Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • July 24, 1875
  • Page 3
  • GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, July 24, 1875: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, July 24, 1875
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE, ← Page 2 of 2
    Article THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE, Page 2 of 2
    Article GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS. Page 1 of 1
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Philosopher's Stone,

be the phoenix himself . There is no rule , no sign , no data , for looking for this key ; we must seek it blindfold , and chance alone will ever place it within our reach . Hence it is that the philosopher ' s stone has been described as ars sine arte , cujns prinoipium laborare , medium mentiri , et finis tnendkare .

It is then in a vast collection of rhapsodies , in manuscript or printed , and all written in mysterious and most obscure language ; it is in a crucible , incessantly heated by a continuous fire , that man , already unhappy enough in being troubled by a mad longing after vain illusions , is obliged to

labour , with ail a madman ' s strength , in order to pursue a shadow which is always moving further and further off , which escapes him when his life , spent in sorrow and anguish , passes away , and which ends usuall y in the indolence of misery , if it does press forward to seek b y rascally means a disgraceful and ephemeral support .

As it is necessary to call m the aid of examples , in ordei to sustain patience in a career in which people are only nourished with vain hopes , the mystagogues have been

careful to announce as possessing the philosopher ' s stone , men who , at their death , left behind them the remembrance of some peculiarity , or of something ambiguous . All the works of the alchemists are filled with wonders and fables

of this kind , which , from constant repetition , have acquired a certain degree of credit with the credulous . It were too hazardous an undertaking to sketch here the history of all the people of this class . More than one biographer has made them known to us , and to him I refer

those who have a desire to study such curious legends . But among those whom the seekers after the philosopher ' s stone hold up to themselves as leading models , I cannot

forbear lingering for a brief time over N . Flamel , as much because he enjoys a wonderful reputation among the hermetic philosophers , and because the world attributes to him certain much vaunted monuments of his skill . This Flamel

was , towards the year 1409 , a scribe , at the mortuary Des Innocents , at Paris , and the alchemists maintain that he discovered the philosopher ' s stone , and they announce with emphasis that he died extremely rich , the grand art having produced him , they say , a fortune of one hundred and fifty

thousand crowns , a very large sum at the beginning of the fifteenth century , and starting from this text , so attractive to all lovers of the marvellous , the different pretended hieoglyphic figures attributed to this individual are set forth as veritable documents , which seekers after the truth must follow , in order to arrive at its happy discovery .

As the question is to disabuse men ' s minds of this ideal , in order to do so , and to throw some light on the matter , be it our business to communicate the result of certain researches

of ours regarding this Flamel . Monsieur Salomon , in his library of Chemical Philosophers , adopts , as well authenticated truths , all the marvels which are credited to Flamel , as well as the cause of his rapid fortune , and the proofs which he invokes in support of his opinion ; these he finds

in the pretended hieroglyphic figures which may be still seen in the Cemetery of the Innocents . But these figures , so extolled b y enthusiasts , do not present a type sufficiently suggestive of any character that is reconcilable with hermetic science , still less do they strike those who weigh

them well , with that overwhelming force which has enlisted the support of M . Salomon . Those figures which may be applied to religion , even more directly than to the purpose of the philosopher ' s stone , seem to have been traced rather as ornaments , and not as the expression of an idea foreign

to the spot where they placed . Other monuments of the same kind bear figures nearly similar , and thus the proof of M . Salomon are not sufficient evidence to give rise even to a simple presumption . It would be necessary , indeed ,

to have a considerable amount of imagination in order to suspect that the author of these figures had been anxious to hand down to posterity ideas relating to the philosopher ' s stone , or indeed , to any other similar science .

Naude , librarian to Cardinal Marazin , does not hesitate to describe Flamel as a mere rascal , who being in correspondence with the Jews and Lombards after their expulsion from France , and having robbed them ri ght and left , in order ! to conceal the true source of his wealth , and to

preserve an outward decency , pretended to have discovered the philosopher ' s stone . "But , " judiciously remarks the president Henaut , "would he not have kept secret his discovery quite as much as his treasures which , after all , had only been filched from the Jews , whose condition was such as to cause him no further embarrassment . " If Flamel had reall y found in his discovery of the philosopher ' s stone

The Philosopher's Stone,

a secret source of wealth , what need was there for him to announce it to the public and to posterity ? And assuming that some motive impenetrable to ordinary sagacity had induced him to make itthuspublic , why should hehave chosen the obscure medium of a hieroglyphic style in preference

to that of writing , which he followed professionally ? Borel , author of Le Tresor des Antiquites ganfoises , who is one of the most zealous believers in the philosopher ' s stone , without assigning any other reason for the rapid rise to fortune of

Flamel , maintains that ho was indebted for his great wealth , neither to the Jews , the Templars , nor to the hospitals , " seeing that ' says he , ' he administered the property of none of them . "

We cannot , in justice , share the opinion of Naude , for it rests on facts of sufficient gravity to require proofs , but we must doubt the view of Borel , for it attributes the fortune of Flamel to the philosopher ' s stone . It is wise to distrust that spirit of enthusiasm which is a veritable blindness , and which seems to influence this latter author .

The marvellous always finds people ready to believe , and thus Flamel has found believers aud apologists . The Abbe Villain , in his Essai sur Vliistoire de saint Jaeqties de la Boucherie , not having been favourably impressed with the sentiments of credulity in speaking of N . Flamel as an

alchemist , the critics attacked the views to which he had given expression in his work , and defended the believers in the philosopher ' s stone discovered by Flamel , and in reply , and in order to justify his statement , Villain published , in 1761 , a critical history of N . Flamel , and of Pernelle , his

wife , in which he destroyed all the assertions of the alchemists in relation to Flamel , proving , by authentic documents , and even by the will of Pernelle , that the

property of this scribe of Les Charniers , at the time of his death , only amounted to the small sum of £ 3 , 398 14 s 2 d of our money . This , then , is what all these magnificent facts come to ! but" L'homme est de glace aux viritis , 11 est de feu pour le mensonge . "

Grand Lodge Of Mark Master Masons.

GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS .

THE Benevolent Fund Festival was held at the Alexandra Palace , on Wednesday , 21 st July , under the presidency of the R . W . Bro . Wm . Romaine Callender , M . P ., Dep . G . M . M . M . The banquet was served b y Bros . Bertram and Roberts in a very satisfactory manner . On the removal of the cloth the following list of toasts was duly proposed and responded to : —

1 . —The Qneen and Mark Masonry . 2 . —H . R . H . the Prince of Wales , the Princess of Wales , and the rest of the Royal Family . 3 . —The Right Honourable the Earl of Limerick , M . W . G . M . M . M ., and the Past Grand Masters , viz .:

—The Right Hon . the Lord Leigh . The Right Hon . the Earl of Carnarvon . The Viscount Holmesdale , M . P . W . W . B . Beach , Esq ., M . P . Rev . George Raymond Portal , M . A .

The Right Hon . the Earl Percy , M . P . 4 . —The R . W . Deputy G . Master , Chairman of the day , and the Grand Officers present and past . 5 — Success to the Mark Benevolent Fund and the Masonic Insti « tutions .

6 . —The Board of Stewards . 7 . —The Ladies . In the course of the evening the following lists were an * nounced as having been received : — NAME OF STEWABD . LODGE . DONATION . Roebuck Wm . . . . Old Kent . . . £ 8 17 6 Verry G . W . . . . Temple No . 173 11 8 0 Attwood J . G . . . . Macdonald „ 104 12 12 0 Richards Wm . . . . Carnarvon „ 119 6 6 0 WellstedW . H . . . . Hnmber „ 182 12 6 6 DuffieldJno . . . . Union ,, 32 5 5 0

Lancashire T . J . . . . Skelmersdale „ 141 5 5 0 Handley Joseph . . . Alfred „ 136 10 0 0 Chambers Richard ) . ., n . „ 10 10 0 Horrocks Nathaniel j . mK 0 " 1 M 10 10 0 Robberds H . T . . . . St . Andrew's „ 34 10 0 0 Sntcliffe Jack . . . Remigias „ 117 10 10 0 Griffiths Francis M . D . } 5 5 0 CollinsonThos I . Bpitaimj a g 3 5 5 0 Bedford Henry Hale l " 5 5 0 White Wm . J Run

Trollope Thos . Jno . . . East Sussex „ 166 15 8 0 Callender , R . W . Bro . W . Romaine , M . P ., Chairman 25 0 0 174 17 ' 0 One more liat has yet to come in .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1875-07-24, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 5 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_24071875/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
WHAT NEXT ? Article 1
THE RETIRING MASTERS OF THE BOYS' SCHOOL. Article 1
THE PHILOSOPHER'S STONE, Article 2
GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS. Article 3
SPENCER'S GREAT LIBRARY. Article 4
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 5
REPORT OF LODGE MEETINGS. Article 5
OUR FREEMASONRY.—SIR C. WREN, &c. Article 5
PRACTICE versus PRECEPT. Article 6
" WHAT FREEMASONRY HAS DONE." Article 6
REVIEWS. Article 7
THE DRAMA. Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
OUR WEEKLY BUDGET Article 8
COUNCIL OE ROYAL AND SELECT MASTERS. Article 10
SYSTEMATIC CHARITY. Article 10
ENGLISH AND ITALIAN FREEMASONS. Article 10
MARRIAGE. Article 10
ESSEX PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGE. Article 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 12
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

4 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

7 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

6 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

15 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

16 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Philosopher's Stone,

be the phoenix himself . There is no rule , no sign , no data , for looking for this key ; we must seek it blindfold , and chance alone will ever place it within our reach . Hence it is that the philosopher ' s stone has been described as ars sine arte , cujns prinoipium laborare , medium mentiri , et finis tnendkare .

It is then in a vast collection of rhapsodies , in manuscript or printed , and all written in mysterious and most obscure language ; it is in a crucible , incessantly heated by a continuous fire , that man , already unhappy enough in being troubled by a mad longing after vain illusions , is obliged to

labour , with ail a madman ' s strength , in order to pursue a shadow which is always moving further and further off , which escapes him when his life , spent in sorrow and anguish , passes away , and which ends usuall y in the indolence of misery , if it does press forward to seek b y rascally means a disgraceful and ephemeral support .

As it is necessary to call m the aid of examples , in ordei to sustain patience in a career in which people are only nourished with vain hopes , the mystagogues have been

careful to announce as possessing the philosopher ' s stone , men who , at their death , left behind them the remembrance of some peculiarity , or of something ambiguous . All the works of the alchemists are filled with wonders and fables

of this kind , which , from constant repetition , have acquired a certain degree of credit with the credulous . It were too hazardous an undertaking to sketch here the history of all the people of this class . More than one biographer has made them known to us , and to him I refer

those who have a desire to study such curious legends . But among those whom the seekers after the philosopher ' s stone hold up to themselves as leading models , I cannot

forbear lingering for a brief time over N . Flamel , as much because he enjoys a wonderful reputation among the hermetic philosophers , and because the world attributes to him certain much vaunted monuments of his skill . This Flamel

was , towards the year 1409 , a scribe , at the mortuary Des Innocents , at Paris , and the alchemists maintain that he discovered the philosopher ' s stone , and they announce with emphasis that he died extremely rich , the grand art having produced him , they say , a fortune of one hundred and fifty

thousand crowns , a very large sum at the beginning of the fifteenth century , and starting from this text , so attractive to all lovers of the marvellous , the different pretended hieoglyphic figures attributed to this individual are set forth as veritable documents , which seekers after the truth must follow , in order to arrive at its happy discovery .

As the question is to disabuse men ' s minds of this ideal , in order to do so , and to throw some light on the matter , be it our business to communicate the result of certain researches

of ours regarding this Flamel . Monsieur Salomon , in his library of Chemical Philosophers , adopts , as well authenticated truths , all the marvels which are credited to Flamel , as well as the cause of his rapid fortune , and the proofs which he invokes in support of his opinion ; these he finds

in the pretended hieroglyphic figures which may be still seen in the Cemetery of the Innocents . But these figures , so extolled b y enthusiasts , do not present a type sufficiently suggestive of any character that is reconcilable with hermetic science , still less do they strike those who weigh

them well , with that overwhelming force which has enlisted the support of M . Salomon . Those figures which may be applied to religion , even more directly than to the purpose of the philosopher ' s stone , seem to have been traced rather as ornaments , and not as the expression of an idea foreign

to the spot where they placed . Other monuments of the same kind bear figures nearly similar , and thus the proof of M . Salomon are not sufficient evidence to give rise even to a simple presumption . It would be necessary , indeed ,

to have a considerable amount of imagination in order to suspect that the author of these figures had been anxious to hand down to posterity ideas relating to the philosopher ' s stone , or indeed , to any other similar science .

Naude , librarian to Cardinal Marazin , does not hesitate to describe Flamel as a mere rascal , who being in correspondence with the Jews and Lombards after their expulsion from France , and having robbed them ri ght and left , in order ! to conceal the true source of his wealth , and to

preserve an outward decency , pretended to have discovered the philosopher ' s stone . "But , " judiciously remarks the president Henaut , "would he not have kept secret his discovery quite as much as his treasures which , after all , had only been filched from the Jews , whose condition was such as to cause him no further embarrassment . " If Flamel had reall y found in his discovery of the philosopher ' s stone

The Philosopher's Stone,

a secret source of wealth , what need was there for him to announce it to the public and to posterity ? And assuming that some motive impenetrable to ordinary sagacity had induced him to make itthuspublic , why should hehave chosen the obscure medium of a hieroglyphic style in preference

to that of writing , which he followed professionally ? Borel , author of Le Tresor des Antiquites ganfoises , who is one of the most zealous believers in the philosopher ' s stone , without assigning any other reason for the rapid rise to fortune of

Flamel , maintains that ho was indebted for his great wealth , neither to the Jews , the Templars , nor to the hospitals , " seeing that ' says he , ' he administered the property of none of them . "

We cannot , in justice , share the opinion of Naude , for it rests on facts of sufficient gravity to require proofs , but we must doubt the view of Borel , for it attributes the fortune of Flamel to the philosopher ' s stone . It is wise to distrust that spirit of enthusiasm which is a veritable blindness , and which seems to influence this latter author .

The marvellous always finds people ready to believe , and thus Flamel has found believers aud apologists . The Abbe Villain , in his Essai sur Vliistoire de saint Jaeqties de la Boucherie , not having been favourably impressed with the sentiments of credulity in speaking of N . Flamel as an

alchemist , the critics attacked the views to which he had given expression in his work , and defended the believers in the philosopher ' s stone discovered by Flamel , and in reply , and in order to justify his statement , Villain published , in 1761 , a critical history of N . Flamel , and of Pernelle , his

wife , in which he destroyed all the assertions of the alchemists in relation to Flamel , proving , by authentic documents , and even by the will of Pernelle , that the

property of this scribe of Les Charniers , at the time of his death , only amounted to the small sum of £ 3 , 398 14 s 2 d of our money . This , then , is what all these magnificent facts come to ! but" L'homme est de glace aux viritis , 11 est de feu pour le mensonge . "

Grand Lodge Of Mark Master Masons.

GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTER MASONS .

THE Benevolent Fund Festival was held at the Alexandra Palace , on Wednesday , 21 st July , under the presidency of the R . W . Bro . Wm . Romaine Callender , M . P ., Dep . G . M . M . M . The banquet was served b y Bros . Bertram and Roberts in a very satisfactory manner . On the removal of the cloth the following list of toasts was duly proposed and responded to : —

1 . —The Qneen and Mark Masonry . 2 . —H . R . H . the Prince of Wales , the Princess of Wales , and the rest of the Royal Family . 3 . —The Right Honourable the Earl of Limerick , M . W . G . M . M . M ., and the Past Grand Masters , viz .:

—The Right Hon . the Lord Leigh . The Right Hon . the Earl of Carnarvon . The Viscount Holmesdale , M . P . W . W . B . Beach , Esq ., M . P . Rev . George Raymond Portal , M . A .

The Right Hon . the Earl Percy , M . P . 4 . —The R . W . Deputy G . Master , Chairman of the day , and the Grand Officers present and past . 5 — Success to the Mark Benevolent Fund and the Masonic Insti « tutions .

6 . —The Board of Stewards . 7 . —The Ladies . In the course of the evening the following lists were an * nounced as having been received : — NAME OF STEWABD . LODGE . DONATION . Roebuck Wm . . . . Old Kent . . . £ 8 17 6 Verry G . W . . . . Temple No . 173 11 8 0 Attwood J . G . . . . Macdonald „ 104 12 12 0 Richards Wm . . . . Carnarvon „ 119 6 6 0 WellstedW . H . . . . Hnmber „ 182 12 6 6 DuffieldJno . . . . Union ,, 32 5 5 0

Lancashire T . J . . . . Skelmersdale „ 141 5 5 0 Handley Joseph . . . Alfred „ 136 10 0 0 Chambers Richard ) . ., n . „ 10 10 0 Horrocks Nathaniel j . mK 0 " 1 M 10 10 0 Robberds H . T . . . . St . Andrew's „ 34 10 0 0 Sntcliffe Jack . . . Remigias „ 117 10 10 0 Griffiths Francis M . D . } 5 5 0 CollinsonThos I . Bpitaimj a g 3 5 5 0 Bedford Henry Hale l " 5 5 0 White Wm . J Run

Trollope Thos . Jno . . . East Sussex „ 166 15 8 0 Callender , R . W . Bro . W . Romaine , M . P ., Chairman 25 0 0 174 17 ' 0 One more liat has yet to come in .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy