Cockerel ! ( tho chairman ) , urging that the former hail declared that "William of

Wykeham ivas essentially a practical man , and one Avho had been engaged all his lifo in works of architecture ; while tho latter had given his opinion that he had never been sufficiently celebrated , and that the restoration of the Cathedral of AVinohester proved him to have been a consummate architect and engineer . AA'ith regard to his will , he had the expression iinvi operkfacli per -me , which ivere to be entrusted to Master AVilliam Wyn ford and other discreet persons versed iu their art ; thereby showing that he had been the designer of the neiv works referred to . But to

show that AA'illiam of AVykeham was not the man to arrogate to himself credit ivlu ' ch should justly attach to others , it ivould be found that in the stained glass at Winchester Cathedral Avere portraits of Thomas the glazier , the carpenter , and the chief mason who had assisted in building the church .

Mr . PAPAA'ORTU said he had referred to the circumstance mentioned by the reverend gentleman , and it was far from his intention to detract from what he believed to he the menVg of AVilliam of AVykeham . The Eev . Mr . AVALCOTT , in continuation , read a number of extracts from ancient records preserved at Oxford aud at the British Museum , with the vieiv of showing that a mass of contemporaneous evidence existed to prove that AVilliam of AV ykeham devoted the greater portion of his life to the study and pursuit of architecture , and that he well

deserved the high reputation which he had acquired as the most skilful and original architect of the middle ages . The rev . gentleman said that he was not sanguine enough to believe that he could coni-ince the lecturer , their Cato , hut if he ivas successful enough to obtain the verdict of the meeting , Mr . AVyatt Papworth would console himself AA'ith the words , Victrix causal diis placuit , sed , vieta Catoni . Mr . KERR remarked that they were always glad to hear the vieivs of amateursand that they were indebted to the rev . gentleman who spoke

, last for his observations ; at the same time it might be desirable to remind the meeting that the object of the paper just read was not simply to clear the biographical question , or to ascertain whether AVilliam of AVykeham ivas or ivas not AA'hat he was represented to be . AVhat AA-as far more important , was to trace the rise and progress of their OAVU profession , aud Mr . AA yatt Papworth had incidentally selected the most prominent amateur architect , to test his merits , and thereby ascertain whether the class of which he ivas the representative ivas or ivas uot

Avhat it AA-as supposed to be . For his own part , he did not take that lively interest in AVilliam of AV ykeham which the reverend gentleman near him did , but he had folloived the lecturer with great interest ; for it was evident that the early history of the architect ' s profession ii-as buried iu great obscurity . Iu early times , the church was tho only receptacle of learning , and consequently it was not unreasonable to suppose that ecclesiastics ivere also architects . It seemed to him that the distinctions drawn b y Sir . AVyatt Papworth as to the supervisors of building , opened np an extremely ( useful subject of inquiry , and he

hoped that he ivould follow it up on ' a future occasion . But that ivliioh architects as a body wanted to know u-.-ts , not whether AVilliam of AVykeham was what he was represented to have boon , but how it was that the beautiful in art arose in this country out of the mediieval system . At the present time it was fully recognized that there was a profession for the designing of beauty in buildings . AVhat the substitute mi ght have been in the Middle Ages was a point upon which opinion might differ , hat it was , at all events , clear that a condition of progress had developed

itself , out of which tho architect of the present day arose , though it could not be said that ho was even noiv full blown . " This appeared to him to be the real subject which the paper AA'as intended to elucidate , and with every desire to acknowledge the superior antiquarian lore of Mr . AValcptt , ho ( Mr . Kerr ) felt that he could not allow his observations to pass Avithout saying a word in defence of the lecture . Mr . STREET said that it ivas with much diffidence that he rose to oppose a paper so carefully prepared aud so instructiveand for which

, all Gothic architects had reason to he grateful . He confessed , however , that in his opinion Mr . AVyatt Papivorth ' s arguments ivere inconclusive , andliad been answered hy the llev . Mr . AValcott , who had shown that the _ architects of the Middle Ages had been described at the period by a variety of names , used indiscriminately . In proof of this , it should be remembered that AVilliam of AVykeham was himself clerk of the Avorks before he was an architect ; but leaving the ease of AVilliam of AVvkcham , he shonld like to call attention to an older artist , to whom " Mr .

AVyatt PapAvorth had done but scant justice—he meant Ellas of Dereham . The lecturer had dismissed him in six words , although Jlr . Pugin , on apparently good grounds , had claimed for him the credit of being the architect of Salisbury Cathedral . Elias of Dereham appeared , like other architects of his time , to liaA-e been variously named , and to have undertaken a great number of duties : for there were entries that he AA'as to make or enlarge a Avindoiv in the eastle oi' 'Winchester , ivhich was to be painted of a green colour , and thafc he ivas to give the disposition of it , as also to give directions as to the decorations of one of the king ' s chambers . He was a canon of Salisbury , and . as be . ( Mr . Street ) believed

Ar01001

the architect of tho cathedral . Ho AIMS present at its consecration ; the bishop appeared to have had great confidence in him , and as the king was present afc the consecration , ifc was most probable that the architect was there introduced to him , and that his subsequent employment by the king Ai-as to be traced to that circumstance , lt seemed to him ( Mr . Street ) that if Mr . Wyatt PapAvorth had not confined his remarks to England , he might have arrived at a truer knoll-ledge of the architects of the middle ages . The ordinary title of a continental architect , from

the thirteenth century doAi-nwards , was MAGISTEII OITJIUS , as shown by tho inscriptions on their tombs afc Rheinis , Amiens , and in the church of Notre Dame , at Paris . The architects in those days appeared to hai-e arranged the whole of the work ; but as time pas ' sed aivay , and the art of construction became better understood , tradesmen were called in to do separate portions ofthe work , for which it was to be presumed they were held responsible . AA'ith reference to the claims of the clergy to be regarded as the chief architects in the Middle Ages , there could be no

doubt but that many of them were entitled to that description ; but , on the other hand , many churches were erected ( Amiens Cathedral , for instance ) by laymen . In England , hoivever , the probability was that the majority of architects in the middle ages were clergymen . AVilliam of Sens and AVilliam the Englishman , of Canterbury , were also laymen . AVilliam of Sens , when engaged upon Canterbury Cathedral , fell from a scaffold , and being incapacitated from conducting the works , deputed a monk who had shown great taste and skill in architecture to

reyoung present him , and this ecclesiastic continued to discharge his trust until , on the removal of AVilliam of Sens to the continent for the restoration of his health , he was succeeded by William the Englishman . AA'ith 1 regard to the general absence of all trace of the AA'orking drawings used in the construction of the cathedrals raised in the thirteenth and subsequent centuries , he wished to state that on examining the roof of the Cathedral of Limoges , he AA'as struck by finding the outlines of the columns and other parts cut on blocks of granite . *

Mr . FJEMIEY expressed his hope that the subject would receive further consideration on a future occasion , as ifc was almost distressing to find the traditions which they were accustomed to regard with so much admiration and veneration so ruthlessly demolished . AA'ith regard to AVilliam of AVykeham , the bare supposition that he was not the designer of those magnificent works associated Avith his memory , was distressing to every Englishman , and more especially to those who claimed to be natives of the county in Avhich he AA-as born .

The CHAIRMAN said he quite agreed ivith the last speaker as to the desirability of rencAving the discussion on a future occasion , as it was of great importance to them as architects to learn the history of their ancestors , from whatever source they might hai-e sprung . It ivas also desirable to collect all the proofs that could he accumulated on so interesting a subject , and he AA-as convinced that their accomplished friend , Mr . AA' yatt Papworth , would be glad to receive any hints ivhich their colleetiA-e learning and research might bring to bear with reference to

the theme AA'hich he had brought under their consideration . The sub-1 jeet was of too great importance to be disposed of in the limited period I AA'hich could be devoted to one evening ' s discussion . He hoped , hoivever , that Mr . Ashpitel would favour the meeting with his opinion . Mr . ASHPITED said that afc so late an hour of the eveningjjlittle time remained to discuss so large and interesting a topic . AVith reference , however , to the issue raised , and ivhich Mr . AValcott had met Avith so much vigour , he might say , with that respectable authority in the

Spectator , that " a great deal might bo said on both sides . " They were , for instance , accustomed to heat- that such and such a building had been built by AVolsey , although ifc was well knoAvn that the great cardinal Avas no architect at all ; and , on the other hand , they were taught to believe thafc certain structures of groat beauty had been raised by-William of AVykeham , who had devoted his Avhole life to the study aud pursuit of architecture . It did not , however follow , that because no buildings had been constructed by AVolsey the wreath was to be taken

from the brow of AVilliam of AVykeham . Then with regard to the designation of the architect , it should be remembered that a good deal depended upon the state of civilization at the timo in which he flourished . In a IOAV state of civilization the man who built a hut might be described as " Carpentarius : '' but , again , in periods at which civilization had attained a high pitch , the architect ivas found occupying a position and taking rank ivith the jurist consults of his age . That the title by which the architect ivas known Avas not to be considered as derogating from the

dignity and importance of his office , was proved even in modern times by the fact that the architect of royalty was called the " clerk of the works , " and that until five or six years ago their friend Mr . Bumiing , who held the office of architect to the corporation of the City of London , AA-as described by the same humble designation . . Air . Drum- AVYATT said that he could supply in his own person a still more modern illustration , as he himself had the honour of being " clerk of the works" to the East India Company .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1860-02-04, Page 10” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 2 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_04021860/page/10/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
FREEMASONRY AND ITS INSTITUTES.—II. Article 1
SKETCHES FROM A TRAVELLER'S JOURNAL. Article 3
FROM DARK TO LIGHT. Article 6
ROYAL INSTITUTE OF BRITISH ARCHITECTS. Article 8
Untitled Article 10
ARCHÆOLOGY . Article 11
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 11
Literature. Article 13
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 16
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 17
MARK MASONRY. Article 18
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
IRELAND. Article 19
DENMARK. Article 19
Obituary. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

4 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

4 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

5 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Royal Institute Of British Architects.

ill-. Wyatt PapAvorth had fallen into many errors in reference to AVilliam of AVykeham , and among others , that he Ai-as horn at AVykeham , iu AVilts ;'"' whereas he A-.-as born sit Wykeham , in Hampshire ; he also declared that he had not been a Freemason , and quoted , iu support of his assertion , a passage occurring in the reign of Henry "VI ., whereas AVykeham had been dead sonic long time before . Mr . AA ' alcoti then proceeded to quote the opinions of Professor AVillis , of Cambridge , and also of Mr . Cockerel ! ( tho chairman ) , urging that the former hail declared that "William of

Wykeham ivas essentially a practical man , and one Avho had been engaged all his lifo in works of architecture ; while tho latter had given his opinion that he had never been sufficiently celebrated , and that the restoration of the Cathedral of AVinohester proved him to have been a consummate architect and engineer . AA'ith regard to his will , he had the expression iinvi operkfacli per -me , which ivere to be entrusted to Master AVilliam Wyn ford and other discreet persons versed iu their art ; thereby showing that he had been the designer of the neiv works referred to . But to

show that AA'illiam of AVykeham was not the man to arrogate to himself credit ivlu ' ch should justly attach to others , it ivould be found that in the stained glass at Winchester Cathedral Avere portraits of Thomas the glazier , the carpenter , and the chief mason who had assisted in building the church .

Mr . PAPAA'ORTU said he had referred to the circumstance mentioned by the reverend gentleman , and it was far from his intention to detract from what he believed to he the menVg of AVilliam of AVykeham . The Eev . Mr . AVALCOTT , in continuation , read a number of extracts from ancient records preserved at Oxford aud at the British Museum , with the vieiv of showing that a mass of contemporaneous evidence existed to prove that AVilliam of AV ykeham devoted the greater portion of his life to the study and pursuit of architecture , and that he well

deserved the high reputation which he had acquired as the most skilful and original architect of the middle ages . The rev . gentleman said that he was not sanguine enough to believe that he could coni-ince the lecturer , their Cato , hut if he ivas successful enough to obtain the verdict of the meeting , Mr . AVyatt Papworth would console himself AA'ith the words , Victrix causal diis placuit , sed , vieta Catoni . Mr . KERR remarked that they were always glad to hear the vieivs of amateursand that they were indebted to the rev . gentleman who spoke

, last for his observations ; at the same time it might be desirable to remind the meeting that the object of the paper just read was not simply to clear the biographical question , or to ascertain whether AVilliam of AVykeham ivas or ivas not AA'hat he was represented to be . AVhat AA-as far more important , was to trace the rise and progress of their OAVU profession , aud Mr . AA yatt Papworth had incidentally selected the most prominent amateur architect , to test his merits , and thereby ascertain whether the class of which he ivas the representative ivas or ivas uot

Avhat it AA-as supposed to be . For his own part , he did not take that lively interest in AVilliam of AV ykeham which the reverend gentleman near him did , but he had folloived the lecturer with great interest ; for it was evident that the early history of the architect ' s profession ii-as buried iu great obscurity . Iu early times , the church was tho only receptacle of learning , and consequently it was not unreasonable to suppose that ecclesiastics ivere also architects . It seemed to him that the distinctions drawn b y Sir . AVyatt Papworth as to the supervisors of building , opened np an extremely ( useful subject of inquiry , and he

hoped that he ivould follow it up on ' a future occasion . But that ivliioh architects as a body wanted to know u-.-ts , not whether AVilliam of AVykeham was what he was represented to have boon , but how it was that the beautiful in art arose in this country out of the mediieval system . At the present time it was fully recognized that there was a profession for the designing of beauty in buildings . AVhat the substitute mi ght have been in the Middle Ages was a point upon which opinion might differ , hat it was , at all events , clear that a condition of progress had developed

itself , out of which tho architect of the present day arose , though it could not be said that ho was even noiv full blown . " This appeared to him to be the real subject which the paper AA'as intended to elucidate , and with every desire to acknowledge the superior antiquarian lore of Mr . AValcptt , ho ( Mr . Kerr ) felt that he could not allow his observations to pass Avithout saying a word in defence of the lecture . Mr . STREET said that it ivas with much diffidence that he rose to oppose a paper so carefully prepared aud so instructiveand for which

, all Gothic architects had reason to he grateful . He confessed , however , that in his opinion Mr . AVyatt Papivorth ' s arguments ivere inconclusive , andliad been answered hy the llev . Mr . AValcott , who had shown that the _ architects of the Middle Ages had been described at the period by a variety of names , used indiscriminately . In proof of this , it should be remembered that AVilliam of AVykeham was himself clerk of the Avorks before he was an architect ; but leaving the ease of AVilliam of AVvkcham , he shonld like to call attention to an older artist , to whom " Mr .

AVyatt PapAvorth had done but scant justice—he meant Ellas of Dereham . The lecturer had dismissed him in six words , although Jlr . Pugin , on apparently good grounds , had claimed for him the credit of being the architect of Salisbury Cathedral . Elias of Dereham appeared , like other architects of his time , to liaA-e been variously named , and to have undertaken a great number of duties : for there were entries that he AA'as to make or enlarge a Avindoiv in the eastle oi' 'Winchester , ivhich was to be painted of a green colour , and thafc he ivas to give the disposition of it , as also to give directions as to the decorations of one of the king ' s chambers . He was a canon of Salisbury , and . as be . ( Mr . Street ) believed

Ar01001

the architect of tho cathedral . Ho AIMS present at its consecration ; the bishop appeared to have had great confidence in him , and as the king was present afc the consecration , ifc was most probable that the architect was there introduced to him , and that his subsequent employment by the king Ai-as to be traced to that circumstance , lt seemed to him ( Mr . Street ) that if Mr . Wyatt PapAvorth had not confined his remarks to England , he might have arrived at a truer knoll-ledge of the architects of the middle ages . The ordinary title of a continental architect , from

the thirteenth century doAi-nwards , was MAGISTEII OITJIUS , as shown by tho inscriptions on their tombs afc Rheinis , Amiens , and in the church of Notre Dame , at Paris . The architects in those days appeared to hai-e arranged the whole of the work ; but as time pas ' sed aivay , and the art of construction became better understood , tradesmen were called in to do separate portions ofthe work , for which it was to be presumed they were held responsible . AA'ith reference to the claims of the clergy to be regarded as the chief architects in the Middle Ages , there could be no

doubt but that many of them were entitled to that description ; but , on the other hand , many churches were erected ( Amiens Cathedral , for instance ) by laymen . In England , hoivever , the probability was that the majority of architects in the middle ages were clergymen . AVilliam of Sens and AVilliam the Englishman , of Canterbury , were also laymen . AVilliam of Sens , when engaged upon Canterbury Cathedral , fell from a scaffold , and being incapacitated from conducting the works , deputed a monk who had shown great taste and skill in architecture to

reyoung present him , and this ecclesiastic continued to discharge his trust until , on the removal of AVilliam of Sens to the continent for the restoration of his health , he was succeeded by William the Englishman . AA'ith 1 regard to the general absence of all trace of the AA'orking drawings used in the construction of the cathedrals raised in the thirteenth and subsequent centuries , he wished to state that on examining the roof of the Cathedral of Limoges , he AA'as struck by finding the outlines of the columns and other parts cut on blocks of granite . *

Mr . FJEMIEY expressed his hope that the subject would receive further consideration on a future occasion , as ifc was almost distressing to find the traditions which they were accustomed to regard with so much admiration and veneration so ruthlessly demolished . AA'ith regard to AVilliam of AVykeham , the bare supposition that he was not the designer of those magnificent works associated Avith his memory , was distressing to every Englishman , and more especially to those who claimed to be natives of the county in Avhich he AA-as born .

The CHAIRMAN said he quite agreed ivith the last speaker as to the desirability of rencAving the discussion on a future occasion , as it was of great importance to them as architects to learn the history of their ancestors , from whatever source they might hai-e sprung . It ivas also desirable to collect all the proofs that could he accumulated on so interesting a subject , and he AA-as convinced that their accomplished friend , Mr . AA' yatt Papworth , would be glad to receive any hints ivhich their colleetiA-e learning and research might bring to bear with reference to

the theme AA'hich he had brought under their consideration . The sub-1 jeet was of too great importance to be disposed of in the limited period I AA'hich could be devoted to one evening ' s discussion . He hoped , hoivever , that Mr . Ashpitel would favour the meeting with his opinion . Mr . ASHPITED said that afc so late an hour of the eveningjjlittle time remained to discuss so large and interesting a topic . AVith reference , however , to the issue raised , and ivhich Mr . AValcott had met Avith so much vigour , he might say , with that respectable authority in the

Spectator , that " a great deal might bo said on both sides . " They were , for instance , accustomed to heat- that such and such a building had been built by AVolsey , although ifc was well knoAvn that the great cardinal Avas no architect at all ; and , on the other hand , they were taught to believe thafc certain structures of groat beauty had been raised by-William of AVykeham , who had devoted his Avhole life to the study aud pursuit of architecture . It did not , however follow , that because no buildings had been constructed by AVolsey the wreath was to be taken

from the brow of AVilliam of AVykeham . Then with regard to the designation of the architect , it should be remembered that a good deal depended upon the state of civilization at the timo in which he flourished . In a IOAV state of civilization the man who built a hut might be described as " Carpentarius : '' but , again , in periods at which civilization had attained a high pitch , the architect ivas found occupying a position and taking rank ivith the jurist consults of his age . That the title by which the architect ivas known Avas not to be considered as derogating from the

dignity and importance of his office , was proved even in modern times by the fact that the architect of royalty was called the " clerk of the works , " and that until five or six years ago their friend Mr . Bumiing , who held the office of architect to the corporation of the City of London , AA-as described by the same humble designation . . Air . Drum- AVYATT said that he could supply in his own person a still more modern illustration , as he himself had the honour of being " clerk of the works" to the East India Company .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 9
  • You're on page10
  • 11
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy