Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Dec. 23, 1865
  • Page 14
  • CHANNEL ISLANDS.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 23, 1865: Page 14

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Dec. 23, 1865
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CHANNEL ISLANDS. Page 1 of 3 →
Page 14

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Channel Islands.

CHANNEL ISLANDS .

. TERSE Y . LODGE LA CESAREE . —( No . 5 AO . )—Owing to an impression that matters of grave and unusual importance would be brought under consideration on Thursday , Nov . 30 th , there was , as had been anticipated , a very numerous attendance of members and visitors , nor was the expectation as to what might take place a vain onethough but fewperhapsbelieved that a recurrence of

, , , the events which had disturbed the harmony of the previous meeting in October would happen . Unfortunately , however , prudence , discretion , and kindly Masonic feeling did not influence the individual to whom the present state of things must be attributed , as will be shown hy the proceedings which it is our painful duty to record . The lodge was opened at a quarter to eight by Bro . Durell ,

I . P . M ., acting as W . M ., assisted by the Bros . Chevalier , S . W . ; Oatley , J . W . ; and Du Jardin , acting as I . P . M . The minutes of the previous meeting were read ancl confirmed . The usual questions on the first degree were put to Bros . Piuel and Boudier , who , having been subsequently entrusted . retired for preparation . Bro . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., at this time entered and took his own chair , Bro . Durell occupying his place as I . P . M . The W . M . reminded the meeting of the occurrences at the last meeting in reference

to Bro . Huard , who had since laid a complaint on the subject of tbe refusal to admit him into tbe lodge before the Prov . Grand Master . Inconsequence the W . M . and several others had been summoned before that official , who instituted an inquiry into the matter , the result of which was a communication from the Prov . G . M . which the W . M . now called upon Bro . E . D . Le Couteur to read . The following is an exact copy of this most

extraordinary document : — Jersey , Nov . 20 , 1865 . The ^ Provincial Grand Master having received from Bro . Huard , a member of Royal Sussex Lodge ( No . 491 ) , also of the Prince of Wales Lodge ( No . 1003 ) , a certain complaint dated Jersey , 27 th October , 1865 , setting forth that Bro . Huard had on Thursday , 26 th October , 1865 , presented himself as a visitor to the Loge La Cesaree ( No . 590 ) . That after having regularly signed the visitors' book , and being announced by tbe outer Guard , was by order of the lodge refused admission without

assigning any reasons . The Provincial Grand Master having summoned Bro . Le Sueur , W . M . of Loge La Cesaree , to meet him on Thursday , November 2 nd , 1865 , Bro . Le Sueur having attended on the above day , stated in his defence , and iu the presence of Bro . Huard , that lie had refused admission to the complainant on a representation made by Bro . Durell , P . M ., that he , the said Bro . Huard , had , at the last regular meeting of the I ! . S . Lodgegrossly insulted Bro . Durellin stating that

, , Bro . Durell was throwing dust in people ' s eyes , and that if Bro . Huard was permitted to enter the lodge , Bro . Durell would be obliged to retire , as he could not sit or remain in the lodge with Bro . Huard . Bro . Le Sueur further stated that he had , in refusing Bro . Huard to enter the lodge , not taken upon himself 'the sole responsibility , but after a resolution duly made and seconded , viz ., that Bro . Huard lie not admitted as a visitor ,

inasmuch that Bro . Huard was in the habit of speaking derogatory of certain members belonging to Loge La Cesaree . The words imputed by Bro . Huard having been spoken iu the Royal Sussex Lodge , the ^ Provincial Grand Master , in justice to all parties felt it his duty to adjourn the investigation to Wednesday , 9 th November , 1 S 65 , so as to enable Bro . Scott , W . M . of the Royal Sussex Lodgeof iving the Provincial Grand Master

, g ¦ every information that was required touching the complaint in question . The W . Master of tho R . S . Lodge , having attended on the above day , stated that Bro . Durell , member of Loge La Cesaree had visited his lodge at the last regular meeting as oue of : \ deputation to advocate the cause of a certain bazaar , the proceeds of which were to be devoted to the purchase of shares

unsold in the Masonic Temple Company , which shares afterwards to be transferred to the widows' and orphans' fund . fhat Bro . Huard , iu giving his opinion respecting a certain document presented by Bro . Durell , stated that he would strongly recommend the Royal Sussex Lodge to weigh well the matter before voting any money towards the support of this bazaar , that the document now read was throwing dust in people's eyes . The Worshipful Master feeling that similar language ought not to have been spoken , called the brother to ¦ ordei , and further admonished him to be more careful for the future when giving his opinion upon any subject before the

lodge . After the above words had been uttered by Bro . Kuard , Bro . Duv ell not only remained in tho lodge , but received and accepted an invitation from the Worshipful Master , officers , and members of the lodge to partake of the monthly banquet of the lodge . The Provincial Grand Master begs to state that every brother visiting a lodge is not only subject to the by-laws of the lodge , but is equally under the protection ofthe Master as any of its

members . Had Bro . Durell , whilst in the lodge , felt in any way aggrieved at any remark Bro . Huard may have made , it was Bro . Durell's duty in the first instance to appeal to the Worshipful Master for protection , for it is clearly laid down that all differences between , or complaints of , members that cannot he accommodated privately or in a regular lodge , & c . ; and what lodge is more proper and fit to obtain redress and satisfaction than in that lodge in which the offence had been committed ?

Had Bro . Durell been refused proper redress , the laws and constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England give him full power and authority to appeal to the Provincial Grand Master , who is the proper and constituted authority to hear and determine all subjects of Masonic complaint or irregularities respecting lodges or Masons . Bro . Durell , not having followed the proper course , was not justified m bringing the case before the members of Lodge La Cesaree , who could possibly know nothing of

the circumstances , except through the representation of au ex parte statement . But even admitting that Bro . Durell . was justified in the course he adopted , it was the duty of the Worshipful Master and members of Loge La Cesaree , before proceeding to put the proposition for the opinion of the lodge , then and there to intimate , or cause to be intimated , to Bro . Huard , that Bro . Durell had objections to meet him in the lod .

ge In so doing , the members of Lodge La Cesaree would have given not only an opportunity to Bro . Huard of withdrawing any hasty expression he may have made , but would also have acted more in the spirit ofthe charge delivered to every brother on his initiation , as well as a manifestation of a desire to reconcile any differences that may have arisen between a member of their lodge and a member of another lodge . Had the members of Loge La Cesaree adopted this course , one so much iu unison

with the true principles of Masonry , much uneasiness and heartrending would have been prevented . Tiie Provincial Grand Master trusts that so long as he has honour in holding that office , he may never again be called upon to investigate or adjudicate a complaint of a similar nature against the Loge La Cesaree . J . J . HAMMOND , Prov . G . M . Bro . E . D . Le Couteur also read a copy of the reply to the

preceding communication , forwarded by Bro . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., to the Prov . Grand Master , as follows : — 22 , Ann-street , November 22 , 1865 . 1 Right Worshipful Sir and Brother , —I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your communication dated 20 th inst ., respecting Bro . Huard and the Cesaree Lodge , and beg to state I will take the earliest opportunity to bring the said communication before my lodge . —I amRight Worshipful Sir

, ancl Brother , respectfully and fraternally , CLEMENT LE SUEUR , W . M . Cesaree Lodge ( No . 590 . ) To J . I . Hammond , Esq ., R . W . Prov . G . M . It was proposed by Bro . Du Jardin , P . M ., and seconded by Bvo . Dr . Hopkins , P . M . 43 and 958 , that the document received from the Prov . G . Master , in reference to the complaint

of Bro . Huard , a member of the Royal Sussex Lodge ( No . 491 ) , against a resolution of this lodge unanimously adopted at its last regular meeting , refusing his admission for reasons mentioned in the said resolution be entered in the minutes , and that nv copying this document the Secretary be requested to observe perfect exactitude , and to record its peculiarities with the utmost minuteness ; also that the reply of the W . M . to the Provincial Grand Master be inserted in the minute book .

After a short a short discussion the W . M . put the resolution , which was carried unanimously . It was proposed by Bro . E . D . Le Couteur , and seconded by Bro . Hopkins : — Considering that truth ought to prevail in all our actions ; Considering that the communication of the Prov . G . M . relative to tho affair of Bro . Huard contains a recital of the depositions of Bros . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., and J . Durell , P . M ., which is totally incorrect ; Considering that the same statement also contains an equally

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1865-12-23, Page 14” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 2 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_23121865/page/14/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
ANCIENT MASONIC HIEROGLYPHS. Article 1
THE LATE KING OF THE BELGIANS. Article 2
FREEMASONRY AND THE POPE. Article 2
THE PROVINCIAL MASONIC CHARITIES. Article 3
ROYAL ARCH. Article 4
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 6
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 6
CHARITY STEWARDS. Article 7
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 7
METROPOLITAN. Article 7
PROVINCIAL. Article 8
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 13
ROYAL ARCH. Article 13
MARK MASONRY. Article 13
CHANNEL ISLANDS. Article 14
BRITISH BURMAH. Article 16
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

5 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 14

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Channel Islands.

CHANNEL ISLANDS .

. TERSE Y . LODGE LA CESAREE . —( No . 5 AO . )—Owing to an impression that matters of grave and unusual importance would be brought under consideration on Thursday , Nov . 30 th , there was , as had been anticipated , a very numerous attendance of members and visitors , nor was the expectation as to what might take place a vain onethough but fewperhapsbelieved that a recurrence of

, , , the events which had disturbed the harmony of the previous meeting in October would happen . Unfortunately , however , prudence , discretion , and kindly Masonic feeling did not influence the individual to whom the present state of things must be attributed , as will be shown hy the proceedings which it is our painful duty to record . The lodge was opened at a quarter to eight by Bro . Durell ,

I . P . M ., acting as W . M ., assisted by the Bros . Chevalier , S . W . ; Oatley , J . W . ; and Du Jardin , acting as I . P . M . The minutes of the previous meeting were read ancl confirmed . The usual questions on the first degree were put to Bros . Piuel and Boudier , who , having been subsequently entrusted . retired for preparation . Bro . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., at this time entered and took his own chair , Bro . Durell occupying his place as I . P . M . The W . M . reminded the meeting of the occurrences at the last meeting in reference

to Bro . Huard , who had since laid a complaint on the subject of tbe refusal to admit him into tbe lodge before the Prov . Grand Master . Inconsequence the W . M . and several others had been summoned before that official , who instituted an inquiry into the matter , the result of which was a communication from the Prov . G . M . which the W . M . now called upon Bro . E . D . Le Couteur to read . The following is an exact copy of this most

extraordinary document : — Jersey , Nov . 20 , 1865 . The ^ Provincial Grand Master having received from Bro . Huard , a member of Royal Sussex Lodge ( No . 491 ) , also of the Prince of Wales Lodge ( No . 1003 ) , a certain complaint dated Jersey , 27 th October , 1865 , setting forth that Bro . Huard had on Thursday , 26 th October , 1865 , presented himself as a visitor to the Loge La Cesaree ( No . 590 ) . That after having regularly signed the visitors' book , and being announced by tbe outer Guard , was by order of the lodge refused admission without

assigning any reasons . The Provincial Grand Master having summoned Bro . Le Sueur , W . M . of Loge La Cesaree , to meet him on Thursday , November 2 nd , 1865 , Bro . Le Sueur having attended on the above day , stated in his defence , and iu the presence of Bro . Huard , that lie had refused admission to the complainant on a representation made by Bro . Durell , P . M ., that he , the said Bro . Huard , had , at the last regular meeting of the I ! . S . Lodgegrossly insulted Bro . Durellin stating that

, , Bro . Durell was throwing dust in people ' s eyes , and that if Bro . Huard was permitted to enter the lodge , Bro . Durell would be obliged to retire , as he could not sit or remain in the lodge with Bro . Huard . Bro . Le Sueur further stated that he had , in refusing Bro . Huard to enter the lodge , not taken upon himself 'the sole responsibility , but after a resolution duly made and seconded , viz ., that Bro . Huard lie not admitted as a visitor ,

inasmuch that Bro . Huard was in the habit of speaking derogatory of certain members belonging to Loge La Cesaree . The words imputed by Bro . Huard having been spoken iu the Royal Sussex Lodge , the ^ Provincial Grand Master , in justice to all parties felt it his duty to adjourn the investigation to Wednesday , 9 th November , 1 S 65 , so as to enable Bro . Scott , W . M . of the Royal Sussex Lodgeof iving the Provincial Grand Master

, g ¦ every information that was required touching the complaint in question . The W . Master of tho R . S . Lodge , having attended on the above day , stated that Bro . Durell , member of Loge La Cesaree had visited his lodge at the last regular meeting as oue of : \ deputation to advocate the cause of a certain bazaar , the proceeds of which were to be devoted to the purchase of shares

unsold in the Masonic Temple Company , which shares afterwards to be transferred to the widows' and orphans' fund . fhat Bro . Huard , iu giving his opinion respecting a certain document presented by Bro . Durell , stated that he would strongly recommend the Royal Sussex Lodge to weigh well the matter before voting any money towards the support of this bazaar , that the document now read was throwing dust in people's eyes . The Worshipful Master feeling that similar language ought not to have been spoken , called the brother to ¦ ordei , and further admonished him to be more careful for the future when giving his opinion upon any subject before the

lodge . After the above words had been uttered by Bro . Kuard , Bro . Duv ell not only remained in tho lodge , but received and accepted an invitation from the Worshipful Master , officers , and members of the lodge to partake of the monthly banquet of the lodge . The Provincial Grand Master begs to state that every brother visiting a lodge is not only subject to the by-laws of the lodge , but is equally under the protection ofthe Master as any of its

members . Had Bro . Durell , whilst in the lodge , felt in any way aggrieved at any remark Bro . Huard may have made , it was Bro . Durell's duty in the first instance to appeal to the Worshipful Master for protection , for it is clearly laid down that all differences between , or complaints of , members that cannot he accommodated privately or in a regular lodge , & c . ; and what lodge is more proper and fit to obtain redress and satisfaction than in that lodge in which the offence had been committed ?

Had Bro . Durell been refused proper redress , the laws and constitutions of the Grand Lodge of England give him full power and authority to appeal to the Provincial Grand Master , who is the proper and constituted authority to hear and determine all subjects of Masonic complaint or irregularities respecting lodges or Masons . Bro . Durell , not having followed the proper course , was not justified m bringing the case before the members of Lodge La Cesaree , who could possibly know nothing of

the circumstances , except through the representation of au ex parte statement . But even admitting that Bro . Durell . was justified in the course he adopted , it was the duty of the Worshipful Master and members of Loge La Cesaree , before proceeding to put the proposition for the opinion of the lodge , then and there to intimate , or cause to be intimated , to Bro . Huard , that Bro . Durell had objections to meet him in the lod .

ge In so doing , the members of Lodge La Cesaree would have given not only an opportunity to Bro . Huard of withdrawing any hasty expression he may have made , but would also have acted more in the spirit ofthe charge delivered to every brother on his initiation , as well as a manifestation of a desire to reconcile any differences that may have arisen between a member of their lodge and a member of another lodge . Had the members of Loge La Cesaree adopted this course , one so much iu unison

with the true principles of Masonry , much uneasiness and heartrending would have been prevented . Tiie Provincial Grand Master trusts that so long as he has honour in holding that office , he may never again be called upon to investigate or adjudicate a complaint of a similar nature against the Loge La Cesaree . J . J . HAMMOND , Prov . G . M . Bro . E . D . Le Couteur also read a copy of the reply to the

preceding communication , forwarded by Bro . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., to the Prov . Grand Master , as follows : — 22 , Ann-street , November 22 , 1865 . 1 Right Worshipful Sir and Brother , —I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your communication dated 20 th inst ., respecting Bro . Huard and the Cesaree Lodge , and beg to state I will take the earliest opportunity to bring the said communication before my lodge . —I amRight Worshipful Sir

, ancl Brother , respectfully and fraternally , CLEMENT LE SUEUR , W . M . Cesaree Lodge ( No . 590 . ) To J . I . Hammond , Esq ., R . W . Prov . G . M . It was proposed by Bro . Du Jardin , P . M ., and seconded by Bvo . Dr . Hopkins , P . M . 43 and 958 , that the document received from the Prov . G . Master , in reference to the complaint

of Bro . Huard , a member of the Royal Sussex Lodge ( No . 491 ) , against a resolution of this lodge unanimously adopted at its last regular meeting , refusing his admission for reasons mentioned in the said resolution be entered in the minutes , and that nv copying this document the Secretary be requested to observe perfect exactitude , and to record its peculiarities with the utmost minuteness ; also that the reply of the W . M . to the Provincial Grand Master be inserted in the minute book .

After a short a short discussion the W . M . put the resolution , which was carried unanimously . It was proposed by Bro . E . D . Le Couteur , and seconded by Bro . Hopkins : — Considering that truth ought to prevail in all our actions ; Considering that the communication of the Prov . G . M . relative to tho affair of Bro . Huard contains a recital of the depositions of Bros . C . Le Sueur , W . M ., and J . Durell , P . M ., which is totally incorrect ; Considering that the same statement also contains an equally

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 13
  • You're on page14
  • 15
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy